$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Dendritic cells (DC) are central players of the immune system. They are a diverse group of cells specialized in antigen-presentation and their major function is to bridge innate and adaptive immunity1,2. Importantly, DC not only play an important role in efficient and specific pathogen-directed responses but are also involved in many aspects of antitumor immunity1,3.
Due to their exclusive role in host immunity, DC came into focus as target cells for vaccination4. One approach is to target antigens to DC in vivo to induce antigen-specific immune responses and over the last years, a large number of studies have been dedicated to defining suitable receptors and targeting strategies1,4. One example is the C-type lectin receptor DEC-205, which can be targeted by DEC-205-specific antibodies to induce endocytosis. Importantly, DEC-205 targeting in the combination with suitable adjuvants has been shown to efficiently induce long-lived and protective CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as antibody responses, also against tumor antigens3,5,6,7,8,9.
There are a number of studies showing conjugated antigens targeted to DC to be superior to free un-conjugated antigen3,5,10,11,12. This makes the conjugation of the antigen to the respective DC targeting moiety a central step in DC targeting approaches. In the case of DC targeting via antibodies or antibody fragments, antigens can be either chemically or genetically linked and either strategy provides its own (dis)advantages1. On the one hand, in genetically engineered antibody-antigen constructs there is a control over the antigen dose as well as the location providing superior comparability between lots1. At the same time however, chemical conjugation needs less preparation and provides more flexibility especially when attempting to test and compare different antigens and/or vaccination strategies in experimental and pre-clinical models.
Here, we present a protocol for the efficient and reliable chemical conjugation of ovalbumin (OVA) as a model protein antigen to a DEC-205-specific IgG2a antibody (αDEC-205) suitable for in vivo DC targeting in mice. First, αDEC-205 is purified from NLDC-145 hybridoma cells13. For chemical conjugation, the heterobifunctional crosslinker sulfosuccinimidyl 4-[N-maleimidomethyl] cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC), which contains NHS (N-hydroxysuccinimide) ester and maleimide groups, is used, allowing covalent conjugation of amine- and sulfhydryl-containing molecules. Specifically, the primary amines of the antibody initially react with sulfo-SMCC and the resulting maleimide-activated αDEC-205 then reacts with the sulfhydryl-containing OVA protein reduced through TCEP-HCl (Tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride). The final product is chemically conjugated αDEC-205/OVA (Figure 1). Beyond chemical conjugation itself, our protocol describes removal of excess OVA from the conjugate as well as the verification of successful conjugation through western blot analysis and a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We have successfully employed this approach in the past to chemically conjugate OVA and other proteins or immunogenic peptides to αDEC-205. We demonstrate efficient binding to CD11c+ cells in vitro as well as the efficient induction of cellular and humoral immunity in vivo.
Certainly, there are drawbacks to this method such as in lot-to-lot comparability and in the exact dosing of the antigen within the final conjugate. Nevertheless, chemical conjugation provides experimental flexibility in the choice of the antibody and the protein antigen as compared to genetically engineered constructs. Therefore, we believe this approach is especially valuable in evaluating different antigens for their efficiency in DC targeting in pre-clinical mouse models, importantly also in the context of specific antitumor immune responses.