$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This paper describes the protocols for signal measurements using the proposed EAG device mounted on a desk and drone. First, we evaluated the performance of the EAG device on a desk. A silkmoth antenna on the EAG device was stimulated by bombykol. Twenty-five continuous stimulations were conducted using 100 ng of bombykol dissolved in 50 µL of hexane with intervals of 5 s, as controlled by a microcontroller. The results indicated that the proposed EAG device reproducibly responded to the stimulations (Figure 5).
The odor detection performance of the EAG device was subsequently evaluated on the drone. The drone equipped with the EAG device hovered at the height of 95 cm from the floor and at a distance of 90 cm from the odor source (Figure 6A). By following the procedure described in section 6, the signals of the EAG device on the drone were measured relative to bombykol (50,000 ng in 250 µL of hexane/filter paper). The sensor performance of a commercial gas sensor on a drone was evaluated for comparison. A digital multi-pixel gas sensor28 was used to detect ethanol vapors. This sensor can be used for the detection of total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs).
According to the datasheet, the TVOC signal range of the sensor was 0-60,000 ppb. The drone with the gas sensor breakout board hovered under the same conditions as the EAG device. Moreover, 500 µL of ethanol (99.5% purity) was used as the odor source instead of bombykol. The typical signals of the EAG device and gas sensor on the drone are shown in Figure 6B. As the odorant molecules and sensor devices differed in this comparison, quantitative comparisons could not be performed. However, the experimental results suggest that it may be difficult for a drone with a commercial gas sensor to detect odorant molecules with a rapid response/recovery speed. In particular, the recovery time of the gas sensor in this study was significantly higher than that of the EAG device with silkmoth antennae.
We also evaluated the sensor directivity of the EAG device on the drone. In this study, the direction toward the odor source was defined as 0°, and the drone was rotated clockwise by 60° intervals to evaluate signal intensities at each angle. For the drone without a sensor enclosure, the signal intensity at 180°, while the drone faced in the opposite direction from the odor source, was occasionally higher than that at 0° (Figure 6C). However, for the drone equipped with the enclosure, the signal intensity of the EAG at 0° became higher than that at 180° (Figure 6D). Consequently, the sensor enclosure enhanced the sensor directivity of the EAG device on the drone.
An odor-tracing demonstration was conducted using the bio-hybrid drone with the sensor enclosure. The results indicated that the drone detected bombykol in the air outside a wind tunnel and identified the direction of the odor plume by pivoting movements (Figure 7, Supplemental Video S1). Finally, odor source localization was conducted based on the spiral-surge algorithm using the bio-hybrid drone (Figure 8A). The drone was set at 270° from the odor source at the starting point. After hovering, the drone started searching for the maximum value of the signal intensity during clockwise or counterclockwise spiral movements. Then, the drone moved forward in the direction of the maximum value of the signal intensity. After repeating the odor-searching spiral and surge movements six times, the drone landed on the ground. The flowchart of the spiral-surge algorithm is described in Terutsuki et al.26
The trajectory, yaw angles, and EAG signals during the odor source localization are presented in Figure 8B-D. Figure 8D shows that the detection time, including response and recover times of the EAG device on the drone, was approximately 1 s. The drone autonomously modified its movement by searching for the maximum odor concentration during the spiral movements. Readers can view videos of the odor source localization by the bio-hybrid drone described by Terutsuki et al.26.

Figure 1: The silkmoth, EAG device, and odor stimulation system. (A) Image of a male silkmoth. (B) Image of the mountable EAG device for a small drone. (C) Image of the odor stimulation system with airflow directions. Abbreviation: EAG = electroantennography. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Isolation of silkmoth antenna. (A) Isolation of a silkmoth antenna using postmortem scissors. (B) Typical isolated silkmoth antenna. (C) Enlarged view of an isolated silkmoth antenna; scale bar = 0.5 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: EAG device set up and GUI. (A) Installation of an isolated silkmoth antenna on the electrodes of the EAG device using gel. (B) Setup for odor stimulation using the EAG device on the desk. (C) The GUI for the experiments. Abbreviations: EAG = electroantennography; GUI = graphical user interface. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Bio-hybrid drone. (A) Bio-hybrid drone based on a silkmoth antenna. (B) Bio-hybrid drone with the sensor enclosure. (C) Configuration of the bio-hybrid drone. Scale bars (A, B) = 50 mm. Abbreviation: CFRP = carbon fiber-reinforced plastic. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Typical continuous response profile of the EAG device on the desk stimulated by bombykol. Abbreviation: EAG = electroantennography. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Experimental environment of the bio-hybrid drone and signal intensity of the EAG device. (A) Image of the experimental environment with the bio-hybrid drone, which autonomously hovered 95 cm above the ground at a distance of 90 cm from the odor source. (B) Comparison between the typical signals of the EAG device and commercial gas sensor on the drone. (C) Typical signal intensity of the EAG device without equipping the sensor enclosure on the drone at each angle (N = 1). (D) Average signal intensity of the EAG device with the enclosure on the drone at each angle (N = 3; individual tests). The unit of the signal intensities is V. C and D have been modified from Terutsuki et al.26. Abbreviations: EAG = electroantennography; TVOC = total volatile organic compounds. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Manual odor stimulation to demonstrate detection and tracing of odor in a room by the bio-hybrid drone. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Odor source localization by the bio-hybrid drone. (A) Viewpoint from the ceiling camera of the flight area of the bio-hybrid drone. (B) Typical flight trajectory, (C) yaw angles, and (D) EAG signal intensities during odor source localization using the spiral-surge algorithm. These figures are representative results (N=1). A-D have been modified from Terutsuki et al.26. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplemental Video S1: Demonstration of manual odor stimulation using the bio-hybrid drone. Please click here to download this Video.