This custom overpressure air system is a useful tool for studying closed-system CNS injuries in murine models. The representative results from the example experiment demonstrate that the focal delivery of overpressure air using this system can effectively induce ITON, resulting in significant axon loss and degeneration. This highlights the system's ability to produce precise and reproducible CNS injury.
One of the major strengths of this system is its customizability to induce a range of CNS injuries. The severity of the injury can be adjusted by modifying the overall output pressure of the system, the distance of the animal from the end of the barrel using the x-y positioning stage, the size and shape of the exposure aperture, the number of exposures to overpressure air, and the interval between exposures. Additionally, the location of the CNS injury can be adjusted by modifying the location of the exposure aperture within the animal holder. This versatility has enabled the system to produce a spectrum of closed-system CNS injuries in murine models. Initially, the system was used to model closed-globe injuries, focusing on anterior and posterior pole damage and related deficits34,36, including the impacts of immune system response37, strain-specific outcomes38, and the efficacy of neuroprotective agents39. Eventually, this application expanded to assess the sequelae of repeated eye-directed exposures to model indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (ITON)30 and explore the effect of the number and interval between repeated exposures33. Since then, the application of the system has expanded to model closed-head mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) through head-directed exposures40,41 and closed-body spinal cord injury (SCI) through dorsum-directed exposures42, emphasizing the device's adaptability and versatility in studying varied CNS injury domains.
When using this system, it is critical to take measures to minimize variability in injury outcomes to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of experimental results. Key measures include calibrating the system's output pressure levels before and after each series of three exposures to ensure consistent pressure delivery. Although variability is low when the system is operated between 15 psi and 50 psi when using compressed air34, consistent calibration helps detect unexpected errors, such as low battery or low air. Additionally, position each animal at the same distance from the end of the barrel to ensure consistent overpressure magnitude, as the intensity of the pressure wave decreases with distance. Uniform positioning also ensures each animal is impacted by the same part of the airwave. Furthermore, securing animals uniformly within the holder ensures the tissue of interest is consistently targeted, especially in repeated exposure models when there is risk of movement. Finally, uniformity in the age, sex, and genetic background of the animals is crucial as these factors influence the response to injury. For example, previous studies using this system compared the effects of eye-directed overpressure air on different mouse strains, highlighting significant differences in injury response between C57Bl/6J36, DBA/2J37, and Balb/c38 mice. The DBA/2J and Balb/c mice exhibited more severe anterior pole pathologies, greater retinal damage, higher oxidative stress, and more pronounced neuroinflammatory responses compared to the C57Bl/6J mice with Balb/c mice showing particularly robust and lasting injury profiles38.
System troubleshooting
If the pressure values are uncharacteristically low for a given pressure gauge setting, pull the trigger 5-10x, allowing air to pass through the system and the regulator to adjust to a new setting. There must be no leaks in the air tank. The O-ring on the air tank must not be damaged or worn, the air tank should have enough air, and the battery of the gun should not be depleted. The x-y table should not have shifted away from its usual position from the end of the barrel and the overpressure air exposure aperture should be lined up with the barrel of the gun and not occluding it. The regulator should be tightly secured to the grip of the gun. If the pressure values are too low despite using the highest setting on the pressure gauge, the pressure gauge must not be increased beyond 200 psi, and the velocity setting on the gun should be adjusted to the maximum setting. If the pressure settings are inconsistent (e.g., high then low), ensure the air tank has enough air, the regulator is tightly secured to the grip of the gun, there are no leaks in the air tank and that it is screwed on tight, and the O-ring on the air tank is not damaged or worn.
