Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove

Immunology and Infection

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published: June 18, 2020 doi: 10.3791/61180

Summary

Extracellular DNA (ecDNA) released during cell death is proinflammatory and contributes to inflammation. Measurement of ecDNA at the site of injury can determine the efficacy of therapeutic treatment in the target organ. This protocol describes the use of a machine learning tool to automate measurement of ecDNA in kidney tissue.

Abstract

Glomerular cell death is a pathological feature of myeloperoxidase anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis (MPO-AAV). Extracellular deoxyribonucleic acid (ecDNA) is released during different forms of cell death including apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and pyroptosis. Measurement of this cell death is time consuming with several different biomarkers required to identify the different biochemical forms of cell death. Measurement of ecDNA is generally conducted in serum and urine as a surrogate for renal damage, not in the actual target organ where the pathological injury occurs. The current difficulty in investigating ecDNA in the kidney is the lack of methods for formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) both experimentally and in archived human kidney biopsies. This protocol provides a summary of the steps required to stain for ecDNA in FFPE tissue (both human and murine), quench autofluorescence and measure the ecDNA in the resulting images using a machine learning tool from the publicly available open source ImageJ plugin trainable Weka segmentation. Trainable Weka segmentation is applied to ecDNA within the glomeruli where the program learns to classify ecDNA. This classifier is applied to subsequent acquired kidney images, reducing the need for manual annotations of each individual image. The adaptability of the trainable Weka segmentation is demonstrated further in kidney tissue from experimental murine anti-MPO glomerulonephritis (GN), to identify NETs and ecMPO, common pathological contributors to anti-MPO GN. This method provides objective analysis of ecDNA in kidney tissue that demonstrates clearly the efficacy in which the trainable Weka segmentation program can distinguish ecDNA between healthy normal kidney tissue and diseased kidney tissue. This protocol can easily be adapted to identify ecDNA, NETs and ecMPO in other organs.

Introduction

Myeloperoxidase anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis (MPO-AAV) is an autoimmune disease that results in renal failure from pathological glomerular injury with considerable cell death and release of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)1,2. DNA can activate the immune system by acting as a danger signal. Under normal healthy conditions, the nuclear location of DNA offers protection from exposure to the immune system. Self-DNA that is released extracellularly during either pathogenic processes or autoimmunity is seen by the immune system as a potent proinflammatory damage associated molecular self-protein (DAMP)3. Extra cellular DNA (ecDNA) is released from dying cells through several distinct mechanisms that are governed by distinct biochemical pathways, such as apoptosis, necroptosis neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETs), necrosis or pyroptosis4,5,6,7,8.

We describe herein methods to stain and measure ecDNA released from dying cells in sections of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) kidneys from experimental anti-MPO GN and kidney biopsies from patients with MPO-AAV9,10. Multiple methods exist for the detection of circulating double stranded DNA (dsDNA) and DNA complexes from both serum and urine and from in vitro assays11,12. These methods, although accurate in determining the amount of ecDNA, do not determine where the ecDNA is released anatomically. There are methods that describe specific measurement of ecDNA such as tunel for apoptosis and measurement of cell debris13,14. There is no method that describes measuring ecDNA culminated from all forms of cell death in FFPE kidneys where the pathological damage occurs. This is important to determine if experimental therapeutic treatments are clearing the ecDNA from the sites of pathological injury in the actual target organ.

The acquisition of multiple images from kidney samples creates a high volume of data that is analyzed commonly by one single user. This is labor intensive, time consuming and can be subject to unreliable reproducibility by other users, due to user bias. Trainable Weka segmentation is an open-source software plugin for ImageJ that uses cutting edge bioinformatic tools to classify pixels using machine learning algorithms15,16. This method is "trainable" whereby it learns from the user's classification of segments of pixels and applies the new learnt classification to other images. This method relies on common analysis tools within the ImageJ program that are used to "classify" each pixel in a segment as belonging to a specific "class". Once the program learns the "classifiers", they can be used to identify other similar classified segments within the same image. This model is then saved and applied to other sets of images within the same experiment.

Current obstacles to determining ecDNA in situ in kidney sections is the endogenous autofluorescence from fixation in formalin and the labor-intensive analysis of the images. We describe here how to quench this autofluorescence, detect ecDNA, and use supervised machine learning for high throughput measurement of ecDNA. We have previously published the measurement of NETs and extracellular MPO (ecMPO) using a macro in ImageJ, we now demonstrate semi automation of these methods using supervised machine learning1. We demonstrate the adaptability of the machine learning tool, to classify an alternative stain for NETs and ecMPO within the same image. These staining methods described here for detecting ecDNA, NETs and ecMPO can be translated to other solid organs and diseases where ecDNA, NETS and ecMPO plays a role in perpetuating disease such as rheumatoid arthritis and lupus17,18.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

This method enables detection of pan ecDNA from all forms of cell death. The same method and antibodies are used for human kidney biopsy tissue (from step 4). All animal and human subjects had Ethics approval from Monash University, and Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

