$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Selective spinal manipulation can promote body weight gain in infant rats with cerebral palsy.
During the treatment, body weight was measured on postnatal days 3, 14, 28, 42, and 61 (Figure 4, Table 3). On the third day after birth, the body weight of the Sham group was 5.53 ± 0.035 g, and the body weight of the Control group was 3.15 ± 0.43 g. The body weight of the Treatment group was 4.42 ± 0.13 g, and it was not significantly different from that of the Sham and Control groups before modeling.
On postnatal day 14, the body weight of the Sham group was 35.97 ± 1.019 g, the body weight of the Control group was 28.00 ± 0.7403 g, and the body weight of the Treatment group was 33.78 ± 3.705 g. There was no significant difference in body weight between the Treatment and Sham groups. The weight of the Treatment group compared with the Control group was statistically significant (P < 0.01).
On the 28th day after birth, the body weight of the Sham group was 104.9 ± 3.534 g, the body weight of the Control group was 80.35 ± 6.767 g, and the body weight of the Treatment group was 96.73 ± 7.638 g. The Treatment group was compared with the Control group, and it was statistically significant (P < 0.01).
On postnatal day 42, the body weight of the Sham group was 194.1 ± 4.333 g, the body weight of the Control group was 138.0 ± 6.029 g, and the body weight of the Treatment group was 173.9 ± 5.433 g. There was a statistically significant difference in body weight between the Treatment and Control groups (P < 0.0001).
On postnatal day 61, the body weight of the Sham group was 321.5 ± 5.675 g, the body weight of the Control group was 230.3 ± 5.198 g, and the body weight of the Treatment group was 268.9 ± 15.22 g. P < 0.0001 was considered statistically significant. There was a statistically significant difference in body weight between the Treatment and Control groups at P < 0.0001.
Selective spinal manipulation can improve cerebral palsy's effective motor balance function.
On the 61st day after birth, after the end of treatment, we performed the fatigue rotarod test. The first falling time of each group was 296.1 ± 1.65 s in the Sham group, 102.7 ± 7.73 s in the Control group, and 220.1 ± 8.04 s in the Treatment group. There was a significant difference between the Sham and Control groups (P < 0.0001). The difference between the Treatment group and the Control group was statistically significant (P < 0.0001), and the difference between the Treatment group and the Sham group was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) (Figure 5, Table 4)
On the 61st day after birth, after the end of treatment, the Foot-fault scores of the Sham and Control groups were 5.53 ± 0.03 and 3.15 ± 0.43, respectively. The score of the Treatment group, 4.42 ± 0.13, was significantly lower than that of the Sham group (P < 0.0001). The score of the Treatment group was significantly higher than that of the Control group (P < 0.0001). Compared with the Treatment group and the Sham group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) (Figure 6, Table 5).
Selective spinal manipulation can regulate the level of growth hormone secretion in cerebral palsy.
Tissue samples were taken on postnatal day 32, and the hypothalamus of rats with cerebral palsy was selected for Western blot, and the corresponding primary and secondary antibodies were selected: Antibodies used were primary anti-Growth Hormone antibody, anti-Growth Hormone receptor antibody, internal reference Anti-beta Actin antibody for primary antibodies and Goat anti-RabbitIgG H&L (HRP) (1/10000) for secondary antibody. Selective spinal manipulation can promote the growth and development of infant rats with cerebral palsy by regulating the expression of growth hormone (GH) and growth hormone receptor (GHR) (Figure 7, Table 6)29.
Promoting the growth and development of infant rats with cerebral palsy can improve the content of serotonin and norepinephrine in the hippocampus, thereby improving the ability to learn and memory30.
Selective spinal manipulation can effectively improve the local acupoint temperature (Figure 8, Table 7).
Infrared thermal imaging was used to detect the temperature of the local acupoint area before and after the treatment in the treatment group. It was found that the temperature was maintained at 32.92 ± 0.55 °C before the treatment, 36.32 ± 0.15 °C immediately after the treatment, and 35.32 ± 0.28 °C 2 min after the treatment. The temperature was 34.61 ± 0.17 °C 5 min after the end of treatment and 34.28 ± 0.60 °C 10 min after the end of treatment. The differences were statistically significant compared with the immediate temperature before the end of treatment and the local acupoint area 2 min, 5 min, and 10 min after treatment (P < 0.05). After selective spinal manipulation, the temperature of the local acupoint area in the treatment group was increased and maintained to a certain extent.

