$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Representative images from a successful LN34 assay run on an ABI ViiA7 real-time PCR instrument are shown in Figure 2. Viewing results plotted on a logarithmic scale allows for easy viewing of the Ct value, the point at which the curve crosses the threshold line (Figure 2A,C). When plotted on a linear scale, successful amplification will appear as a sigmoidal (or "S"-shaped) curve (Figure 2B,D), while negative results should appear as a straight, flat line. Viewing results in both linear and log scale views is recommended to identify possible anomalies or errors. Typical positive and negative results in the multicomponent plot view can be seen in Figure 2E,F, respectively, where the fluorescence level of the dye labeling the probe (FAM for LN34, VIC/HEX for βA) can be observed relative to the passive dye in the reaction buffer (ROX).
Examples of abnormal results are shown in Figure 3. Comparisons between the graphs of successful runs (Figure 2) and abnormal graphs (Figure 3) can be used to isolate atypical runs and instrument issues. Figure 3A shows a signal crossing the threshold, producing a Ct value for LN34, but the amplification curve is very atypical, increasing linearly. The multicomponent (Figure 3B) plot also shows a wavy line that is not typical of a positive sample. This example highlights the importance of viewing the amplification plots and not simply copying Ct values. Always ensure the amplification curves look normal for all samples. Viewing the multicomponent plot is also advised to ensure that no irregularities are present. On occasion, messy baseline signals can generate Ct values in cases where no amplification has occurred. If amplification signals appear linear, it is suggested that the baseline be adjusted to see if the curve disappears. In the case of any unusual signal, the entire run should be repeated. Cleaning and running a background plate on your real-time PCR instrument is recommended if issues persist. If available, PCR products can be run on an agarose gel and/or sequenced to troubleshoot any unusual results. It is not recommended to use the results of gel electrophoresis or sequencing to determine diagnostic results.
Previous studies have shown low variability between replicates, assay run, operator, and laboratory for the LN34 assay7. If high variability (>±1.5 Ct difference) between replicates of the same sample is observed, that RNA should be retested. High variability can be caused by issues with pipettes, laboratory practices, mis-pipetting, or real-time PCR machines. Repeated observation of high variability across several samples or across assay runs may indicate systemic issues. Samples with low RNA, approaching the assay threshold for a positive sample (Ct 35), may exhibit higher variability in Ct values between replicates. Consultation with CDC and troubleshooting may be necessary to address the cause of the persistent variability, inconsistent results, or assay failure.
The high sensitivity of PCR-based assays makes them inherently susceptible to contamination. Strict adherence to good laboratory practices is the best way to mitigate cross-contamination. Knowing how to identify potential contamination is important. Reagent contamination should be suspected if no template control and suspect negative sample wells in an assay run all produce similar Ct values. Repeat testing with new aliquots of PCR reagents (buffer, water, primers, and enzyme) and the same RNA. If all samples and extraction control produce similar CT values but NTC is negative, contamination of extraction reagents should be investigated, and extraction should be repeated using new reagents. It is good practice to make small aliquots of reagents in order to reduce the risk of contamination and avoid the possibility of discarding large volumes of expensive reagents. Sample cross-contamination is more difficult to identify. If sample contamination is suspected, repeat sample collection starting from the original tissues. In some cases, sequencing of the viral RNA can confirm contamination, especially when the contaminating RNA is very different from the expected viral variant (such as a control virus used in the laboratory). Sequencing of two samples processed at the same time can determine if the viral sequences are identical but may be uninformative if the sequences are expected to be very similar (for example, the same variant collected in the same county). If sample contamination with the positive control RNA is suspected, one can run the LN34 assay amplicons on an agarose gel to differentiate lyssavirus RNA (165 bp) from positive control RNA (99 bp). The sequence of the template used to generate the positive control RNA provided by CDC8.
For other pathogens, laboratorians may be used to set the threshold manually to get rid of "noise" such as the weak amplification shown in cyan in Figure 4. This practice is NOT recommended for rabies diagnosis because it can lead to false negative results with dire consequences since rabies is almost 100% fatal. Do NOT manually change the threshold to produce negative results for weak or late amplification samples. These samples must be re-extracted and/or retested to rule out rabies.

