Here, we have presented the ADCC Bioassay method for assessing the ADCC reaction of a therapeutic antibody. The method is straightforward and employs a simple "add-mix-read" format for measurement.
Before doing the experiment, the expression of the target antigen in the target cells must be confirmed by either flow cytometry or western blotting. Flow cytometry will be a better tool to detect the surface antigen. However, using flow cytometry can stress the cells, causing apoptosis and affecting the viability of the cell and, therefore, the overall analysis. In addition, it costs more than western blotting. In this experiment, we used western blotting as a faster and more cost-effective method because targeted antigens are known cell surface antigens.
Engineered Jurkat cells, which stably expressed the FcγRIIIa receptor, the V158 (high affinity) variant, and an NFAT response element that drives the expression of firefly luciferase, were used as effector cells. Activation of the NFAT pathway results in the production of luciferase, and its activity is quantified in the form of luminescence readout. The signal also represents the activity of ADCC.
First, target cells (T) are incubated with effector cells (E) in the presence of varying amounts of antibody in 96-well plates for 6 h at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator. The effector:target ratio of 5:1 is used to optimize the signal. For example, 75,000 effector cells were added to 15,000 target cells. At the end of incubation, Bio-Glo luciferase assay reagent is added to each well, incubated for 30 min, and the luminescence (RLU, relative luciferase units) is measured using a luminescence plate reader.
The key critical steps in this protocol are: (1) The handling of effector cells. The cell vial should not be inverted during the thawing process, rock gently, and must be used immediately after thawing to prevent unwanted cell death or affecting the performance of biological detection. (2). It is important to use white polystyrene 96-well microplates with clear, flat bottom for luminescence measurements because the luminescence is captured from the bottom of the reader.
In this study, we observed the stronger and weaker ADCC reactions of the anti-EGFR antibody, cetuximab, depending on the amount of target cells and antibody concentration. Some reasons for handling the calibration of weak ADCC reactions: (1) The readings of the ADCC reporter bioassay come from effector cells (E), with a constant number of 75,000 cells per well in the ADCC reaction system of this study. Therefore, optimizing the quality of target cells (T) is one aspect that can be improved. The E:T ratio in this study was 5:1, which could be adjusted up to 20:1. (2) Antibody concentration is also one of the important factors affecting ADCC reaction. Adjustments can be made through serial dilution of antibodies to explore the optimal concentration range, thus achieving maximum response in the ADCC report. (3) The incubation time of antibodies, target cells, and effector cells is also crucial for experimental results. In this study, we incubated for 6 h, which can be extended up to 24 h to achieve the optimal ADCC reaction. (4) Additionally, the concentration of the buffer solution (low IgG) for ADCC assay also needs to be explored. The optimal serum concentration for ADCC response can be achieved within the range of 1% to 10%.
This experimental method is rapid and straightforward, allowing completion within one day through a simple "add-mix-read" protocol. The results are stable and amenable to batch testing. However, this bioassay kit does not detect cell death like conventional ADCC methods that use PBMC or NK cells as effector cells12,13. Instead, it uses FcγRIIIa receptor expressed Jurkat cells as effector cells, which will cost more because the cells are genetically modified. In comparison to traditional ADCC experiments13,14, it eliminates the requirement of blood donations from healthy individuals and avoids the complex process of extracting immune cells, thus mitigating individual variations that could impact the results. The detected luminescence signals are from the binding of effector cells to target cells, not from the actual death of target cells. Therefore, there may be discrepancies compared to standard ADCC detection methods. Furthermore, cell dissociation buffer, which is more expensive than trypsin, is used to detach the adherent cells to maintain the membrane integrity.
ADCC reporter gene analysis demonstrates excellent accuracy and stability, serving as an efficacy analysis method for the mass detection of therapeutic antibody drugs. It can also function as a critical analysis method for the characterization of therapeutic molecules and process development15.
In summary, ADCC is an important immune mechanism, and the quantitative detection of ADCC holds great importance in the field of immunotherapy. This experimental method offers an effective means for the quantitative measurement of ADCC15.