Multiple successive events are required for neoplasm development. In 2011, Hanahan and Weinberg described 10 capabilities that enable transformed cells’ growth, survival, and dissemination: the so-called “Hallmarks of Cancer”1. The methodology described here compiles three different tools to evaluate in vitro cellular transformation by focusing on some of the tumoral cells’ distinctive features. These techniques assess the cell proliferation rate, the behavior of cells when cultured in 3D and their capacity to form colonies with anchorage independence.
Cell models are crucial to test hypothesis in vitro. Different approaches have been developed to generate experimental models of cellular transformation for the study of cancer2,3,4. Since breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and is responsible for approximately 15% of cancer deaths among women5, providing suitable cellular models of mammary epithelial cells is of utmost importance for further investigation. In this article, we have illustrated the potential of three techniques to evaluate cellular transformation using an experimental model of Breast Primary Epithelial Cells (BPECs) transformation initially described by Ince and colleagues in 20076 and later implemented in our laboratory7. This experimental model is based on the sequential alteration of three targeted genes (SV40 Large T and small t antigens herein referred to as Ttag, hTERT, and HRAS) to the genome of non-transformed BPECs. Moreover, the method used for BPECs derivation favors the maintenance of mammary epithelial cells with luminal or myoepithelial markers, resulting in a heterogeneous cell culture that retains some of the mammary gland physiological traits.
In the mammary gland, luminal mammary epithelial cells, which are responsible for milk production, are located near the lumen, whereas myoepithelial cells are disposed around luminal cells and take care of contraction movements leading the milk to the nipple. The loss of proper organization between these cell lineages is a feature of tumoral transformation8 that can be assessed in vitro after immunofluorescent detection of distinctive lineage markers in 3D cell cultures. Another major characteristic of tumoral cells is their capacity to grow without attachment to other cells and to the extracellular matrix1. When healthy cells are forced to grow in suspension, mechanisms such as anoikis ‒ a type of cell death induced in response to detachment from the extracellular matrix ‒ are activated9. The evasion of cell death is one of the distinctive hallmarks of cancer and thus, transformed cells are capable to inactivate anoikis and survive in an anchor-independent manner. This capacity can be evaluated in vitro with the anchorage-independent assay using soft agar. Furthermore, an inherent feature of tumoral tissues is their sustained proliferative signaling capacity, which can be easily monitored under in vitro conditions by measuring the increase of cell number along time, not only in suspension assays but also by monitoring the growth rate of monolayer adherent cultures.
Despite the best model to test tumorigenic potential is the inoculation of tumoral cells in murine models and evaluation of tumor development in situ, it is important to minimize the number of animals employed in experimental procedures as much as possible. Therefore, having suitable tests to assess transformation in vitro is a top priority. Here, we provide a set of tools to evaluate the tumorigenic potential of partially and fully transformed breast epithelial cells that can be easily implemented in most of the laboratories that work with cellular transformation models.