1. Staining for ecDNA with DAPI and β-Actin

  1. Induce a 20 day model of anti-myeloperoxidase glomerulonephritis (anti-MPO-GN) in 8-10 week old C57/Bl6 mice, with controls9.
    1. Euthanize mice humanely using a CO2 chamber.
    2. Remove kidneys by making an anterior midline incision through the skin with scissors, and then carefully cut the peritoneum and pin back on a dissection board. Using forceps push aside the anterior renal fascia and parietal peritoneum and cut the kidney free by severing the ureter and blood vessels (renal artery and vein) at the renal pelvis. Remove with forceps and cut kidneys in half (sagittal plane) with a size 22 scalpel.
    3. Place kidney in fixative (4% buffered formalin) for 16 hours at room temperature (RT). Remove and soak fixed kidney in 30% ethanol for 24 hours prior to processing.
  2. Process kidneys using a standard 6-hour cycle:
    70% ethanol for 15 min
    90% ethanol for 15 min
    100% ethanol for 15 min
    100% ethanol for 20 min
    100% ethanol for 25 min
    100% ethanol for 30 min
    Xylene for 20 min
    Xylene for 30 min
    Xylene for 40 min
    Wax for 30 min
    Wax for 35 min
    Wax for 40 min
    NOTE: This is important as kidneys should not be subjected to prolonged exposure to heat in the wax, as it can destroy antigens of interest.
  3. Cut 3 µm sections on a microtome and mount on commercially available glass microscope slides coated with a positive charge. Allow to dry overnight.
  4. Put glass slides into a slide rack into a 60 °C oven for 60 min.
    NOTE: Steps 1.3 and 1.4 are crucial to ensure sections do not float off during the antigen retrieval step.
  5. Immerse slides in two changes of solvent (xylene or substitute) for 40 min each, in a fume hood.
  6. Rehydrate slides in 100% ethanol, 100% ethanol, 70% ethanol for 5 min each. Wash for 5 min in tap water.
  7. Place a hot plate in a fume hood and preboil antigen retrieval solution (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA pH 9.0) in a pressure cooker. As soon as the antigen retrieval solution starts to boil, place the slides in the pot horizontally using a pair of tongs and lock the lid. Boil on high (equivalent to 15 psi or 103 kPa) for 10 min.
    NOTE: This step is crucial as it retrieves the antigen of interest by unmasking the antigen epitope (cross linked via formalin fixation) to allow epitope antibody specific binding the subsequent staining will not work without it.
  8. Remove pressure cooker from heat and remove lid immediately by running cold tap on top of the lid in a sink. Leave slides to equilibrate for 20 min in the antigen retrieval solution.
  9. Wash slides twice for 5 min in 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) on an orbital shaker.
  10. Use a hydrophobic pen to draw circles around the kidney tissue being careful not to let any tissue dry out in this time.
  11. Block tissue in 10% chicken sera in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) for 30 min, 60 µL per section. Do not wash after this step but carefully remove the blocking solution using a 60 µL pipette, do not let the sections dry out.
  12. Apply primary antibody cocktail for β-actin diluted 1/1000 in 1% BSA/PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M), 60 µL per section and incubate overnight in a humidity chamber at 4 °C.
  13. Wash slides twice for 5 min in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) on an orbital shaker.
  14. Apply secondary antibody, chicken anti rabbit 488 (1/200), 60 µL per section diluted in 1%BSA/PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) for 40 min at RT.
  15. Wash the slides twice for 5 min in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) on an orbital shaker.
  16. Immerse the slides in 0.3% Sudan Black in 70% ethanol for 30 min in a Coplin jar.
    NOTE: This step is important as it quenches the autofluorescence caused by formalin fixation.
  17. Wash the slides in tap water to remove precipitate and then immerse in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) for 10 min to prevent further Sudan Black precipitate from forming.
  18. Mount slides onto confocal glass coverslips using three 60 µL drops of mounting solution with DAPI and seal the coverslips with nail polish by applying around the perimeter of the coverslip.
  19. Allow slides to cure for 24 hours at RT (to allow DAPI to penetrate) and then store at 4 °C protected from light.
    NOTE: Important to keep in the dark to prevent fading of fluorescent probes.
  20. Image slides using a confocal laser scanning head attached to a microscope. Excite slides with the 405 laser for DAPI and the 488 Laser for Beta Actin. Capture single plane 1024 x1024 pixel images by using line-sequential capturing and 4-line averaging, which is essential for detecting ecDNA. 40x 1.0 NA oil objective is used.
    1. Image a minimum of 20 glomeruli per sample. Save images as ND2 files.

