$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This procedure was used to pattern EM grids for whole cell cryo-ET experiments. The entire workflow presented in this study, including initial cell culture preparations, micropatterning (Figure 1), and imaging, encompasses 3-7 days. A two-step procedure was used to generate the anti-fouling layer by applying PLL to the grid and subsequently linking PEG by addition of the reactive PEG-SVA. The anti-fouling layer can also be applied in a single step by adding PLL-g-PEG in one incubation. The PLPP gel is a catalyst for the UV micropatterning, which is also available as a less concentrated liquid. The gel allows for patterning at a significantly reduced dose compared to the liquid, which results in much faster patterning. With this system, the actual patterning time of a full TEM grid was ~2 minutes. The micropatterning workflow alone generally spans 5-6 hours and allows an individual to pattern eight grids for standard cell-culture on TEM grids.
A number of the steps during the micropatterning process require long incubation times (see steps 2.1, 2.3, 6.4). Conveniently, some of these steps, such as PLL passivation (2.1) or PEG-SVA passivation (2.3), may be extended to an overnight incubation. Additionally, grids may be patterned in advance and stored in a solution of the ECM protein or PBS for later use. In our study, these options were valuable in instances where the timing of cell preparation and seeding is critical, such as primary Drosophila neurons and RSV-infection of BEAS-2B cells.
Grids were prepared in a general biosafety-level 2 (BSL-2) lab setting using clean tools, sterile solutions, and included antibiotics/antimycotics in the growth media6,22,29,30. For samples particularly sensitive to microbial contamination, the anti-fouling layer and ECM can be applied in a tissue culture hood or other sterile environment. Additionally, the grid could be washed in ethanol between patterning and ECM application. If working with infectious agents, it is important to adapt the procedure to comply with appropriate biosafety protocols.
This workflow and the procedures presented (Figure 1) allowed HeLa cells (Figure 4), RSV-infected BEAS-2B cells (Figure 3, Figure 5), and primary Drosophila larval neurons (Figure 6, Figure 7) to be seeded onto patterned EM grids for optimal cryo-ET data collection.
HeLa cells seeded onto micropatterned TEM grids remain viable as determined by fluorescent staining using a calcein-AM and ethidium homodimer-1 based cell viability assay (Figure 4A,B). Using a mixed ECM of collagen and fibrinogen, HeLa cells readily adhere to patterns across the grid (Figure 4A,C). The overall morphology of cells that expand along the pattern is similar to that of cells grown on unpatterned grids (Figure 4C,D). In the case of HeLa cells, the total cell thickness remains ~< 10 µm with significantly thinner areas ~< 1 µm thick near the cell periphery (Figure 4E,F).
For RSV studies, we patterned entire grid squares using a gradient, with a low-dose exposure on the edges and a higher dose pattern towards the center (Figure 3A). Gradient patterns yielded better results when searching for released viruses present near the periphery of cells. With these patterns, cells were found to preferentially adhere to the higher ECM concentration, but are also able to adhere to and grow on the lower ECM concentrations. The relative dose between areas will need to be optimized when using patterns that require multiple doses. If the doses and thus ECM concentrations are too similar or too disparate to one another, the effect of using multiple doses will be lost.
In Figure 3, a TEM grid was patterned and subsequently seeded with RSV infected BEAS-2B cells and used for cryo-EM data collection. Figure 4A is a fluorescent image of ECM patterned onto a TEM grid using a gradient pattern. Cell adhesion and growth along the central region of the pattern can be seen in Figure 3B as a brightfield image of the cells 18 hours post-seeding. In Figure 3C, fluorescent signal (red) from replication of RSV-A2mK+ is overlaid with signal from the ECM. The majority of the infected cells are positioned along the higher density central region of the gradient pattern. A low-mag TEM map of the grid post cryo-fixation reveals a number of cells, including RSV-infected cells, positioned on the carbon foil near the center of the grid squares. As previously shown for cells grown on standard TEM grids22, tilt-series were located and collected of RSV virions in close proximity to the periphery of infected BEAS-2B cells grown on micropatterned grids (Figure 5A,B). Many of the RSV structural proteins can be identified within the tomograms including nucleocapsid (N) and the viral fusion protein (F) (Figure 5C, blue and red arrows respectively).
For primary Drosophila neuron studies, it was found that the narrow pattern, near the resolution limit offered by the software (where the thickness of the pattern was 2 µm), allowed from one to a few cells to be isolated within a grid square (Figure 6). The neuronal soma was able to extend its neurites over a period of several days within the pattern. This allowed easy identification and tilt series acquisition of the neurites compared to neurons cultured on unpatterned grids (Figure 7). It was also found that fluorescently-labeled concanavalin A, a lectin that has been used as an ECM for in vitro Drosophila neuronal cultures20,21, is amenable for patterning.