To comprehensively understand this system's full capabilities, it is important to recognize its limitations. Mimicking real-world scenarios in a laboratory setting remains challenging. Although this system generates overpressure air, it does not replicate the complex dynamics of an explosive event, such as the varying pressure and temperature gradients, the presence of debris and reflected waves, and a multiphasic nature. Additionally, it does not mimic a Friedlander waveform ("primary blast wave"), which is characterized by a sharp, near-instantaneous peak in pressure followed by a rapid exponential decay that drops below ambient pressure before returning to baseline43. Rather, the waveform produced by this system represents a simpler, more symmetrical profile in which there is a more gradual rise and fall in pressure with no distinct negative phase (see Figure 2C in Hines-Beard et al.34). Somewhat advantageously, this waveform combines elements of both blast and blunt injuries. The bell-shaped "pressure pulse" delivers a consistent overpressure impact, akin to a "wall of air" hitting the subject. Yet, the overpressure air delivered by the wave is also a key characteristic aspect of blast injuries. Some may argue that while this waveform includes aspects of both injury types, it does not fully capture the complexity of either one. However, this consistent and reproducible "pressure pulse" is ideal for controlled experiments in a laboratory setting to study focal closed-system CNS injury. We have demonstrated the focal nature of the injury previously. For example, exposure to one eye does not cause damage to the primary nasal epithelium or brain44. Also, when directed to the side of the mouse head, a small area of the brain is affected45. Finally, the energy from the overpressure air from this system at the pressure level used for ITON did not affect the mouse unless repeated with a short time interval33. Thus, the pressure is non-injurious and therefore does not replicate a jet-end force. Further, even with repeated overpressure air exposure to the eye, there was no effect on anterior eye structures33. Significant optic nerve degeneration and vision loss only occurred with repeated exposure with an inter-exposure interval of less than 1 min33.
Compared to other laboratory devices for creating closed-system CNS injuries, this system offers unique benefits. It can deliver sequential bursts of overpressure air in rapid succession (0.5 s intervals)33, mimicking conditions in high-risk occupational environments where rapid blast exposures are a common hazard. For example, military personnel, both in training and combat scenarios, use a host of automatic firearms capable of rapid repeated firing, including automatic rifles (e.g., M16, AK-47), machine guns (e.g., M2 .50 caliber), Gatling guns, and miniguns. Other slower, yet repetitive weaponry used by military personnel include artillery, mortars, grenades, and improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Demolition workers involved in controlled demolition and miners involved in blasting operations to break up rock and extract minerals also experience sequential blasts in rapid succession. Finally, construction workers using pneumatic tools, pile drivers, or other heavy equipment that generative powerful percussive forces can experience rapid repeat impacts that mimic blast exposures. Notably, rapid delivery of overpressure air is not possible with devices like shock tubes that require extensive reconfiguration or re-pressurization between each event. Shock tubes use diaphragms that burst to generate shock waves, and after each burst, the diaphragm must be replaced. This process takes time, as the shock tube must be opened, the spent diaphragm removed, a new diaphragm installed, and the system allowed time to reset and repressurize. Thus, especially for studies investigating CNS injury after rapid repeat blast exposure, a system that does not require extensive reconfiguration or re-pressurization between each event is ideal.
Future applications of this modulatory, user-friendly, cost-effective system are promising. Leveraging its adaptable and unique attributes, this system opens several promising avenues for future pre-clinical therapeutic studies. Its ability to deliver rapid, sequential bursts of overpressure air can be leveraged to study the cumulative effects of repeated blast exposures, which is relevant for understanding chronic traumatic encephalopathy and other long-term neurodegenerative conditions. Additionally, this system can be used to explore the effectiveness of various pharmacological interventions aimed at mitigating closed-system CNS injuries, including the timing and dosing of neuroprotective drugs to determine optimal treatment windows. Furthermore, the system's precision in mimicking aspects of both blunt and blast injury mechanisms allows for the development of comprehensive injury models that reflect the complex trauma experienced by individuals in real-world scenarios. This can facilitate the testing of multi-modal therapies that address common global aspects of injury, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and neuronal death. Overall, this device offers a versatile and powerful platform for advancing our understanding of closed-system CNS injuries and developing effective therapeutic interventions.