The best surgical treatment for ovarian endometriosis, especially when fertility preservation is a priority for women with a desire for offspring, is still a matter of debate. Although cystectomy is still the recommended technique1, previous studies have raised some concerns about its possible detrimental effect on ovarian reserve and reproductive outcomes due to the inadvertent removal of healthy ovarian parenchyma2,3,4.
Indeed, unlike non-endometriotic cysts, endometrioma is a pseudocyst not surrounded by a real anatomic capsule5, in which inflammation caused by free iron and reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a role in the substitution of the surrounding normal ovarian cortical tissue with fibrous tissue6. Thus, the absence of a clear cleavage plan may lead to an increased risk of removing healthy ovarian parenchyma, even when cystectomy is performed by experienced surgeons7,8.
Moreover, cystectomy-mediated injuries could lead to compromised vascularization due to the diffusion of thermal damage to the surrounding healthy ovarian parenchyma during coagulation, as shown by previous findings where adverse changes in the ovarian artery blood flow were reported after cystectomy9,10,11.
At our institution, concerns about ovarian damage after cystectomy led to the introduction of CO2 fiber laser technology since in 2015. This surgical procedure, which can deliver energy with a controlled tissue penetration depth and little thermal spread, was inspired by the work of Jacques Donnez more than 20 years ago12.
Although ablative techniques involving CO2 fiber laser technology do not represent a novelty in the surgical management of endometrioma, many surgeons may not feel confident with the procedure. Indeed, only a few studies have investigated the impact of this technique on ovarian reserve, pregnancy outcome, and the rate of recurrence of endometriosis. The aim of this protocol is to provide an overview of the promising results obtained using the CO2 fiber laser technology since its introduction in 2015 and to describe the simplicity and reproducibility of this technique.
Firstly, in order to assess the impact of CO2 fiber laser vaporization and cystectomy on ovarian reserve markers, a multicenter randomized trial was conducted between 2017 and 2018. A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned either to Group 1 (cystectomy: 30 patients) or Group 2 (CO2 laser vaporization: 30 patients) at a ratio of 1:1, by using a computer-generated randomization list that used the simple randomization method13. To investigate postoperative spontaneous conception, a prospective observational study was conducted between 2015 and 2019 on 142 women, comparing cystectomy and laser vaporization14. When pregnancy was not achieved after CO2 fiber laser vaporization, patients were referred to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics and were then included (n = 26) in a prospective observational study to investigate ovarian responsiveness to controlled ovarian stimulation15. Following this, a retrospective analysis of a larger sample size study population (n = 125, women with or without offspring desire), who were treated between 2015 and 2018 and whose follow-up lasted at least 12 months, was performed to assess the recurrence rate of a cyst and/or pain symptoms after both the surgical techniques16.