Drosophila neurons from third instar larvae were isolated according to previously published protocols20,21,31. The neuronal preparations were applied to micropatterned cryo-EM grids where concanavalin A was deposited on the pattern to regulate cell placement, spreading, and organization. The neurons on patterned or unpatterned grids were allowed to incubate for a minimum of 48-72 hours, and the grids were then plunge frozen. A representative image of a micropatterned EM grid with several Drosophila neurons distributed across the patterned regions is shown in Figure 6A. These neurons, derived from a transgenic fly strain that has pan-neuronal GFP expression in the membrane, can be easily tracked by light microscopy not only due to its fluorescent labeling, but also because of its location within the micropatterns. While neurons cultured on unpatterned grids can also be tracked through its GFP signaling by light microscopy (Figure 7A, yellow circle), locating them in cryo-EM became substantially more difficult due to the presence of cellular debris and contamination from the media (Figure 7B, yellow circle). Such presence was lessened for neurons on patterned grids, likely due to the PEG in the anti-fouling layer of the non-patterned regions repelling the cell debris from adhering. Due to the dimensions of the neuron cell body and the extended neurites (Figure 6A,B, yellow circle), cryo-ET tilt series were collected along thinner regions of the cells (Figure 6C,D, red circle). The neuronal cell membrane, a mitochondrion (cyan), microtubules (purple), actin filaments (blue), vesicular structures (orange and green), and macromolecules such as ribosomes (red) were well resolved in higher-magnification image montages and slices through the 3D tomogram (Figure 6E). While similar sub-cellular features can be seen from 3D tomograms of unpatterned neurons (Figure 7E), the difficulty in locating viable cellular targets for data collection decreased throughput substantially.
In Figure 8, representative images from grids with some of these issues have been assembled to assist in their identification and troubleshooting. Once optimal conditions are determined, micropatterning is a reliable and reproducible method for the positioning of cells on grids for cryo-TEM.

Figure 1: General workflow of micropatterning for cryo-EM. The workflow can be roughly divided four parts: Grid preparation, micropatterning, ECM and cell seeding, and cryo-preparation and data collection. Major steps of each section are listed below the headings and the approximate time to complete each section is shown to the left. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Screen shot of the software with pattern positioned on grid. Area 1 contains the µm/pix ratio for pattern design. Area 2 is the ruler for measuring a grid. Area 3 is where to add or change patterns and ROIs. Area 4 contains all of the information for pattern positioning and dose. Area 5 contains options for patterns, including toggling overlays, copying or deleting patterns, and selecting patterns for micropatterning. Area 6 is where templates can be saved and loaded. Larger views of areas 4 and 5 are shown below for clarity. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: RSV-infected BEAS-2B cells on the patterned cryo-TEM grid. (A) Fluorescent image of the patterned grid after addition of fluorescently labeled ECM. The input pattern is shown in the lower left corner. (B) Brightfield image of BEAS-2B cells grown on the grid in A. (C) Merge of the image in A (cyan) and B (grey) with fluorescent image of RSV-infected cells (red) immediately prior to plunge-freezing; infected cells express mKate-2. Scale bars are 500 µm. (D) Low-magnification cryo-TEM map of the grid in B after plunge-freezing. Fluorescent images are pseudocolored. Scale bars are 500 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Live/Dead staining of patterned and unpatterned cells. (A) Fluorescent image of HeLa cells grown on a patterned grid and stained with calcein-AM (live cell stain, green) and ethidium homodimer-1 (dead cell stain, red). (B) HeLa cells grown on an unpatterned grid and stained as in A. (C) Projection of confocal z-stacks of a HeLa cell on a patterned Quantifoil R2/2 grid with 0.01 mg/mL collagen and fibrinogen 647 ECM (red). Cell was stained with calcein-AM (green) and Hoechst-33342 (blue). (D) HeLa cells on unpatterned grid incubated with 0.01 mg/mL collagen and fibrinogen 647 ECM, incubated and stained with calcein-AM and Hoecsht-33342. The fluorescent images were merged with transmitted light (grayscale). (E) X,Z projection of C. (F) X,Z projection of D. Images are pseudocolored. Scale bars in (A) and (B) are 500 µm; scale bars in (C) - (F) are 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Cryo-ET of RSV-infected BEAS-2B cell on the patterned cryo-TEM grid. (A) Cryo-EM grid square map of RSV infected BEAS-2B cell. Approximate cell boundary is indicated by the dashed green line. (B) Higher resolution image of area boxed in red in (A). Approximate cell boundary is indicated by dashed green line. RSV virions can be seen near the cell periphery (white arrow and yellow box). (C) Single z-slice from tomogram collected in the area of the yellow box in (B). Red arrows point to RSV F fusion protein, blue arrows point to the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. The scale bars in (A)-(C) are embedded in the image. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Primary neurons derived from the brains of 3rd instar Drosophila melanogaster larvae on the patterned cryo-TEM grid. (A) Overlaid live-cell fluorescence microscopy grid montage of Drosophila neurons expressing membrane-targeted GFP on patterned grid squares with 0.5 mg/mL fluorescent concanavalin A. Green: Drosophila neurons. Blue: Photopattern. (B) Cryo-EM image montage of the grid in (A) after cryo-preservation. Yellow circle notes the same grid square as in (A). (C) Cryo-EM image montage of the square highlighted by the yellow circle in (A) and (B). (D) Higher magnification image of the area bounded by the red circle in (C), where a tilt series was collected on the cell's neurites. E. 25 nm thick slice of a tomogram reconstructed from the tilt series that was acquired from the red circle in (C). Various organelles can be seen in this tomogram, such as the mitochondria (cyan), microtubules (purple), dense core vesicles (orange), light vesicles (green), the endoplasmic reticulum (yellow), and actin (blue). Macromolecules, such as ribosomes (red), can also be seen in the upper right corner. Fluorescent images are pseudocolored. The scale bars in (A)-(E) are embedded in the image. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Primary neurons derived from the brains of 3rd instar Drosophila melanogaster larvae on unpatterned grids. (A) Live-cell fluorescence microscopy grid montage of Drosophila neurons expressing membrane-targeted GFP on grid squares with 0.5 mg/mL concanavalin A. Green: Drosophila neurons. (B) Cryo-EM grid montage of the same grid in (A) after plunge-freezing. Yellow circle shows the same grid square as in (A). Note the presence of cellular debris and media contamination, which made target identification difficult compared to patterned grids. (C) Cryo-EM image montage of the square highlighted by the yellow circles in the (A) and (B) maps. (D) Higher magnification image of the area bounded by the red circle in (C), where a tilt series was collected on the cell's neurites. (E) 25 nm thick slice of the reconstructed tomogram from the tilt series from (C) and (D). A number of organelles are visible in this tomogram, such as microtubules (purple), actin (blue), the endoplasmic reticulum (yellow), and dense core vesicles (orange). Macromolecules, such as ribosomes (red), can also be seen. Fluorescent images are pseudocolored. The scale bars in (A)-(E) are embedded in the image. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Examples of possible problems with patterning. Fluorescent images of labeled ECM deposited on micropatterned grids. (A) Uneven patterning across the grid due to uneven distribution of PLPP gel. (B) ECM cannot adhere to areas covered by the PDMS stencil during patterning. (C) Saturated gradient pattern (right side) or inverted pattern (left) on a grid patterned with too high total dose. (D) ECM is adhering to areas on the grid bars as well as patterned area due to reflections of the UV laser during patterning. Images are pseudocolored; input pattern is shown in the lower left; scale bars are 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Issue | Potential cause(s) | Troubleshooting |
| Micropatterning | | |
| Cannot see illumination from PRIMO laser | • Light path is not set up correctly | • Check that the microscope light path is set up properly |
| • PRIMO laser is not on or laser is interlocked |
| Many broken grid squares | • Touching grid foil with tweezers or pipet while handling | • Handle grids with care |
| • Grid dried out during incubations or washing | • Do not allow grid to dry during washes and incubations |
| Large unpatterned areas | • Insufficient gel coverage | • Ensure gel spreads evenly over grid while adding |
| • Grid foil out of focus during patterning | • Add an additional microliter of gel |
| •Area covered by stencil | • Check focus before patterning each region |
| • Carefully center grid in stencil |
| Saturated or inverted pattern | • Incorrect dose | • Try a range of total doses for pattern |
| • Insufficient gel coverage | • Ensure grid is evenly covered with gel |
| • Try different values for grayscale patterns |
| Blurry pattern | • Poor focus during patterning | • Repeat PRIMO calibration at same height as sample |
| • Incorrect calibration | • Focus on grid foil before patterning |
| • Divide pattern into additional regions for patterning |
| ECM adhereing outside of pattern | • Reflections from gel or dust | • Ensure gel is dry before patterning |
| • Make sure coverslip and objective lens are clean |
| ECM not visible after patterning | • Photo bleaching | • Minimize light exposure to ECM prior to imaging |
| • Incorrect dose during patterning | • Try a range of total dose values for pattern |
| • Insufficient ECM incubation time | • Increase incubation time for ECM |
| Cell seeding | | |
| Cells clumping | • Over digestion | • Use lower percentage of trypsin or time for release of adherent cells |
| • High cell density | • Passage and/or digest cells at lower confluency |
| • Do not agitate cells during release |
| • Gently pipet cell solution or use cell strainers |
| Cells not adhering to patterned areas | • ECM is not suitable for cell type | • Try different ECM concentrations and composition |
| • Cells viability is decreased prior to seeding | • Ensure cell culture and cell release conditions are not damaging cells |
| Cells not expanding after adhesion | • ECM or pattern not suitable for cell type | • Try different patterns and ECM |
| • In some cases a more continuous foil (R1.2/20 vs R2/1) may promote cell expansion |
Table 1: Potential issues during micropatterning. This table describes some issues a user may experience during micropatterning or cell-seeding. Potential causes and troubleshooting are provided for each issue. Representative images of some problems can be seen in Figure 8.