Method Article

Characterization and Functional Prediction of Bacteria in Ovarian Tissues

DOI:

10.3791/61878

October 23rd, 2021

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Immunohistochemistry staining and 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S rRNA gene) sequencing were performed in order to discover and distinguish bacteria in cancerous and noncancerous ovarian tissues in situ. The compositional and functional differences of the bacteria were predicted by using BugBase and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt).

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The theory of a "sterile" female upper reproductive tract has been encountering increasing opposition due to advancements in bacterial detection. However, whether ovaries contain bacteria has not yet been confirmed yet. Herein, an experiment to detect bacteria in ovarian tissues was introduced. We chose ovarian cancer patients in the cancer group and noncancerous patients in the control group. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to differentiate bacteria in ovarian tissues from the cancer and control groups. Furthermore, we predicted the functional composition of the identified bacteria by using BugBase and PICRUSt. This method can also be used in other viscera and tissues since many organs have been proven to harbor bacteria in recent years. The presence of bacteria in viscera and tissues may help scientists evaluate cancerous and normal tissues and may be aid in the treatment of cancer.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Recently, an increasing number of articles have been published that prove the existence of bacteria in abdominal solid viscera, such as the kidney, spleen, liver, and ovary1,2. Geller et al. found bacteria in pancreatic tumors, and these bacteria were resistant to gemcitabine, a chemotherapeutic drug2. S. Manfredo Vieira et al. concluded that Enterococcus gallinarum was portable to the lymph nodes, liver and spleen, and it could drive autoimmunity3.

Since the cervix plays a role as a defender, bacteria in the upper female reproductive tract, which contains the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries, have been minimally researched. However, some new theories have been established in recent years. Bacteria may have access to the uterine cavity during the menstrual cycle due to changes in mucins4,5. Additionally, Zervomanolakis et al. confirmed that the uterus, together with the fallopian tubes, is a peristaltic pump controlled by the endocrine system of the ovaries, and this arrangement enables bacteria to enter the endometrium, fallopian tubes, and ovaries6.

The upper reproductive tract is no longer a mystery anymore thanks to the development of bacterial detection methods. Verstraelen et al. used a barcoded paired-end sequencing method to discover uterine bacteria by targeting at the V1-2 hypervariable region of the 16S RNA gene7. Fang et al. employed barcoded sequencing in patients with endometrial polyps and revealed the presence of diverse intrauterine bacteria8. Additionally, by using the 16S RNA gene, Miles et al. and Chen et al. found bacteria in the genital system of women who had undergone salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy, respectively5,9.

Bacteria in tumor tissues have gained increasing attention in recent years. Banerjee et al. discovered that the microbiome signature differed between ovarian cancer patients and controls10. Anoxynatronum sibiricum was associated with tumor stage, and Methanosarcina vacuolata might be used to diagnose ovarian cancer11. In addition to ovarian cancer, other cancers, such as stomach, lung, prostate, breast, cervix, and endometrium, have been proven to be associated with bacteria12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Poore et al. proposed a new class of microbial-based oncology diagnostics, foreseeing early-stage cancer screening19. In this protocol, we investigated the differences between cancerous and normal ovarian tissues by comparing the composition and function of bacteria in these two tissues.

Immunohistochemistry staining and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed to confirm the presence of bacteria in the ovaries. The differences and predicted functions of the ovarian bacteria in cancerous and noncancerous ovarian tissues were studied. The results showed the existence of bacteria in ovarian tissues. Anoxynatronum sibiricum and Methanosarcina vacuolata were related to the stage and the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, respectively. Forty-six significantly different KEGG pathways that were present in both groups were compared.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study was approved by the Medical Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (No. XJTUIAF2018LSK-139). Informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients.

1. Criteria for entering the cancer group and the control group

  1. For the cancer group, enroll patients who are primarily diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and after laparotomy, they are proven to have serous ovarian cancer by pathological findings.
  2. For the control group, enroll patients that are primarily diagnosed with uterine myoma or uterine adenomyosis, without presenting any ovarian condition, and who have undergone hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy.
    NOTE: This standard is not definite. Patients with diseases not affecting the ovaries who undergo hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy can also be enrolled.
  3. Exclude patients with one or more of the following criteria:
    Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
    Taking antibiotics 2 months prior to the surgery.
    Having fever or elevated inflammatory markers.
    Having inflammation of any kind.
    Having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2. Gather samples

  1. During the surgery, place the resected ovaries into a sterile tube and place the tube in liquid nitrogen for transport. Avoid touching anything else throughout the whole procedure.
  2. Separate the ovaries into approximately 1-cm thick tissue samples with a pair of new sterile tweezers under a laminar flow cabinet. After separation, preserve samples at -80 °C.
    ​NOTE: All the procedures for gathering samples are aseptic, including separating the ovaries.