Figure 1: Field of view showing unilateral spread of rabies virus antigen in an infected donkey by direct fluorescent antibody test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Amplification and multicomponent plots from a successful LN34 assay run. (A-D) Result data are plotted on a (A,C) log scale and (B,D) linear scale for the LN34 and βA assay. Panels A and B depict LN34 results from two samples (in pink and cyan) compared to the positive control (in yellow). In panel B, there is a flat green line that depicts an additional negative sample in the run. In A, the green line(s) do not show any amplification and are depicted as broken segments. The threshold for the LN34 assay was set manually to 0.2 and is shown by the red horizontal line. (C,D) Results from the βA assay for two samples (red and cyan). The threshold for the βA assay was manually set at 0.05. (E,F) Multicomponent plots depict the fluorescence (RFU) at each cycle for FAM (LN34), VIC (βA), and ROX (passive dye present in AgPath-ID buffer). ROX levels should stay flat across all cycles. A typical positive sample is shown in panel E; FAM fluorescence increases as a sigmoidal curve starting at cycle 18 for this sample. A typical negative sample is shown in panel F, where the FAM level stays parallel to the ROX level across all cycles. Data are from an ABI ViiA7 real-time PCR instrument. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Representative images of the rare, atypical signal observed in LN34 assay runs on a ViiA7 real-time PCR instrument. (A-F) Amplification (A,C,E) and multicomponent (B,D,F) plots produced due to well contamination. The linear increase (A,C) and wavy fluctuations (B,D) in FAM fluorescence do not represent true amplification based on the shape of the curves and the magnitude of the fluorescence change. Panels A through D likely represent negative samples even though a Ct value was produced for the replicate shown in panels A and B. Panels E and F show an odd wavy signal that is more easily seen in the multicomponent plot. This type of signal should be investigated and may indicate instrument issues, even though all controls performed as expected in this run. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: LN34 real-time RT-PCR curves from 2 rabies suspect samples showing two methods of setting threshold values. (A) LN34 threshold was set to 0.2 (recommended for all runs). (B) Manually determining a different threshold for each run to mask signal determined to be "noise" (late amplification signal). The method used in panel B is NOT recommended for rabies due to the severe consequences of missing a true positive result. Late amplification could indicate a weak positive sample, PCR inhibition, or failed extraction in a positive case. It could also indicate cross-contamination. The golden sample (indicated by black arrows) produces a Ct value at the assay's cutoff and should not be considered negative. Samples with late amplification should be re-extracted and retested. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Primer and probe sequences and concentrations used in the LN34lys (singleplex LN34), LN34M (LN34 and βA multiplexed) real-time RT-PCR assays. LN34 probes are labeled with the fluorescent FAM dye at the 5ʹend and Black Hole quencher (BHQ1) at the 3ʹend. The βA probe is labeled with the fluorescent HEX dye at the 5ʹend and Black Hole quencher (BHQ1) at the 3ʹend. Locked nucleotide-modified bases are indicated by a plus preceding the base in the sequence. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 2: Assay set up for LN34lys, Actin3, and LN34M assays. Primer and probe names, sequences, and concentrations can be found in Table 1. LN34_F1 corresponds to ACGCTTAACAACCAGATCAAAGAA7. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 3: Cycling parameters for ABI instruments. IMPORTANT: Make sure to run in STANDARD mode, not FAST mode. ROX should be selected as the passive reference dye. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 4: Algorithm for interpretation of LN34 real-time RT-PCR results for singleplex (top, blue table) and multiplex (bottom, red table) formats. A positive LN34 result should be considered positive, even if the βA result is negative or inconclusive. If LN34 amplicon is not detected, the βA Ct must be ≤ the Ct value cutoff listed to be considered negative. βA Ct values indicate the quality of the sample being tested and identify possible inhibition. Low concentration in the original clinical specimen may impact βA growth curves, leading to no discernable amplification. Additional contributing factors in the failure to detect β-actin include poor extraction of RNA due to loss of RNA or carryover of PCR inhibitors, incorrect assay setup and technique, unsatisfactory sample type or quality, and malfunction of reagents or equipment. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 5: Actions and interpretations of common results for LN34 assay controls. All three controls (rabies positive control RNA, rabies negative extraction control, and no template control must produce expected results for a run to pass. Failure in the positive control or no template control may indicate mispipetting, reagent, or equipment failure. The entire run, including all RNA samples tested must be repeated. Failure of the extraction control may indicate a problem during extraction, such as reagent failure, mispipetting, or cross-contamination. Extraction of all samples must be repeated. Failure of controls should be rare for experienced laboratory personnel. Please click here to download this Table.