2. DAPI and β-Actin analysis

  1. Install ImageJ: https://imagej.net/Fiji/Downloads.
  2. Check that the trainable Weka segmentation is available under Plugins | Segmentation | Trainable Weka Segmentation.
  3. Drop the image onto the ImageJ tool bar. Click Image | Color | Split Channels. One image with DAPI in blue staining all nuclei will appear and 1 image with β-actin in green will appear, which delineates the glomeruli.
    1. Create a merged file of the single images to draw a region of interest (ROI) for the glomerulus by clicking on Color | Merge Channels. A pop-up box will ask to assign a color to each channel. After assigning each channel a color, tick the Create Composite box and the Keep Source Images box and click Ok. A merged composite image will appear.
    2. Using the β-actin staining as a guide, draw a ROI around the glomerular tuft. Keep this image aside to use the ROI at the end of this protocol.
  4. Perform a Gaussian blur on the single blue DAPI image. Click Process | Filters | Gaussian Blur, put in 1-2.00. The image will now look a little blurred, but nuclei are now smooth and background softened.
    NOTE: This step is preformed to remove noise to clean up the image from artifacts that may prevent relevant detection of image attributes to be analyzed.
  5. Click on Plugins | Segmentation | Trainable Weka Segmentation.
  6. Using the line tool on the tool bar in ImageJ, first trace around intact nuclei using the free hand tools (there are line, circular, and square tool options available to choose from) and then add to Add Class 1 box.
  7. Using the line tool on the tool bar in ImageJ delineate areas of background to Class 2 box.
  8. Click on the Create New Class button label on the Weka segmentation window and label "ecDNA." Use the line tool (from ImageJ tool bar) to delineate extranuclear DNA stained by DAPI.
  9. Click on the Train Classifier button in the training menu in the trainable Weka segmentation window.
    NOTE: The STOP button will appear in place of the Train Classifier button and remain until the training has finished. Do not to click on this button during training as the process will be interrupted.
  10. Click on Create Result button to create an image with all the classified components, consisting of intact nuclei, the background and identified ecDNA.
  11. Click on the Get Probability button. Toggle the mouse to give a black and white image of all the classes with the object of selection highlighted in white.
  12. Duplicate this image by clicking on Image | Duplicate.
  13. Toggle to the screen using the mouse button that contains the ecDNA. Apply a threshold to get only what has been identified as ecDNA. Click Apply when the threshold is sufficient.
  14. If after thresholding, there are more areas of DNA that are not ecDNA, return to the original trained image, add more classifiers, and repeat steps 2.1-2.13.
  15. Click Image | Image Adjust | Make Binary. Copy the glomerular ROI made in step 2.3 and click Ctrl+Shift+E. Activate the Weka window by Edit | Selections | Restore, which restores the selection. Click Analyze Particles, which will measure only the ecDNA particles within the glomerulus.
    NOTE: A result sheet is computed with the count of particles, the area, averages pixels and the percentage of the glomerulus containing ecDNA. These results can be exported into a spreadsheet and saved, for later statistical analysis.
  16. Save the classifier as ecDNA.classifier by clicking Save Classifier from the options menu into the ImageJ app on the desktop. Then click Save Data from the options menu and save as ecDNA.arff into the ImageJ folder. The ROI will have to be manually added each time as glomerulus size and shape will change, however the program has learnt what ecDNA is.
  17. To reapply the model to subsequent images, repeat steps 2.1-2.5 with a new image. Click Load Classifier from the option menu and then ecDNAmodel.classifier in the ImageJ folder from step 2.16. The log menu will pop up and run the model.
  18. Once the model has run, click on Load Data in the options menu and select the ecDNA.arff file saved in the ImageJ folder from step 2.16. Click on Create Result. If the resulting image has failed to pick up all the nuclei, background or ecDNA click on re-train classifier and add more classifiers and save the new model. Complete the analysis process by repeating steps 2.9-2.16.
    NOTE: Several images can be used to generate the final model used to detect ecDNA. This is achieved by applying the model to subsequent images, adding more classifiers and saving the new model and data into the ImageJ folder. This can be particularly important when different samples have higher background. The Weka Segmentation program is also compatible with ImageJ macro language which enables many of the commands to be macro recordable to automate some of the steps.

3. Measurement of neutrophil extracellular traps and ecMPO

NOTE: This method identifies NETs by colocalization of extracellular DNA, Citrullinated Histones peptidyl arginase 4 (PAD4) and MPO.

