The protocol describes the in vivo and in vitro pinewood nematode infection of Pinus pinaster and their volatilome analysis through Gas Chromatography (GC) and GC coupled to Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).
Method Article
The protocol describes the in vivo and in vitro pinewood nematode infection of Pinus pinaster and their volatilome analysis through Gas Chromatography (GC) and GC coupled to Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).
The pinewood nematode (PWN) is a phytoparasite that causes pine wilt disease (PWD) in conifer species. This plant parasitic nematode has heavily contributed to pine deforestation in Asian countries, e.g., Japan, China, and Korea. Over the last two decades, in Europe, Portugal and Spain have been greatly affected. Research on the mechanisms of PWN infection and/or PWD progression in susceptible host species relies on the controlled infection of pine seedlings under greenhouse conditions. This technique is laborious and mobilizes substantial economic and human resources. Additionally, it can be prone to variability that results from the genetic diversity associated with some pine species but also from the interference of external factors. As an alternative, in vitro co-cultures of pine with PWNs offer a more advantageous system for studying biochemical changes since they a) allow controlling single environmental or nutritional variables, b) occupy less space, c) require less time to obtain, and d) are free from contamination or from host genetic variation. The following protocol details the standard in vivo PWN infection of Pinus pinaster, the maritime pine, and the establishment of the novel in vitro co-cultures of pine shoots with the PWN as an improved methodology to study this phytoparasite influence on pine volatiles. PWN-induced volatiles are extracted from in vivo and in vitro infected pines by hydrodistillation and distillation-extraction, and the emitted volatiles are captured by solid phase microextraction (SPME), using fiber or packed column techniques.
The pinewood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner & Bührer 1934) Nickle 1970, is a plant parasitic nematode that mainly parasitizes Pinus species. This phytoparasite is vectored by insects of the genus Monochamus into trees of susceptible pine species during the insect's maturation feeding. The PWN kills the tree by attacking its resin canals and reducing resin flow, and by damaging its vascular tissue, causing interruptions in the water column. Lack of water at the tree canopy induces the first visible symptoms of pine wilt disease (PWD), i.e., the pine needles become chlorotic after the cessation of photosynthesis and drooping due to desiccation. Pine generally responds to biotic and abiotic stress through the production of resin and volatile compounds1. Thus, understanding the mechanisms of pine defense is important to determine the specific effects of PWN attacks and to find alternative methods for pest control2.
Currently, experimentation under field conditions is dependent on the availability of infected pines, the confirmation of PWN infection, and variable environmental conditions. Under greenhouse conditions, these parameters can be more easily controlled; however, the genetic diversity of the host becomes a strong source of variability3. For example, in a study on the resistance response of Pinus pinaster, the production of the terpene limonene and resin acids was associated with PWN infection4. However, due to the small number of samples and the variability of natural conditions, detectable changes were only registered for half the samples. In another study using greenhouse-grown pine seedlings, even though environmental conditions were more easily controlled, natural pine genetic diversity induced a great variability in the volatiles extracted5. Since disease-induced pine volatiles can be greatly influenced by environmental and genetic variation, resorting to in vitro shoot cultures is a good alternative for studies on the chemical and biochemical response of pine tissue to PWN infection5,6. By propagating a plant genotype in vitro, its genetic makeup can be maintained and cloned indefinitely, leading to the establishment of a higher amount of genetically identical individuals in less space and under less time than in in vivo conditions. These cultures are a simple working system under easily manipulated nutritional and environmental conditions, so they offer additional advantages to conventional systems in the evaluation of the production and emission of volatiles7,8. These systems are particularly advantageous for research in woody species, which most of the time require substantial resources, i.e., target trees are sometimes located in hard-to-reach sites, require expensive equipment, a dedicated workforce, and longer time periods of analysis8. In vitro, co-cultures of pines with the PWN enable the assessment of metabolic interactions between the nematode and the plant at different stages9. For the analysis of volatiles, this is very important since profiling techniques have become highly accurate, and minute variations in sampling can result in substantial changes in volatile profiles. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is a powerful technique for the analysis of volatiles and allows a quick and streamlined profiling of volatiles10. The protocol presented here describes techniques for infecting in vivo pine seedlings under greenhouse conditions and in vitro shoot cultures of genetically identical pines optimized for the extraction and profiling of induced volatiles.
