Here we present a protocol to analyze Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin production in maize kernels expressing an antifungal protein. Using a GFP-expressing A. flavus strain we monitored the infection and spread of the fungus in mature kernels in real time. The assay is rapid, reliable, and reproducible.
Aflatoxin contamination in food and feed crops is a major challenge worldwide. Aflatoxins, produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) are potent carcinogens that substantially reduce crop value in maize and other oil rich crops like peanut besides posing serious threat to human and animal health. Different approaches, including traditional breeding, transgenic expression of resistance associated proteins, and RNA interference (RNAi)-based host-induced gene silencing of critical A. flavus gene targets, are being evaluated to increase aflatoxin resistance in susceptible crops. Past studies have shown an important role of α-amylase in A. flavus pathogenesis and aflatoxin production, suggesting this gene/enzyme is a potential target to reduce both A. flavus growth and aflatoxin production. In this regard, the current study was undertaken to evaluate heterologous expression (under control of the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter) of a Lablab purpureus L. α-amylase inhibitor-like protein (AILP) in maize against A. flavus. AILP is a 36-kDa protein, which is a competitive inhibitor of A. flavus α-amylase enzyme and belongs to the lectin–arcelin–α-amylase inhibitor protein family in common bean. In vitro studies prior to the current work had demonstrated the role of AILP in inhibition of A. flavus α-amylase activity and fungal growth. Fungal growth and aflatoxin production in mature kernels were monitored in real time using a GFP-expressing A. flavus strain. This kernel screening assay (KSA) is very simple to set up and provides reliable and reproducible data on infection and the extent of spread that could be quantified for evaluation of germplasm and transgenic lines. The fluorescence from the GFP strain is closely correlated to fungal growth and, by extension, it is well-correlated to aflatoxin values. The goal of the current work was to implement this previous knowledge in a commercially important crop like maize to increase aflatoxin resistance. Our results show a 35%–72% reduction in A. flavus growth in AILP-expressing transgenic maize kernels which, in turn, translated into a 62%–88% reduction in aflatoxin levels.
Mycotoxin contamination by the fungal genera, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Alternaria is a major problem of food and feed crops grown worldwide1,2,3. Among these phytopathogenic fungi, Aspergillus has the highest adverse impact on crop value and human and animal health. Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus) is an opportunistic plant pathogen that infects oil rich crops such as maize, cottonseed and peanut and produces the potent carcinogens, aflatoxins, as well as numerous toxic secondary metabolites (SMs). Maize is an important food and feed crop grown worldwide and is highly susceptible to contamination by A. flavus. The economic impact of aflatoxin contamination on loses and reduced value in maize can be as much as $686.6 million/year in the U.S.2 With predicted changes in global climate, the impact of aflatoxins could result in greater economic losses in maize with estimates as high as $1.68 billion/year in the near future2. Given the adverse economic and health effects of aflatoxins in humans and livestock, pre-harvest aflatoxin control in maize might be the most efficient way to prevent aflatoxin contamination in food and feed products.
The major pre-harvest control approach for aflatoxin resistance in maize that has been used extensively in the last few decades is primarily through breeding, which requires a significant amount of time4. Recently, biocontrol has had some success in aflatoxin reduction in large scale field applications5,6. Besides biocontrol, application of cutting-edge molecular tools such as ‘Host Induced Gene Silencing’ (HIGS) through RNAi and transgenic expression of resistance-associated proteins has had some success in reduction of A. flavus growth and aflatoxin production in small scale laboratory and field studies. These approaches are currently being optimized in addition to identifying new potential A. flavus gene targets for future manipulation.
Besides genes that are directly involved in mycotoxin production as potential targets of transgenic control strategies, fungal amylases have been shown to play a critical role in maintaining successful pathogenesis and mycotoxin production during early stages of host plant infection. A few examples include Pythium pleroticum (causal agent of ginger rhizome rot), Fusarium solani (causal agent of cauliflower wilt), where positive correlations between pathogenicity and α-amylase expression and activity were observed7,8. Inhibition of α-amylase activity either through gene knockout or knockdown approaches negatively affects fungal growth and toxin production. An α-amylase knockout mutant of A. flavus was unable to produce aflatoxins when grown on starch substrate or degermed maize kernels9. Similarly, in Fusarium verticillioides an α-amylase knockout strain failed to produce fumonisin B1 (mycotoxin) during infection of maize kernels10. In a more recent study, Gilbert et al. (2018) demonstrated that an RNAi-based knock down of A. flavus α-amylase expression through HIGS significantly reduced A. flavus growth and aflatoxin production during maize kernel infection11.
Specific inhibitors of α-amylase activity have also produced similar results as obtained from down-regulation of α-amylase expression. The first report on the role of an α-amylase inhibitor in fungal resistance came from the isolation and characterization of a 14-kDa trypsin-α-amylase inhibitor from maize lines resistant to A. flavus12. Further screening of several hundreds of plant species by Fakhoury and Woloshuk led to the identification of a 36-kDa α-amylase inhibitor-like protein (AILP) from the seeds of hyacinth beans, Lablab purpureus L.13. The peptide sequence of AILP resembled lectins belonging to the lectin–arcelin–α-amylase inhibitor family reported in common bean14,15. Purified AILP does not exhibit any inhibitory activity towards mammalian trypsin and further in vitro characterization showed significant inhibition of A. flavus growth and conidial germination13. The reports presented here clearly shows α-amylase can serve as a target in control approaches to restrict pathogens or pests that depend on starch mobilization (through α-amylase activity) and acquisition of soluble sugars as an energy source during their pathogenic interaction with host plants.
