Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove
JoVE Journal Environment

Environment

High-throughput Siderophore Screening from Environmental Samples: Plant Tissues, Bulk Soils, and Rhizosphere Soils

Published: February 9, 2019 doi: 10.3791/59137
Automatic Translation
*1, *1, 2, 2, 1
1Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, 2Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University
* These authors contributed equally

Summary

We present a protocol for rapid screening of environmental samples for siderophore potential contributing to micronutrient bioavailability and turnover in terrestrial systems.

Abstract

Siderophores (low-molecular weight metal chelating compounds) are important in various ecological phenomenon ranging from iron (Fe) biogeochemical cycling in soils, to pathogen competition, plant growth promotion, and cross-kingdom signaling. Furthermore, siderophores are also of commercial interest in bioleaching and bioweathering of metal-bearing minerals and ores. A rapid, cost effective, and robust means of quantitatively assessing siderophore production in complex samples is key to identifying important aspects of the ecological ramifications of siderophore activity, including, novel siderophore producing microbes. The method presented here was developed to assess siderophore activity of in-tact microbiome communities, in environmental samples, such as soil or plant tissues. The samples were homogenized and diluted in a modified M9 medium (without Fe), and enrichment cultures were incubated for 3 days. Siderophore production was assessed in samples at 24, 48, and 72 hours (h) using a novel 96-well microplate CAS (Chrome azurol sulphonate)-Fe agar assay, an adaptation of the traditionally tedious and time-consuming colorimetric method of assessing siderophore activity, performed on individual cultivated microbial isolates. We applied our method to 4 different genotypes/Lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), including Lewjain, Madsen, and PI561725, and PI561727 commonly grown in the inland Pacific Northwest. Siderophore production was clearly impacted by the genotype of wheat, and in the specific types of plant tissues observed. We successfully used our method to rapidly screen for the influence of plant genotype on siderophore production, a key function in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We produced many technical replicates, yielding very reliable statistical differences in soils and within plant tissues. Importantly, the results show the proposed method can be used to rapidly examine siderophore production in complex samples with a high degree of reliability, in a manner that allows communities to be preserved for later work to identify taxa and functional genes.

Introduction

Siderophores are important biomolecules involved primarily in iron-chelation for bioavailability, but with a wide array of additional purposes in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems ranging from microbial quorum sensing, signaling to microbial plant-hosts, plant growth promotion, cooperation and competition within complex microbial communities1,2. Siderophores can be broadly classified according to their active sites and structural features, creating four basic types: carboxylate, hydroxamate, catecholate, and mixed types3,4. Many microorganisms are capable of excreting more than one type of siderophore5 and in complex communities, a vast majority of organisms biosynthesize the membrane receptors to allow the uptake of an even wider variety of siderophores1,6. Recent work indicates that siderophores are particularly important at the community level, and even in inter-kingdom communications and biogeochemical transfers7,8,9,10,11.

Chrome azurol sulphonate (CAS) has been used for over 30 years as a chelating agent to bind iron (Fe) in such a way that addition of ligands (i.e., siderophores) can result in dissociation of the CAS-Fe complex, creating an easily identifiable color change in the medium12. When the CAS is bound with Fe, the dye appears as a royal blue color, and as the CAS-Fe complex dissociates, the medium changes color according to the type of ligand used to scavenge the Fe13. The initial, liquid-based medium established by Schwyn and Neilands in 1987, has been modified in many ways to accommodate changing microbial targets14, growth habits and limitations15, as well as a variety of metals besides Fe, including aluminum, manganese, cobalt, cadmium nickel, lithium, zinc16, copper17, and even arsenic18.

Many human pathogens, as well as plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPM) have been identified as siderophore-producing organisms3,19,20, and important rhizosphere and endophytic PGPM often test positive for siderophore-production4. The traditional Fe-based liquid method has been adapted to microtiter testing of isolates in cultivation for siderophore production21. However, these techniques fail to recognize the importance of the microbial community as a whole (the microbiome), in cooperation and potential regulation of siderophore production in soils and plant systems22. For that reason, we have developed a high-throughput community-level assessment of siderophore production from a given environment, based on the traditional CAS assay, but with replication, ease of measurement, reliability, and repeatability in a microplate assay.

