$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The importance of a 3D culture, which better mimics biological environments than does a 2D culture, is considerably emphasized in cell/tissue culture1,2,3. The interaction between the cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) provides important cues regarding morphogenesis4,5. Many tissue formations can emerge only under 3D environments, such as the folding process6,7, invagination8, and tubular formation9,10. However, numerous difficulties prevent researchers from shifting to 3D experiments from 2D experiments on a dish. One of the major difficulties in 3D experiments is the issue of imaging 3D samples. Compared with planar experiments, acquisition of appropriate 3D images is still challenging in many cases. In particular, obtaining an appropriate 3D image is a difficult task when the sample size reaches the millimeter range owing to the large focal depth of low-magnification lenses. For example, the focal depth reaches more than 50 µm when a 10x magnification lens is used while the size of the single cell is normally less than 10 µm. To enhance the imaging quality, high-technology microscopy systems are being developed (e.g., two-photon microscopy11 and light-sheet microscopy system12), but their availability is limited owing to their expensive price. As an alternative, we have previously developed a hybrid gel cube (HGC) device13. The device consists of two types of hydrogels: agarose as a support gel and an ECM such as collagen or Matrigel as a culture gel. The HGC allows us to collect the sample during culturing and rotate the cube to achieve multi-directional imaging, which addresses the focal depth problem14.
Another difficulty in 3D experiments is their low repeatability owing to the poor controllability of the 3D environments. Unlike a planar culture on a plastic dish, variations in the initial culture conditions easily occur in a 3D space surrounded by a soft material. A significant variation in the experimental results deteriorates the following analysis and masks the underlying mechanisms. Many engineering technologies have been developed to spatially align single cells, such as bioprinting15,16, fiber weaving17, and scaffolding18, but they require complex preprocessing or specifically designed equipment. In contrast, we have developed a methodology for achieving 3D cell alignment in an HGC19.
In this protocol, we illustrated a simple procedure with commonly used equipment for controlling the 3D initial cell cluster shape in an HGC. First, the fabrication process of the HGC was demonstrated. Then, micromolds fabricated by photolithography or a machining process were placed in the HGC to produce a pocket with an arbitrary shape in an ECM. Subsequently, highly dense cells after centrifugation were injected into the pocket to control the initial cell cluster shape in the HGC. The precisely controlled cell cluster could be imaged from many directions because of the HGC. Normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells were used to demonstrate the control of the initial cell cluster shape and imaging of the branches from multiple directions for enhancing the imaging quality.