3. Sequence the 16S rRNA gene

  1. Extract DNA.
    1. Add 1.2 mL of inhibit EX buffer into a 2 mL centrifuge tube. Then, add 180-220 mg of samples into the tube. Let the sample fully mix (70 °C water bath for 5 min and then vortex for 15 s).
    2. Centrifuge the tube for 1 min at 600 x g.
    3. Place 550 µL of the supernatant into a new 1.5 mL tube, and centrifuge for 1 min at 600 x g.
    4. Transfer 400 µL of the supernatant with 30 µL of proteinase K into another 1.5 mL tube.
    5. Add 400 µL of buffer AL and use a vortex mixer for 15 s.
    6. Incubate at 70 °C for 10 min.
    7. Add 400 µL of 96-100% alcohol. Use a vortex mixer for 15 s.
    8. Transfer 600 µL of mixture into an absorption column and centrifuge for 1 min at 13700 g. Exchange the lower tube. Repeat this step 11 times.
    9. Add 500 µL of buffer AW1, centrifuge for 1 min at 13,700 x g, and change the lower tube.
    10. Add 500 µL of buffer AW2, centrifuge for 3 min at 13,700 x g, and change the lower tube.
    11. Centrifuge for 3 min at 13,700 x g.
    12. Transfer the mixture into a new 1.5 mL tube, add 200 µL of buffer ATE, incubate at room temperature for 5 min and centrifuge for 1 min at 13,700 x g.
  2. Quality testing. Use 1% Sepharose gel electrophoresis to test the quality. Add 400 ng of sample, 120 V, 30 mins. Ideal result: DNA concentration: ≥ 10 ng/µL, DNA purity: A260/A280 = 1.8-2.0, gross DNA: ≥ 300 ng.
  3. Prepare the libraries using a 16S metagenomic sequencing kit according to the manufacturer's protocol.
    1. Perform PCR. Briefly, each 25 µL PCR reaction contains 12.5 ng of sample DNA as input, 12.5 µL of 2x KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix and 5 µL of each primer at 1 µM.
    2. Carry out PCR using the following protocol: an initial denaturation step performed at 95°C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 30 s), annealing (55°C, 30 s) and extension (72°C, 30 s), and a final elongation of 5 min at 72°C.
    3. Clean up the PCR product from the reaction mix with magnetic beads using the manufacturer's instructions.
    4. Repeat steps 3.3.1 and 3.3.2.
    5. Quality testing. Please refer to step 3.2.
    6. Repeat step 3.3.3.
    7. Quality testing. Use 1% Sepharose gel electrophoresis to test impurity, a spectrophotometer to test purity, a fluorometer to test the concentration, and an RNA assay kit to test integrity. Follow the manufacturer's protocol. Normalize and pool the libraries; then sequence (2 x 300 bp paired-end read setting) using 600 cycle V3 standard flow cells, producing approximately 100,000 paired-end 2 x 300 base reads.
      ​NOTE: The full-length primer sequences: 16S Amplicon polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Forward primer: 5' TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGA GACAG-[CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG] and 16S Amplicon PCR Reverse primer: 5' GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-[GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC].

4. Analyze 16S rRNA gene sequencing data

  1. Filter the raw reads of every sample based on sequencing quality with the software package QIIME 2-20180220.
    1. Copy three files into the directory: emp-paired-end-sequences_01
      one forward.fastq.gz file that contains the forward sequence reads,
      one reverse.fastq.gz file that contains the reverse sequence reads,
      one barcodes.fastq.gz file that contains the associated barcode reads
    2. Execute
      qiime tools import \
      --type EMPPairedEndSequences \
      --input-path emp-paired-end-sequences_01 \--output-path emp-paired-end-sequences_02.qza
  2. Remove the primer and adaptor sequences.
    qiime cutadapt trim-paired \
    --i-demultiplexed-sequences demultiplexed-seqs_02.qza \
    --p-front-f GCTACGGGGGG \
    --p-front-r GCTACGGGGGG \
    --p-error-rate 0 \
    --quality-cutoff 25 \
    --o-trimmed-sequences trimmed-seqs_03.qza \
    --​verbose
  3. Shorten sequence reads in which both paired-end qualities are lower than 25. See above --quality-cutoff 25
  4. Analyze the sequencing data.
    1. Gather sequences to form operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a similarity cutoff at 97%.
      qiime vsearch dereplicate-sequences \
      --i-sequences trimmed-seqs_03.qza \
      --o-dereplicated-table table_04.qza \
      --o-dereplicated-sequences rep-seqs_04.qza

      qiime vsearch cluster-features-closed-reference \
      --i-table table_04.qza \
      --i-sequences rep-seqs_04.qza \
      --i-reference-sequences 97_otus.qza \
      --p-perc-identity 0.97 \
      --o-clustered-table table-cr-97.qza \
      --o-clustered-sequences rep-seqs-cr-97.qza \
      --o-unmatched-sequences unmatched-cr-97.qza
    2. For the OTUs, calculate the relative abundance in each sample. Abundance information is in table-cr-97.qza
  5. Employ a native Bayesian classifier, which aims at the RDP training set (version 9; http://sourceforge.net/projects/rdp-classifier/), to sort all of the sequences. Mapped taxon information is in table-cr-97.qza
  6. Within the given OTU, assign a classification that reflects the major coherence of the sequences to OTUs. Then, align the OTUs. See table-cr-97.qza and rep-seqs-cr-97.qza
  7. Based on the sample group information, perform alpha diversity (including the Chao 1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson and Evenness indexes) and the UniFrac-based principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
    qiime tools export \
    --input-path table-cr-97.qza \
    --output-path exported-feature-table
    exported-feature-table

    qiime diversity alpha \
    --i-table table-cr-97.qza \
    --p-metric observed_otus \
    --o-alpha-diversity observed_otus_vector.qza

    qiime diversity beta \
    --i-table table-cr-97.qza \
    --p-metric braycurtis \
    --o-distance-matrix unweighted_unifrac_distance_matrix.qza

5. Predict bacterial function

  1. To predict the related representation of the characteristics of the bacteria, use BugBase21. The input OTU table for BugBase is prepared using the following commands.
    biom convert -i otu_table.biom -o otu_table.txt --to-tsv
    biom convert -i otu_table.txt -o otu_table_json.biom --table-type="OTU table" --to-json
    NOTE: The prediction is based on six phenotype categories (Ward et al. unpublished) (https://bugbase.cs.umn.edu/): Gram staining, oxygen tolerance, ability to form biofilms, mobile element content, pathogenicity, and oxidative stress tolerance.
  2. Predict the functional composition of a metagenome by PICRUSt with the usage of marker gene data and a database containing reference genomes22.
    make_otu_table.py -i microbiome_97/uclust_ref_picked_otus/test_paired_otus.txt -t /mnt/nas_bioinfo/ref/qiime2_ref/97_otu_taxonomy.txt -o otu_table.biom &
    normalize_by_copy_number.py -i otu_table.biom -o normalized_otus.biom
    predict_metagenomes.py -i normalized_otus.biom -o metagenome_predictions.biom
    categorize_by_function.py -i metagenome_predictions.biom -c "KEGG_Pathways" -l 1 -o picrust_L1.biom
    categorize_by_function.py -f -i metagenome_predictions.biom -c KEGG_Pathways -l 1 -o metagenome_predictions.L1.txt
  3. Analyze the differences in functions among each group with the help of STAMP23,24. Please refer to the citations to operate the software.

6. Data

  1. Use statistical software to calculate the significance of the findings. The indication of statistical significance should be set as P < 0.05.
  2. Assess differences in age and parity by Student's t-test. Assess differences in menopausal status, history of hypertension and diabetes by the chi-square test. Assess differences in the number of ovarian bacterial taxa by the Mann-Whitney U test.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Patients
A total of 16 qualified patients were included in the study. The control group included 10 women with a diagnosis of benign uterine tumor (among them, 3 patients were diagnosed with uterine myoma, and 7 patients were diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis). Meanwhile, the cancer group contained 6 women with a diagnosis of serous ovarian cancer (among them, 2 patients were diagnosed with stage II, and 2 of them were diagnosed with stage III). The following characteristics showed no differences be...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Ovarian cancer has a notable influence on women's fertility25. Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at late stages, and the 5-year survival rate is less than 30%18. Confirmation of bacteria in the abdominal solid viscera, including the liver, pancreas and spleen, has been published. The existence of bacteria in the upper female reproductive tract occurs because the cervix is not enclosed2,3,

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by the Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, China (XJTU1AF-2018-017, XJTU1AF-CRF-2019-002), the Major Basic Research Project of Natural Science of Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department (2018JM7073, 2017ZDJC-11), the Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department (2017ZDXM-SF-068, 2019QYPY-138), the Shaanxi Provincial Collaborative Technology Innovation Project (2017XT-026, 2018XT-002), and the Medical Research Project of Xi'an Social Development Guidance Plan (2017117SF/YX011-3). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