In this study, a cost-effective, high-throughput CAS-Fe assay for detecting siderophore production is presented to assess the enrichment of siderophore production from complex samples (i.e., soil and plant tissue homogenates). Bulk, loosely-bound, and tightly-bound rhizosphere soil (in terms of how the soil was bound to the root) were obtained along with grain, shoot, and root tissues from four distinct wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes: Lewjain, Madsen, PI561725, and PI561727. It was hypothesized that fundamental differences in the wheat genotypes could result in differences in recruitment and selection of siderophore producing communities. Of particular interest is the difference between microbial communities associated with the PI561725 isogenic line, which is aluminum tolerant because it possesses ALMT1 (Aluminum-activated Malate Transporter 1), compared with the aluminum sensitive PI561727 isogenic line, which possesses a non-aluminum responsive form of the gene, almt123,24,25,26. The chief objective of the study was to develop a straightforward, rapid method of quantitatively assessing siderophore production in siderophore enrichment cultures of complex sample types while preserving the cultures for future work.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

NOTE: Location of Field Site: Washington State University, Plant Pathology Farm (46°46’38.0”N 117°04’57.4”W). Seeds were sown using a mechanical planter on October 19, 2017. Each wheat genotype was planted in headrows, approximately 1 meter apart to avoid overlapping of root system. Plant and soil samples were collected on August 9, 2018, when plants were ready for harvest. Samples were gathered from three replicates of four wheat genotypes: PI561727, PI561725, Madsen, Lewjain.

1. Preparation of modified M9 medium

  1. Use Na2PO4∙7H2O (12.8 g/200 mL), KH2PO4 (0.3 g/200 mL), NaCl (0.5 g/200 mL), and NH4Cl (1 g/20 mL) reagents to prepare the M9 salt solution.
  2. Use 18 g of MgSO4∙7H2O in 100 mL of double deionized water (ddH2O) to prepare 0.75 M MgSO4∙7H2O.
  3. Make 1 M of CaCl2∙2H2O by adding 14.7 g of CaCl2∙2H2O with 100 mL of ddH2O.
  4. Prepare the buffer solution by dissolving 6.048 g of PIPES into 156 mL of ddH2O with stirring. Adjust the pH to 6.8 with 5 M NaOH.
  5. Prepare 20% glucose (dextrose monohydrate) by dissolving 20 g of glucose into 100 mL of ddH2O.
  6. Prepare solutions and individually autoclave all but the glucose. Filter sterilize the glucose solution for addition to the M9 media after autoclaving (0.22 µm).
  7. Prepare the modified M9 medium by mixing 156 mL of PIPES Buffer solution, 40 mL of M9 salts solution, 20 μL of CaCl2·2H2O solution, 266 μL of MgSO4·7H2O, and 4 mL of 20% glucose solutions together in the biosafety cabinet, using sterile technique.
  8. For preservation of the modified M9, seal the container, cover with aluminum foil to protect from UV, and place at 4 °C.

