Peptidoglycan (PG) is a mesh-like polymer that delineates cell shape and structure in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria1,2. This heteropolymer is a matrix of amino sugars cross-linked by short peptides3,4,5,6 with a backbone composed of β-(1,4)-linked alternating N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) residues (Figure 1)1. Attached to the C-3 lactyl moiety of MurNAc is the stem peptide. The metabolism of PG involves a tightly coordinated system of biosynthetic and degradative enzymes to incorporate new material into the cell wall7,8. Degradation of PG is carried out by enzymes collectively referred to as autolysins9 and further classified based on the specificity of the bond cleaved. Autolysins participate in many cellular processes including cell growth, cell division, motility, PG maturation, chemotaxis, protein secretion, genetic competence, differentiation, and pathogenicity10,11. Unraveling the specific biological functions of individual autolysins can be daunting, due in part to functional redundancy. However, recent biophysical8,12,13 and computational studies12 have provided new insight into their roles in PG metabolism. In addition, recent reports have provided further insight into the synthesis14 and membrane-mediated15,16,17 steps in PG metabolism. A thorough understanding of the relationship between degradative and synthetic pathways of PG metabolism could give rise to previously untapped antibiotic targets.
While there have been significant advances in methodology to study glycobiology in eukaryotes, bacterial glycobiology and, in particular, PG metabolism has not advanced at a similar rate. Current chemical approaches to study PG metabolism include fluorescently labeled antibiotics18, fluorescent probes19,20, and metabolic labeling21,22,23,24. These new approaches are providing new ways to interrogate bacterial cell wall metabolism. While some of these strategies are capable of labeling PG in vivo, they can be species-specific19, or only work in strains lacking a particular autolysin25. Many PG labeling strategies are intended for use with isolated cell walls26 or with in vitro reconstituted PG biosynthesis pathways20,27,28. The use of fluorescently labeled antibiotics is currently limited to biosynthetic steps and transpeptidation18.
The current knowledge of bacterial autolysins and their role in cell wall metabolism comes from genetic and in vitro biochemical analysis11,29,30,31,32. While these approaches have provided a wealth of information on this important class of enzymes, deciphering their biological role can be challenging. For instance, due to functional redundancy33, deletion of an autolysin in most cases does not result in halting bacterial growth. This is despite their implied role in cell growth and division7,12. Another complication is that genetic deletion of bacterial autolysins can give rise to meta-phenotypes34. Meta-phenotypes arise from the complex interplay between the pathway affected by the genetic deletion and other interconnected pathways. For instance, a meta-phenotype can arise via a direct effect such as the lack of an enzyme, or an indirect effect such as a disruption of regulators.
Currently, there are only a few inhibitors of glycosidase autolysins such as N-acetylglucosaminidases (GlcNAcase) and N-acetylmuramidases, which can be used as chemical probes to study the degradation of PG. To address this, the diamide masarimycin (previously termed as fgkc) has been identified and characterized35 as a bacteriostatic inhibitor of Bacillus subtilis growth that targets the GlcNAcase LytG32 (Figure 1). LytG is an exo-acting GlcNAcase36, a member of cluster 2 within glycosyl hydrolase family 73 (GH73). It is the major active GlcNAcase during vegetative growth32. To our knowledge, masarimycin is the first inhibitor of a PG-acting GlcNAcase that inhibits cellular growth. Additional studies of masarimycin with Streptococcus pneumoniae found that masarimycin likely inhibits cell wall metabolism in this organism37. Here, the preparation of masarimycin is reported for use as a chemical biology probe to study physiology in the Gram-positive organisms B. subtilis, and S. pneumoniae. Examples of morphological analysis of sub-minimum inhibitory concentration treatment with masarimycin, as well as a synergy/antagonism assay are presented. Synergy and antagonism assays using antibiotics with well-defined modes of action can be a useful way to explore connections between cellular processes38,39,40.