Figure 1: Righting reflex. (A) Schematic representation of the righting reflex experiment. The righting reflex test was performed on the 4th day after birth (the second day after modeling) to verify the success of modeling. (B) Bar graph of righting reflex test in each group (n = 6, Mean ± SD). Note: ns indicates P > 0.05 and no statistical difference. **** indicates a P < 0.0001, indicating a highly significant difference. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Selective spinal manipulation. (A) Handling of pups before manipulation. The infant rats were placed in the palm of the operator and kept quiet, which was the environment in the camp. (B) Representation of selective spinal manipulation. Press and knead the muscles on both sides of the spine. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Map of acupoints on the back of human versus SD rat. (A) Human and (B) SD rat. C7: seventh cervical vertebra; GV14: Dazhui (GV14), location: between the seventh cervical vertebra and the first thoracic vertebra, dorsal midline; T3: third thoracic vertebra; BL13: Feishu (BL13), location: between the two ribs below the third thoracic vertebra; T5: fifth thoracic vertebra; BL15: Xinshu point, located between the two sides of the lower rib of the fifth thoracic vertebra; T7: seventh thoracic vertebra; BL17: Geshu point, location: lower and lower ribs of the seventh thoracic vertebra; BL18: Ganshu point, location: lower and lower ribs of the seventh thoracic vertebra; T11: eleventh thoracic vertebra; GV6: Jizhong point, located between the eleventh and twelfth spinous process of thoracic vertebra; BL20: Pishu point, located between the two ribs below the twelfth thoracic vertebra; L2: second lumbar spine; GV4: Mingmen (GV4), location: the dorsal median line, the depression under the second lumbar spinous process; BL23: Shenshu point, located on both sides of the second lumbar spine. GV20: Baihui (GV20), location: median parietal bone; GV16, Fengfu point, location: occipito-atlantoaxial joint dorsal depression behind occipital crest. The location of acupoints in the human body is highly consistent with the location of acupoints in animals from the anatomical position. The abnormal response point was close to the projection point of the innervated body surface. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Bar chart of weight measurement in each group (n = 6, Mean ± SD). Note: ns P >0.05, no statistical difference; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001,****P < 0.0001, the difference was statistically significant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Bar graph of the time of the first drop of the Roat-rod test in each group (n = 6, Mean ± SD). Note: ****P < 0.0001, the difference was statistically significant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Bar plot of the Foot-fault scores in each group (n = 6, Mean ± SD). Note: ****P < 0.0001, the difference was statistically significant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Western blot bands of GH and GH receptor. Western blot was used to detect the secretion of growth hormone at the molecular biological level in each group, and the effect of selective spinal manipulation on growth hormone was observed. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Temperature monitoring before and after treatment. (Top Panel) Thermal images taken by an infrared thermal imager. The temperature (°C) of the local acupoint area was recorded by an infrared thermal imager before and after tuina treatment. (A) Before tuina treatment. (B) Temperature immediately at the end of treatment. (C) Local acupoint temperature 2 min after treatment. (D) Local acupoint temperature 5 min after the end of treatment. (E) local acupoint temperature 10 min after treatment. (Bottom Panel) Bar chart of temperature monitoring before and after treatment (n = 3, Mean ± SD).*P < 0.05, P < 0.01, * * * * *P < 0.001, * * * *P < 0.0001, the difference is statistically significant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Group | Number of cases (n) | Righting reflex/s |
| Sham | 6 | 0.77 ± 0.10 |
| Control | 6 | 19.00 ± 2.04* |
| Treatment | 6 | 19.77 ± 0.55# |
Table 1: The time statistics of righting reflex in infant rats with cerebral palsy(Mean ± SD; n = 6). Pups in each group were subjected to the righting reflex test on the 4th day after birth (the 2nd day after modeling) to verify whether the model was successful. * Compared with Sham group, P < 0.0001; # compared with Control group, P < 0.0001.
