Endovascular thrombectomy and tPA-mediated thrombolysis are the only two U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies of acute ischemic stroke, which afflicts ~700,000 patients annually in the United States1. Because the application of thrombectomy is limited to large vessel occlusion (LVO), while tPA-thrombolysis may alleviate small vessel occlusions, both are valuable therapies of acute ischemic stroke2. Moreover, the combination of both therapies (e.g., initiation of tPA-thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, followed by thrombectomy) improves reperfusion and the functional outcomes3. Thus, optimizing thrombolysis remains an important goal for stroke research, even in the era of thrombectomy.
Thromboembolic models are an essential tool for preclinical stroke research aiming to improve thrombolytic therapies. This is because mechanical vascular occlusion models (e.g., intraluminal suture MCA occlusion) do not produce blood clots, and its fast recovery of cerebral blood flow after the removal of mechanical occlusion is overly idealized4,5. To date, major thromboembolic models include photothrombosis6,7,8, topical ferric chloride (FeCl3) application9, microinjection of thrombin into the MCA branch10,11, injection of ex vivo (micro)emboli into the MCA or common carotid artery (CCA)12,13,14, and transient hypoxia-ischemia (tHI)15,16,17,18. These stroke models differ in the histological composition of ensuing clots and the sensitivity to tPA-mediated lytic therapies (Table 1). They also vary in the surgical requirement of craniotomy (needed for in situ thrombin injection and topical application of FeCl3), the consistency of infarct size and location (e.g., CCA-infusion of microemboli yield very variable outcomes), and global effects on the cardiovascular system (e.g., tHI increases the heart rate and cardiac output to compensate for hypoxia-induced peripheral vasodilation).
The RB dye-based photothrombotic stroke (PTS) model has many attractive features, including simple craniotomy-free surgical procedures, low mortality (typically < 5%), and a predictable size and location of infarct (in the MCA-supplying territory), but it has two major limitations.8 The first caveat is weak-to-nil response to tPA-mediated thrombolytic treatment, which is also a drawback of the FeCl3 model7,19,20. The second caveat of PTS and FeCl3 stroke models is that the ensuing thrombi consist of densely-packed platelet aggregates with a small amount of fibrin, which not only lead to its resilience to tPA-lytic therapy, but also deviates from the pattern of intermixed platelet:fibrin thrombi in acute ischemic stroke patients21,22. In contrast, the in situ thrombin-microinjection model mainly comprises polymerized fibrin and a uncertain content of platelets10.
Given the above reasoning, we hypothesized that admixture of RB and a sub-thrombotic dose of thrombin for MCA-targeted photoactivation through thinned skull may increase the fibrin component in the resultant thrombi and boost the sensitivity to tPA-mediated lytic treatment. We have confirmed this hypothesis,23 and herein we describe detail procedures of the modified (T+RB) photothrombotic stroke model.