In recent years, with the advancement of implant technology, more and more patients with tooth loss are choosing dental implants for restorative treatment1,2. One of the keys to implant success is adequate bone volume in the alveolar ridge. Patients often experience varying degrees of alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction. According to previous studies, the alveolar ridge width decreases by 5-7 mm, and the alveolar ridge height decreases by 2-4.5 mm within 12 months after tooth extraction3. Therefore, bone augmentation is a very important part of oral implantology, which offers the possibility of performing implant surgery in patients with inadequate implant conditions.
Patients with different types of alveolar ridge defects are treated with different bone augmentation techniques, such as distraction osteogenesis4, Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation5, Guided Bone Regeneration6, Onlay Bone Graft7, etc. Autogenous bone block grafting is a common surgical option for patients with substantial loss of alveolar ridge width and height for better support and osteogenesis. Patients with severe bone defects require larger autograft bone blocks. Petrungaro and other scholars have statistically shown that ascending ramus, anterior mandible, and tuberosity, among the intraoral bone retrieval sites, yielded about 5-10 mL, 5 mL, and 2 mL of bone volume, respectively. Extraoral bone retrieval sites, including the posterior iliac crest, anterior iliac crest, tibia, etc., can obtain 20-70 mL of bone volume, but the difficulty and risk of extra-oral bone block retrieval surgery is high8.
In some patients, the conventional intraoral bone extraction site is unable to provide the appropriate volume of bone. A 2013 imaging-related study by Qinghua et al. showed that the maxillary palate is a potential osteotomy area in the oral cavity9. The palatal bone is predominantly cortical, supplemented by cancellous bone, and bone fragments obtained from this site exhibit good supportive and osteogenic properties. The palate also has a rich blood supply, is covered by keratinized epithelium, and demonstrates a high healing capacity after osteotomy. Because the palate lies in a blind area of the surgical field, and the operating space is constrained by the patient's mouth opening degree, the operational space is adjacent to critical anatomical structures such as the nasal cavity, maxillary sinus, and multiple tooth roots. Consequently, the difficulty of performing a freehand palatal osteotomy is high, which is why palatal osteotomy is seldom reported, and palatal bone blocks have not been widely used in bone augmentation surgeries. The absence of a specific tool for palatal bone extraction further increases the difficulty of the operation.
With the advances in computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS), maxillary palatal bone extraction became possible. Static guides are difficult to apply to maxillary palatal osteotomies due to resin and guide ring thickness requirements, which require an increased degree of patient mouth opening10. The emergence of the dynamic CAIS system overcomes the above difficulties. The dynamic CAIS system uses motion-tracking technology to track implant drilling instruments and the patient's jaw position. This achieves real-time tracking of the surgery and feedback on the software to guide the surgery in real time11. Dynamic navigation makes maxillary palatal osteotomies possible by ensuring the accuracy of the osteotomies with low requirements for the patient's mouth opening and allowing for clear visualization of the operation.