Alpha-amylase is known to be critical in A. flavus pathogenicity9,10,11, and given the importance of AILP as a potent anti-A. flavus agent (α-amylase inhibition/antigrowth)13, we generated transgenic maize plants expressing Lablab AILP gene under the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter. The goal was to investigate if heterologous expression of this α-amylase inhibitor in maize is effective against A. flavus pathogenesis and aflatoxin production during maize kernel infection. Our results demonstrate that transgenic maize kernels expressing AILP significantly reduced A. flavus growth and aflatoxin production during kernel infection.
1. Plasmid constructs and maize transformation
- PCR amplify Lablab AILP insert using the primers 5’-TATCTAGAACTAGTGATTACCATGGCTCC-3’ and 5'-ATACTGCAGGATTGCATGCAGAGTAGTACTG-3'. The PCR conditions include an initial denaturation step at 98 °C for 30 s (step 1), followed by denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s (step 2), annealing at 55 °C for 30 s (step 3), elongation at 72 °C for 20 s (step 4), 31 cycles of step 2 to step 4, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 5 min. Clone the PCR product into a modified pCAMBIA 1,300 vector using XbaI and PstI restriction sites. Sequence the final plant destination vector to confirm the orientation and sequence of the cloned AILP gene in the vector.
- Transform Agrobacterium strain EHA101 with the final vector construct (Figure 1) as earlier described 16.
- Use transformed Agrobacterium containing the final plant destination vector to transform immature maize (Zea mays L. Hi-II) embryos (performed at the Plant Transformation Facility of Iowa State University) 16.
- Grow T0 plants in the greenhouse (26–29 °C; 16/8 h photoperiod supplemented with High Pressure Na-lamps) and repeatedly self-pollinate to obtain T6 generation to achieve homozygosity for the transgenic trait.
2. Spore germination assay
- Harvest leaf samples and store at -80 °C. Grind leaf samples with a mortar and pestle using liquid nitrogen. Weigh out 0.5 g in 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes, add 17 µL of protease inhibitor, and place tubes on ice.
- Centrifuge tubes for 10 min at 16,000 x g. Transfer 225 µL of plant extract to 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and place on ice.
- In a 15 mL centrifuge tube, prepare a 5 mL spore suspension of Aspergillus flavus 70 – GFP in 1% potato dextrose broth (w/v). Vortex and adjust spore concentration to 105 spores/mL with a haemocytometer.
CAUTION: A. flavus produces aflatoxins, all work with this fungus should be conducted in a biological safety cabinet.
- Incubate in PDB at 28 °C until culture achieves 50% initiation of spore germination as indicated by bulging of spores.
- Vortex and aliquot 25 µL spore solution to the 225 µL plant extract. Incubate samples for 20 hours at 28 °C with intermittent shaking.
- Aliquot 25 µL of spore solution on a microscope slide and measure the length of germ tubes spores using the digital camera software. Use a minimum of 20 replicate measurements for each line.
NOTE: At this stage, place all cultures at 4 °C to stop colony growth until ready to count.
3. Kernel Screening Assay (KSA)
- Construct KSA caps by gluing 4 snap caps (22 mm) in a 60 x 15 mm petri dish. Allow glue to dry for 48 H before using caps. Each KSA cap constitutes one rep. (Figure 2).
- In a sterile biological safety cabinet, spray a square bioassay tray (24 cm x 24 cm) with 70% ethanol:H2O (v/v) and let air dry. Add sterile chromatography paper to the tray. Spray 9 KSA caps with 70% ethanol, let air dry, and place in the bioassay tray.
- For each transgenic maize line being tested, select 20 undamaged kernels and place in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. Add 70% ethanol and let sit for 4 minutes. Gently shake tubes during sterilization. Pour off the ethanol and rinse kernels three times in sterile deionized H2O.
- Prepare a spore suspension of Aspergillus flavus 70 – GFP17 from a 6 day old culture grown on V8 medium (5% V8 Juice, 2% agar, pH 5.2).
- Add 20 mL sterile 0.02% Triton X-100/deionized H2O (v/v) and scrap off spores with a sterile loop. Pipet off the inoculum and place in a 300 mL sterile beaker.
- Prepare a 5-fold dilution with 0.02% Triton X-100, then perform a spore count with a haemocytometer. Dilute again if necessary to obtain 100 mL with a concentration of 4 x 106 spores/mL.
- Place kernels in a sterile 300 mL beaker with a stir bar. Add inoculum to the beaker.
CAUTION: Adding kernels to inoculum will cause solution to splash. Place beaker on a stir plate for 3 minutes. After 3 minutes, pour off inoculum into an empty beaker.
