Stable expression of luciferase in L. infantum
Genetically modified L. infantum was produced using the plasmid of the pLEXSY line, which integrates into the genome of Leishmania in the 18S rRNA (ssu) ribosomal locus, whose transcription is driven by RNA polymerase I. Thus, L. infantum-Luc clones were evaluated for plasmid integration in the genome of Leishmania, and for stable expression by bioluminescence emission in vitro. The highly expressing clone displaying bioluminescence >120 fold above the background was chosen for evaluation of genomic integration by PCR. See Figure 1 for agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products to evaluate plasmid integration in the genome and bioluminescence emission (RLU) of promastigotes of the L. infantum-Luc clone. Fragments of the expected size were obtained from each PCR; one product of approximately 1,1 kb (5'ssu - utr1), and another of 1.8 kb (hyg- 3'ssu) were amplified from the genome of L. infantum- Luc (Figure 1A), confirming the integration of the plasmid cassette and the luciferase gene in the ssu locus of L. infantum genome.
The firefly luciferase expression was also evaluated in promastigotes of L. infantum-Luc by bioluminescence emission (RLU) in the microplate reader, as described in protocols, section 2. Even after several passages in culture and in BALB/c mice for 5 days, it maintained the level of bioluminescence; 569.3 ± 19.5 for the wild type background, and 59361.9 ± 2673.3 (n = 2) for cloned L. infantum- Luc (Figure 1B). Thus, the L. infantum-Luc clone stably expressing firefly luciferase, was used to infect hamsters via intragingival or intraperitoneal routes.
Intravenous inoculum in the gingival vein
To inoculate the Leishmania into the bloodstream of hamsters, care should be taken to minimize vein perforation, bleeding and leakage of the inoculum. Thus, the lower lip has to be pulled down gently to expose the gingival vein (Figure 2A); and a smaller gauge 30 G needle has to be used to avoid excessive perforation of the vein. The needle has to be positioned with the bezel facing up to insert into the vein in a proper angle (Figure 2B). Indeed, to ensure that the needle was injected into the vessel-the mandibular labial vein, the syringe plunger has to be pulled down until blood is aspirated into the needle barrel (Figure 2C). Before needle removal, light pressure has to be applied with a cotton swab to promote hemostasis (Figure 2D).
Longitudinal evaluation by bioluminescence imaging
Hamsters infected intraperitoneally (IP) or via intragingival (IG) with L. infantum-Luc were followed up until the 50th dpi and were evaluated by bioluminescence imaging until 22 dpi (Figure 3). Images were acquired 2 h after intraperitoneal infection with 108 parasites in the peritoneal cavity; images were acquired for 30 s or 1 min exposition binning medium. The bioluminescence signal was >65 fold more intense in the abdomen in amastigote-infected animals (4.6 × 105 ± 3.7 × 105) than promastigote-infected ones (6.8 × 103 ± 3.8 × 103) (Table 1), which demonstrates that amastigotes differentiated in vitro are more bioluminescent than the metacyclic promastigotes at the stationary phase and purified in the Ficoll cushion.
One day post infection (1 dpi), bioluminescence images were acquired for 3 min of exposition (Figure 3). There was a 45% decrease in the bioluminescence signal in the abdominal region in promastigote-infected hamsters and 70% decay in amastigote-infected ones (Figure 3), which suggests that amastigotes had degraded to a greater extent than metacyclic promastigotes (Table 1 and Figure 4). One week after infection (8 dpi), promastigote-infected animals sustained the bioluminescence signal (3.3 × 103 ± 5 × 103). However, the bioluminescence emission in amastigote-infected hamsters dropped off 95%, from 1.3 × 105 ± 1.1 × 105 to 6.7 × 103 ± 7.5 × 103 (Table 1) and reached the same level of promastigote-infected hamsters. Three weeks after infection (22 dpi), a bioluminescence signal was acquired for 5 min of exposition and binning large (Figure 3); the signal was much lower for promastigotes and amastigotes-infected animals (Table 1 and Figure 4).
Another group of hamsters was infected via the intragingival route with amastigotes and promastigotes of L. infantum-Luc (108); bioluminescence emission was observed in the maxillary region (Figure 3). The follow-up started 1 day after infection, and amastigote-infected hamsters displayed more bioluminescence signal and radiance (7.3 × 103 ± 4.1 × 103) than promastigote-infected ones (1 × 103 ± 5.7 × 102). One week after infection (8 dpi), a 36% drop in bioluminescence signal was observed in promastigotes-infected animals and 90% in the amastigote-infected hamsters; radiance varied from 7.3 × 103 ± 4.1 × 103 to 7.8 × 102 ± 5.6 × 102 (Table 1). Three weeks after infection (22 dpi), a bioluminescence signal was also acquired for 5 min of exposition and binning large (Figure 3). The bioluminescence signal was similar and low for promastigote- and amastigote-infected animals (Table 1 and Figure 4) in the head of animals infected at the gingiva and was not observed dispersion of the infection to the abdominal region by bioluminescence signal.
Evaluation of infection in tissues and organs by PCR
We performed conventional PCR to investigate infection in specific organs, such as liver, spleen and lymph nodes, that could be below the detection limit of the in vivo imaging. The target region of kDNA was more specific for L. infantum DNA amplification in infected tissues and organs, and the PCR for the enzyme GAPDH from the hamster was a control of DNA integrity and PCR reaction. Only the samples that were amplified for GAPDH were considered in the analysis. Thus, by PCR, two of three hamsters infected via the intraperitoneal route with axenic amastigotes displayed infection in tissues and organs; animal two (A2) in the spleen and animal three (A3) in the liver, at 50 dpi (Figure 5A). One hamster was infected intraperitoneally with axenic promastigotes; animal three (A3) (Figure 5B) displayed amplification in the lymph node. Hamsters inoculated intragingivally with promastigotes or axenic amastigotes at 50 dpi could not display a clear amplification-just a band in the liver of animal one (A1) infected with promastigotes (Figure 5C). Notably, we had three animals maintained for 8 months whose inoculum delivered by the intragingival route with amastigotes leaked slightly during the injection. Two of three animals displayed a clear infection in the liver, animals one and two (Figure 5D).

Figure 1: Evaluation of the Leishmania infantum-Luc clone by PCR and bioluminescence emission. (A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products to evaluate plasmid integration in the genome: lane 1 - 1 kb DNA ladder; PCR of L. infantum-Luc genomic DNA, lane 2 - 5'ssu - utr1 (1.1 kb) and lane 3- hyg- 3'ssu (1.8 kb); PCR of L. infantum-wt genomic DNA, lanes 4 and 5.(B) Bioluminescence emission (RLU) of promastigotes of L. infantum-Luc clone (106) in the microplate reader. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Intravenous injection of Leishmania infantum-Luc into the gingival vein. (A) The hamster was placed in dorsal decubitus, and the lower lip was pulled down. (B) A thinner needle (8 x 0.30 mm) coupled to a 1 mL syringe was positioned below the lower incisors along the middle line between the pair of teeth at an angle of 25º and inserted 2-4 mm into the mandibularis labialis vein. (C) Inoculation of 50 µL (108) of amastigotes or promastigotes in PBS. (D) Hemostasis using a cotton swab and applying light pressure to the inoculation site. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Follow-up by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. Representative images of one animal per group: Infected via intraperitoneal (upper panels) or intragingival (lower panels), with amastigotes or promastigotes of L. infantum-Luc, for 1, 8, and 22 dpi. Red ROI representing the probed regions at the abdomen and head, for intraperitoneal or intragingival infection, respectively. Data show that at 1 dpi, all animals displayed bioluminescence signal in the abdomen or mandible. The signal was dropping after 8 dpi and was almost undetectable in any group at 22 dpi. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Comparative analysis of radiance from bioluminescence images. Radiance quantification photons.sec-1.cm-2.sr-1 was performed in the abdomen or head of hamsters with manual ROI measurement tools. Average background ROI was subtracted from measurement ROI to remove any spurious signal. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: PCR amplification of kDNA. (A) IP-AMA, hamsters infected via intraperitoneal route with amastigote, 50 dpi (n = 3); (B) IP-PRO, infected via intraperitoneal route with promastigotes, 50 dpi (n = 3); (C) IG-AMA, infected via intragingival route with amastigote (n = 2), IG-PRO, infected via intragingival route with promastigote (n = 2); (D) IG-AMA, infected via intragingival route with amastigote, 8 months post infection (n = 3). NI, uninfected hamsters as negative control (n = 2); C- genomic DNA of L. infantum-Luc, positive control of PCR. Tissues and organs: 1- spleen, 2- liver, 3- lymph nodes. mw- molecular weight marker, arrows indicate the lower molecular weight bands. A1- animal one, A2- animal two, and A3- animal three. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| dpi | Amastigotes IP | | Promastigotes IP | | Amastigotes IG | | Promastigotes IG | |
| Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N |
| 0 | 4.6 x 105 | 3.7 x 105 | 3 | 6.8 x 103 | 3.8 x 103 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 1 | 1.3 x 105 | 1.1 x 105 | 3 | 3.8 x 103 | 5.5 x 103 | 3 | 7.3 x 103 | 4.1 x 103 | 2 | 1.0 x 103 | 5.7 x 102 | 2 |
| 8 | 6.7 x 103 | 7.5 x 103 | 3 | 3.3 x 103 | 5.0 x 103 | 3 | 7.8 x 102 | 5.6 x 102 | 2 | 6.4 x 102 | 8.2 x 101 | 2 |
| 22 | 7.3 x 101 | 8.5 x 101 | 3 | 9.9 x 101 | 8.6 x 101 | 3 | 4.6 x 102 | 7.5 x 101 | 2 | 5.0 x 102 | 1.5 x 102 | 2 |
Table 1: Raw data from comparative radiance analysis of bioluminescence images. Radiance quantification average photons.sec-1.cm-2.sr-1 by group and route. Abbreviations: dpi = days post infection; SD = standard deviation; N = sample size.