  1. Induce a 20 day model of anti-myeloperoxidase glomerulonephritis (anti-MPO-GN) in 8-10 week old C57/Bl6 mice, with controls9.
    1. Euthanize mice humanely using a CO2 chamber.
    2. Remove kidneys by making an anterior midline incision through the skin with scissors, and then carefully cut the peritoneum and pin back on a dissection board. Using forceps push aside the anterior renal fascia and parietal peritoneum and cut the kidney free by severing the ureter and blood vessels (renal artery and vein) at the renal pelvis. Remove with forceps and cut kidneys in half (sagittal plane) with a size 22 scalpel.
    3. Place kidney in fixative (4% buffered formalin) for 16 hours at room temperature (RT). Remove and soak fixed kidney in 30% ethanol for 24 hours prior to processing.
  2. Process kidneys using a standard 6-hour cycle:
    70% ethanol for 15 min
    90% ethanol for 15 min
    100% ethanol for 15 min
    100% ethanol for 20 min
    100% ethanol for 25 min
    100% ethanol for 30 min
    Xylene for 20 min
    Xylene for 30 min
    Xylene for 40 min
    Wax for 30 min
    Wax for 35 min
    Wax for 40 min
    NOTE: Kidneys should not be subjected to prolonged exposure to heat in the wax, as it can destroy antigens of interest.
  3. Cut 3 µm sections on a microtome and mount on commercially available glass microscope slides coated with a positive charge. Allow to dry overnight
  4. Put glass slides into a slide rack into a 60 °C oven for 60 min.
    NOTE: Steps 3.3-3.4 are crucial to ensure sections do not float off during the antigen retrieval step.
  5. Immerse slides in two changes of solvent (xylene or substitute) for 40 min each, in a fume hood.
  6. Rehydrate slides in 100% ethanol, 100% ethanol, 70% ethanol for 5 min each.
  7. Wash for 5 min in tap water.
  8. Place a hot plate in a fume hood and preboil antigen retrieval solution (10 mM Tris-1 mM EDTA pH 9.0) in a pressure cooker. As soon as the antigen retrieval solution starts to boil place the slides in the pot horizontally using a pair of tongs and lock the lid. Boil on high (equivalent to 15 psi or 103 kPa) for 10 min.
    NOTE: This step retrieves the antigen of interest by unmasking the antigen epitope (cross linked via formalin fixation) to allow epitope antibody specific binding the subsequent staining will not work without this step.
  9. Remove the pressure cooker from heat and remove the lid immediately by running cold tap on top of the lid in a sink. Leave slides to equilibrate for 20 min in the antigen retrieval solution.
  10. Wash slides twice for 5 min in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) on an orbital shaker.
  11. Use a hydrophobic pen to draw circles around the kidney tissue being careful not to let any tissue dry out in this time.
  12. Block tissue in 10% chicken sera in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) for 30 min, 60 µL per section. Do not wash after this step but carefully remove the blocking solution using a 60 µL pipette. Do not let the sections dry out.
  13. Make a cocktail of the primary antibodies diluted in 1%BSA/PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) in 1 tube. Apply 60 µL per kidney sections. The concentration of the primary antibodies are as follows:
    Rabbit anti human/mouse H3Cit 1/100
    Mouse anti human/mouse PAD4 1/50
    Goat anti human/mouse MPO 1/200
  14. Incubate overnight at 4 °C in a humidity chamber.
  15. Wash slides twice for 5 min in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) on an orbital shaker.
  16. Make a cocktail of the secondary antibodies in 1 tube. Secondary antibodies are applied in 1% BSA/PBS, 60 µL per section as follows:
    Chicken anti rabbit 488 1/200.
    Chicken anti mouse 647 1/200.
    Chicken anti goat 594 1/200.
  17. Incubate at RT for 40 min.
  18. Wash slides twice for 5 min in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) on an orbital shaker.
  19. Apply secondary antibody 1:200 in 1%BSA/PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) for 40 min at RT 60 µL per section.
  20. Wash slides twice for 5 min in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) on an orbital shaker.
  21. Immerse slides in 0.3% Sudan Black in 70% ethanol for 30 min.
  22. Wash slides in tap water to remove precipitate and then immerse in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.01 M) for 10 min to prevent further Sudan Black precipitate from forming.
  23. Mount slides onto confocal glass coverslips using three 60 µL drops of mounting solution with DAPI. Seal the coverslips with nail polish by applying around the perimeter of the coverslip.
  24. Allow slides to cure for 24 hours at RT (to allow DAPI to penetrate) and then store at 4 °C protected from light. Keep in the dark to prevent fading of fluorescent probes.
  25. Image slides using a confocal laser scanning head attached to a microscope. Excite slides with the 405 laser for DAPI and the 488 Laser for H3Cit, 561 for MPO, and 647 for PAD4. Capture single plane 1024x1024 pixel images by using line-sequential capturing and 4-line averaging which is essential for detecting ecDNA. Use a 40x 1.0 NA oil objective. Image a minimum of 20 glomeruli per sample. Save images as ND2 files.

