$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Bone has remarkable regeneration abilities as one of the few structures in the body that can heal by recreating its normal cellular composition, orientation, and mechanical strength up until a critical defect size, when endogenous healing capacity is compromised1. Bone, together with cartilage and ligament, supports and facilitates body movement, while also storing minerals and fats and producing blood cells. As a hard, dense connective tissue, bone is mainly composed of an inorganic phase, water, and organic material composed primarily of collagen fibers2. Cells are embedded within this highly mineralized matrix of collagen I fibers and hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals, forming a hierarchical structure3.
The complex organization of this tissue makes the fabrication of synthetic alternatives to replicate the heterogeneous bone micro- and nano-environments exceptionally challenging3. For this purpose, a variety of materials, including bioceramics, cell-laden hydrogels, and synthetic materials have been proposed as solutions to create bone matrices. Among the scaffold fabrication techniques, 3D printing-based techniques have recently emerged and received much attention from the tissue engineering community owing to their remarkable ability to allow the fabrication of highly sophisticated and precise structures with great promise of patient-specific treatment4,5,6. Hydrogels have been the most popular choice of matrix mimics and bio-inks since they can be printed together with cells and bioactive molecules, generating functional constructs6. However, hydrogels lack the functional properties of bone, such as mechanical strength and a highly calcified, inorganic phase containing metabolically active cells.
3D printed ceramic scaffolds typically require postprocessing steps, including sintering, high-temperature treatments, or using harsh chemicals that must be thoroughly washed before in vitro or in vivo applications5. To address these limitations, Lode et al.7 recently developed an α-tricalcium phosphate-based paste formed by hydroxyapatite, which can be printed and set under physiological conditions. However, this material still cannot be printed together with live cells as it requires post-treatment in a humid environment and subsequent aqueous solution immersion for a long period.
Alternatively, cell-laden hydrogels with inorganic particles incorporated have been proposed as a replacement for 3D bone matrix8,9. Despite their great ability to support cell viability, they are not able to recapitulate the densely mineralized bone tissue environment. Thrivikarman et al.10 adopted a biomimetic approach in which a supersaturated calcium and phosphate medium was used with a non-collagenous protein analog to better mimic the nanoscale apatite deposition. However, their constructs still cannot generate rigid 3D constructs with micro- and macro-scale architecture resembling bone.
The present study addresses these shortcomings through the development of a printing strategy to fabricate bone-mimicking constructs, in inorganic and organic phases, that are able to integrate both cells and growth factors11. COBICS uniquely recapitulates the mineral and cellular structure of bone using a microgel-based bioprinting technique. The protocol herein describes the process of synthesizing the ceramic bone-ink and gelatin-based microgels and then combining cells that enable COBICS. The process begins with the synthesis of the main precursor material of the bone-ink. The cross-linkable hydrogel is then synthesized and formed into microgels. Lastly, the bone-ink is deposited omnidirectionally in a support bath of the microgels laden with cells (Figure 1).
The bone-ink may be printed into any suspension of microgels that have the appropriate yield-stress characteristics, that is, the ability to fluidize at a specific shear rate and subsequently support the deposited structure. Two flexible approaches have been demonstrated: a suspension consisting of gelatin microgels and a suspension consisting of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) microgels. The former suspension dissolves when the temperature is raised to 37 °C, the freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) technique12, while the latter can be photocrosslinked after printing, effectively "stitching" the microgels together and locking the printed bone-ink in place. The present study focuses on using GelMA as the matrix as it provides the unique advantage of being able to support cell growth with in situ printing of complex bone mimetic structures. Ultimately, this approach enables the generation of complex tissue models with high levels of biomimicry and broad implications for disease modeling, drug discovery, and regenerative engineering.

Figure 1: Schematic of the workflow. (A) The bone-ink is synthesized starting from α-tricalcium phosphate synthesis and its subsequent combination with glycerol, polysorbate 80, and ammonium phosphate dibasic. (B) GelMA microgels are fabricated by the water-in-oil emulsion method. The obtained microgels are then (C) hydrated and (D) combined with cells. Cell-microgel composites are then used as a granular bath in which the bone-ink is deposited. (E) The whole construct is then UV-crosslinked and transferred to the incubator for culture. Abbreviations: α-TCP = α-tricalcium phosphate; GelMA =gelatin methacrylate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.