A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Microfocus X-ray CT (microCT) Imaging of Actinia equina (Cnidaria), Harmothoe sp. (Annelida), and Xenoturbella japonica (Xenacoelomorpha)

8.3K views

DOI:

10.3791/59161

August 6th, 2019

In This Article

Summary

Here, protocols for performing microfocus X-ray computed tomography (microCT) imaging of three marine invertebrate animals are explained in detail. This study describes steps such as sample fixation, staining, mounting, scanning, image reconstruction, and data analyses. Suggestions on how the protocol can be adjusted for different samples are also provided.

Abstract

Traditionally, biologists have had to rely on destructive methods such as sectioning in order to investigate the internal structures of opaque organisms. Non-destructive microfocus X-ray computed tomography (microCT) imaging has become a powerful and emerging protocol in biology, due to technological advancements in sample staining methods and innovations in microCT hardware, processing computers, and data analysis software. However, this protocol is not commonly used, as it is in the medical and industrial fields. One of the reasons for this limited use is the lack of a simple and comprehensible manual that covers all of the necessary steps: sample collection, fixation, staining, mounting, scanning, and data analyses. Another reason is the vast diversity of metazoans, particularly marine invertebrates. Because of marine invertebrates’ diverse sizes, morphologies, and physiologies, it is crucial to adjust experimental conditions and hardware configurations at each step, depending on the sample. Here, microCT imaging methods are explained in detail using three phylogenetically diverse marine invertebrates: Actinia equina (Anthozoa, Cnidaria), Harmothoe sp. (Polychaeta, Annelida), and Xenoturbella japonica (Xenoturbellida, Xenacoelomorpha). Suggestions on performing microCT imaging on various animals are also provided.

Introduction

Biological researchers generally have had to make thin sections and perform observations by light or electron microscopy in order to investigate the internal structures of opaque organisms. However, these methods are destructive and problematic when applied to rare or valuable specimens. Furthermore, several steps in the method, such as embedding and sectioning, are time consuming, and it can take several days to observe a sample, depending on the protocol. Moreover, when handling numerous sections, there is always a possibility of damaging or losing some sections. Tissue-clearing techniques are available for some specimens1,

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Fixation

  1. For Actinia equina, relax the animals in 10% MgCl2 seawater for about 15 min at room temperature. Transfer to 70% ethanol and store at room temperature.
  2. For Harmothoe sp., anesthetize the animals by placing them in ice-cold seawater for about 15 min. Transfer to 10% (v/v) formalin solution with seawater and store at room temperature.
  3. For Xenoturbella japonica, relax the animal using 7% MgCl2 in freshwater. Fix in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in filtered seawater overnight. Place in 70% ethanol and store at 4 °C.
    CAUTION: PFA is hazardous and must be handled with care.....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

We performed microCT imaging on A. equina (Anthozoa, Cnidaria), Harmothoe sp. (Polychaeta, Annelida), and X. japonica (Xenoturbellida, Xenacoelomorpha) after staining the samples with 25% Lugol solution. The staining successfully enhanced the contrast of the internal structures in all specimens, enabling observations of internal soft tissues (Figure 6). Together with past reports6,7,

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Fixatives using formalin, such as the 10% (v/v) formalin solution in seawater used in this study, are known to preserve the morphology of diverse marine invertebrates and are often used for microCT imaging18,24,25,26,28,30,33. However, restrictions on the use of this chemical have become str.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Toshihiko Shiroishi for his assistance and for providing the research environment during this study. We are grateful to Kensuke Yanagi and Takato Izumi for advice on A. equina, and Masaatsu Tanaka for advice on the Harmothoe sp. specimen. We would like to thank the staff at Shimoda Marine Research Center, University of Tsukuba, and Misaki Marine Biological Station, The University of Tokyo for their help in sample collections. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing. This work was supported by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (JP26711022) to HN, and JAMBIO, Japanese Association ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
250-ml Erlenmeyer flaskCorningCLS430183
5-ml Sampling tube ST-500BIO-BIK103010
50-ml Polypropylene tubeGreiner Bio One International227261
60-mm Non-treated DishIWAKI1010-060
AgarosePromegaV3125
Ecological grade tip (blue) 1000 µlBMBioBIO1000RF
EthanolWako Pure Chemical Industries057-00451
FormalinWako Pure Chemical Industries061-00416
IodineWako Pure Chemical Industries094-05421
Magnesium chloride hexahydrateWako Pure Chemical Industries135-00165
OsiriX DICOM ViewerPixmeo SARLOsiriX MD v10.0https://www.osirix-viewer.com
ParaformaldehydeWako Pure Chemical Industries163-25983
Petiolate needleAS ONE2-013-01
Pipetman P200 MicropipetteGILSONF123601
Pipetman P1000 MicropipetteGILSONF123602
Potassium iodideWako Pure Chemical Industries166-03971
Precision tweezers 5DUMONT0302-5-PS
QuickRack MultI fit tip (yellow) 200 ulSorenson10660
Razor bladesFeatherFA-10
Ring tweezersNAPOXA-26
Stereoscopic microscopeLeicaMZ95
X-ray Micro-CT imaging systemComscantechnoScanXmate-E090S105

References

  1. Susaki, E. A., Tainaka, K., Perrin, D., Yukinaga, H., Kuno, A., Ueda, H. R. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nature Protocols. 10, 1709-1727 (2015).
  2. Susaki, E. A., Ueda, H. R.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Marine InvertebratesSample MountingAgarose EmbeddingLugol s StainingX ray Scanning3D ReconstructionInternal MorphologyNon destructive Imaging