- Using a forceps, place kernels in the bioassay dish (1 kernel/cap). Add 30 mL deionized water to the bottom of each bioassay tray and incubate at 31 °C in the dark for 7 days.
- Prepare kernels for photography.
- Set aside 4 kernels from each line for microscopic analysis and photography.
NOTE: Kernels can be stored at 4 °C for no longer than 5 days before completing photography.
- Take pictures of kernels after seven days of inoculation with A. flavus (Figure 3).
- Clean exterior of kernels with a soft tissue and deionized water. Perform longitudinal sections of kernels and immediately take photographs under the fluorescent microscope.
- Set aside 4 kernels from each line for microscopic analysis and photography.
- Prepare kernels for analysis.
- Clean exterior of remaining kernels with a soft tissue and deionized water.
- Place 4 kernels, constituting 1 rep, in a 15 mL screw cap polycarbonate vial containing 2 stainless steel balls. Immediately freeze vials in liquid nitrogen and store at -80 °C until further processing and analysis.
- Remove vials from -80 °C freezer and grind kernels in a homogenizer at 1,500 rpm for 3 minutes.
NOTE: Keep kernels frozen with liquid nitrogen.
4. PCR screening of transgenic maize kernels
- Use DNA isolation kit to isolate genomic DNA (gDNA) from pulverized maize kernels infected with A. flavus according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, add 280 µL buffer F, 20 µL protease, and 3 µL dithiothreitol (DTT) to 10-15 mg of pulverized maize kernels. Incubate and shake in a thermomixer (56 °C, 1,200 rpm, 30 min). Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 min and transfer the clear supernatant to equilibrated column. Incubate at room temperature for 3 min and centrifuge at 700 x g for 1 min to elute gDNA.
- Take 0.8 µL of extracted gDNA to set up a 20 µL PCR reaction for each sample using a PCR kit. Follow thermocycling conditions as recommended in the manufacturer’s protocol. The PCR conditions include an initial denaturation step at 98 °C for 5 min (step 1) followed by denaturation at 98 °C for 5 s (step 2), annealing at 55 °C for 5 s (step 3), elongation at 72 °C for 20 s (step 4), 40 cycles of step 2 to step 4, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 1 min (step 5).
- Use forward primer 5’-TATACCACCCCCATCCGTGT-3’ and reverse primer 5’-AGCTCGGAAGCAAAAGACCA-3’ to confirm the presence of the Lablab AILP gene in the transgenic maize kernels.
5. RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and semi-quantitative RT-PCR
- Take homogenized A. flavus infected maize kernels previously stored at -80°C for RNA extraction. Extract RNA using a total RNA isolation kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol but with slight modification18. After adding 50 mg of homogenized maize kernel powder in the extraction buffer, mix it well (without vortexing) using a 1 mL pipet tip and leave it on ice for 5-6 minutes before proceeding to subsequent steps as described in the manufacturer’s protocol.
- Prepare cDNA using a cDNA synthesis kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol 18.
- Use 0.5 µL of undiluted cDNA per PCR reaction for semi-quantitative RT-PCR as earlier described18. Use forward and reverse primers qAILP-F 5’-TCCCAACAAGGCAACTACTG-3’ and qAILP-R 5’- CGGTGTCGAAGAGACCTAGATA-3’ respectively to detect Lablab AILP gene expression, and forward and reverse primers qRib-F 5ʹ-GGCTTGGCTTAAAGGAAGGT-3ʹ and qRib-R 5ʹ-TCAGTCCAACTTCCAGAATGG-3ʹ respectively for expression of maize ribosomal structural gene (Rib), GRMZM2G02483819 as a house-keeping gene.
6. GFP quantitation
- Prepare 50 mL each of 0.2 M monobasic sodium phosphate (NaH2PO4) and 0.2 M dibasic sodium phosphate (Na2HPO4·7H2O) in deionized H2O.
- Make up 100 mL of pH 7.0 Sorenson’s phosphate buffer. For pH 7.0, add 19.5 mL NaH2PO4 stock, 30.5 mL NaHPO4·7H2O stock, and 50 mL deionized H2O.
- Weigh out 25 mg ground kernel material (fresh weight, FW) and place in a 1.0 mL microcentrifuge tube. Add 500 µL phosphate buffer to the centrifuge tube and vortex for 30 s.
- Centrifuge samples for 15 minutes at 16,000 x g. Pipet 100 µL supernatant into a black 96 well plate. Read the samples with a fluorometer (excitation 485 nm, emission 528 nm).
7. Total aflatoxin analysis
- Sample processing and aflatoxin extraction
- Dry kernel samples in a forced air oven for 2 days at 60 °C. Weigh samples and place in a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask with a glass stopper.
- In a fume hood, add 25 mL methylene chloride to each flask.
CAUTION: Methylene chloride is highly volatile and is considered hazardous (irritant, carcinogen). Neither latex nor nitrile gloves are safe for working with Methylene Chloride. Use IMPROVED organic solvent resistant PolyVinylAlcohol gloves.
- Shake samples for 30 min on a wrist action shaker. After 30 min, slowly pour the extract through a fluted filter paper circle into an 80 mL beaker. Let the beakers dry overnight in a fume hood.
