$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In this protocol, we describe the isolation of the three major glial cell subpopulations from mouse CNS: microglia, OPCs, and astrocytes. A major setback for the investigation of neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory CNS diseases is the lack of primary human cells and tissues, particularly those that are regional and from the same patient. In most instances, human CNS cell lines are derived from transformed, immortalized cancer cells which may not be accurate representations of their normal physiological behavior20,21,22. Thus, alternative methods are necessary to study CNS cell phenotypes in a controlled manner. Furthermore, the diversity of neurological glial cell populations makes it necessary to investigate each subtype both independently of one another, as well as in co-culture conditions in order to recapitulate both their cell autonomous and non-autonomous functions. Glial cells have a wide variety of critical functions in the CNS ranging from neuronal support23, learning/cognition24,25, and CNS immunological responses26. As such, it is necessary to understand the molecular and cellular functions of each glial subpopulation in a physiological and pathological context. In order to do so, we provide here a reliable method for the extraction and isolation of viable glia subtypes. Due to practical and ethical constraints in human subject’s research, animal models are currently the most relevant surrogates for human glial cell biology. In particular, mice are ideal model animals as their genome can be manipulated and analyzed to further dissect particular molecular mechanisms underlying health and disease. Therefore, the successful removal and separation of murine microglia, OPCs, and astrocytes is a key tool to investigate the functions of glia during physiological, neurodegenerative, or neuroinflammatory conditions.
This protocol can be optimized to explore CNS cell regional heterogeneity. It is becoming increasingly clear that glia exhibit regional heterogeneity in form and function. Astrocytes are regionally diverse and display distinct morphology depending on their location within the CNS27. Furthermore, the density of astrocytes and their mitotic index can define anatomical regions, supporting the hypothesis that regional astrocyte heterogeneity may reflect molecular and functional differences based on their location within the CNS28. Microglial regional heterogeneity is also under active investigation, although the underlying mechanisms and functional consequences of microglia diversity in CNS development or behavior are currently unclear. However, it is known that adult microglia display diversity in cell number, cell and subcellular structures, and molecular signatures29. Moreover, recent advances in multiplexed mass cytometry have further defined the regional heterogeneity of microglia, analyzing cellular phenotype from five different CNS regions of nine human donors, allowing for large-scale immunophenotyping of human microglia30. Currently, such approaches are in their nascent stages, making animal studies a viable solution for the study of regional glia in CNS disease development. Finally, regional heterogeneity has also recently been described in oligodendrocytes. Single-cell RNA sequencing on 5072 individual cells from 10 regions of juvenile and adult CNS identified 13 distinct subpopulations across different stages of differentiation31. Importantly, it was also found that as oligodendrocytes matured from OPCs, their transcriptional profiles diverged and their functional phenotypes changed, highlighting oligodendrocyte heterogeneity within the CNS31.
Thus, understanding regional heterogeneity of the various resident CNS cells in the context of their diverse neighboring neurons and other glia may provide important rationale for the future development of novel therapies to treat neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders. While this protocol focuses on the extraction, isolation, and identification of glial subpopulations, it provides a convenient starting point for the examination of their function. Furthermore, it can be adapted and combined with transgenic mouse models in order to study genetic mechanisms associated with glial cell biology. It can also be used to examine the responses of glial cells to each other in co-culture assays. The outlined steps represent a cost-efficient and high-throughput method of extracting and isolating different CNS glial populations which can then be adapted to a wide variety of experimental parameters. It should be noted; however, that the method described here utilizes neonates due to the lower levels of myelination and high density of proliferating glia. For these reasons, it is technically more feasible to isolate viable glia from neonates compared to adult animals. The phenotypic differences in neonatal glia compared to adult glia should thus be considered during experimental design and data interpretation.