The ability to simultaneously record ECG signals from multiple fish significantly distinguishes this device, offering a considerable advantage in reducing the time required for drug or cardiac research on zebrafish or other similar species (Figure 1). Recording accurate ECG signals can be challenging due to the anatomical variations among fish, especially when it comes to electrode placement. Traditionally, obtaining a clear ECG signal involves positioning the active electrode over the heart to circumvent capturing mechanical beats or motion artifacts, with the reference electrode placed towards the lower abdomen. However, pinpointing the heart's precise location can be difficult due to its depth within the tissue or the fish's uneven surface. Sometimes, electrodes must be maneuvered with micromanipulators for accurate placement, which may require multiple attempts before capturing a quality signal.
To overcome these challenges, the system introduces an innovative approach by using a configuration of four electrodes instead of conventional single-working electrodes. Each electrode operates independently, allowing adjustments in three dimensions-up and down (heave), tilting forward and backward (pitch), and rotating around the vertical axis (roll). This flexibility proves particularly useful when working with fish of various shapes, as it enables precise electrode positioning to either capture the optimal ECG signal or explore how ECG readings vary with different contact points on the fish.
This feature not only enhances the efficiency of cardiac and drug studies but also broadens the possibilities for ECG and even ECG recording techniques. Given that these methods have yet to be standardized and are often customized to accommodate the specific conditions of the experimental subject, this device opens new avenues for research, offering more adaptable and reliable data collection methods (Figure 2).
One of the distinctive features of this system is its ability to evaluate up to four different drugs concurrently on four separate fish or to investigate the effects of up to four different doses of a single drug across four distinct fish. The experimental setup can range from a brief acute exposure to longer sessions spanning 1 h, involving variable drug dosages or changes in environmental conditions such as temperature and anesthesia. In this study, we conducted a brief experiment to demonstrate the method's efficacy, particularly highlighting the functionality of the four-electrode array. We tested three varying doses of Amiodarone, a class-III anti-arrhythmic drug known for inducting bradycardia and prolonging the QT interval in zebrafish, over a 5 min exposure period, similar to a previous study20 using the first prototype of this device.
Consistent with prior research, the fish showed both a prolonged QTc interval and a reduction in heart rate compared to the untreated control group. Despite the brief exposure time, which is shorter than in many comparable studies that extend to 1 h, we were able to observe significant alterations in the ECG signals and cardiac parameters (Figure 3).
How Amiodarone treatment elicited observable modifications in the ECG, which escalated with an increase in dosage, is illustrated in Figure 3A,B. Notably, the QTc interval extended with each successive dosage increase relative to the control group, which exhibited a QTc interval of 330 ms. Following the treated groups, the QTcs intervals were measured at 365 ms for 70 µM of Amiodarone, 480 ms for 100 µM, and 546 ms for 200 µM. Correspondingly, a noteworthy decrease in heart rate was observed in reaction to the varied Amiodarone dosages and the prolonged QTcs intervals. Heart rate dropped significantly from an average of 120 ±5 BPM in the control group to 105 ±10 BPM at 70 µM of Amiodarone, 90 ± 5 BPM at 100 µM, and 84 ±5 BPM at 200 µM (Figure 3C,D).
Based on these findings, we can conclude that the newly proposed technique demonstrates comparable quality to previous studies17,18, employing a two-electrode approach (one working electrode and one reference electrode). We successfully gathered data from four working electrodes, selecting the optimal one for analysis to then report the anticipated cardiac parameters. The criteria for selection align with those of earlier methods, emphasizing the need to distinctly visualize PQRST complex and low baseline noise in the ECG signal. This enables the calculation of QT and QTc intervals and facilitates the identification of clear differences. Also, the methodology underwent further validation through testing by three additional researchers from our group who had not participated in the development of the current device. They first implemented the preliminary methodology suggested by the designers and subsequently suggested modifications based on their feedback, leading to the refinement of the approach now presented. This iterative process of enhancement has been crucial for improving the device, leveraging insights from external researchers to make it more user-friendly and effective for future applications.
This brief study on drug response underscores the device's proficiency not only in concurrently recording ECGs from four distinct fish under different conditions but also in capturing multiple (four) ECG signals per fish. This multifactored capability significantly reduces the time and effort required for electrode placement and minimizes the likelihood of human error by providing a selection of signals. This choice allows for either the selection of the most accurate signal or the ability to aggregate data from multiple signals based on the study's goal. However, it's important to clarify that employing the four-electrode setup does not automatically ensure that all four signals will be clean and of high quality. The primary aim of introducing this innovative feature is to mitigate human errors and save time by enabling four concurrent recordings instead of sequential ones, which is more time-efficient and less stressful for the fish, given their limited tolerance for time out of water and under anesthesia.

Figure 1: Zebra II system. (A) Isometric view of the Zebra II device (SolidWorks Model) with labeled components. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Electrode positioning on Zebrafish. (A) The 4-point electrode holder degrees of freedom (conceptual image). (B) Electrode positioning on fish's chest. (C) ECG signal from the 4-point electrode holder (Channels 1-4). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Effects of acute amiodarone exposure (ECG signals). (A) Representative ECG data obtained from the system and its change in ECG parameters due to different Amiodarone concentrations. (B) Change in ECG due to Amiodarone exposure. (C) Bar chart describing the discrepancy of HR. (D) Bar chart describing the discrepancy QTc interval in ECG data with different Amiodarone concentrations. *p<0.05 (one-way analysis of variance with Tukey test). Error bars show standard deviation. This figure has been modified from20. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.