- The next day, squirt methylene chloride (approximately 5 mL) around the inside rim of the dry beakers, swirl around, and pour into 2 dram glass vials. Leave vials open to dry in a fume hood overnight.
- Aflatoxin analysis
- Add 4.0 mL 80% methanol:deionized H2O (v/v) to vials.
- Use an aflatoxin extraction kit to filter purify methanol solution with the provided column. Analyze total aflatoxin levels with a fluorometer, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Maize transformation and molecular screening of transgenic plants
Immature embryos of maize Hi-II lines were transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA101 strain containing the final plant destination vector expressing the Lablab purpureus AILP gene under the control of CaMV 35S promoter. Five independently transformed maize lines were advanced to the T6 generation for subsequent studies. The transgenic maize plants were much smaller and less vigorous but did not show any other abnormalities compared to the isogenic negative control plants. PCR amplification of the target AILP gene showed a 548 bp amplicon, observed only in the transgenic maize lines as compared to the control plants (Figure 4A). The AILP gene showed expression in the transgenic lines whereas no AILP expression was observed in the control plants (Figure 4B).
Aspergillus flavus spore assay with leaf extracts
Crude leaf extracts from young transgenic maize plants were prepared by grinding in liquid N and centrifuging at 16,000 x g. Early stage germinating spores were exposed to the leaf extract for 20 hours and the mean spore hyphal length was recorded from 20 samples. Hyphal length from spores exposed to transgenic leaf extracts showed a 58%–80% reduction compared to the negative control (Figure 5)
Aspergillus flavus growth during kernel infection
A Kernel Screening Assay (KSA) was performed to examine the growth of A. flavus in the transgenic and control kernels. Expression of the AILP gene in transgenic kernels negatively affected A. flavus growth. The A. flavus strain used in the current study contains a GFP reporter which enables the monitoring and quantification of fungal growth in real-time. Significant reduction in GFP fluorescence was observed in transgenic AILP kernels compared to the isogenic negative control (Figure 6). AILP Lines 4 and 5 showed a significant reduction in fungal growth, 69% and 72%, respectively, followed by the other lines where a 35%–60% reduction was observed in comparison to the control kernels (Figure 7A).
Aflatoxin production in the infected kernels
Heterologous expression of the AILP gene in maize resulted in significant reduction of aflatoxin content in the transgenic lines vs. control. The aflatoxin data provided here is the total aflatoxin content detected in the infected kernels. A 62%–88% reduction in aflatoxin content was observed in the AILP kernels as compared to the control (Figure 7B). Among the 5 different AILP lines, Line 4 showed the lowest aflatoxin content (486 ng/g DW), followed by other lines ranging between 640-1,498 ng/g DW in the kernels vs. control (3,986 ng/g DW).
Figure 1: Vector design for transgenic expression of Lablab AILP gene in maize. 35S = Cauliflower mosaic virus or CaMV constitutive promoter; RB = right border; LB = left border; nptII = neomycin phosphotransferase- kanamycin resistance gene; nos and 35s = transcription terminators. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Kernel Screening Assay. (A,B) Sterilize kernels and pour into a sterile beaker in a biological safety cabinet. (C–E) Inoculate kernels with A. flavus spore suspension. (F–H) Using a sterile forceps, place kernels in bioassay dish. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Light micrographs of A. flavus growth. (A) Isogenic negative control. (B–F) Transgenic kernels expressing AILP (lines 1-5) one week after inoculation. Scale bar = 1 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Molecular screening of transgenic plants. (A) PCR confirmation of transgenic maize plants (lanes 1-5) containing Lablab AILP (548 bp diagnostic DNA fragment; C = isogenic negative control; NEB 2-Log DNA ladder used as a DNA marker). (B) Expression of Lablab AILP gene in transgenic maize lines (lanes 1-5) using RT-PCR. Lane C represents isogenic negative control. Maize ribosomal structural gene (Rib), GRMZM2G02483819 was used as a house-keeping gene (NEB 2-Log DNA ladder: DNA marker). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5. Effect of crude leaf extracts from transgenic AILP maize plants on A. flavus spore germination as compared with an isogenic negative control (neg). Mean separation was done by Dunnett’s posttest after ANOVA. Levels of significant reduction are denoted by asterisks (****P ≤ 0.0001). Error bars indicate standard error of means for twenty samples. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6. GFP fluorescence emanating from the A. flavus strain 70-GFP in transgenic kernels expressing AILP after one week of bioassay. Isogenic negative controls (A) were used to evaluate the fungal infection and spread in transgenic kernels (B-F representing transgenic lines 1-5). At least four kernels were screened for each line under the fluorescent microscope. Scale bar = 2 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: A flavus growth and aflatoxin production. (A) A. flavus 70-GFP infection and growth in maize kernels after 7 days in a Kernel Screening Assay. Average of three independent experiments with four biological replicates each time. GFP quantification (in Relative Fluorescence Units, RFU) indicates fungal growth in transgenic maize lines expressing AILP to an isogenic negative control. Mean separation was done by Dunnett’s posttest after ANOVA. Levels of significant reduction is denoted by asterisks (*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001). Error bars indicate standard error of means for four randomized biological replicates. (B) Aflatoxin production by A. flavus 70-GFP in maize kernels after 7 days in a Kernel Screening Assay. Average of 12 biological replicates and each replicate contained four kernels. Aflatoxin levels in transgenic AILP kernels (lines 1-5) as compared with an isogenic negative control (neg). Mean separation was done by Dunnett’s posttest after ANOVA. Levels of significant reduction is denoted by asterisks (**P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001). Error bars indicate standard error of means for four randomized biological replicates. See Supplemental Figures to view the data in panel B devoid of bias due to fungal inhibition. Close correlation between GFP=RFU and aflatoxin values are also provided. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplemental Figure 1: Data from Figure 7B redrawn to show aflatoxin production by A. flavus 70-GFP in maize kernels after 7 days in a Kernel Screening Assay to eliminate bias due to fungal growth inhibition. Aflatoxin values were divided by the fungal growth inhibition represented as GFP-RFU values in Figure 7B. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplemental Figure 2: Close correlation between GFP-RFU values (=fungal growth) and aflatoxin levels (r2 = 0.86) reported in the KSA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Yield losses in agricultural crops due to pathogens and pests is a global problem20. Currently, application of synthetic fungicides and pesticides is the predominant means for controlling plant pathogens and pests, but residual toxicity of these biochemicals in food and feed can pose serious threat to human and animal health21. Considering the economic importance of maize as a food and feed crop, reduction in or elimination of aflatoxin contamination is of utmost importance2,3,22. Conventional breeding through resistant gene introgression into susceptible varieties is a time-consuming process and such resistance is not always stable as aflatoxin resistance is a polygenic trait and expression of participating genes vary significantly with changes in environmental parameters4. Alternative approaches are being evaluated to increase and stabilize host plant defense against A. flavus in an ecofriendly manner.
In the current study, we chose to evaluate the efficacy of the AILP gene from hyacinth beans in maize against A. flavus. As AILP is a competitive inhibitor of α-amylase and also possesses antifungal properties, we expressed this gene under a strong constitutive promoter CaMV 35S. The goal was to increase the production of this heterologous protein in maize irrespective of developmental stage or tissue type. Significant expression of the α-amylase gene in the transgenic maize lines (Figure 4A,B) supports stable expression of this gene in a heterologous system. This negatively affected fungal growth as evident from the reduction in spatial distribution of GFP fluorescence inside the infected AILP kernels and reduction in overall GFP fluorescence in the kernels (Figure 6 and Figure 7A).
The development of the Kernel Screening Assay (KSA) utilizes a genetically engineered A. flavus reporter strain expressing a gene encoding the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria18,23. To devise control strategies for any pathogen, it is necessary to understand the mode of infection, spread and colonization within the host plant or tissue. The colonization and spread of the aflatoxigenic saprophyte, A. flavus is not well understood because genetic regulation of resistance to the pathogen, if one exists, is not well understood. Use of the GFP-expressing A. flavus strain makes it possible to track in real time the infection process and colonization. The GFP strain and the wild-type did not differ significantly in pathogen aggressiveness and aflatoxin production23. However, the GFP gene in this particular strain is placed under the control of the constitutively expressed glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gpdA) gene promoter 24 which is more apt for tracking fungal growth. However, using this stain on cottonseed and maize kernels, we have shown a close relationship between GFP fluorescence emanating from the fungus to fungal growth and aflatoxin levels18,23.
To establish a close correlation with aflatoxin producing ability, gfp driven by aflatoxin gene promoters such as omtA or ver-125,26 will be more suitable than gpdA. The GFP fluorescence is sensitive enough to allow for detection and measurement in real time of even small changes in fungal growth, both in vitro and in planta, and evaluation of inhibitory activities of unknown antifungal proteins and peptides such as AILP and others11,17,18,23. In addition, results from the KSA correlates well with field performance of resistant or susceptible maize lines with regards to evaluation for aflatoxin contamination27.
The KSA is very useful in our laboratory to screen classically-bred new varieties4 and transgenic lines11,18. It is easy to set up and perform KSA in any laboratory. One needs to use undamaged clean kernels to perform this assay so that a clear understanding of host plant-fungal interaction could be evaluated. We routinely scan all the kernels that we use in our laboratory under a stereomicroscope before conducting the assay. It should be noted that the conditions that we employ for the KSA include high humidity (95% RH) and constant temperature (31 °C). With the onset of simulated germination process under these conditions, the assay provides ideal conditions to test the integrity of the seed coat, genetic makeup of the kernels including antifungal genes/proteins turned on during germination, and/or fungal infection. Fungal infection and aflatoxin production will always be higher in KSA compared to their occurrence in the field; however, a close correlation has been established4,27.
