The reESCs and rat uterus organoids were established from six female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 200 g and 250 g following the protocol outlined in Figure 1. Drawing on the success of the long-term culture of human endometrial epithelial stem cells, the REEM formulation predominantly consisted of Y27632, A8301, and CHIR99021. To stabilize the reESCs in vitro, we initially isolated endometrial cells from rat endometrium using enzymatic and mechanical techniques. Flow cytometry analysis in Figure 2A revealed that the primary endometrial cells comprised approximately 50% epithelial cells expressing CD9 (49.8%), with low levels of EpCAM (4.49%) and CD24 (2.64%). The SSEA-1 marker for reESCs was present at 6.58%, while endothelial markers CD31 (30.9%) and CD45 (70.3%) were relatively high.
However, culturing in REEM resulted in P1 reESCs displaying a uniform whorled or polyhedral morphology and forming compact clone structures (Figure 2D). Gradual removal of individual factors from REEM led to a corresponding decrease in the proliferative capacity of reESCs. The clone formation assay highlighted the critical role of Y27632 in the stable culture of reESCs (Figure 2B,C). By the third passage, reESCs exhibited consistent expression of SSEA-1 and Cytokeratin, indicating successful expansion of primary reESCs during culture (Figure 2F). Moreover, reESCs maintained robust and stable proliferative capacity even at late passages (Figure 2E), demonstrating their successful isolation and expansion in the current REEM system.
Organoid cultures were established following a previously reported system derived from human endometrial stem cells8. Within 3 days, the reESCs exhibited rapid self-organization into organoid-like structures with a hollow center, which subsequently increased in size and thickness (see Figure 3A). The typical HE staining results illustrating the formation of organoids by reESCs are presented in Figure 3B. These organoid cultures can be sustained through passaging, as evidenced by the high cell viability indicated by Ki67 staining following both direct passaging and freeze-thaw cycles. Furthermore, HE staining was performed on the 10th generation of organoids, and the results showed that the organoid structure could be maintained intact (see Figure 3E). Additionally, qPCR results indicated that Nanog, Sox2, and Oct4 were expressed at levels comparable to those of the P1 generation (Figure 3F). This finding suggests the potential for long-term culture of organoids within the current system.
Our study conducted a preliminary investigation into the response of rat uterine-like structures to E2 and P4. Immunofluorescence staining in Figure 4A revealed the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors. Following E2 supplementation, these organoids underwent a transition from a hollow spherical form to a more densely populated internal growth pattern (Figure 4C). Subsequent exposure to P4 led to decreased permeability of the dense structures, ultimately resulting in their disintegration (Figure 4B). These findings suggest that E2 potentially drives further differentiation of rat uterine-like structures, whereas P4 may trigger apoptotic pathways.

Figure 1: Procedures used to establish rat endometrial epithelial stem cells and rat uterus organoids. Abbreviation: SD = Sprague-Dawley. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Generation and long-term culture of rat endometrial epithelial stem cells in vitro. (A) Flow cytometric analysis showing the proportion of positive cells in the rat endometrium. (B) Crystal violet staining of clones in REEM with or without A8301, Y27632, or CHIR99021, respectively. Scale bars = 1 cm. (C) The clone numbers in REEM with or without factors. Error bars represent standard deviation; n = 3 donors (***, p<0.001). (D) Light microscopy images of P1 rat endometrial epithelial stem cells with and without crystal violet staining. (E) CCK-8 analyses of rat endometrial epithelial stem cells at passage 1, passage 7, and passage 14. Error bars represent standard deviation, n = 3. (F) Immunofluorescence analyses demonstrating the expression of Cytokeratin and SSEA-1. Abbreviation: REEM = reESCs expansion medium. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Generation and long-term culture of rat endometrial organoids in vitro. (A) Light microscopy images of P1 rat endometrial organoids. (B) H&E staining for P1 organoids from rat endometrial epithelial stem cells. (C) Immunofluorescence analyses demonstrating the expression of Cytokeratin and SSEA-1. (D) Immunofluorescence analyses demonstrating the expression of Ki67 and SSEA-1. (E) H&E staining for P 10 rat organoids. (F) qPCR analyses for the expression of Nanog, Sox2 and Oct-4 in P1 and P10 rat endometrial organoids. Expression normalized to GAPDH (n = 3, two-tailed unpaired t-test, n.s. = non-significant). Abbreviation: H&E = hematoxylin and eosin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Sequential culturing of organoids with E2 and P4. (A) Immunofluorescence analyses demonstrating the expression of estrogen receptor, progestogen receptor, and SSEA-1. (B) Overview of light microscopy images of rat organoids cultured in E2 and P4. (C) Light microscopy images demonstrate the transformation of a hollow sphere into dense within the inner cavity of organoids after being cultured 7 days in E2. Abbreviations: ER = estrogen receptor; PR = progestogen receptor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.