4. Neutrophil extracellular traps and ecMPO Analysis

  1. Install ImageJ: https://imagej.net/Fiji/Downloads.
  2. Check that the trainable Weka segmentation is available under Plugins | Segmentation | Trainable Weka Segmentation.
  3. Drop the image into ImageJ. Click Image | Color | Split Channels. One image with DAPI in blue staining all nuclei will appear, one image with H3Cit in green, one image with MPO in red, and one image with PAD4 in white will appear.
    1. Create a merged file of the single images to draw a ROI for the glomerulus by clicking on Color | Merge Channels. A pop-up box will ask to assign a color to each channel. After assigning each channel a color, tick the Create Composite box and the Keep Source Images box and click Ok. A merged image appears. Unlike the protocol for ecDNA previously we will use the composite image to perform the rest of the steps.
  4. Perform a Gaussian blur on the composite image. This allows smoothing out of the nuclei. Click Process | Filters | Gaussian Blur, put in 1.00-2.00. The image will now look a little blurred but nuclei are now smooth and background softened.
    NOTE: This step is preformed to remove noise to clean up the image from artifacts that may prevent relevant detection of image attributes to be analyzed.
  5. Click on Plugins | Segmentation | Trainable Weka Segmentation. A whole new window will appear with the image to be analyzed and Weka segmentation specific menu tools.
  6. Using the line tool on the tool bar (in ImageJ), first trace around intact nuclei not positive for all 4 NET components (MPO, PAD4, DAPI and H3Cit) using the free hand tool and then add to the Add Class 1 box.
  7. Using the line tool on the ImageJ tool bar delineate areas of background to the Class 2 box.
  8. Click on the Create New Class button label in the label menu and label "NETs". Use the line tool to delineate NETS identified as co-localization DAPI (blue), MPO (red), PAD4 (white) and citrullinated histones (green).
  9. Click on the Create New Class button label in the label menu and label "ecMPO". Use the line tool to delineate MPO (red) that is cell free.
  10. Click on the Train Classifier button in the training menu in the Trainable Weka Segmentation window.
    NOTE: The STOP button will appear in place of the Train Classifier button and remain until the training has finished. Do not to click on this button during training and the process will be interrupted.
  11. Click on Create Result button in the training menu and an image is created with all the classified components, consisting of intact nuclei, the background and what was identified as ecMPO.
  12. Click on the Get Probability button in the training menu. Toggle the mouse to give a black and white image of all the classes with the object of selection highlighted in white.
  13. Duplicate both the NET probability and the ecMPO probability image by clicking on Image | Duplicate.
  14. Toggle to the screen using the mouse button that contains NETs. Apply a threshold to ensure only highlighting of identified NETs. On the ImageJ menu tool bar, click Image | Adjust | Threshold. Move the sliding toggle bars until on the NET components are highlighted. Click Apply when satisfied with the threshold. Repeat the same steps for ecMPO.
  15. If after thresholding there are still detecting areas of ecMPO or NETs, go back to the original trained image and add more classifiers and reapply steps 4.1-4.14.
  16. Click Image | Image Adjust | Make Binary. Copy the glomerular ROI made in step 4.3, click Ctrl+Shift+E. Activate Weka window by Edit | Selections | Restore, which restores the selection. Click Analyze Particles to measure only the NET particles within the glomerulus.
  17. Toggle to the screen using the mouse button that contains ecMPO. Apply a threshold to ensure that only identified ecMPO are obtained. Click Apply when satisfied with the threshold. Repeat step 4.16 above.
    NOTE: A result sheet is computed with the Count of particles, the area, averages pixels and the percentage of the glomerulus containing both NETs and ecMPO. These results can then be put into a spreadsheet and saved, for later statistical analysis.
  18. Save the classifier as NETs.classifier by clicking Save Classifier from the options menu and save file into the ImageJ app on the desktop (ImageJ folder). Then click Save Data from the options menu and save as NETs.arff file. The glomerular ROI will have to be manually added each time as glomerulus size and shape will change, but the program has learnt what both NETs and ecMPO are.
  19. To reapply the model to subsequent images, repeat steps 4.1-4.5 with a new image. Click Load Classifier from the option menu. Click on Nets.classifier in the ImageJ folder. The log menu will pop up and run model, once the model has run click on Load Data in the options menu and select the NETs.arff file.
    1. Click on Create Result. If the resulting image has failed to pick up all the nuclei, background or ecDNA click on re-train classifier and add more classifiers and save the new model. Complete the analysis process by repeating steps 4.11-4.19.
      NOTE: Several images can be used to generate the final model used to detect ecDNA, ecMPO and NETs. This is achieved by applying the model to subsequent images, adding more classifiers and saving the new model and data into the ImageJ folder. This can be particularly important when different samples have higher background. The Weka Segmentation program is compatible with ImageJ macro language which enables many of the commands to be macro recordable to automate some of the steps.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