2. Preparation of CAS-Fe-Agar medium

  1. Acid wash all glassware in 100 mM HCl/100 mM HNO3 for a minimum of 2 h prior to utilization in the CAS assay.
  2. Prepare an aluminum baking pan filled with laboratory grade sand and cover it with aluminum foil. Autoclave at 121 °C for 30 min and set aside.
  3. Prepare HDTMA (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) by adding 0.0365 g to 20 mL ddH2O and place the solution at 37 °C to promote solubilization.
  4. Prepare 10 mM HCl and generate 1 mM FeCl3·6H2O using 10 mM HCl as the solvent. Add 0.0302 g of CAS to 25 mL of ddH2O while gently stirring with a sterile magnetic stir bar. Then add 5 mL of 1 mM FeCl3·6H2O (in 10 mM HCl) to the 25 mL of CAS solution while continuing to gently stir (the solution turns into dark reddish black color).
  5. Slowly add the 20 mL of HDTMA solution while gently stirring, into the Fe-CAS solution (this yields a dark blue solution).
  6. Prepare the buffer solution by dissolving 15.12 g of PIPES into 375 mL of ddH2O, with gentle stirring. Adjust the pH to 6.8 with 5 M NaOH. Add water to bring the volume to 450 mL. Add 5 g of agarose to the solution. Autoclave the PIPES buffer solution and the CAS-Fe solution at 121 °C for 30 min.
  7. Carefully add the entirety of the CAS-Fe solution to the entirety of the PIPES Buffer in the biosafety cabinet after each of them is autoclaved.
  8. Place the mixed solution in a water bath at 50 °C.
    NOTE: Freshly prepare all the reagents in the CAS-Fe-Agar medium before each assay, as long-term storage at 50 °C results in precipitation of the CAS-Fe complex, and cooling results in solidified medium.
  9. Place a sterile reagent boat in the sterile sand in the biosafety cabinet and heat to 50 °C. Transfer the CAS-Fe-Agar to the boat, then quickly aliquot 100 µL to each well in a clear, flat-bottom, sterile 96-well microplate.

3. Pyoverdine/EDTA standard preparation

  1. Pyoverdine preparation
    1. Prepare 800 μM pyoverdine standard (mixture of succinic acid, 2-hydroxy glutaramide, and succinaminde forms of pyoverdine – see Table of Materials), in previously prepared modified M9 medium.
    2. Dilute this solution into 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 μM solutions.
  2. EDTA standard preparation
    1. Add 0.594 g of disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA: C10H14N2Na2O8.2H2O), to 500 mL of previously prepared modified M9 medium to prepare 3200 μM EDTA standard.
    2. Dilute this solution into 1600, 800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 μM solutions.
  3. Standard curve generation
    1. Add 100 μL of each concentration of pyoverdine and EDTA to separate wells of a 96-well microplate containing 100 μL of CAS-Fe Agar medium. Make duplicate technical replications of each concentration. Also, add blank wells with only M9 (no EDTA or pyoverdine).
    2. Using a microplate reader, measure absorbance (at 420 nm and 665 nm) after 1, 6, and 24 h incubation at 22 °C, and use absorbance measurements to generate standard curves.
      NOTE: For 420 nm measurements, subtract absorbance of blanks from the absorbance of pyoverdine or EDTA containing wells. For 665 nm, subtract absorbance of pyoverdine or EDTA containing wells from absorbance of blanks. Then, log10(µM pyoverdine or EDTA) is regressed against the absorbance measurements. For ease of interpreting sample results, use absorbance as the x-axis and log10(µM pyoverdine or EDTA) as the y-axis.

4. Collection of environmental samples: soil and plant tissues

  1. Wash sampling equipment (shovels and scissors) with 0.22 µm filtered ddH2O followed by 70% ethanol, and wipe with paper towels before sampling and in between samples to maintain sterile technique and reduce cross-contamination.
  2. Excise the plant tissues (grains and shoots) from plants in the field, and place them in a labeled plastic storage bag, leaving enough shoot stubble for ease in uprooting the desired soil and root samples.
  3. Excavate a small root ball approximately 15 cm deep and 23 cm wide and place it in a separate, labeled plastic bag for sample preparation in the laboratory environment. This step is similar to the methods of McPherson et al.27.
  4. Place all samples (grains, shoots, bulk soil, and root balls in separate bags) directly on ice and keep at 4 °C until samples are processed for the siderophore production assay.
  5. Separate root associated soil samples into bulk, loosely-bound rhizosphere soil, and tightly-bound rhizosphere soil.
    1. Take the root balls out of the bags. Gently shake off soil from the root ball. Shaken off soil, along with the soil left in the bag comprises the “bulk” soil.
    2. Use a rubber mallet to further remove soil from the root ball. This is the loosely-bound rhizosphere soil.
    3. Generate tightly-bound rhizosphere soil by taking roots with the tightly-bound sample and putting them in a centrifuge tube. Add 30 mL of ddH2O and vortex it for 2-3 minutes. Remove roots to get the tightly-bound rhizosphere soil slurry dilution.

