$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Characterization of ALGMS cross-linked with different metal ions
The optical morphology of Ca-ALGMS, Cu-ALGMS, Zn-ALGMS, and Fe-ALGMS is shown in Figure 2, exhibiting good sphericity, smooth surface, uniform particle size distribution (Supplementary Figure 2) and excellent monodispersity. We further performed microscopic characterization using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. As shown in Figure 3, the microspheres were generally spherical with well-defined roundness. The surface of Zn-ALGMS was unevenly distributed, appearing rougher with many wrinkles. We performed energy dispersive spectroscopy to determine the content distribution of metal ions involved in the cross-linking reaction in the gel. Notably, the microsphere size can be adjusted by changing parameters such as the collection distance, gel concentration, and electric field voltage12. In the outlined protocol, by adjusting the parameters of the microfluidic device and the liquid concentration, particles of different sizes can be easily obtained according to specific requirements.
Assessment of antimicrobial properties
We evaluated the antimicrobial capacity of different microspheres using the plate method, as shown in Figure 4. Different microspheres exhibited antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus, with Cu-ALGMS and Zn-ALGMS showing the strongest antibacterial properties. This heightened effectiveness can be attributed to the antimicrobial activity of metals, namely copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn)13. Sukhodub et al. demonstrated that Fe3+, Zn2+, Ca2+, and Cu2+ exhibited synergistic antibacterial effects with chitosan, while the samples without chitosan showed no such activity, validating the synergistic antibacterial effect of the complexes formed14. The results obtained align with this study, with Cu-ALGMS and Zn-ALGMS being superior to other hydrogel microspheres in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases.
Evaluation of drug release properties
The evaluation of the drug release from different metal-based alginate hydrogel microspheres using BSA as the model drug revealed differences in their release profiles. (Supplementary Figure 3). Ions exhibited a better slow drug-release ability than those of other materials.The drug-release rate of Fe2+ was relatively faster than that of the other three ions, whereas the drug-release rate of Ca2+ and Zn2+ was relatively slower. These results highlight the differences in the effects of different ions on drug release. We hypothesize that Fe2+ possibly interacts with the drug or binds in a way that makes it easier to release, whereas Ca2+ and Zn2+ bind to the drug more tightly, or there are other factors that limit the rate of release. This sustained drug release from the hydrogel microspheres may be related to the cross-linking strength between the metal and the alginate polysaccharide. In addition, the difference in the adsorption capacity of different metals compared to that of BSA likely contributed to the differences observed in drug retardation abilities.
Biocompatibility assessment
Good biocompatibility is a prerequisite for drug delivery carriers in clinical applications. Therefore, we evaluated the hemocompatibility of microspheres using an in vitro hemolysis test. We used pure water as the positive control and PBS solution as the negative control. The experimental results are shown in Supplementary Figure 4, revealing that the red blood cells in the suspension remained intact upon contact with different microspheres, indicating minimal hemolysis by the microspheres. Cytobiocompatibility results showed that the microspheres did not affect cellular activity (Supplementary Figure 5). These results indicated that the microspheres have good blood cell compatibility.

Figure 1: Alginate hydrogel microspheres preparation. (A) Installation of microfluidic electrospray technology. (B) The real-time image of the microfluidic electrospray process. (C) The prepared Ca2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Fe3+ alginate hydrogel microspheres. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Alginate hydrogel microspheres micrograph. Micrograph of (A) Ca-ALGMS, (B) Cu-ALGMS, (C) Zn-ALGMS, and (D) Fe-ALGMS in PBS (pH 7.4). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy. The images show the characterization of (A) Ca-ALGMS, (B) Cu-ALGMS, (C) Zn-ALGMS, and (D) Fe-ALGMS with i and ii for scanning microscopy data and iii-v for spectroscopy data. The images iii-v show an EDS mapping, in which the EDS selects a face on the sample surface to scan to obtain elemental distribution information over the entire area. Map sweep mode is used in applications for compositional analysis, phase zone analysis, and particle size distribution of materials, where each element is represented by a different color, as shown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Antimicrobial properties of microspheres. (A) The antimicrobial properties of the groups were tested using the bacterial smear method. (B, C) Quantification of the bacterial smear plate count results for each group. The control samples show colonies grown on LB medium without any addition. The relative colonies for the other bacteria were calculated by taking the control group's clone count as 100% and using it as a baseline. The error bar: standard deviation, n = 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1: A glass tube is connected to the syringe through a long rubber tube. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 2: Particle size. (A) Zn-ALGMS, (B) Ca-ALGMS, (C) Cu-ALGMS, (D) Fe-ALGMS. A molar concentration of 5% was used for all the samples. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 3: Drug release. The drug release curve of Ca-ALGMS, Cu-ALGMS, Zn-ALGMS, and Fe-ALGMS in PBS (pH 7.4). The error bar: standard deviation, n = 3 Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 4: Hemolysis assay of Ca-ALGMS, Cu-ALGMS, Zn-ALGMS, and Fe-ALGMS. PC (Positive Control): ddH2O; NC (Negative Control): PBS. The error bar: standard deviation, n = 3. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 5: Cytotoxicity of microspheres cross-linked with different ions. The biocompatibility assessment of Zn-ALGMS, Ca-ALGMS, Cu-ALGMS, and Fe-ALGMS was done. Calcein-AM/PI was used to perform the test, and for the results here, 5 fields of view were randomly selected. ImageJ was used to analyze the ratio of red blood cells to dead cells to obtain relative cell viability. 1.PC, Positive Control, 2.NC, Negative Control, 3. Zn-ALGMS, 4. Ca-ALGMS, 5. Cu-ALGMS, 6. Fe-ALGMS, The error bar: standard deviation, n = 3. Please click here to download this File.