We thank the colleagues in the Department of Gynecology of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University for their contributions to collecting samples.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
2200 TapeStation SoftwareAgilgent
United States
AmpliSeq for Illumina Library Prep, Indexes, and AccessoriesIllumina
Image-pro plus 7Media Cybernetics
Leica ASP 300SLeica Biosystems Division of Leica Microsystems
Leica EG 1150Leica Biosystems Division of Leica Microsystems
Leica RM2235Leica Biosystems Division of Leica Microsystems
LPS Core monoclonal antibody, clone WN1 222-5Hycult Biotech
Mag-Bind RxnPure Plus magnetic beadsOmega BiotekM1386-00
Mag-Bind Universal Pathogen 96 KitOmega BiotekM4029-01
MiSeqIlluminaSY-410-1003
Silva databaseMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology and Jacobs University
the QuantiFluor dsDNA SystemPromegaE2670
TrimmomaticBjörn Usadel
ZytoChem Plus (HRP) Anti-Rabbit (DAB) KitZytomed SystemsHRP008DAB-RB

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Manfredo Vieira, S., et al. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans. Science. 359 (6380), 1156-1161 (2018).
  2. Geller, L. T., et al. Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Science. 357 (6356), 1156-1160 (2017).
  3. Manfredo, V. S., et al. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans. Science. 359 (6380), 1156-1161 (2018).
  4. Brunelli, R., et al. Globular structure of human ovulatory cervical mucus. FASEB J. 21 (14), 3872-3876 (2007).
  5. Chen, C., et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nature Communications. 8 (1), 875(2017).
  6. Zervomanolakis, I., et al. Physiology of upward transport in the human female genital tract. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1101, 1-20 (2007).
  7. Verstraelen, H., et al. Characterisation of the human uterine microbiome in non-pregnant women through deep sequencing of the V1-2 region of the 16S rRNA gene. PeerJ. 4, 1602(2016).
  8. Fang, R. L., et al. Barcoded sequencing reveals diverse intrauterine microbiomes in patients suffering with endometrial polyps. American Journal of Translational Research. 8 (3), 1581-1592 (2016).
  9. Miles, S. M., Hardy, B. L., Merrell, D. S. Investigation of the microbiota of the reproductive tract in women undergoing a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy. Fertil Steril. 107 (3), 813-820 (2017).
  10. Banerjee, S., et al. The ovarian cancer oncobiome. Oncotarget. 8 (22), 36225-36245 (2017).
  11. Wang, Q., et al. The differential distribution of bacteria between cancerous and noncancerous ovarian tissues in situ. Journal of Ovarian Research. 13 (1), 8(2020).
  12. Wang, L., et al. Bacterial overgrowth and diversification of microbiota in gastric cancer. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 28 (3), 261-266 (2016).
  13. Hosgood, H. D., et al. The potential role of lung microbiota in lung cancer attributed to household coal burning exposures. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 55 (8), 643-651 (2014).
  14. Kwon, M., Seo, S. S., Kim, M. K., Lee, D. O., Lim, M. C. Compositional and Functional Differences between Microbiota and Cervical Carcinogenesis as Identified by Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing. Cancers. 11 (3), 309(2019).
  15. Urbaniak, C., et al. The Microbiota of Breast Tissue and Its Association with Breast Cancer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 82 (16), 5039-5048 (2016).
  16. Feng, Y., et al. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analysis of human prostate microbiota from patients with prostate cancer. BMC Genomics. 20 (1), 146(2019).
  17. Walsh, D. M., et al. Postmenopause as a key factor in the composition of the Endometrial Cancer Microbiome (ECbiome). Scientific Reports. 9 (1), 19213(2019).
  18. Walther-Antonio, M. R., et al. Potential contribution of the uterine microbiome in the development of endometrial cancer. Genome Medicine. 8 (1), 122(2016).
  19. Poore, G. D., et al. Microbiome analyses of blood and tissues suggest cancer diagnostic approach. Nature. 579 (7800), 567-574 (2020).
  20. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30 (15), 2114-2120 (2014).
  21. Ward, T., et al. BugBase predicts organism-level microbiome phenotypes. bioRxiv. , (2017).
  22. Langille, M. G., et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nature Biotechnology. 31 (9), 814-821 (2013).
  23. Langille, M. G. I., et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nature Biotechnology. 31 (9), 814(2013).
  24. Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P., Beiko, R. G. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics. 30 (21), 3123(2014).
  25. Leranth, C., Hamori, J. 34;Dark" Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 21 (4), 405-419 (1970).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Ovarian Tissue Bacteria16S rRNA SequencingImmunohistochemistry StainingBugBase AnalysisPICRUSt Functional PredictionSterile Tissue ProcessingDNA Library PreparationQIIME Data AnalysisAlpha Diversity MetricsStatistical Significance Testing

Related Articles