$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
These images represent the multiple steps required to successfully use trainable Weka segmentation to minimize the labor-intensive manual measurement of ecDNA in fluorescently stained FFPE kidney tissue from a mouse with induced anti-MPO GN. These steps are summarized in Figure 1 and Figure 2 with images taken directly from the Weka segmentation program, outlining every step in the analysis process. Measurements from this analysis is then shown in Figure 3 demonstrating the ability of the program to determine the different amounts of ecDNA deposited in the glomerulus, in control tissue, without induced anti MPO GN. Figure 4 demonstrates that the model for ecDNA can be adapted to identify ecDNA in kidney biopsy specimens from a control patient (Minimal Change Disease patients have minimal glomerular damage evident at a histological level) and compared to that of a kidney biopsy from a patient with MPO-AAV. Figure 5 demonstrates the translational capacity of this program to other stains within kidney tissue. We have used a representative sample from a mouse kidney with induced experimental anti-MPO GN to stain for NETs and ecMPO. The trainable Weka segmentation program is then used to identify both NETS and ecMPO within the same image. Figure 6 demonstrates there is no significant difference in the outcome of results in the amount of ecDNA quantification on the same data set analyzed by two independent users creating 2 different models designed to semi-quantitate ecDNA.

Figure 1: Images illustrating classification of nuclei, background and extracellular DNA within mouse kidney glomeruli from experimental MPO-ANCA GN using trainable Weka segmentation. (A) Demonstrates single channel images of DAPI to stain DNA (blue), β actin (green) to delineate glomerular area, and the composite file with a region of interest (ROI) indicating the glomerular area to be measured. (B) Classification of intact nuclei to develop the model (pink) and unclassified nuclei (blue). (C) Classification of what is considered to be background (green). (D) Classification of what is considered to be ecDNA (purple). (E) The model generated by trainable Weka segmentation showing nuclei in red, background in green and ecDNA area in purple. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Images demonstrating the supervised component of the model to reduce the inaccuracy. The Weka model generates the probability of recognizing each classifier in unclassified components. (A) Model generated classification of what intact nuclei is. (B) Model generated classification of what is considered background. (C) Model generation of what ecDNA is considered. (D) Illustrates the image of classified ecDNA unthresholded. (E) Shows the adjustment of the threshold to rule out any errors in what has been identified as ecDNA, identified ecDNA shown in red. (F) Threshold is applied to image and made into a binary image for particle analysis. (G) The glomerular ROI is superimposed on the image so only glomerular ecDNA is analyzed. (H) Shows the summary of results generated from the analysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Images illustrating classification of nuclei, background and extracellular DNA within mouse kidney glomeruli from a control mouse without induced experimental MPO-ANCA GN using trainable Weka segmentation. (A) Shows the original merged image with the glomerular region to be analyzed, the training and the trained model result (background green, nuclei red and ecDNA identified in purple. (B) Shows the model probabilities of identifying, nuclei, background and ecDNA. (C) Results of what the model classified and identified as ecDNA, displayed in arbitrary units. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Image illustrating trainable Weka segmentation is adaptable for the analysis of ecDNA in human kidney biopsies from a patient with minimal change disease and a patient with MPO-ANCA vasculitis. (A) Illustrates that minimal ecDNA is detected using trainable Weka segmentation intact nuclei (red), background (green) and ecDNA (purple). (B) Demonstrates considerable quantities of ecDNA in a patient kidney biopsy from a patient with MPO-ANCA vasculitis intact nuclei (red), background (green) and ecDNA purple. Results demonstrate that 8 particles of ecDNA were found within the glomerular region of a patient with MCD compared to a patient with active MPO ANCA vasculitis (180 particles). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Trainable Weka segmentation can used to identify NETS and ecMPO within the same image and model analysis, in mouse kidney tissue from experimental MPO-ANCA GN. (A) Demonstrates a glomerulus with NETs [co-localization of green (Citrullinate histone 3), red (MPO) DAPI (nuclei) and PAD4 (white)]. ecMPO is considered to be cell free. (B) Training for identification of the classifiers, Red (Intact nuclei), Green (background), Purple (NETs) and yellow (ecDNA)]. (C) The model trainable Weka segmentation uses to classify NETs and ecMPO, Red (Intact nuclei), Green (background), Purple (NETs) and yellow (ecDNA). (D) Particle analysis of what the model determined to be NETs. (E) Particle analysis of what the model determined to be ecMPO. (F) Results sheet from the particle analysis for both NETs and ecDNA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Comparison of 2 independent users in designing a model for the detection of ecDNA. (A) Original image showing the DAPI, Beta Actin and Merged images to be analyzed. (B) Comparison of training model, classifiers, thresholding and glomerular ROI between 2 independent users. The yellow arrow indicates that User 2 had to retrain the model to remove background. (C) Results generated showing the comparison of ecDNA count, total area, % area and perimeter, between 2 users. (D) Graph of results showing no significant difference between the number of ecDNA detected within glomeruli and % area from two independent investigators. Statistical analysis performed using Mann-Whitney U test with significance set at <0.05. Sample size is n=6. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.