These images represent the multiple steps required to successfully use trainable Weka segmentation to minimize the labor-intensive manual measurement of ecDNA in fluorescently stained FFPE kidney tissue from a mouse with induced anti-MPO GN. These steps are summarized in Figure 1 and Figure 2 with images taken directly from the Weka segmentation program, outlining every step in the analysis process. Measurements from this analysis is then shown in Figure 3 demonstrating the ability of the program to determine the different amounts of ecDNA deposited in the glomerulus, in control tissue, without induced anti MPO GN. Figure 4 demonstrates that the model for ecDNA can be adapted to identify ecDNA in kidney biopsy specimens from a control patient (Minimal Change Disease patients have minimal glomerular damage evident at a histological level) and compared to that of a kidney biopsy from a patient with MPO-AAV. Figure 5 demonstrates the translational capacity of this program to other stains within kidney tissue. We have used a representative sample from a mouse kidney with induced experimental anti-MPO GN to stain for NETs and ecMPO. The trainable Weka segmentation program is then used to identify both NETS and ecMPO within the same image. Figure 6 demonstrates there is no significant difference in the outcome of results in the amount of ecDNA quantification on the same data set analyzed by two independent users creating 2 different models designed to semi-quantitate ecDNA.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Images illustrating classification of nuclei, background and extracellular DNA within mouse kidney glomeruli from experimental MPO-ANCA GN using trainable Weka segmentation. (A) Demonstrates single channel images of DAPI to stain DNA (blue), β actin (green) to delineate glomerular area, and the composite file with a region of interest (ROI) indicating the glomerular area to be measured. (B) Classification of intact nuclei to develop the model (pink) and unclassified nuclei (blue). (C) Classification of what is considered to be background (green). (D) Classification of what is considered to be ecDNA (purple). (E) The model generated by trainable Weka segmentation showing nuclei in red, background in green and ecDNA area in purple. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Images demonstrating the supervised component of the model to reduce the inaccuracy. The Weka model generates the probability of recognizing each classifier in unclassified components. (A) Model generated classification of what intact nuclei is. (B) Model generated classification of what is considered background. (C) Model generation of what ecDNA is considered. (D) Illustrates the image of classified ecDNA unthresholded. (E) Shows the adjustment of the threshold to rule out any errors in what has been identified as ecDNA, identified ecDNA shown in red. (F) Threshold is applied to image and made into a binary image for particle analysis. (G) The glomerular ROI is superimposed on the image so only glomerular ecDNA is analyzed. (H) Shows the summary of results generated from the analysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Images illustrating classification of nuclei, background and extracellular DNA within mouse kidney glomeruli from a control mouse without induced experimental MPO-ANCA GN using trainable Weka segmentation. (A) Shows the original merged image with the glomerular region to be analyzed, the training and the trained model result (background green, nuclei red and ecDNA identified in purple. (B) Shows the model probabilities of identifying, nuclei, background and ecDNA. (C) Results of what the model classified and identified as ecDNA, displayed in arbitrary units. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Image illustrating trainable Weka segmentation is adaptable for the analysis of ecDNA in human kidney biopsies from a patient with minimal change disease and a patient with MPO-ANCA vasculitis. (A) Illustrates that minimal ecDNA is detected using trainable Weka segmentation intact nuclei (red), background (green) and ecDNA (purple). (B) Demonstrates considerable quantities of ecDNA in a patient kidney biopsy from a patient with MPO-ANCA vasculitis intact nuclei (red), background (green) and ecDNA purple. Results demonstrate that 8 particles of ecDNA were found within the glomerular region of a patient with MCD compared to a patient with active MPO ANCA vasculitis (180 particles). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Trainable Weka segmentation can used to identify NETS and ecMPO within the same image and model analysis, in mouse kidney tissue from experimental MPO-ANCA GN. (A) Demonstrates a glomerulus with NETs [co-localization of green (Citrullinate histone 3), red (MPO) DAPI (nuclei) and PAD4 (white)]. ecMPO is considered to be cell free. (B) Training for identification of the classifiers, Red (Intact nuclei), Green (background), Purple (NETs) and yellow (ecDNA)]. (C) The model trainable Weka segmentation uses to classify NETs and ecMPO, Red (Intact nuclei), Green (background), Purple (NETs) and yellow (ecDNA). (D) Particle analysis of what the model determined to be NETs. (E) Particle analysis of what the model determined to be ecMPO. (F) Results sheet from the particle analysis for both NETs and ecDNA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Comparison of 2 independent users in designing a model for the detection of ecDNA. (A) Original image showing the DAPI, Beta Actin and Merged images to be analyzed. (B) Comparison of training model, classifiers, thresholding and glomerular ROI between 2 independent users. The yellow arrow indicates that User 2 had to retrain the model to remove background. (C) Results generated showing the comparison of ecDNA count, total area, % area and perimeter, between 2 users. (D) Graph of results showing no significant difference between the number of ecDNA detected within glomeruli and % area from two independent investigators. Statistical analysis performed using Mann-Whitney U test with significance set at <0.05. Sample size is n=6. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

Multiple protocols exist that measure proinflammatory markers in the serum and urine of both patients and mouse models of glomerulonephritis. This described protocol allows analysis of the products of cell death (ecDNA, NETs and ecMPO) within the glomerulus directly. The most crucial steps in this protocol is the tissue preparation and imaging. The major restricting element of using a fluorescent staining method for analysis is the tissue autofluorescence. Formalin fixed paraffin tissue is subject to autofluorescence that can obscure specific fluorescent staining. The final step in the staining method where slides are immersed in Sudan black, attenuates autofluorescence of the tissue, and allows the illumination of the antibody specific staining through reduction in signal to noise ratio19. The imaging of the tissue must be performed with at least 40x oil magnification to be able to detect smaller fragments of ecDNA and MPO. When imaging is acquired, it is crucial that it is done in a line sequential manner to ensure no bleed through of fluorescence of one marker to another.

An advantage of the protocol for analysis is that it is available in open access through ImageJ for anyone to access16. We have demonstrated herein that the method can be easily adapted to measure different fluorescent markers within kidney tissue. Once the model in trainable Weka segmentation has been determined it can be applied to subsequent images with no bias and in the exact same manner each image has been analyzed. The supervised nature of the analysis allows any error in segmentation to be adjusted through the additional steps of thresholding the "trained" images, or retraining the program and adding more classifiers. The advantage of this program is that two different users will get similar result using the same model, provided they accurately delineate the glomerular tuft. The biggest inaccuracy in reproducibility by two different end users is created by the different manner in which people trace around the glomerular tuft. For example, if one person draws a rough circle around the glomerular tuft and another user carefully draws around the outermost capillary loops the area being examined will differ (as demonstrated in the results). Therefore, it is essential that both users are trained to identify the glomerular tuft in an identical manner. The practical application of this program would be for two users to design the model together on multiple images to build a robust model to be applied to further data sets. The more images that are used to train the classifiers the more accurate the model will be.

