In most eukaryotes, spindle microtubules must attach to a single region of each chromosome, termed as centromere. The kinetochore is a complex of proteins that are located at the centromere. Studying the timing of centromere and kinetochore protein’s movements and the structure of kinetochores and centromeres is important for understanding chromosome instability (CIN) and cancer progression. The key questions are how the chromosomal location and function of a centromere (i.e., centromere identity) are determined and how they participate in accurate chromosome segregation. In most species, the presence of a special nucleosome containing a specific histone-like protein called CENP-A defines the centromere identity. Therefore, it is proposed that CENP-A is the non-DNA indicator (epigenetic mark) of centromere identity. It is important to elucidate the mechanism of how CENP-A defines the centromere identity in humans.
The Holliday junction recognition protein (HJURP) is the CENP-A-specific chaperon which deposits CENP-A in centromeric nucleosomes1,2,3. We have previously reported that the CUL4A-RBX1-COPS8 E3 ligase is required for CENP-A ubiquitylation on lysine 124 (K124) and centromere localization4. Also, our results showed that the centromere recruitment of newly synthesized CENP-A requires pre-existing ubiquitylated CENP-A5. Thus, a model was provided suggesting that CENP-A ubiquitylation is inherited through dimerization between cell divisions.
In contrast to our findings and those of Yu et al., negative results regarding the CENP-A and its centromeric localization were recently published6. The article claimed that CENP-A modifications on lysine 124 (K124) are dispensable for the establishment, maintenance, and long-term function of human centromeres, based on their negative results showing that the mutation of K124R did not affect CENP-A centromere localization neither cell viability6. However, there is enough room for debate in their results and conclusions, and we have already described what problem there could be in their previous publication7. Attention should be paid that they fused proteins with CENP-A, which have much larger molecular weights than the size of endogenous CENP-A: e.g., they fused ~30 kDa enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) to ~16 kDa CENP-A and analyzed EYFP-CENP-A K124R fusion protein in their RPE-1 CENP-A-/F knockout system. K124 ubiquitin is not expected to bind directly to HJURP based on structural predictions4, however, addition of mono-ubiquitin is predicted to have an impact on protein conformation of CENP-A. The protein of CENP-A conformation can be changed by the presence of a large fusion protein, and this conformational change may mask the structural changes caused by the loss of ubiquitylation. We suggest that the fusion of large-sized protein induces ubiquitylation at a lysine other than K124 in EYFP-CENP-A K124R mutant and this ubiquitylation at another site inhibits/masks the original K124R single mutant phenotype. Evidence that ubiquitylation occurs at different lysine in the CENP-A K124R mutant protein with a large tag protein (EYFP) was reported in our previous publication8. It was found that EYFP tagging induces ubiquitination of another lysine site of EYFP-CENP-A K124R and that EYFP-CENP-A K124R mutant binds to HJURP. As a result, this ubiquitylation at another site inhibits/masks the original K124R single mutant phenotype, and both EYFP-CENP-A WT and K124R mutants showed centromere localization (we used and compared pBabe-EYFP-CENP-A WT and K124R mutant, together with pBabe-EYFP control.). The results demonstrated that Flag-tagged or untagged CENP-A K124R mutants are lethal but can be rescued by a monoubiquitin fusion, suggesting that CENP-A ubiquitylation is indispensable to cell viability.
In recent years, many studies have developed different assays to identify posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of CENP-A protein and other centromere-kinetochore proteins both in vivo and in vitro9,10,11. Analogous to the PTMs of histone proteins that are a major mechanism regulating the function of chromatin, PTMs of centromeric chromatin components are also involved in an essential mechanism to regulate the overall structure and function of centromeres. The majority of CENP-A PTM sites are specific to CENP-A-containing nucleosomes, although a few of them are conserved in histone H3, suggesting that modification of these residues contribute to the centromere-specific function. PTMs of CENP-A including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and ubiquitylation were previously reported9, suggesting that CENP-A is subjected to a variety of PTMs and their combinatorial arrays on its amino terminus and C-terminus histone-fold domain. The importance of CENP-A modifications in multiple functions was revealed by many groups including ours. These functions involve CENP-A deposition at centromeres, protein stability, and recruitment of the CCAN (constitutive centromere-associated network)9. However, limited studies and findings of CENP-A PTMs are preformed where comparisons are made with one of canonical histones that directly or indirectly regulate their function. Technical reports focusing on the methodology to identify these CENP-A PTMs are also limited.
Because CENP-A ubiquitylation is required for CENP-A deposition at the centromere12, inherited through dimerization between cell division5, and indispensable to cell viability8, the method to identify CENP-A ubiquitylation would be essential in future to study the functional activity, positioning, and structure of the centromere. Therefore, here we describe mass spectrometry analysis to identify ubiquitylation of EYFP-CENP-A K124R mutant suggesting that the EYFP tagging induces ubiquitylation at a different lysine in the CENP-A K124R mutant protein8. Protocols of other control assays and analyses (immunofluorescence analysis, colony outgrowth assay, and in vivo ubiquitylation assay) are also presented to discuss the outcome of major mass spectrometry analysis properly.