5. Preparation of siderophore enrichment cultures and CAS-Fe siderophore production assay

NOTE: All glassware should be acid washed prior to beginning the assays.

  1. Soil sample preparation (for each of the three soil sample types)
    1. Homogenize each soil sample within the sample bag, by mixing and turning the soil as much as possible without opening the bag.
      NOTE: This helps reduce natural soil spatial variability and aligns with normal soil sampling procedures. Other methods may be utilized to homogenize environmental samples, as appropriate, and depending on the experimental design.
    2. After each sample has been thoroughly mixed, aliquot and suspend 2.0 g of each soil in 20 mL of modified M9 medium, then dilute 10-3 to a total volume of 20 mL in a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube with a sterile foam plug to allow aeration.
    3. For tightly-bound rhizosphere samples, add 2 mL of the rhizosphere soil slurry to 20 mL of modified M9 medium, then dilute 10-3 to a total volume of 20 mL in a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube with a sterile foam plug to allow aeration.
  2. Tissue sample (root, shoot and grain) preparation
    1. Surface sterilize the sample with 70% ethanol. Macerate 2.0 g of fresh tissue in 20 mL of modified M9 medium using a blender on high for 30 seconds. Transfer the sample to a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube, then dilute 10-3 to a total volume of 20 mL in a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube with a sterile foam plug to allow aeration.
  3. Enrichment of Siderophore Production Through Fe Limitation
    1. Incubate 50 mL centrifuge tubes at room temperature and shake at 160 rpm.

6. CAS-Fe agar assays for detection of siderophore production in environmental samples

  1. At 24, 48, and 72 h after initiating the enrichment culture, remove 1 mL subsamples from the enrichment tubes using sterile technique and centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 min in 2 mL centrifuge tubes to pelletize the cells.
  2. Collect the separated supernatant. Using sterile technique, add 100 μL of the supernatant to 100 μL solution of CAS-Fe-Agar in duplicate or triplicate in the microplate. Also add 100 µL of sterile M9 medium (as blanks). Then incubate the plate at 28 °C.
  3. Suspend the remaining supernatant and pellet for each sample (not added to microtiter plate) into its own, sterile 2 mL centrifuge tube. Add 400 μL of sterile glycerol into each sample-supernatant tube and resuspend the pellet to create glycerol stocks. Freeze the stock at -80 °C for later analyses.
    NOTE: This step can be modified to generate glycerol stocks according to any preferred in-house protocol.
  4. Measure absorbance at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h, at 420 nm wavelength.
  5. Use standard curves generated from pyoverdine or EDTA to interpret sample absorbance measurements in terms of pyoverdine equivalents.
    NOTE: Pyoverdine was determined to be a superior standard compared with EDTA (vide infra), so EDTA was not used to interpret results in the current study.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

A pyoverdine mixture biosynthesized by Pseudomonas fluorescens was used as a standard to interpret and quantify absorbance (at 420 nm) of samples in terms of pyoverdine equivalents in µM. Figure 1 shows the relationship between absorbance (420 nm) and starting concentration of pyoverdine (Log10 molarity in µM). EDTA did not provide an adequate standard because samples exhibited greater absorbance measurements than were attainable with pyoverdine, and the R2 was lower (Figure 2). While initial work using the CAS-Fe assay as a method of siderophore detection measured absorbance at 630 nm, in a related study using a very similar method (CAS-Fe-Agar was mixed 1:1 with modified M9 to generate a 200 µL column in the microplate), it was observed that the peak absorbance was at 665 nm, but that 420 nm was more reproducible in terms of changes in absorbance induced by samples (Figure 3).

