The goal of this method is to investigate how retinal input influences the growth and development of the optic tectum, the visual processing center in the zebrafish brain. By removing one eye and then comparing the two sides of the optic tectum, tectal changes within the same specimen can be observed and normalized, enabling comparison across multiple specimens. Modern molecular approaches combined with this technique will yield insights into the mechanisms underlying visual system growth and development, as well as axonal degeneration and regeneration.
Sensory systems - visual, auditory, and somatosensory - gather information from external organs and relay that information to the central nervous system, generating "maps" of the external world across the midbrain1,2. Vision is the dominant sensory modality for nearly all vertebrates, including many fishes. The retina, the neural tissue in the eye, gathers information with a neuronal circuit consisting primarily of photoreceptors, bipolar cells, and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the projection neurons of the retina. RGCs have long axons that find their way across the inner surface of the retina to the optic nerve head, where they fasciculate and travel together through the brain, ultimately terminating in the visual processing center in the dorsal midbrain. This structure is called the optic tectum in fish and other non-mammalian vertebrates and is homologous to the superior colliculus in mammals3.
The optic tectum is a bilaterally symmetric multilayered structure in the dorsal midbrain. In zebrafish and most other fishes, each lobe of the optic tectum receives visual input solely from the contralateral eye, such that the left optic nerve terminates in the right tectal lobe and the right optic nerve terminates in the left tectal lobe4 (Figure 1). Like its mammalian counterpart, the superior colliculus, the optic tectum integrates visual information with other sensory inputs, including audition and somatosensation, controlling shifts in visual attention and eye movements such as saccades1,5,6. However, unlike the mammalian superior colliculus, the optic tectum continuously generates new neurons and glia from a specialized stem cell niche near the medial and caudal edges of the tectal lobes called the tectal proliferation zone7. Maintenance of proliferative progenitors in the optic tectum and other regions of the central nervous system contributes, in part, to the remarkable regenerative capacity documented in zebrafish8.
Previous work examining the brains of blind or one-eyed fishes revealed that optic tectum size is directly proportional to the amount of retinal innervation it receives9,10,11. In adult cave fish, whose eyes degenerate in early embryogenesis, the optic tectum is noticeably smaller than that of closely related, sighted surface fish9. Cave fish eye degeneration can be blocked by replacing the endogenous lens with a lens from a surface fish during embryogenesis. When these one-eyed cave fish are reared to adulthood, the innervated tectal lobe contains approximately 10% more cells than the non-innervated tectal lobe9. Similarly, in larval killifish that were incubated with chemical treatments to generate eyes of different sizes within the same individual, the side of the tectum with more innervation was larger and contained more neurons10. Evidence from optic nerve crush experiments in adult goldfish indicates that innervation promotes proliferation, with tectal cell proliferation decreasing when innervation was disrupted11.
Confirming and extending these classical studies, several recent reports provide data suggesting that proliferation in response to innervation is modulated, at least in part, by the BDNF-TrkB pathway12,13. Many open questions about optic tectum growth and development remain, including how a developing sensory system copes with injury and axon degeneration, which cellular and molecular signals enable retinal input to regulate optic tectum growth, when these mechanisms become active, and whether innervation-linked proliferation and differentiation enable the retina and its target tissue to coordinate growth rates and ensure accurate retinotopic mapping. In addition, there are much larger questions about activity-dependent development that can be addressed by interrogating the zebrafish visual system with surgical approaches such as the one described below.
To investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which neural activity, specifically from visual input, alters cell survival and proliferation, the described approach directly compares innervated and denervated tectal lobes (Figure 1) within individual zebrafish larvae. This method allows for the documentation of RGC axon degeneration in the optic tectum and confirmation that the number of mitotic cells correlates with innervation.

Figure 1: Sketches of zebrafish larvae before and after unilateral eye removal. (A) Drawing of 5 dpf larvae as viewed under a dissecting microscope. Each larva is embedded in low-melting-point agarose and oriented laterally before a tungsten needle with a sharp, hooked tip is used to scoop out the eye facing up (left eye in this example). (B) Drawing of the dorsal view of a 9 dpf larva resulting from the surgery depicted in A. Only three highly schematized RGC axons from the right eye are shown defasciculating and connecting with neurons in the left tectal lobe. Abbreviations: dpf = days post fertilization; dps = days post surgery; RGC = retinal ganglion cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.