Orofacial muscles are critical in daily physiological activities such as mastication, speech, respiration, and facial expression1. In congenital orofacial deformities, however, these muscles exhibit atrophic and fibrotic alterations, leading to impaired body health and social cognition2. Facial reconstructive surgery remains the first-line treatment, but up to 30-70% of postoperative patients still suffer from muscle loss and muscle dysfunction3,4 The failure of orofacial muscle regeneration has been attributed to intrinsic factors, which cannot be corrected by surgery alone.
The emergence of orofacial muscles is an evolutionary novelty, accompanying the complex vertebrate head and chambered heart5,6. Unlike their somite-derived limb counterparts, orofacial muscles originate from the branchial arch7. These phylogenetic and ontogenetical characters may predispose them to distinct regenerative behaviors8. It has been reported that the masseter (MAS) muscle developed severe fibrosis at the time when the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle fully regenerated after exposure to the same extent of injury1,9. However, the underlying mechanism of regeneration remains poorly understood.
In this study, a freezing injury model of the mice masseter muscle was established to facilitate the investigation into orofacial muscle regeneration. We chose 14 days after injury as the time point for assessing fibrosis phenotype as it was the earliest time point where discernible divergence was detectable between two muscles. Complete regeneration of the MAS after injury requires at least 40 weeks1. Consistently, this study revealed a remarkable deposition of collagen following freezing injury of MAS compared to the regular regeneration of the TA at 14 days post injury. With the help of this model, further mechanistic studies of muscle atrophy and fibrosis can be carried out, which will in turn help the development of potential therapeutic avenues to promote orofacial muscle regeneration after surgery.