Siderophore production was observed in enrichment cultures of all tissue types after 72 h of Fe-deficit enrichment and siderophore activity appeared to stabilize after 48 h of incubation (Supplementary Figure 1). Thus, siderophore activity of the 72 h enrichment was assessed at 48 h incubation to determine the influence of genotype and sample type on siderophore isolation (Figure 4). Siderophore activity in bulk soil samples was relatively low and did not exhibit differences between the wheat genotype from which the bulk soil was sampled (Figure 4A). Enrichments of loosely bound soil isolated from the PI561725 genotype exhibited greater siderophore production compared with loosely bound soil from Madsen and PI561727, but not Lewjain (Figure 4B). Siderophore production in enrichments from tightly bound soil was not heavily influenced by genotype (Figure 4C).

Enrichment cultures of grain tissue yielded relatively low siderophore production regardless of genotype (Figure 4D). Enrichments of Lewjain shoot tissue had significantly lower siderophore production than the other genotypes, and PI561725 shoot tissue cultures resulted in more variable siderophore production (Figure 4E). Siderophore activity was more than 200% greater in in root tissue enrichment cultures of PI561725 compared with all other genotypes (Figure 4F).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Absorbance at 420 nm and 655 nm regressed against the log10 concentration of pyoverdine. (A) Absorbance at 420 nm regressed against the log10 concentration of pyoverdine in µM. A polynomial curve was fit to obtain an explanatory equation for interpreting absorbance in terms of pyoverdine equivalents. (B) Absorbance at 665 nm regressed against the Log10 concentration of pyoverdine in µM. R2 is the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the equation explains the fitted curve. Points are duplicates of absorbance measurements at 800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 µM pyoverdine after 6 h incubation at 28 °C. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Absorbance at 420 nm and 655 nm regressed against the log10 concentration of EDTA. (A) Absorbance at 420 nm regressed against the log10 concentration of EDTA in µM. A polynomial curve was fit to obtain an explanatory equation for interpreting absorbance in terms of pyoverdine equivalents. (B) Absorbance at 665 nm regressed against the Log10 concentration of EDTA in µM. R2 is the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the equation explains the fitted curve. Points are duplicates of absorbance measurements at 3200, 1600, 800, 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 µM EDTA after 6 h incubation at 28 °C, and error bars . Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Absorbance scans from 315−1000 nm of microplate wells containing 200 µL columns of 1:1 CAS-Fe-Agar and modified M9 or M9 medium with siderophore producing samples. The plate was incubated at 28 °C for 72 hours before measuring absorbance in a microplate reader. Absorbance scans show the three blanks containing no sample (black lines) yielded tightly clustered curves with a peak at 665 nm. Absorbance scans show the three blanks containing siderophore producing samples (gray lines) yielded curves with more variability, but with more consistent absorbance at 420 nm compared with 665 nm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Pyoverdine equivalents of siderophore enrichment cultures. Pyoverdine equivalents of siderophore enrichment cultures associated with (A) bulk (B) loosely bound, and (C) tightly bound soil, and in tissue homogenates of wheat (D) grain (E) shoots, and (F) roots. Siderophore enrichment cultures were incubated for 72 h before transferring subsamples to a microplate and incubating at 28 °C. Siderophore production was assessed after 48 h of incubation with Chrome azurol S. Genotypes/Lines are Lew = Lewjain, Mad = Madsen, 725 = PI561725, and 727 = PI561727. Asterisks represent significance at alpha = 0.008 (after Bonferroni correction). Bars are standard deviation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Supplementary Figure 1. Pyoverdine equivalents over time. Pyoverdine equivalents of siderophore enrichment cultures assessed after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation with Chrome azurol S. Sderophore enrichment cultures associated with (A) bulk (B) loosely bound, and (C) tightly bound soil, and in tissue homogenates of wheat (D) grain (E) shoots, and (F) roots. Siderophore enrichment cultures were incubated for 72 h before transferring subsamples to a microplate and incubating at 28 °C. and subsampled to assess siderophore production at each timepoint. Genotypes/Lines are Lew = Lewjain, Mad = Madsen, 725 = PI561725, and 727 = PI561727. Siderophore production was assessed after, 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation. Bars are standard deviation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