Limitations of this protocol would be measurement of fragments of ecDNA smaller than what the confocal microscope can detect. This could be overcome with the use of capturing images using super resolution microscopy methods and applying the trainable Weka segmentation to those images. The supervised component of the machine learning adds extra steps and reduces the ability to batch process large sets of images. However, as we demonstrated within the results unsupervised models have reduced accuracy and introducing the supervised component reduced inaccuracy significantly.

We have previously published that in addition to neutrophils producing extracellular traps, monocytes/macrophages were also observed to produce extracellular traps (termed METs) in human ANCA vasculitis, but in smaller proportions1. The current methods described herein do not distinguish, between extracellular traps produced by neutrophils or monocytes/macrophages. This is difficult to achieve as most confocal microscopes are limited by the number of lasers. Identification of NETs requires 4 different lasers therefore limiting the number of cell markers able to be processed via standard confocal imaging. If the MPO positive cell of origin is required a second serial section can be stained with either a neutrophil or macrophage/monocyte marker, to identify the cell type producing the extracellular trap.

Pathological features of MPO-ANCA vasculitis include the deposition of ecDNA, NETS and ecMPO within the glomeruli of the kidney20. Therapeutically targeting DNA within NETs and ecMPO as well as measuring them in human biopsies as markers of disease has been the subject of recent studies1,20,21,22. The significance of these methods in this field is accurately determining the relative proportion of ecDNA, NETs and ecMPO within the target organ, in a reproducible, less time-consuming manner. In conclusion we have demonstrated a supervised machine learning tool trainable Weka segmentation to semi automate the analysis of large data sets of acquired images for ecDNA, NETs and ecMPO. The use of this tool will reduce image analysis time considerably and the techniques can be easily adapted to other stains in other organs.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Monash Micro Imaging for the use of Nikon C1 upright confocal laser scanning microscope and the Monash Histology Platform for the processing of kidney tissue.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Bovine Serum Albumin SIGMA A2153 5% and 1% solutions are made up in PBS, can be made in bulk and frozen- discard once thawed.
Chicken anti Goat IgG (H+L) cross absorbed antibody Alexa Fluor 594 ThermoFisher Scientific A-21468 Spin in mini centrifuge for 1 minute prior to use to avoid any free conjugate in your antibody cocktail
Chicken anti mouse IgG (H+L) cross absorbed antibody, Alex Fluor 647 ThermoFisher Scientific A-121468 Spin in mini centrifuge for 1 minute prior to use to avoid any free conjugate in your antibody cocktail
Chicken anti rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross absorbed antibody Alexa Fluor 488 ThermoFisher Scientific A-21441 Spin in mini centrifuge for 1 minute prior to use to avoid any free conjugate in your antibody cocktail
Chicken sera SIGMA C5405 Made up in 1%BSA/PBS
Coverslips 24 x60 mm Azerscientific ES0107222 #1.5 This is not standard thickness- designed for use in confocal microscopy
EDTA 10mM SIGMA E6758 Add TRIS and EDTA together in distilled water and pH to 9, for antigen retrieval, can be made up in a 10x Solution
Ethanol 30%, 70% and 100% Chem Supply UN1170 Supplied as 100% undenatured ethanol- dilute to 30% and 70% using distilled water
Formaldehyde, 4% (10% Neutral buffered Formalin) TRAJAN NBF-500 Kidney is put into a 5ml tube containing 3ml of formalin for 16 hours at RT, formalin should be used in a fume hood
Glass histology slides- Ultra Super Frost, Menzel Glaze, 25x75 x1.0mm TRAJAN J3800AM4 Using positive charged coated slides is essential. We do not recommend using poly-L-lysine for coating slides as tissue dislodges from slides during the antigen retrieval step
Goat anti human/mouse MPO antibody R&D AF3667 Aliquot and freeze at minus 80 degrees upon arrival
Histosol Clini Pure CPL HISTOSOL 08 Used neat, in 200ml staining rack containers, use in a fume hood
Hydrophobic pen VECTOR Labs H-400 Use to draw circle around kidney tissue
Mouse anti human/mouse Peptidyl arginase 4 (PAD4) ABCAM ab128086 Aliquot and freeze at minus 80 degrees upon arrival
Nikon C1 confocal scanning laser head attached to Nikon Ti-E inverted Microscope Coherent Scientific Aliquot and freeze at minus 80 degrees upon arrival
Phosphate Buffered Saline SIGMA P38135 0.01M PB/0.09% NaCl Make up 5L at a time
Pressure Cooker 6L Tefal secure 5 Neo stainless Tefal GSA-P2530738 Purchased at local homeware store
Prolong Gold DAPI Life Technologies P36962 Apply drops directly to coverslip
Rabbit anti human/mouse Beta Actin antibody ABCAM ab8227 Aliquot and freeze at minus 80 degrees upon arrival
Rabbit anti human/mouse H3Cit antibody ABCAM ab5103 Aliquot and freeze at minus 80 degrees upon arrival
Staining rack 24 slides ProScitech H4465 Staining rack chosen has to be able to withstand boiling under pressure and incubation in 60 degree oven
Sudan Black B SIGMA 199664 0.3% Add 3g to a 1L bottle in 70% Ethanol, filter and protect from the light- stable for 6 months at room temperature
Tris 10mM SIGMA T4661 Add TRIS and EDTA together in distilled water and pH to 9, for antigen retrieval, can be made up in a 10x solution
Xylene Trajan XL005/20 Must be use used in a fume hood

