Due to the short life span, terminal differentiation status, and lytic content of neutrophils, studying these cells has always been a challenge. Apart from utilizing mouse models or cells from patient cohorts, cell lines are useful tools to help study neutrophil biology16. However, neutrophil-like cell lines cannot completely reiterate all aspects of neutrophil biology, adding an extra layer of difficulty in studying these cells. The most commonly used in vitro model is the HL-60 cell line, which can be differentiated into neutrophil-like cells by treatment with dimethylsulfoxide or retinoic acid17,18. Although these cells are useful in the study of migration and respiratory burst, they are not suitable for studying the microbiocidal activity of neutrophils. Other cell lines exist (PLB-98, NB4), and they are also associated with their set of limitations19.
It is pivotal to validate with primary human neutrophils observations made with mouse disease models and cell lines. Neutrophils cannot be cryopreserved efficiently and thus are often freshly isolated from whole blood or buffy coats obtained from donors and immediately processed. Once isolated, the cells start to undergo a complex form of spontaneous death, regulated by oxidation, cytoplasmic caspases, and proteases found in neutrophil granules20,21. Improper isolation methods or techniques can lead to the activation of neutrophils, only accelerating cell demise. It is imperative to have a reliable and consistent method to obtain pure and high-quality neutrophils from donors.
There have been many methods published on human neutrophil isolation10,22. They mainly fall into two categories, with some shared strategies. The first category is antibody-based, being either through positive or negative selection. Positive selection would label neutrophils directly, therefore providing a highly pure cell population, although it also leads to rapid cell activation, cell death, as well as unwanted tagging of neutrophils23. Negative selection, though leaving the cells unlabeled and giving a very pure population, accelerated neutrophil death, although the precise mechanism is unknown (Figure 5). Whether gene or protein expression is also altered after positive or negative selection needs to be further investigated. Moreover, due to the amount of antibody needed to deplete the other types of cells, these methods cannot output large amounts of neutrophils. However, antibody-based assays can still be used for short-term culture and experiments on a smaller scale and are methods of choice for experiments requiring very high cell purity, such as gene and protein expression studies.
The second type of isolation method is gradient- and density-based. It usually involves Percoll, Ficoll-Paque, or other polysaccharide/polyvinylpyrrolidone components and utilizes centrifugation force to separate different types of blood cells based on cell density. These methods often are complemented with the sedimentation of red blood cells by dextran. These methods can handle larger scales of starting material and can achieve high purity as well. One caveat of density-based isolation is the inefficient separation of other far less abundant granulocytes (mostly eosinophils) from neutrophils, and it is, therefore, the major limitation of the protocol presented, as even the presence of small cell contamination can affect neutrophil response24.
Presented here is a summarized method based on gradient isolation, refining previous methods10,22. We utilize the current understating of neutrophil specificities to reliably isolate pure human neutrophils with limited residual platelet and RBCs, preventing neutrophil activation and accelerated death. The most crucial step is the layering of the gradient, which is much more effectively obtained by adding the density gradient medium underneath the blood to obtain a sharp interface. A quick examination of the PBMC ring and the gradient after centrifugation can reveal possible contamination, activation, and low yields. When working with a leukapheresis membrane or buffy coat, diluting the blood is important as excessive cell density would lead to cell aggregation, leading to impurities and cell activation.
This protocol should be completed within 2 h to ensure cell freshness, and steps involving the density gradient medium, dextran, and lysis be done immediately, as exposure to these solutions can alter neutrophils. With this protocol, the expected yield of neutrophils is at least ~10 million/10 mL of whole blood and at least ~60 million/10 mL of buffy coat. Evaluation of isolation quality should be done as follows: activated neutrophils should be less than 10%, lymphocyte contamination lower than 5%, minimal eosinophil (same side scatter but lower forward scatter population), and cell viability should be over 90%. Lower purity can result from improper layering or storage of the density gradient medium or due to the quality and freshness of the starting blood product.