The primary result of this work is the production of a new methodology that can be used to rapidly enrich for siderophore producing microbes while quantitatively measuring siderophore production/activity in the environmental sample. The methodology is quick, simple, and cost-effective, and the results show how it can be used to detect siderophore activity from complex and novel sample types (e.g., soil and plant tissue). The protocol also results in the production of glycerol stocks of the enrichment cultures, which can easily be taken through time to accommodate studies of shifts in microbial community structure and function during Fe deficiency through DNA or RNA based techniques. Those interested in examining the kinetics of siderophore activity in ecological studies could also likely benefit from this method. The results also show that pyoverdine equivalents (pyoverdines are important siderophores in terms of the environment28 and medicine29) provide a good method of quantitatively assessing siderophore production. An important finding is that absorbance measurements at 665 nm are inadequate for determining siderophore activity compared with those observed at 420 nm (Figure 1). Of particular importance was the finding that absorbance at 665 nm clustered across a broad range of pyoverdine concentrations (Pyoverdine µM = 50-800 µM, log10(µM pyoverdine) = 0.18-0.76), suggesting a detection ceiling at this wavelength (Figure 1B). It should be noted that while pyoverdine was a superior standard compared with EDTA, it is also costly, so it is suggested that preliminary work is performed with EDTA or other cost-effective chelators to ensure the methodology has been mastered before generating pyoverdine standards.

There are several critical steps throughout the protocol that require close attention. Firstly, it is important to maintain metal-free glassware and other wares wherever possible when working with metals, particularly those necessary in low concentrations, like Fe. Secondly, because cultures were enriched for siderophore production through Fe limitation, it is important to maintain aseptic conditions throughout the workflow to reduce the influence of environmental contaminants. Lastly, preparation of the CAS-Fe-agar requires careful attention to detail and should be prepared as closely to described as possible. For instance, if the CAS-Fe-agar solution is kept warm but is not used quickly, the CAS-Fe will precipitate. Additionally, it is essential to keep the CAS-Fe-Agar warm during transfer to the microplate. This was achieved by using heated, sterile sand and quickly transferring the medium to the microplate in a biosafety cabinet.

One limitation of the methodology is that because some plants also produce siderophores (phytosiderophores); these can contribute to measured siderophore activity in enrichment cultures of plant tissue homogenates. Also, there was relatively high variability in the results from field replicates, suggesting more replication could be beneficial in future studies. Another limitation of the technique is that while the microplate method is high-throughput, the sample gathering and preparation are time-consuming. Still, because a single microplate can be used for 96 samples (including standards), the time and cost inputs are much lower compared with existing techniques. This is primarily because other existing methods rely on performing the CAS-Fe assay in Petri dishes30, which are inherently less time and cost efficient to prepare than a microplate. Additionally, because solubilized CAS-Fe complexes are prone to precipitation12, the proposed method using CAS-Fe-Agar medium is superior to liquid-based methods, which have also be adapted to the 96-well format.

