The improved method increased the number of intact paraffin sections. We tested this new method on adult mouse hippocampal tissue, adult mouse kidneys, embryonic mouse brains, and zebrafish eyes. Water was added to the tank, and the water temperature was maintained between 38.0 °C to 40.0 °C. After a serially preparing the tissue samples, they were sectioned and compared to conventional sectioning. The new method avoided section loss and increased the proportion of intact sections in the adult mouse hippocampus, adult mouse kidneys, E15.5 mouse brains, and adult zebrafish eyes (Figure 4A, 4C, 4E, 4G). In conclusion, our method improved the sectioning by preventing section loss and harvesting more intact sections per specimen.
The improved method decreased the time spent per specimen. In comparing the time taken between the conventional method and our improved method, we performed whole-series sectioning (from the first section to the last section of an organ) on the adult mouse hippocampus, adult mouse kidneys, E15.5 mouse brains, and adult zebrafish eyes. The results suggest that the improved method accelerated the paraffin sectioning speed in all tested samples (Figure 4B, 4D, 4F, 4H). In general, our method allowed for faster high-quality paraffin sectioning.
Series sections of the zebrafish optic retina was observed by H and E staining. For series sectioning of the optic disc segment of the zebrafish retina,the sections harvested from the improved method were better has better integrity than those from the conventional paraffin sectioning method (Figure 5A, 5B). There was no significant difference between these two methods regarding the quality of most harvested sections (Figure 5C, 5D). Occasionally, the quality of sections harvested from the conventional method were relatively low (Figure 5E, 5F).

Figure 1: The process for assembling the 7 commercial acrylic boards into a tank. (A) Overall view of the 7 acrylic boards. (B-G) Stepwise assembly of the tank from board # 1 to board #7. (H) Primary tank after assembly. (I) General tank size; the protective membrane on the tank surface was removed for further installation. L = 400 mm, L' = 220 mm, H = 122 mm, W = 200 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: The appropriately assembled equipment ready for use. (A) The intact equipment after being connected to the rotary microtome. Arrow indication, the temperature detector is installed through the small hole by electric drill. Arrow head, the heater (tubular electric heating element) is installed through the hole in board #1. (B) The amplified dashed area in A, the feature of the connection between the microtome blade holder and the sections channel. Arrow head, the blade holder and sections channel are connected by neutral silicone sealant. (C) Same as B, with the water poured and blade installed. (D) Side view of the dashed area in C. Arrow head, the water surface is close to the blade edge. VT: voltage transformer; WB: water bath; DT: digital thermostat; B: blade; BH: blade holder; SC: sections channel. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: The improved paraffin sectioning process. The figures located at the lower left corner are the amplified dashed areas in A-D respectively. Arrow indications, the first section. (A, A') The section enters the sections channel immediately and directly after cutting. (B, B') The sections ribbon crosses the border between the sections channel and water bath. (C, C') The sections float to the posterior of the water bath and are fully unfolded. (D, D') The sections are picked up by microscope slide when they reach the posterior of the water bath and are fully unfolded. SC: sections channel; WB, water bath. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: The improved sectioning method improved the efficiency and yield rate significantly for whole-series sections. The yield rate equaled the proportion of intact sections in all cut sections. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM and acquired by the same operator. (A, C, E, G) The improved method prevented section loss of the adult mouse hippocampus (91.04 ± 1.429% N = 3, vs 97.63 ± 0.4864% N = 3, p = 0.0120), adult mouse kidneys (92.30 ± 0.5689% N = 3, vs 95.99 ± 0.7055% N = 3, p = 0.0153), E15.5 mouse brain (90.67 ± 1.549%, N = 3 vs 97.01 ± 0.2816%, N = 3, p = 0.0158), and adult zebrafish eyes (91.27 ± 0.9734% N = 4 vs 96.32 ± 0.7217% N = 4, p = 0.0059). (B, D, F, H) The improved method saved time compared with the conventional method for the adult mouse hippocampus (126.0 ± 3.606 min vs 79.67 ± 1.856 min, N = 3, p = 0.0003), adult mouse kidneys (66.67 ± 1.764 min vs 41.33 ± 2.186 min, N = 3, p = 0.0008), E15.5 mouse brain (99.67 ± 3.480 min vs 52.33 ± 4.333 min, N = 3, p = 0.0010), and adult zebrafish eyes (48.00 ± 2.160 min vs 30.75 ± 1.797 min, N = 4, p = 0.0009). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.005. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: H and E staining of the whole-series sections of the optic disc segment of the zebrafish eyes acquired from the conventional methods and improved paraffin sectioning by the same operator are compared. (A) Conventional paraffin sectioning (21 sections). (B) Improved paraffin sectioning (24 sections). (C) Dashed area of A6. (D) Dashed area of B7. (E) Dashed area of A17. (F) Dashed area of B19. Asterisks, the sections with relatively poor quality. Arrow heads, optic disc; Arrows, severe tear of retinal tissues. Scale bar = 200 µm (A and B); Scale bar = 50 µm (C, D, E, F). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1: The dimension parameters of the 7 commercial acrylic boards. The number represents the length of corresponding board margin. Units: mm. Please click here to download this file.