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. O'Sullivan, K. M., et al. Renal participation of myeloperoxidase in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis. Kidney International. 88 (5), 1030-1046 (2015).
  2. Jennette, J. C., Falk, R. J., Hu, P., Xiao, H. Pathogenesis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated small-vessel vasculitis. Annual Review of Pathology. 8, 139-160 (2013).
  3. Jorgensen, I., Rayamajhi, M., Miao, E. A. Programmed cell death as a defence against infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 17 (3), 151-164 (2017).
  4. Brinkmann, V., et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 303 (5663), 1532-1535 (2004).
  5. Wyllie, A. H., Kerr, J. F., Currie, A. R. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. International Review of Cytology. 68, 251-306 (1980).
  6. Fiers, W., Beyaert, R., Declercq, W., Vandenabeele, P. More than one way to die: apoptosis, necrosis and reactive oxygen damage. Oncogene. 18 (54), 7719-7730 (1999).
  7. Pasparakis, M., Vandenabeele, P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature. 517 (7534), 311-320 (2015).
  8. Fink, S. L., Cookson, B. T. Caspase-1-dependent pore formation during pyroptosis leads to osmotic lysis of infected host macrophages. Cellular Microbiology. 8 (11), 1812-1825 (2006).
  9. Ooi, J. D., Gan, P. Y., Odobasic, D., Holdsworth, S. R., Kitching, A. R. T cell mediated autoimmune glomerular disease in mice. Current Protocols in Immunology. 107, 15.27.11-15.27.19 (2014).
  10. Ruth, A. J., et al. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and effector CD4+ cells play nonredundant roles in anti-myeloperoxidase crescentic glomerulonephritis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 17 (7), 1940-1949 (2006).
  11. Nagler, M., Insam, H., Pietramellara, G., Ascher-Jenull, J. Extracellular DNA in natural environments: features, relevance and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 102 (15), 6343-6356 (2018).
  12. Burnham, P., et al. Urinary cell-free DNA is a versatile analyte for monitoring infections of the urinary tract. Nature Communications. 9 (1), 2412 (2018).
  13. Gobe, G. Identification of apoptosis in kidney tissue sections. Methods in Molecular Biology. 466, 175-192 (2009).
  14. Olander, M., Handin, N., Artursson, P. Image-Based Quantification of Cell Debris as a Measure of Apoptosis. Analytical Chemistry. 91 (9), 5548-5552 (2019).
  15. Arganda-Carreras, I., et al. Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 33 (15), 2424-2426 (2017).
  16. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 9 (7), 676-682 (2012).
  17. Apel, F., Zychlinsky, A., Kenny, E. F. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in rheumatic diseases. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 14 (8), 467-475 (2018).
  18. Chapman, E. A., et al. Caught in a Trap? Proteomic Analysis of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Frontiers in Immunology. 10, 423 (2019).
  19. Oliveira, V. C., et al. Sudan Black B treatment reduces autofluorescence and improves resolution of in situ hybridization specific fluorescent signals of brain sections. Histology & Histopathology. 25 (8), 1017-1024 (2010).
  20. Kessenbrock, K., et al. Netting neutrophils in autoimmune small-vessel vasculitis. Nature Medicine. 15 (6), 623-625 (2009).
  21. Schreiber, A., et al. Necroptosis controls NET generation and mediates complement activation, endothelial damage, and autoimmune vasculitis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (45), E9618-E9625 (2017).
  22. Antonelou, M., Perea Ortega, L., Harvey, J., Salama, A. D. Anti-myeloperoxidase antibody positivity in patients without primary systemic vasculitis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 37 (2), 86-89 (2019).

Tags

Supervised Machine Learning Semi-quantification Extracellular DNA Glomerulonephritis Pathological Injury Visualization Surrogate Marker Autoimmune Diseases Rheumatoid Arthritis Lupus Kidney Histology Accurate Detection Extracellular DNA Staining Heat Treatment Solvent Immersion Rehydration Antigen Retrieval Solution
Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

O'Sullivan, K. M., Creed, S., Gan,More

O'Sullivan, K. M., Creed, S., Gan, P. Y., Holdsworth, S. R. Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis. J. Vis. Exp. (160), e61180, doi:10.3791/61180 (2020).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter