$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This protocol details two AAV systems and mouse models for investigating the ectopic expression of Neurod1 in the context of a mild-moderate ET-1 cortical stroke model. A number of critical steps relating to the ET-1 stroke are important to consider for the reproducibility and consistency of the injury. Burr holes must be carefully drilled without puncturing the dura mater to prevent unintentional surgical injury. It is important to use consistent landmarks, in this case bregma, to ensure a similar region of interest (sensorimotor cortex in this study). This is particularly important for studies using behavioral assessments since the lesion location and size will impact functional outcomes13,22,25,27. Most importantly, the injection rate of ET-1 and the pressure applied by the surgeon on the syringe need to be consistent for reproducible results. Of note, the needle of the syringe can get clogged and needs to be cleaned between animals to ensure accurate ET-1 delivery. During cellular analysis of tissue, if a stroke lesion is not observed, the needle was likely clogged during surgery. If the issue persists, obtain a new lot of endothelin-1 from the manufacturer, as lot-dependent potency issues have been observed in the past.
The steps for the surgical procedure to deliver AAV are similar to that of the ET-1 stroke induction protocol. Hence, the aforementioned considerations are critical. Additionally, the AAV viral titer and volume must be consistent to ensure the transduction efficiency can be compared across groups. In this protocol, 1 x 109 GC/µL of AAV for the acute study and 1 x 1010 GC/µL of AAV for the chronic study was administered. It is crucial to select a viral dose that is low enough to minimize artefactual misexpression while still being high enough to ensure sufficient cell transduction, enabling the detection of differences across experimental groups. The optimal viral dose range for such studies has been determined to be 107-1010 GC/µL13,24. Higher titers of AAV not only result in extensive labeling of neurons in the control group but have also been shown to induce astrocytosis, disrupt the blood-brain barrier, and upregulate inflammatory responses28,29. Studies investigating viral-mediated transcription factor delivery post-stroke have used different delivery sites for AAV injections. One study described the successful labeling of transduced cells using a single AAV injection into the stroke lesion site13. Other studies target one to three areas around the infarct area30. Herein, AAV was delivered in three locations, with one injection at the coordinates for the site of the ET-1 injection and 2 surrounding the lesion site (one injection at 1.0 mm anterior and one injection at 1.0 mm posterior) with the goal of transducing reactive astrocytes in the perilesional glial border9. During cellular analysis of tissue, if none or very few (1-10 cells/section) fluorescent cells are observed, the needle may have been clogged during injection, or the AAV has been freeze-thawed too many times, leading to the inactivation of the virus.
The efficiency of transduction was examined at different times in the mild-moderate stroke model, and the results demonstrate that significantly more neurons are labeled in Neurod1-treated brains at both the subacute and chronic times post-stroke. The work shown here is the first to demonstrate Neurod1 transduction in the chronic phase post-stroke and reveals neurons ectopically expressing Neurod1 as long as 8 weeks post-stroke. While the findings that increased numbers of transduced neurons are seen in stroke-injured brains that received Neurod1 versus control vectors are consistent with Neurod1 playing a role in AtN conversion, interpreting the cellular outcomes requires a sound knowledge of the limitations of the experimental paradigm. The vast majority of published studies investigating AtN conversion utilize GFAP as the promoter as GFAP is upregulated in reactive astrocytes in neurodegenerative diseases, including stroke4,31. However, it has been shown that low GFAP expression also occurs in neurons32. This is consistent with the findings reported here wherein a percentage of transduced cells in the control group (Stroke-Cre) are pre-existing neurons32. Specifically, the Stroke-Cre control groups in this protocol showed 18.43 +/- 3.03% and 53.05 +/- 5.028% labeling of NeuN+Reporter+ cells, which represents the labeling of pre-existing neurons, indicating GFAP promoter-driven expression in neurons. Indeed, targeted expression of Neurod1 depends on a number of factors, including viral tropism. AAV5 has been shown to transduce neurons with different efficiency in different brain regions, including the sensorimotor cortex, indicating that AAV serotypes have regional cell tropism, which needs to be considered in studies inducing ectopic expression of transcription factors31,33. Mouse strains can also affect AAV transduction14,34. A study comparing AAV transduction in the striatum of wild-type (C57BL/6J) and FVB/N mice found variable cell tropism and transduction efficiency in the two strains34.
An advantage of the Cre-Flex system is that it can be used for long-term labeling in wild-type mice, which may reduce the issue of non-specific Cre expression present in Cre-reporter mouse lines15,35. A disadvantage of the Cre-Flex system is that Cre-independent transgene expression may occur due to 0.1%-0.8% of viral particles having recombined LoxP sites during viral production36. These findings highlight the importance of lineage tracing experiments, for example, pre-labeling astrocytes before AAV administration using the Aldh1l1-CreERT2 mouse line, to ensure that AtN conversion is not overestimated when reporting conclusions15. Studies have suggested that activation of the human GFAP promoter (as used in these studies) through cis-regulation by downstream genes (such as Neurod1) may result in GFAP expression in endogenous neurons, leading to a higher number of labeled neurons in the treatment group15,32. Together, these studies and the findings herein highlight the importance of lineage tracing experiments, for example, pre-labeling astrocytes or neurons before AAV administration, to differentiate between pre-existing and endogenous neurons during analysis15.
In considering the next steps that could reduce neuronal transduction, different AAV serotypes and/or the use of a less promiscuous astrocyte-specific promoter would be useful19. Increasing numbers of reports describing astrocyte heterogeneity may further impact gene expression specificity if different subpopulations of astrocytes are more susceptible to AtN conversion in general37,38,39,40.
The age of animals used in pre-clinical models of injury or disease is also an important consideration that may introduce variable outcomes. For example, in the case of neurotrauma, age can affect astrocyte reactivity, which would impact study outcomes for AtN conversion41. In addition, Cre-inducible reporter lines can lose expression specificity over time, which can impact outcome measures42. To date, reprogramming in older animals has not been comprehensively investigated43.
The protocol describes AAV delivery in 2 phases post-stroke: (1) the subacute phase (at 7 days) and (2) the chronic phase (at 21 days) post-ischemic stroke. Ectopic expression of Neurod1 in a chronic stroke model has not been examined; hence, the observation that significantly more neurons are labeled at this late stage has important implications for future studies aimed at promoting stroke recovery in chronic stroke. Studies examining the potential for ectopic expression of Neurod1 to enhance stroke outcomes will need to incorporate behavioral assessments, as functional outcomes following stroke are the most clinically relevant measures of success for a therapeutic intervention13,22,25,27.
There are currently no treatments available for patients suffering from stroke-induced disabilities in the subacute and chronic phases post-stroke with the exception of rehabilitation, which has limited benefit. Forced expression of neurogenic bHLH genes in glia has been shown to improve functional outcomes post-stroke22,30. The findings are consistent with AtN reprogramming studies demonstrating that the ectopic expression of Neurod1 increases neuronal transduction at 3 and 7 weeks post-AAV delivery compared to mice receiving the control vector. Most importantly, several articles have outlined recommendations for study controls, design, and interpretations in the AtN reprogramming field17,18,19,22. To this end, this protocol has described AAV systems and mouse models for ectopic expression of transcription factors following stroke, which can be used to inform and advance further investigations into the cellular mechanisms underlying the observations.