$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Image panels in Figure 3 show examples of a typical fully grown oocyte (Figure 3A), the nucleoplasm in a fully grown oocyte expressing YFP-Rango (Figure 3B), the nucleoplasm in a fully grown oocyte expressing a correct (left panel; Figure 3C) or an excessive (right panel; Figure 3C) dose of SRSF2-GFP cRNA, and an immunostaining of nuclear speckles in a fully grown oocyte using the SC35 antibody (Figure 3D). The correct dose of SRSF2-GFP cRNA to microinject was defined based on visual comparisons between expression profiles of SRSF2-GFP with endogenous profiles of nuclear speckles.
Cytoplasmic stirring forces in oocytes, as shown by previous work from the lab using STICS vector maps and image correlation analysis (see9 and11), can be decreased by cytoskeletal perturbations, both genetic (e.g., FMN2-mutant mouse) and chemical (e.g., Cytochalasin D). STICS maps of control oocytes display numerous vectors, with colors indicating high flow velocities, whereas maps of oocytes with disrupted cytoskeletal forces display less vectors, with colors indicating low flow velocities. Similarly, image correlation is lost very fast in control oocytes compared to oocytes with disrupted cytoskeletal forces. This is observable on correlation curves, with a faster decrease of the curve for control oocytes compared to oocytes with disrupted cytoskeletal forces9 or a faster increase when the curve is inverted11.
Cytoskeletal forces agitate the nucleus and its interior organelles, in particular nuclear condensates like nuclear speckles10,11. In Figure 4A, the nucleus of control oocytes is subjected to important peripheral fluctuations, which is visible using the nuclear probe YFP-Rango. Nucleus shape in oocytes with disrupted cytoskeletal forces is stable during time (Figure 4C). Analysis of nuclear outline fluctuations is key to precisely quantify the agitation. By determining the variance of the distance from the nucleus centroid to its periphery, (r-R)2 (Figure 4B), fluctuations could be quantified, showing that nuclear agitation is 6 times higher in control oocytes than in oocytes with disrupted cytoskeletal forces10. In Figure 5A-B, nuclear speckles (SRSF2-GFP+ droplets) are shown in control and disrupted contexts of cytoplasmic forces at high temporal resolution. In controls, the droplet surface fluctuates significantly more than droplet surfaces in oocytes with disrupted cytoplasmic forces, which can be visualized and quantified using the Radioak32 plugin. Visually, green and red colors (Radioak output seen on bottom images of Figure 5A-B) indicate angles where the plugin detected surface changes between consecutive images and white indicates a lack of surface changes.

Figure 1: Illustration of late mouse oogenesis and early embryogenesis. Illustration of nucleus centering that occurs in late oocyte growth, chromosome off centering that occurs during oocyte division, and early steps (1-cell and 2-cell stages) of embryogenesis. The female genomes (oocyte nucleus and female pronucleus) are in pink, the male pronucleus is in blue. The embryo nuclei (after fusion of parental genomes) are purple. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Illustration of cytoplasmic and nuclear remodeling across scales in growing mouse oocytes. This figure summarizes key findings from9,10,11. Illustration of actomyosin-based remodeling of the cytoplasm, nuclear agitation, and functional nuclear biomolecular condensate remodeling across spatiotemporal scales. The scale-crossing remodeling of nuclear speckles enhances biomolecular reactions associated with their function (i.e., splicing of pre-mRNA). Note that this protocol allows the assessment of nuclear agitation only across spatial scales but not temporal ones, since all imaging is done with the same temporal resolution of 0.5 s between image frames. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Sample images of the fully grown oocyte and the nucleoplasm. (A) Bright-field image of a fully grown oocyte showing chromatin (cyan) that encircles the nucleolus. A dotted white circle outlines the nucleus. (B) Live oocyte nucleus expressing YFP-Rango; note the absence of fluorescence in the nucleolus. (C) Example of live oocyte nucleus expressing SRSF2-GFP after microinjection of correct doses of cRNA (left panel) or high doses of cRNA (right panel); note the condensed (droplet) and dissolved phases on the left and their absence in the condition on the right. (D) Nuclear speckle immunostaining in a fixed oocyte; note the endogenous expression profile that is comparable to the one in C (left panel). Scale bars = 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Plugin outputs of control and disrupted nuclear outline fluctuations. (A) Time-lapse of a control oocyte nucleus expressing YFP-Rango (top) and its corresponding binary mask generated by the Ovocyte_nucleus plugin (bottom). (B) Principle of nuclear outline fluctuations measurements over time and in a given direction. Directions are defined by a revolving angle θ of 1° increment from 0° to 360°. Two representative shapes at t=0 s (yellow) and t=135 s (purple) are represented. The blue shape corresponds to the mean shape over time. (C) Nuclear outline fluctuations of a nucleus in an oocyte with decreased cytoskeletal forces due to disruption of both F-actin (FMN2-mutant mouse) and microtubules (Nocodazole treatment; as in10). Scale bars = 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Plugin outputs of control and disrupted droplet surface fluctuations. (A) Crop of a control SRSF2-GFP nuclear droplet imaged at 500 ms per frame and shown in Ice Look Up Table (LUT) (top); binary mask of the same droplet generated by Fiji (center); and Radioak plugin outputs after analysis of surface fluctuations of the droplet (bottom), with green and red indicating angles where the plugin detected surface changes between consecutive images and white indicating a lack of surface changes. (B) Surface fluctuations of a nuclear droplet in oocytes with decreased cytoskeletal forces due to disruption of both F-actin and microtubules (as in11). Scale bars = 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Table 1: Example of Ovocyte_nucleus plugin analysis output. The same nucleus analyzed as the one shown in Figure 4A. Theta (θ) is the angle in degrees and t1 to t600 correspond to the frame number, which can be converted in time. The radii are in µm. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Table 2: Sample spreadsheet used to calculate nuclear outline fluctuations. The same nucleus analyzed as the one shown in Figure 4A. Theta (θ) is the angle in degrees and t1 to t600 correspond to the frame number, which can be converted in time. Tab Raw and average: The radii are in µm. Tab r-R: The r-R distances are in µm. Table (r-R)2: The fluctuation values are in µm2. Tabs x and y correspond to the Cartesian coordinates of the radii from the Raw and average tab. They allow to draw the mean shape of the nucleus over time in the mean shape tab. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Table 3: Example of Radioak plugin analysis output. The same droplet analyzed as the one shown in Figure 5A. The measured radii at distinct timepoints and angles are shown. The radii are in µm. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Table 4: Sample spreadsheet used to calculate nuclear droplet surface fluctuations. The same droplet analyzed as the one shown in Figure 5A. Theta (θ) is the angle in degrees and t1 to t600 correspond to the frame number, which can be converted in time. Tab Raw and average: The radii are in µm. Tab r-R: The r-R distances are in µm. Table (r-R)2: The fluctuation values are in µm2. Tabs x and y correspond to the Cartesian coordinates of the radii from the Raw and average tab. Please click here to download this File.