We have demonstrated in this KSA that AILP reduces fungal growth in maize kernels. AILP possesses antifungal properties of plant lectins, and has been shown to inhibit α-amylase, decreasing starch breakdown and limiting fungal growth. In vitro studies demonstrated that AILP was capable of inhibiting A. flavus growth in sugar-rich potato dextrose broth (PDB) artificial growth medium, indicating its antifungal/growth inhibition activity was independent of its amylase inhibition activity13. Other plant lectins isolated from Urtica dioica (common nettle), Hevea brasiliensis (rubber tree), and Solanum tuberosum (potato) tubers also show similar antifungal properties and inhibited growth of Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenophora tritici, and Fusarium oxysporum28,29,30,31. Alpha amylase inhibitors are not only effective against fungi and bacteria but were also shown to be effective against insect pests32. Alpha amylases are reported to be critical for normal growth and development of plant-feeding insects, and several insect α-amylase inhibitors have been isolated from plants such as wheat, common bean, and maize12,33,34,35. A significant reduction in fungal hyphal length from spores exposed to crude leaf extracts (Figure 5), reduction in fungal growth in the AILP-expressing maize kernels as demonstrated by the reduction of GFP fluorescence both qualitatively (Figure 6) and quantitatively (Figure 7A) is possibly due to a combination of its α-amylase inhibition and antifungal properties. Experiments using these AILP-expressing maize plants against other pathogens and pests in the future will be of great interest to test its efficacy against diverse biotic stressors of seed and vegetative tissues. The antifungal and growth inhibition properties of lectin has been mainly attributed to its cross-linking with chitin and inhibition of hyphal tip expansion28. In fact, in vitro AILP-mediated inhibition of α-amylases from diverse fungal and bacterial origins showed over 65% inhibition in fungal pathogens including A. flavus, Magnaporthe grisea, Helminthosporium victoriae, and 41% inhibition in the bacterial pathogen Bacillus subtilis13. The results on reduction of A. flavus growth presented here are in line with the role of α-amylase inhibitors as antifungal agents. The current study further demonstrates practical application of such useful information obtained from earlier in vitro studies.
Reduction in aflatoxin content (Figure 7B) in the AILP-expressing maize lines is possibly due to inhibition of A. flavus α-amylase activity, leading to diminished breakdown of stored starch, and reduced acquisition of sugars as an energy source from the maize kernels during pathogenic interaction. As fungal α-amylase plays an important role in breaking down kernel starches, any change in fungal α-amylase activity by AILP likely alters soluble sugar content during kernel infection. Content of soluble sugars, especially sucrose and glucose, has been highly correlated with increased production of AFB1 and total aflatoxins in maize and other A. flavus susceptible crops such as peanut36,37. Increasing sucrose content in artificial growth media increases A. flavus aflatoxin production38. Other soluble sugars such as glucose and maltose also positively contribute to aflatoxin production both in artificial media and seed substrates38. Inhibition of α-amylase activity and reduction in mycotoxin production in other fungi reinforces an important role of fungal α-amylases in toxin production during kernel infection. Alpha-amylase knockout mutants of both F. verticillioides and A. flavus failed to produce fumonisin B1 and aflatoxins respectively following infection of maize kernels9,10. Similarly, down-regulation of A. flavus α-amylase significantly reduced fungal growth and aflatoxin production during maize kernel infection11. A 62%-88% reduction in aflatoxin in the transgenic lines are in accordance with earlier reports on the role of α-amylase in aflatoxin production. It is to be noted that the in vitro Kernel Screening Assay (KSA) is more stringent than normally found under natural conditions. Conditions during the in vitro assay are also highly conducive for aflatoxin production, so the percentage change in aflatoxin content in the transgenic lines might be more meaningful rather than the absolute numbers of aflatoxin content in the infected kernels. The results presented here are promising and future experiments under field conditions are important to examine the potential of these AILP-expressing maize lines for aflatoxin resistance under a natural scenario.
The authors have no conflict of interest.
We thank David Meints, University of Arkansas for his assistance in developing and analyzing the transgenic maize during the early generations. This work received the financial support of USDA-ARS CRIS project 6054-42000-025-00D. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture. USDA-ARS’ Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy mandates equal opportunity for all persons and prohibits discrimination in all aspects of the Agency’s personnel policies, practices, and operations.
|Amazing Marine Goop||Eclectic Products|
|C1000 Touch CFX96 Real-Time System||Bio-Rad|
|Corning Falcon Tissue Culture Dishes, 60 mm||Fisher Scientific||08-772F|
|Eppendorf 5424 Microcentrifuge||Fisher Scientific|
|Erlenmeyer flask with stopper, 50 mL||Ace Glass||6999-10|
|FluoroQuant Afla||Romer Labs||COKFA1010|
|Fluted Qualitative Filter Paper Circles, 15 cm||Fisher Scientific||09-790-14E|
|Force Air Oven||VWR|
|Geno/Grinder 2010||OPS Diagnostics||SP 2010-115|
|Improved PolyVinylAlcohol Organic Solvent Resistant Gloves||Ansell||012-15-554|
|Innova 44 Incubator Shaker||Brunswick Scientific|
|iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit||Bio-Rad||1708890|
|Low Form Griffin Beakers, 100 mL||DKW Life Sciences||14000-100|
|Nexttec 1-step DNA Isolation Kit for Plants||Nexttec||47N|
|Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope with Nikon DS-Qi1 camera||Nikon|
|Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope with C-HGFI Episcopic Illuminator and Andor Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera||Nikon|
|Nunc Square BioAssay Dishes||ThermoFisher Scientific||240835|
|Phire Plant Direct PCR Kit||ThermoFisher Scientific||F130WH|
|Polycarbonate Vials, 15 ml||OPS Diagnostics||PCRV 15-100-23|
|Potato Dextrose Broth|
|Snap Cap, 22 mm||DKW Life Sciences||242612|
|Sodium Phosphate dibasic heptahydrate||Sigma-Aldrich|
|Sodium Phosphate monobasic||Sigma-Aldrich|
|Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit||Sigma-Aldrich||STRN50|
|Stainless Steel Grinding Balls, 3/8''||OPS Diagnostics||GBSS 375-1000-02|
|Synergy 4 Fluorometer||Biotek|
|T100 Thermal Cycler||Bio-Rad|
|Whatman Qualitative Grade Plain Sheets, Grade 3||Fisher Scientific||09-820P|
|Wrist-Action Shaker||Burrell Scientific|
- Ismaiel, A., Papenbrock, J. Mycotoxins: Producing fungi and mechanisms of phytotoxicity. Agriculture. 5, (3), 492-537 (2015).