In terms of the reported findings, given that the primary difference between the PI561725 and PI561727 is the presence of ALMT1 vs.almt1, respectively, the results suggest the presence of ALMT1 likely results in the selection of microbial communities in both the plant and the soil which have a greater potential for siderophore production, as assessed via enrichment cultures. Future work should further investigate the phenomenon using a larger number of replicates, particularly to clarify if the presence of ALMT1 specifically selects for enhanced siderophore activity.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Kalyani Muhunthan for assistance in laboratory procedures, Lee Opdahl for wheat genotype harvesting, the Washington State Concord Grape Research Council, and the Washington State University Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources for a BIOAg grant to support this work. Additional funding was provided by the USDA/NIFA through Hatch project 1014527.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Agarose Apex LF451320014
Aluminum Baking Pan
Aluminum Foil
Ammonium chloride, granular Fiesher Scientific 152315A
Autoclave and Sterilizer Thermo Scientific
Calcium chloride dihydrate Fiesher Scientific 171428
CAS (Chrome Azurol S) Chem-Impex Int'l Inc) 000331-27168
Dextrose Monohydrate (glucose), crystalline powder Fiesher Scientific 1521754
EDTA, disodium salt, dihydrate, Crystal J.T.Baker JI2476
Glycerol, Anhydrous Baker Analyzed C22634
HDTMA (Cetyltrimethylammomonium Bromide Reagent World FZ0941
Hydrochloride acid ACROS Organic B0756767
Infinite M200 PRO plate reader TECAN
Iron (III) chloride hexahydrate, 99% ACROS Organic A0342179
Laboratory Fume Hood Thermo Scientific
Laboratory Incubator VWR Scientific
Magnesium Sulfate Fiesher Scientific 27855
Niric Acid, (69-70)% J.T.Baker 72287
PIPES buffer, 98.5% ACROS Organic A0338723
Potassium phosphate, dibaisc,powder J.T.Baker J48594
Pyoverdine SIGMA-ALDRICH 078M4094V
Sand
SI-600R Shaker Lab Companion
Sodium chloride, granular Fiesher Scientific 136539
Sodium hydroxide, pellets J.T.Baker G48K53
Sodium phosphate, dibasic heptahydrate, 99% ACROS Organic A0371705

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Butaite, E., Baumgartner, M., Wyder, S., Kummerli, R. Siderophore cheating and cheating resistance shape competition for iron in soil and freshwater Pseudomonas communities. Nature Communications. 8, (2017).
  2. Ghirardi, S., et al. Identification of Traits Shared by Rhizosphere-Competent Strains of Fluorescent Pseudomonads. Microbial Ecology. 64 (3), 725-737 (2012).
  3. Hider, R. C., Kong, X. L. Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Natural Product Reports. 27 (5), 637-657 (2010).
  4. Saha, M., et al. Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23 (5), 3984-3999 (2016).
  5. Bhattacharyya, P. N., Jha, D. K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology. 28 (4), 1327-1350 (2012).
  6. Lewis, R. W., Islam, A., Opdahl, L., Davenport, J. R., Sullivan, T. S. Phylogenetics, Siderophore Production, and Iron Scavenging Potential of Root Zone Soil Bacteria Isolated from 'Concord' Grape Vineyards. Microbial Ecology. , Accepted (2018).
  7. Li, S. S., et al. The opportunistic human fungal pathogen Candida albicans promotes the growth and proliferation of commensal Escherichia coli through an iron-responsive pathway. Microbiological Research. 207, 232-239 (2018).
  8. Lorenz, N., Shin, J. Y., Jung, K. Activity, Abundance, and Localization of Quorum Sensing Receptors in Vibrio harveyi. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8, (2017).
  9. O'Brien, S., Fothergill, J. L. The role of multispecies social interactions in shaping Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenicity in the cystic fibrosis lung. Fems Microbiology Letters. 364 (15), (2017).
  10. Ozkaya, O., Balbontin, R., Gordo, I., Xavier, K. B. Cheating on Cheaters Stabilizes Cooperation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Current Biology. 28 (13), (2018).
  11. Popat, R., et al. Environmental modification via a quorum sensing molecule influences the social landscape of siderophore production. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 284 (1852), (2017).
  12. Schwyn, B., Neilands, J. B. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry. 160 (1), 47-56 (1987).
  13. Sullivan, T. S., Ramkissoon, S., Garrison, V. H., Ramsubhag, A., Thies, J. E. Siderophore production of African dust microorganisms over Trinidad and Tobago. Aerobiologia. 28 (3), 391-401 (2012).
  14. Buyer, J. S., DeLorenzo, V., Neilands, J. B. Production of the siderophore aerobactin by a halophilic Pseudomonad. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 57 (8), 2246-2250 (1991).
  15. Perez-Miranda, S., Cabirol, N., George-Tellez, R., Zamudio-Rivera, L., Fernandez, F. O-CAS, a fast and universal method for siderophore detection. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 70 (1), 127-131 (2007).
  16. Nakouti, I., Hobbs, G. A new approach to studying ion uptake by actinomycetes. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 53 (11), 913-916 (2013).
  17. Wang, L. J., et al. Diisonitrile Natural Product SF2768 Functions As a Chalkophore That Mediates Copper Acquisition in Streptomyces thioluteus. Acs Chemical Biology. 12 (12), 3067-3075 (2017).
  18. Retamal-Morales, G., et al. Detection of arsenic-binding siderophores in arsenic-tolerating Actinobacteria by a modified CAS assay. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 157, 176-181 (2018).
  19. Desai, A., Archana, G. Role of Siderophores in Crop Improvement. , (2011).
  20. Dertz, E. A., Raymond, K. N. Comprehensive coordination chemistry II. Que, L., Tolman, W. B. 8, Elsevier, Ltd. (2003).
  21. Arora, N. K., Verma, M. Modified microplate method for rapid and efficient estimation of siderophore produced by bacteria. 3 Biotech. 7, 9 (2017).
  22. Bandyopadhyay, P., Bhuyan, S. K., Yadava, P. K., Varma, A., Tuteja, N. Emergence of plant and rhizospheric microbiota as stable interactomes. Protoplasma. 254 (2), 617-626 (2017).
  23. Lakshmanan, V., Castaneda, R., Rudrappa, T., Bais, H. P. Root transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to beneficial Bacillus subtilis FB17 rhizobacteria revealed genes for bacterial recruitment and plant defense independent of malate efflux. Planta. 238 (4), 657-668 (2013).
  24. Sasaki, T., et al. A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. The Plant Journal. 37 (5), 645-653 (2004).
  25. Mahoney, A. K., Yin, C., Hulbert, S. H. Community Structure, Species Variation, and Potential Functions of Rhizosphere-Associated Bacteria of Different Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8 (132), (2017).
  26. Rayburn, A. L., Wetzel, J., Baligar, V. Mitotic analysis of sticky chromosomes in aluminum tolerant and susceptible wheat lines grown in soils of differing aluminum saturation. Euphytica. 127 (2), 193-199 (2002).
  27. McPherson, M. R., Wang, P., Marsh, E. L., Mitchell, R. B., Schachtman, D. P. Isolation and Analysis of Microbial Communities in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Roots in Perennial Grass Experiments. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (137), 57932 (2018).
  28. Mirleau, P., et al. Fitness in soil and rhizosphere of Pseudomonas fluorescens C7R12 compared with a C7R12 mutant affected in pyoverdine synthesis and uptake. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 34 (1), 35-44 (2000).
  29. Visca, P., Imperi, F., Lamont, I. L. Pyoverdine siderophores: from biogenesis to biosignificance. Trends in Microbiology. 15 (1), 22-30 (2007).
  30. Louden, B. C., Haarmann, D., Lynne, A. M. Use of Blue Agar CAS Assay for Siderophore Detection. Journal of Microbiology, Biology Education. 12 (1), 51-53 (2011).

Tags

High-throughput Siderophore Screening Environmental Samples Plant Tissues Bulk Soils Rhizosphere Soils Metal-chelating Biomolecules Iron Cycling Rapid Assessment Microbial Community Iron Availability Agriculture Productivity Farm Management Practices Soil Health Siderophore-producing Communities Acid Wash Glassware CAS Assay HDTMA Solubilization
High-throughput Siderophore Screening from Environmental Samples: Plant Tissues, Bulk Soils, and Rhizosphere Soils
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Lewis, R. W., Islam, A. A.,… More

Lewis, R. W., Islam, A. A., Dilla-Ermita, C. J., Hulbert, S. H., Sullivan, T. S. High-throughput Siderophore Screening from Environmental Samples: Plant Tissues, Bulk Soils, and Rhizosphere Soils. J. Vis. Exp. (144), e59137, doi:10.3791/59137 (2019).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter