$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Animal models are essential for understanding the pathogenesis of hemophilia and developing and testing treatment regimens and therapies. The Factor VIII knock-out mouse (F8-KO) is a widely used model for the study of hemophilia A1,2. These mice recapitulate key features of the disease and have been widely used for development of treatments, such as recombinant FVIII products3,4,5 and gene therapy strategies6,7.
There are various bleeding injury models for evaluating the pharmacological effects of different hemostatic compounds in vivo. One of these coagulation models is the tail vein transection survival model in mice8,9,10,11,12,13,14, measuring the ability of hemophilic mice to survive exsanguination after tail transection. This method was introduced more than four decades ago15 and is still used9,16,17. However, the model utilizes survival as an endpoint and requires observation of the animals over a period of up to 24 h, during which the animals are conscious and hence can experience pain and distress.
Bleeding models of shorter duration and under full anesthesia have been described previously, such as the tail clip model (also known as the tail tip)8,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. Nevertheless, for a complete normalization of blood loss after the bleeding challenge, these models require doses of procoagulant compounds (e.g., FVIII) far higher than those administered clinically29. A different injury model under anesthesia, the vena saphena bleeding method, is sensitive to lower doses of procoagulant compounds30 but requires a high level of experimenter intervention since the clots must be disrupted frequently (as opposed to 3 times in the presented model).
Standardization towards a common protocol to test new procoagulant compounds would greatly facilitate data comparison between laboratories31,32,33. In TVT models, there is not yet a common agreement on studied endpoints (blood loss7,26, bleeding time9,34, and survival rate35,36), and experimental length varies between studies13.
Our primary objective is to describe and characterize an optimized model with high reproducibility, the possibility to study on-demand as well as a prophylactic treatment, sensitivity to pharmacological intervention equivalent to the survival model, yet not using death or near-death as endpoints. In order to reduce pain and distress, the animals should not be conscious during bleeding and a more ethical endpoint needs to be implemented37.
Tail clip models are generally conducted in one of two variants, either amputating the tip of the tail, e.g., amputation of 1-5 mm18,19,20,21,23,24 or, in a more severe variant, transected at a tail diameter around 1-3 mm8,22,25. This causes a combined arteriovenous bleed, as the lateral and dorsal veins and ventral artery are usually severed, and in general, the larger the amputation, the lower the sensitivity to a procoagulant compound. Furthermore, since the tail tip is amputated, the arteriovenous injury is exposed without any opposing tissue; thus, at least in theory, it is dissimilar to the most common hemophilic bleeds.
As the name implies, only the vein is injured in tail vein transection models such as described in this paper, thus resulting in an exclusively venous bleed. Since the vessel is not fully severed, the injury is expected to be smaller than in the amputation models, and the tissue around the cut, which a clot may adhere to, is retained. In addition, there is lower blood pressure in the vein as opposed to the artery. These factors contribute to an increased sensitivity relative to amputation models, such that normalization of bleeding can be achieved with clinically relevant doses of replacement therapy, e.g., with rFVIII in hemophilia A, which is useful for evaluating the magnitude and durability of effects of procoagulant treatment26,38,39.