$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This protocol outlines the differentiation of hiPSCs into iHOs and their utility as a model in which to simulate enteric infections. Below, we outline the critical steps in the protocol and any modifications or improvements we have made.
This protocol streamlines the differentiation process of hiPSCs compared to previously published work25. Previously used methods required the transfer of hiPSCs from other hiPSC culture systems (e.g., feeder-dependent hiPSC culture) to chemically-defined medium–polyvinyl alcohol (CDM-PVA). This transfer to CDM-PVA typically takes 2–3 weeks and requires daily feeding of the hiPSCs. This protocol was also not consistently effective, with some differentiations failing; therefore, we trialed differentiation using the same growth factors but starting with hiPSCs grown in stem cell culture medium (rather than CDM-PVA) and replacement of CDM-PVA with stem cell culture medium during differentiation days 0–3. This has been successful for the five independent hiPSC lines trialed thus far, making the differentiation process much more rapid and efficient. This also allows weekend-free culturing of hiPSCs prior to differentiation, allowing more flexibility in the hiPSC culture. iHO lines produced by this method have been phenotyped for markers of intestinal epithelium as we have previously described for the hiPSC lines Kolf2, Yemz1, and Lise116 and appear phenotypically indistinguishable from iHOs produced using the previous protocol.
Following seeding, iHOs require at least 1 month of routine passaging, with splitting every 4–7 days to facilitate maturation. Note that there will be some variation in iHO development depending on the iPSC line used and the density of the initial culture. During the first few passages, there will be visibly contaminating cells which are not iHOs. These will eventually die, leaving a clean culture of spherical and, after approximately 4 weeks, budded iHOs. In addition, an in-hood imaging system can be used to select and passage only iHOs with the desired morphology. As iHOs mature, they will require splitting every 6–7 days, dependent on the growth rate and density. If any of the following occur, iHOs should be split prior to this point: the luminal cavities of the iHOs start to fill up with dead cells, the basement membrane matrix starts to disintegrate, the iHOs start to grow out of the basement membrane matrix, or the culture is too dense and the media starts to go yellow very quickly.
Once the iHO culture is established, if at any time the appearance of the iHOs changes or is different than expected (for example, the cultures remain spherical, rather than budding), phenotyping via immunohistochemistry and qPCR for cell markers ought to be repeated to ensure that the differentiation of the cell types within the iHOs (e.g., goblet cells, Paneth cells) remains intact. If the iHOs are no longer differentiating, then they should be discarded and redifferentiated or an earlier passage of the iHOs should be thawed and reconstituted. If the iHOs cease to differentiate, the potential causes are the age of the culture (if it is over 6 months old), the activity of the growth factors (ensure that these are reconstituted as per the manufacturers’ instructions and kept frozen in small aliquots to avoid multiple freeze-thaw cycles), too frequent or violent passages (in general, passaging should only occur once a week, and if the iHOs are manually dissociated too vigorously on a regular basis, they will cease to fully differentiate).
We established via RNA sequencing that IL-22 stimulation 18 h prior to infection upregulates antimicrobial genes and those involved in the barrier defense phenotype. Prior to the use of new iHsO for assays involving prestimulation with rhIL-22 (or an alternative cytokine if the system is being used for this), it is advisable to check the activity of genes known to be upregulated by the cytokine (in the case of IL-22, we used DUOX2 and LCN2) via qPCR after stimulation of the iHOs, to ensure receptor expression and intact signalling. Prior to the first use of IL-22, we also carried out immunohistochemistry to locate the IL-22 receptor on iHOs to establish that the expression of the IL-22 receptor was basal, meaning that prestimulation could be achieved simply by adding rhIL-22 to the iHO culture medium. However, if a receptor is apically expressed, this protocol may have to be adapted to deliver ligands apically.
Pitfalls regarding the microinjection system are generally related to the delicacy of the needles required for the injection. Here, we use commercially available drill tips with a 6 μm lumen. It is possible to pull the injection needles from glass capillaries26 although this may be less uniform, leading to leakages from the needle tip or inconsistent volumes being injected into the iHOs. It is important to be sure that the injection has taken place into the iHO lumen, which is one reason for the use of phenol red as a dye; the iHOs will visibly expand and hold the red inoculum, allowing certainty about which iHOs have been injected. Occasionally needles will clog with debris from the iHO wall; if this is the case, remove the needle tip from inside the iHO and press the clean button on the microinjection system. This will produce a brief period of higher air pressure which should clear the blockage. It will also induce some leakage of the bacterial inoculum onto the plate; therefore, if this occurs, the clean action should be repeated on all plates to ensure equality of bacterial inoculum per plate. One large advantage of the hiPSC-derived iHOs is their size. Intestinal organoids from mice and primary human organoids are much smaller (measuring up to ~100 μm and 100–300 μm, respectively27, versus 250–1500 μm for hiPSC-derived iHOs), meaning that injections of large amounts of organoids will be slower. This allows larger-scale injection experiments to be trialed in the hiPSC-derived iHOs. It is also possible to study the luminal contents of the iHOs by harvesting them postinfection and manually dissociating the iHOs into DPBS, releasing their luminal contents. For microinjection, we recommend using a high concentration of bacteria. We found that lower concentrations were not sufficient to generate a response from the IECs comprising the iHOs. Additionally, it was difficult to subsequently locate internalized bacteria using microscopy. Inoculums may have to be optimized for different bacterial strains.
In summary, hiPSC-derived iHOs provide a promising model for directly dissecting the epithelial response to enteric infections, whether by studying intracellular invasion counts, imaging, measuring cytokine levels in the iHO supernatants, or harvesting RNA to study transcriptional changes after exposure to pathogens. Their utility will be even more apparent in the future for establishing infection models for human-restricted pathogens and in exploiting the possibilities of using this technology to personalize research by studying specific disease-related genetic mutations and drug responses.