OCT is a common long-term cryo-preservation agent used in biorepositories. However, OCT can result in ion suppression when tissues are analyzed by various mass spectrometry platforms12,13,14,15, or result in loss of signal when samples are analyzed by LC-ESI-MS/MS11. OCT in cryopreserved tissues can also interfere with tissue normalization methods such as weighing and protein quantification assays such as Bradford and BCA11. Here, we present a detailed protocol to remove OCT from human tissues and subsequently be analyzed by mass spectrometry. The protocol may be modified to use other tissue sources that are not lung, or from mice tissues as we have previously described11. In addition, other mass spectrometry data normalization strategies can be used, including those we have previously described11, as well as other validated methods.
An important limitation of this protocol is that it is not adequate for the analysis of tissues that have been previously fixed with formaldehyde or another fixing agent. It is only adequate for tissues that have not been fixed and have been cryopreserved in OCT. In addition, this method is not adequate for processing tissues that weigh less than 1-2 mg as there is always some tissue loss during the sOCTrP steps and transfers between tubes. It will be difficult to weigh such small tissues using a standard analytical scale, and any left-over PBS not removed during the wicking stage will contribute greatly to the experimental error. Below are other important considerations when washing tissues to remove OCT with this method.
To ensure the smooth execution of this protocol, particularly if many samples will be processed, steps outlined in section 1 should be performed ahead of time, including pre-labeling and pre-weighing 1.5 mL tubes, pre-labeling 13 x 100 mm screw cap tubes and caps, 13 x 100 mm culture tubes, and autoinjector vials, preparing all wicks, pre-shortening 1 mL pipette tips, and pre-chilling wash solutions. This will prevent time-consuming procedures having to be performed on the day that tissues will be washed, which can lead to delays. In general, we find that if many of these steps are performed the day prior, an experienced researcher can wash 30-40 specimens in a normal workday. However, because the first suggested stopping point is after all tissues have been washed, weighed, and placed in methanol and stored at -80 °C, not performing 1.5 mL pre-weighing and labeling ahead of time will impact efficiency and extend the length of time required to wash 30-40 tissues.
Tissue weighing is one of the most important steps, as errors or carelessness will impact data quality as they will carry over into data normalization. It is critical that the analytical balance used for weighing be calibrated, properly zeroed, and tared. Accordingly, when using wicks, removing as much of the wash solution as possible is important, especially for tissues weighing less than 5 mg. At these tissue weights, leftover wash solution will make weighing inaccurate by a large percentage and carry over as an error in data normalization. When removing wash solution, we find that tissues can be gently touched with the wick for several seconds to remove as much wash solution as possible without leading to significant losses of tissue by adhesion to the wick. However, each tissue type being washed should be tested for adhesion to wicks, and these steps in the protocol adjusted accordingly.
To facilitate the tissue washing workflow, it is recommended that tissue shavings be requested from the biorepository in 15 mL polypropylene tubes. This will reduce the handling of tissues prior to washing.
When washing tissues, if a gel-like material is observed at the bottom of a tube after the third sOCTrP cycle, this is indicative that not all OCT has been removed and more sOCTrP cycles are needed. Keep track of how many cycles are needed, and for consistency, perform the same number of sOCTrP cycles in all specimens in the data set. We have previously evaluated up to 9 sOCTrP cycles and found no effect on depletion of sphingolipids in tissues11.
When using wicks to remove wash solution, gently dabbing the tissue will ensure that all wash solution is removed. This increases the accuracy of tissue weight estimation. However, great care must be taken with very small tissues as these can stick to the wick and result in the loss of specimen. It is helpful to use several wicks for the same tube to remove as much solution as possible. To prevent cross-sample contamination, always use a new, and clean, wick for each sample. When making wicks, use laboratory grade tissue (see Table of Materials) as we previously tested these and found to contain a negligible amount of contaminating sphingolipids11. Wicks from other materials can be used if they are tested as described11.
When retrieving specimens from 1.5 mL tubes after weighing, it is critical that all tissue be recovered. Failing to do so will result in errors in data normalization. If more PBS is needed to recover all the tissue, add the equivalent amount of PBS used to all other tubes to avoid differences in extraction efficiency that might result from samples containing different amounts of PBS. Adjust chloroform and methanol volumes to account for any increase in water volume to maintain a 2:1:0.1 methanol:chloroform:water ratio.
When thawing specimens, it is important that this step be done on ice to avoid the degradation of labile lipids such as sphingosine-1-phosphate. Fully thawing samples until the OCT is in a liquid state will also facilitate its removal as it will more easily be dissolved in the cold washing solution rather than remaining as a pellet during early wash steps.
Occasionally, especially when washing lung tissues, there will be fragments that will not pellet and will float on top of the wash solution after centrifugation. With care, immersing the aspirating tip beneath the floating tissues to remove the wash solution can prevent loss during aspiration.
Do not add chloroform to samples prior to homogenization as the disposable homogenizer tips are made of plastic and will dissolve in solutions containing chloroform. This can significantly impact the LC-MS/MS quantification of lipids in the samples. Therefore, in general, the use of plastics that are not resistant to solvents should be avoided when dispensing chloroform and methanol. These solvents are also toxic and should be handled in an appropriate fume hood. Wear appropriate PPE when handling solvent such as methanol and chloroform.
Human tissues should be processed in an appropriate biosafety cabinet (e.g., Class II). Users should be trained in the handling of biohazardous materials and fluids of human origin and follow safety protocols such as wearing appropriate personal protective equipment and decontaminating any surface or equipment that comes in contact with specimens. Users should thoroughly disinfect (see Table of Materials for suggested decontaminant) any surface or equipment (centrifuges, centrifuge carriers and adapters, pipettors, vortexers, fume hood surfaces, balances, glassware, ice trays, computer keyboards, computer mouse, etc.) used during the wash procedure. Lab members should not use equipment or hoods used for tissue washing until they have been thoroughly disinfected. Avoid the use of bleach on steel surfaces and electronics.
When processing many samples, use caution to prevent cross contamination using clean caps in re-capping steps during the lipid extraction steps. Caps can also be re-used if they are labeled. However, in practice, we find that markers stand out poorly on the black caps, and adhesive labels fall off tubes during the overnight 48 °C incubation.
Sphingolipids are demonstrated important players in the etiology of disease and human cancers. Therefore, there is great interest in precisely defining the sphingolipid metabolism alterations in these diseases as they may reveal therapeutic targets. However, many of the tissues that are easily accessible to researchers are cryopreserved in OCT, which is not compatible with mass spectrometry analysis. Thus, the detailed protocol described here will expand the repertoire of tissues adequate for quantitative sphingolipidomic analysis, and thus help increase our understanding of the biology of lipid metabolism alterations in human disease and cancer.