The method presented here was modified according to instruction from TA Instruments and is sufficient to determine the binding affinity and thermodynamics of many selected aptamers and targets at our center. Crucial steps from this procedure include exchanging the buffer to have a target matching the ligand, running samples with proper parameters, and finding the appropriate binding fitting model to analyze the data. Continuous recording of heat release requires eliminating all noise heat, such as from mismatch of the buffer, dirtiness of the cell and syringe, and bubbles inside the samples. In the buffer exchange step, it is better to use the last dialysis buffer or flow-through buffer in the dialysis membrane or spin column to dissolve the ligand because it is expensive to exchange small molecules directly.
Most other binding affinity determination methods assume a 1:1 binding ratio between aptamer and ligand. However, due to the binding behavior and the drastically different size between small molecules and aptamers, the 1:1 binding model is not always accurate14,15. In this aspect, the ITC can give data on the binding stoichiometry to know the number of binding sites and give information about binding behavior7,15. That advanced function can be provided by using the correct binding model from the ITC analysis software, either the one- or two-site binding model. One saturated point can be analyzed at a different binding ratio of 1:1 (1 binding site), 1:2, or 0.5:1 (two binding sites). For the sequential model, there is no distinct saturated site but only a total number of saturated sites. If the sites are identical, the data fit with sequential saturation. There, the first binding site has more empty copies of the same kind to choose from than the second site, as evident from the decrease in released heat energy from site to site14,15,16. The binding parameters determine the binding constant K for each binding site. In this case, it shows the binding with two sequential binding sites, confirming the conformational change in the overall molecule. Although ITC offers many advanced functions to characterize the binding between the aptamer and small molecules, the optimization process having good conditions costs time7,16,17. Besides, in comparison with other instruments, ITC equipment is expensive and requires handling by a well-trained technician.
In most cases, determining the binding affinity between an aptamer and a small molecule ligand is challenging. ITC can be considered an advanced method for this purpose because ITC provides highly accurate binding affinities, as well as thermodynamic information. From this information, we can predict its behavior to use it for clinical use or detection. For example, with the selected aptamer with two binding sites, we can truncate it to keep one binding site if one site is not favorable for binding, or we can split the aptamer into two aptamers if both binding sites have the same behavior. Also, with conformation structure change behavior, we can combine the aptamer with a quenching platform to develop a sensor.