| Score | Standard for evaluation |
| 1 | When the young rat is placed on the horizontal ladder, the foot slips off when bearing weight, affecting the walking |
| 2 | When the young rat is placed on the ladder, the foot slips when bearing weight, but does not affect the walking |
| 3 | When the young rat is placed on the horizontal ladder, the rat moves the foot quickly to the next step of the ladder bearing weight |
| 4 | When the young rat is placed on the horizontal ladder, the rat places the foot partially, and moves across the ladder bearing weight |
| 5 | When the young rat is placed on the horizontal ladder, the rat puts its foot on one step and quickly moved to another step |
| 6 | When the young rat is placed on the horizontal ladder, the rat places its paw pads correctly and fully bearing the body weight |
Table 2: Foot-fault test score standard table
| Time (Day) | Number of cases (n) | Group |
| Sham | Control | Treatment |
| P3 | 6 | 8.52 ± 0.27 | 8.60 ± 0.08 | 8.45 ± 0.28D |
| P14 | 6 | 35.97 ± 1.01 | 28.00 ± 0.74* | 33.78 ± 3.70Ñ |
| P28 | 6 | 104.9 ± 3.53 | 80.35 ± 6.76* | 96.73 ± 7.63Ñ |
| P42 | 6 | 194.1 ± 4.33 | 138.0 ± 6.02* | 173.9 ± 5.43#D |
| P61 | 6 | 321.5 ± 5.67 | 230.3 ± 5.19* | 268.9 ± 15.22#D |
Table 3: The weight test results of each group (Mean ± SD) (g). Note: Ñ Compared with Control group, P < 0.01; ° Compared with Sham group, P < 0.01; à Compared with Control group, P < 0.001; * Compared with Sham group, P < 0.0001; # Compared with Control group, P < 0.0001; D Compared with Sham group, P < 0.0001.
| Group | Number of cases (n) | Roat-rod/time/s |
| Sham | 6 | 296.1 ± 1.65 |
| Control | 6 | 102.7 ± 7.73* |
| Treatment | 6 | 220.1 ± 8.04#D |
Table 4: The Rotarod test of infant rats in each group (Mean ± SD) (s). Note: * Compared with the Sham group, P < 0.0001; # Compared with the Control group, P < 0.0001; D Compared with the Sham group, P < 0.0001.
| Group | Number of cases (n) | Foot-Fault score |
| Sham | 6 | 5.53 ± 0.03 |
| Control | 6 | 3.15 ± 0.43* |
| Treatment | 6 | 4.42 ± 0.13#D |
Table 5: The Foot-fault scores of each group (Mean ± SD). Note: * Compared with the Sham group, P < 0.0001; # Compared with the Control group, P < 0.0001; D Compared with the Sham group, P < 0.0001.
| Group | GH | GHR |
| Sham | 2.325 ± 0.830 | 1.469 ± 0.265 |
| Control | 1.563 ± 0.070# | 1.563 ± 0.070Ñ |
| Treatment | 2.471 ± 0.956* | 2.471 ± 0.956& |
Table 6: Growth hormone and growth hormone receptor Western blot band gray value data (n = 10). GH:* The pairwise comparison between the Treatment group and the Control group (P = 0.020 < 0.05) showed statistically significant difference; # Pairwise comparison between Sham group and Control group (P = 0.022 < 0.05) showed significant difference; The pairwise comparison between the Treatment group and the Sham group showed no statistical significance (P = 0.076 > 0.05); GHR: & Pairwise comparison between Treatment group and Control group (P = 0.024 < 0.05) showed significant difference; Ñ Pairwise comparison between Sham group and Model group (P = 0.021 < 0.05) showed statistically significant difference; Pairwise comparison between Treatment group and Sham group showed no statistical significance (P = 0.085 > 0.05).
| Time of therapy | Number of cases (n) | Temperature |
| Before treatment | 3 | 32.92 ± 0.55 |
| Immediately | 3 | 36.32 ± 0.15* |
| After 2 min | 3 | 35.32 ± 0.28# |
| After 5 min | 3 | 34.61 ± 0.17Ñ |
| After 10 min | 3 | 34.28 ± 0.60Dà |
Table 7: Temperature monitoring results before and after treatment (Mean ± SD) (°C). Note: * Compared with those before treatment, P < 0.0001; # Compared with that before treatment, P < 0.001; D Compared with 0 min after treatment, P <0.001; Ñ Compared with before treatment, P < 0.01; à Compared with pre-treatment, P < 0.05.