Con A injections induced a strong inflammatory response in the lacrimal glands characterized by a dense lymphocytic infiltrate (Figure 13), accompanied by decreased tear production. All tear parameters were markedly altered (Table 1 and Table 2). In addition, tear lactoferrin levels were suppressed (control = 3.1±0.45 vs. Con A injected = 2.7±0.02 ng/mg protein (mean ± SEM); p<0.03). The end result was a compromised corneal and conjunctival epithelium, evidenced by increased rose bengal staining (Figure 6).
Injection of the three orbital LG tissues produced a consistent and uniform DED state unlike the states achieved by previous methods18,27. Key contributors to this result were the US-guided injection of the ILG and the injection of the OSLG. Table 1 summarizes the salient results of this method. All changes are consistent with severe DED.
A single set of Con A injections produces DED lasting about 1 week; all clinical parameters normalize by day 10 (Table 2). Sequential Con A injections about 1 week apart extend the duration of DED accordingly. For example, the second set of Con A injections on day 7 maintains DED for 2 weeks and so on. After approximately 5 sets of injections, the DED state often becomes permanent without the need for further injections.
When the rabbits with Con A-induced DED were treated with the novel agent phosphosulindac, it markedly suppressed the disease. For example, following one week's treatment with this agent TBUT increased markedly compared to vehicle-treated animals (43.6±4.0 vs. 12.2±2.8 s; p<0.001; mean ± SEM respectively, for these and following values) while tear osmolarity was normalized (294±4.6 vs. 311±2.0 mOsm/L, p<0.002). Mechanistically, phosphosulindac decreased the levels of two crucial interleukins, IL-1β (8.4±1.2 vs 21.2±6.6 pg/mg protein; p<0.03) and IL-8 (4.9±1.7 vs. 13.5±5.0 pg/mg protein; p<0.05)19.

Figure 1: Ultrasound image of the inferior lacrimal gland. Upper Panel: The ILG as it moves deeper in orbit to lie beneath the zygomatic arch. The dashed line represents the line on skin across which the US probe is swept. Middle Panels: As the hand-piece is swept across this line, the examiner looks for loss of the zygomatic bone echo that is present in the left image (arrow) and disappears in the right. Lower Panels: Images of the ILG taken before (left) and after (right) injection of Con A. Development of a large cystic space within the gland confirms proper delivery. Reprinted with permission19. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Gas mask sedation. This photograph shows the gas mask providing brief moderate sedation with isoflurane. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Removal of the nictitating membrane. (A) Injection of lidocaine/epinephrine. (B) Truncation of the nictitating membrane at its base with Westcott scissors. (C) The ocular surface visualized more readily after removal of the nictitating membrane. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Tear break-up time measurement. (A) Uniform green tear film appearance of the corneal surface under blue light immediately following application of fluorescein drops. (B) Corneal surface that has already undergone marked break-up evidenced by multiple dark circles and linear streaks in the fluorescein. Break-up time is recorded as soon as the first dark spot or line develops. The two light blue circles are reflections of the light source off of the cornea. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Schirmer's tear test. (A) The proper placement of the Weck-Cel sponge in the lower fornix to remove any residual topical lidocaine solution and baseline tears. By placing the posterior edge of the triangular sponge under the lower lid margin, one can maintain a very uniform technique to dry the ocular surface prior to placement of the tear strips. (B) A tear strip appropriately placed at the mid-position of the lower lid between the globe and lower lid (palpebral conjunctiva). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Rose bengal staining. Upper: Photographs of the corneal surface. Left: No rose bengal staining is present before treatment with Con A. Right: Diffuse corneal and conjunctival staining is seen in the upper nasal quadrant post-injection (upper right). Lower: Conjunctival impression cytology from the superior bulbar conjunctiva. Left: Numerous goblet cells are present before treatment. Right: Epithelial cells are present but goblet cells are absent post-treatment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Preparation of rabbit for concanavalin A injections. (A) Small shears are used to remove fur, allowing easier visualization of landmarks to identify the orbital superior lacrimal gland. (B) Nair is used to remove hair that remains after shearing. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Injection of the palpebral lacrimal gland. (A) The palpebral lacrimal gland, appearing as a bulbous elevation in the posterior temporal portion of the upper lid. Tears are seen streaming from the surface of this gland after applying a drop of 2% fluorescein. (B) The palpebral lacrimal gland is being injected while the rabbit is receiving moderate sedation. One investigator retracts the eyelid, optimizes exposure of the gland, and secures the mask while the second investigator injects the gland. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: Localization of the orbital superior lacrimal gland. Changes in skin contours indicate the location of the OSLG as it protrudes through the posterior incisure. Alternating medial pressure on the globe (large arrow) causes the superior orbital gland to prolapse, which is seen as a small elevation in the skin. This elevation will increase in size each time the pressure is applied (small arrows). The location of this gland is usually in line with the posterior orbital rim. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10: Injection of the orbital superior lacrimal gland. (A) Application of gentle pressure to the skull with fine-toothed forceps in the area which prolapsed as in Figure 9. A thin slit-like opening in the skull can be palpated. Leaving a small indentation mark with the forceps greatly aids placement of the needle during injection. (B) The needle is being inserted perpendicularly through the incisure. If placed incorrectly, its passage is stopped by the bony skull. (C) The needle is in final position angled towards the lateral canthus. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 11: Localization of the inferior lacrimal gland. (A) The prominence of the superficial portion of the ILG seen through the lower lid. The curvilinear pen mark denotes the lower position of the gland. The vertical line, under the nasal limbus, denotes the approximate position where the ILG transitions to a deeper position within the orbit and serves as a visual reference for the US. (B) US hand-piece sweeping across the area of the vertical line; the US monitor will show where the zygomatic bone ends, where the ILG transitions and where the Con A injection should be given ("injection site"). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 12: Injection of the inferior lacrimal gland. Injection of the ILG is done at the location identified by US. The depth of injection is calculated as described in the text (step 5.8.6). Calipers (seen behind the needle) ensure that the needle is placed at the proper depth before injection. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 13: Histology of the lacrimal glands. Tissue sections of a normal inferior lacrimal gland with typical tubulo-alveolar structure (A) and following injection of Con A (B), showing marked lymphocytic infiltrate with effacement of structure. Similar inflammatory infiltrates are seen in the superior lacrimal glands. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Injection Method | TBUT, sec | Tear Osmolality, Osm/L | STT, mm |
| Baseline | Post-injection | Baseline | Post-injection | Baseline | Post-injection |
| mean ± SEM, % change |
| ILG without US guidance | 58.5 ± 1.5 | 44.5 ± 7.7 | 297 ± 4.9 | 300 ± 3.8 | 15.2 ± 0.9 | 12.9 ± 2.2 |
| %change | -23% | 1% | -15% |
| p=0.05 | p=0.36 | p=0.21 |
| US-guided ILG + PSLG | 59.4 ± 0.6 | 11.4 ± 4.2 | 296 ± 4.7 | 326 ± 3.7 | 15.1 ± 1.3 | 10.7 ± 1.8 |
| % change | -81% | 10% | -29% |
| p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.03 |
| US-guided ILG + PSLG + OSLG | 60 ± 0.0 | 6.2 ± 1.3 | 299 ± 2.9 | 309 ± 2.8 | 14.6 ± 0.9 | 9.9 ± 1.3 |
| % change | -90% | 3% | -32% |
| p<0.0001 | p<0.008 | p<0.002 |
| All values were measured on day 6 following a single injection of Con A into the glands listed. All comparisons were made to baseline. *ILG, inferior lacrimal gland; PSLG, palpebral portion of superior lacrimal gland; OSLG, orbital portion of superior lacrimal gland; US, ultrasound. |
Table 1: Effect of injection technique and number of injection sites on dry eye severity.
| Baseline | Day 6 | Day 13 | Day 21 |
| 1 injection | 2 injections | 3 injections |
| TBUT, sec | 58.5 ± 1.5 | 44.5 ± 7.7 | 29.2 ± 7.8 | 12.8 ± 3.9 |
| % change | -24% | -50% | -78% |
| p=0.17 | p=0.001 | p<0.0001 |
| TOsm, Osm/L | 297 ± 4.9 | 300 ± 3.9 | 308 ± 4.9 | 313 ± 2.7 |
| % change | 1% | 4% | 5% |
| p=0.36 | p=0.04 | p=0.003 |
| STT, mm | 15.2 ± 0.9 | 9.3 ± 1.6 | 12.9 ± 1.6 | 7.4 ± 1.1 |
| % change | -39% | -15% | -51% |
| p=0.17 | p=0.13 | p=0.008 |
| Comparisons were made to baseline. |
Table 2: Effect of repeated Con A injections into ILG on duration of DED.