- Mitchell, N., Bowers, E., Hurburgh, C., Wu, F. Potential economic losses to the USA corn industry from aflatoxin contamination. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A. 33, (3), 540-550 (2016).
- Umesha, S., Manukumar, H. M., Chandrasekhar, B., Shivakumara, P., Shiva Kumar, J., Raghava, S., Avinash, P., Shirin, M., Bharathi, T. R., Rajini, S. B., Nandhini, M., Vinaya Rani, G., Shobha, M., Prakash, H. S. Aflatoxins and food pathogens: Impact of biologically active aflatoxins and their control strategies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. (2016).
- Brown, R. L., Menkir, A., Chen, Z. Y., Bhatnagar, D., Yu, J., Yao, H., Cleveland, T. E. Breeding aflatoxin-resistant maize lines using recent advances in technologies - a review. Food Additives & Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment. 30, (8), 1382-1391 (2013).
- Abbas, H., Accinelli, C., Shier, W. T. Biological control of aflatoxin contamination in U.S. crops and the use of bioplastic formulations of Aspergillus flavus biocontrol strains to optimize application strategies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 65, 7081-7087 (2017).
- Udomkun, P., Wiredu, A. N., Nagle, M., Müller, J., Vanlauwe, B., Bandyopadhyay, R. Innovative technologies to manage aflatoxins in foods and feeds and the profitability of application – A review. Food Control. 76, 127-138 (2017).
- Dohroo, N. P., Bhardwaj, S. S., Shyram, K. R. Amylase and invertase activity as influenced by Pythium pleroticum causing rhizome rot of ginger. Plant Disease Research. 2, 106-107 (1987).
- Singh, R., Saxena, V. S., Singh, R. Pectinolytic, cellulolytic, amylase and protease production by three isolates of Fusarium solani variable in their virulence. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology. 19, 22-29 (1989).
- Fakhoury, A. M., Woloshuk, C. P. Amy1, the α-amylase gene of Aspergillus flavus: Involvement in aflatoxin biosynthesis in maize kernels. Phytopathology. 89, (10), 908-914 (1999).
- Bluhm, B. H., Woloshuk, C. P. Amylopectin induces Fumonisin B1 production by Fusarium verticillioides during colonization of maize kernels. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 18, (12), 1333-1339 (2005).
- Gilbert, M. K., Majumdar, R., Rajasekaran, K., Chen, Z. Y., Wei, Q., Sickler, C. M., Lebar, M. D., Cary, J. W., Frame, B. R., Wang, K. RNA interference-based silencing of the a-amylase (amy1) gene in Aspergillus flavus decreases fungal growth and aflatoxin production in maize kernels. Planta. 247, (6), 1465-1473 (2018).
- Chen, Z. Y., Brown, R. L., Russin, J. S., Lax, A. R., Cleveland, T. E. A corn trypsin inhibitor with antifungal activity inhibits Aspergillus flavus α-amylase. Phytopathology. 89, (18944733), 902-907 (1999).
- Fakhoury, A. M., Woloshuk, C. P. Inhibition of growth of Aspergillus flavus and fungal α-amylases by a lectin-like protein from Lablab purpureus. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 14, (8), 955-961 (2001).
- Mirkov, T. E., Wahlstrom, J. M., Hagiwara, K., Finardi-Filho, F., Kjemtrup, S., Chrispeels, M. J. Evolutionary relationships among proteins in the phytohemagglutinin-arcelin-a-amylase inhibitor family of the common bean and its relatives. Plant Molecular Biology. 26, (4), 1103-1113 (1994).
- Kim, Y. H., Woloshuk, C. P., Cho, E. H., Bae, J. M., Song, Y. S., Huh, G. H. Cloning and functional expression of the gene encoding an inhibitor against Aspergillus flavus a-amylase, a novel seed lectin from Lablab purpureus (Dolichos lablab). Plant Cell Reports. 26, (4), 395-405 (2007).
- Frame, B., Main, M., Schick, R., Wang, K. Ch. 22. Plant Embryo Culture. Thorpe, T. A., Yeung, E. C. 710, Humana Press. Methods in Molecular Biology 327-341 (2011).
