Given the diversity in size and stability of the thousands of proteins present in the biological systems, it is often empirical for a research laboratory to decide which heterologous expression system has to be chosen for the expression of a specific protein. The E. coli expression system is often the first choice for protein expression due to the short life cycle of the bacteria, low cost of the culture media, and relative ease to scale up19. For the expression of large eukaryotic proteins with sizes more than 60 kDa, however, using the E. coli system often results in insoluble proteins in the inclusion body or aggregation20. For the expression of those difficult proteins, and for other secreted proteins, the baculovirus-insect cell expression system may be more advantageous than the E coli. Especially when expressing secreted eukaryotic proteins, this modified baculovirus-insect cell expression system could be a preferred choice.
Many secreted eukaryotic proteins, including plant secreted proteins, need complex glycosylation, disulfide formation, and other post-translational modifications during protein folding and secretion21. E. coli systems do not have the cellular machinery to process the complex modifications required for many of the eukaryotic proteins22. Yeast has a relatively more advanced glycosylation system than E. coli23. However, for the expression of the secreted proteins in higher eukaryotic species and plants, the baculovirus-insect cell system presents a significant advantage. Since glycosylation affects protein folding and stability24, many of the secreted recombinant proteins expressed in the E. coli and yeast systems have a low yield and tend to aggregate, presumably due to incorrect protein folding. The baculovirus-insect system has been modified to improve protein glycosylation, which makes it an ideal system for the expression of secreted eukaryotic proteins25. In this study, both the GP67 and the hemolin signal peptides have been successfully used to guide the secretion expression of two plant receptor proteins for protein crystallization. With these studies in mind though, the choice of either signal peptide is a critical step, and it needs more systematic comparative studies with a set of target genes from different organisms.
The idea of using both GP67 and hemolin signal peptides to enhance protein secretion expression was driven by the high expression yields of both genes. However, if the protein secretion and posttranslational modification machinery of the expression host are overloaded with the expressed recombinant proteins, the secreted recombinant proteins may not have adequate modifications, especially glycosylation. Both modified vectors have been used to successfully express numerous plant secretory proteins11,12,26, many of which tend to aggregate, which is probably due to the incorrect or inadequate glycosylation. Therefore, for the expression of those difficult proteins, both strong and weak signal peptide sequences have to be tested and the quality of the expressed recombinant proteins needs to be compared. Keep in mind that a weak signal peptide sequence will lower the overall yield of the protein; however, it may give the secretion machinery of the expression host enough capacity to process the protein secretion and modifications.
In addition to the expression of heterologous secreted proteins in insect cells, the mammalian cell and plant cell expression systems have been used successfully in the overexpression of recombinant mammalian and plant proteins, respectively27,28,29. In comparison to the heterologous systems, the near endogenous expression condition of either the mammalian or the plant secreted proteins will have the almost native modification machineries in the host cells to yield well-folded proteins. The caveat of using the near-native expression system is that the expressed recombinant proteins may interfere with the physiological function of the cells, which may potentially have adverse effects on the final expression yield of the proteins.