- Rajasekaran, K., Sickler, C. M., Brown, R. L., Cary, J. W., Bhatnagar, D. Evaluation of resistance to aflatoxin contamination in kernels of maize genotypes using a GFP-expressing Aspergillus flavus strain. World Mycotoxin Journal. 6, (2), 151-158 (2013).
- Rajasekaran, K., Sayler, R. J., Sickler, C. M., Majumdar, R., Jaynes, J. M., Cary, J. W. Control of Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin production in transgenic maize kernels expressing a tachyplesin-derived synthetic peptide, AGM182. Plant Science. 150-156 (2018).
- Shu, X., Livingston, D. P., Franks, R. G., Boston, R. S., Woloshuk, C. P., Payne, G. A. Tissue-specific gene expression in maize seeds during colonization by Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. Molecular Plant Pathology. 16, (4), 662-674 (2015).
- Savary, S., Ficke, A., Aubertot, J. -N., Hollier, C. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Security. 4, 519-537 (2012).
- Damalas, C. A., Eleftherohorinos, I. G. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 8, (5), 1402-1419 (2011).
- Kowalska, A., Walkiewicz, K., Kozieł, P., Muc-Wierzgoń, M. Aflatoxins: Characterisitcs and impact on human health. Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej (Online). 71, 315-327 (2017).
- Rajasekaran, K., Cary, J. W., Cotty, P. J., Cleveland, T. E. Development of a GFP-expressing Aspergillus flavus strain to study fungal invasion, colonization, and resistance in cottonseed. Mycopathologia. 165, (2), 89-97 (2008).
- Punt, P., Dingemanse, M. A., Kuyvenhoven, A., Soede, R. D., Pouwels, P. H., van den Hondel, C. A. Functional elements in the promoter region of the Aspergillus nidulans gpdA gene encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Gene. 93, (1), 101-109 (1990).
- Lee, L. W., Chiou, C. H., Klomparens, K. L., Cary, J. W., Linz, J. E. Subcellular localization of aflatoxin biosynthetic enzymes Nor-1, Ver-1, and OmtA in time-dependent fractionated colonies of Aspergillus parasiticus. Archives of Microbiology. 181, (3), 204-214 (2004).
- Bhatnagar, D., Cary, J. W., Ehrlich, K., Yu, J., Cleveland, T. E. Understanding the genetics of regulation of aflatoxin production and Aspergillus flavus development. Mycopathologia. 162, 155-166 (2006).
- Williams, W. P., Krakowsky, M. D., Scully, B. T., Brown, R. L., Menkir, A., Warburton, M. L., Windham, G. L. Identifying and developing maize germplasm with resistance to accumulation of aflatoxins. World Mycotoxin Journal. 8, (2), 193-209 (2015).
- Broekaert, W. F., van Parijs, J., Leyns, F., Joos, H., Peumans, W. J. A chitin-binding lectin from stinging nettle rhizomes with antifungal properties. Science. 245, (4922), 1100-1102 (1989).
- Vanparijs, J., Broekaert, W. F., Goldstein, I. J., Peumans, W. J. Hevein-an antifungal protein from rubber-tree (Hevea brasiliensis) latex. Planta. 183, 258-264 (1991).
- Gozia, O., Ciopraga, J., Bentia, T., Lungu, M., Zamfirescu, I., Tudor, R., Roseanu, A., Nitu, F. Antifungal properties of lectin and new chitinases from potato tubers. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences - Series III. 316, (8), 788-792 (1993).
- Wisessing, A., Choowongkomon, K. Amylase inhibitors in plants: Structures, Functions and Applications. Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology. 6, (1), 31-41 (2012).
- Tyagi, B., Trivedi, N., Dubey, A. a-amylase inhibitor: A compelling plant defense mechanism against insect/pests. Environment & Ecology. 32, (3), 995-999 (2014).
- Powers, J. R., Culbertson, J. D. In vitro effect of bean amylase inhibitor on insect amylases. Journal of Food Protection. 45, 655-657 (1982).
- Gatehouse, A. M. R., Fenton, K. A., Jepson, I., Pavey, D. J. The effects of a-amylase inhibitors on insect storage pests: Inhibition of a-amylase in vitro and effects on development in vivo. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 37, 727-734 (1986).
- Blanco-Labra, A., Chagolla-Lopez, A., Martinez-Gallardo, N., Valdes-Rodriguez, S. Further characterization of the 12-kDa protease a-amylase inhibitor present in maize seeds. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 19, 27-41 (1995).
- Abdollahi, A., Buchanan, R. L. Regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis: Induction of aflatoxin production by various carbohydrates. Journal of Food Science. 46, 633-635 (1981).
- Liu, J., Sun, L., Zhang, N., Zhang, J., Guo, J., Li, C., Rajput, S. A., Qi, D. Effects of nutrients in substrates of different grains on aflatoxin B1 production by Aspergillus flavus. BioMed Research International. 2016, (2016).
- Uppala, S. S., Bowen, K. L., Woods, F. M. Pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination and soluble sugars of peanut. Peanut Science. 40, (1), 40-51 (2013).