1. Growing in vitro pinewood nematode
NOTE: Pinewood nematodes are grown by feeding on the fungal mycelium of a non-sporulating strain of Botrytis cinerea (de Bary) Whetzel11.
2. Sterilizing mixed life-stage pinewood nematodes
3. Infection of in vivo Pinus pinaster seedlings
NOTE: Inoculation trials are performed in ≥ 2-year-old P. pinaster seedlings. Trees can be acquired from certified commercial retailers but can also be grown in a greenhouse from certified seeds.
4. Establishment and infection of in vitro pine shoot cultures
5. Isolation of volatile compounds
NOTE: Isolation of volatiles can be performed through several techniques. Here, volatile extraction is done by hydrodistillation, using a Clevenger apparatus20, distillation-extraction, using a Likens-Nickerson apparatus21, and trapping of headspace volatiles through solid phase microextraction (SPME) using coated fibers or packed tubes (porous polymer sorbent)22.
6. Analysis of volatile profiles
The PWN reproduces quickly under optimal conditions, and generation times can be as low as 4 days, with each female lying about 80 eggs during her life28. Using the methodology described above, large amounts of PWNs can be obtained depending on fungal growth. Within an 8-day growth period, PWNs can have a 100-fold increase in population numbers (Figure 1). To increase the consistency in the amounts of PWNs, use sterilized PWNs since contamination with unknown bacteria or fungi will negatively impact the PWN population.
The successful infection of pine seedlings with the PWN will result in symptoms of PWD at around 20 days after infection (Figure 2). However, P. pinaster is known to possess a high genetic variability on susceptibility to PWD, and variations on the time of symptoms onset are very common3.
In vitro pine shoots do not have this genetic variability, and environmental and nutritional conditions are controlled and set according to the user's needs. In vitro maritime pine shoot cultures grow well in SH elongation medium, showing a growth rate of about 0.9 mm per week6. Ideally, sterile PWNs can be added to shoots with at least 5 cm (from the base to the highest needle). Because in vitro pine shoots are smaller and the PWN infection area is reduced, nematode population growth is less expressive, so doubling times can be between 6 and 7 days6. Nevertheless, chlorotic needles can be observed within a month of co-culture (Figure 3). In comparison to greenhouse-grown pines, in vitro pine shoot cultures allow synchronization of PWD symptoms, control of temperature and photoperiod, control of nutritional status, and avoidance of contamination.
Two-year-old P. pinaster seedlings have an essential oil yield of around 0.2% ± 0.1% (v/fresh weight) and a volatiles profile rich in α-pinene, β-pinene or δ-3-carene, with regular chemical variability. Currently, two main chemotypes have been identified, one where α-pinene and β-pinene are dominant and another where α-pinene and β-pinene share dominance with δ-3-carene5. Maritime pine in vitro shoots can be cultured according to the desired chemotype, whose volatiles are fully profiled through GC-MS. While volatile profiles from volatiles obtained by distillation-extraction can be different from those of essential oils, in P. pinaster, they are similar (Figure 5A). Volatile extraction techniques are adequate for assessing induced changes in pine volatile metabolite profiles. Volatile trapping techniques give information on the volatiles emitted by pines. Chemical profiles from SPME techniques can be different, but differences are usually dependent on the amount of plant material and the volatiles trapped (Figure 5B,C).

Figure 1: In vitro growth of pinewood nematode. (A) Non-sporulating Botrytis cinerea strain grown in sterilized hydrated barley seeds and (B) in vitro pinewood nematode culture after feeding on fungal mycelium. Scale bar = 1 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Greenhouse trials with pine seedlings. (A) A 2-year-old Pinus pinaster seedlings without and (B) with symptoms of Pine Wilt Disease. Scale bar = 10 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: In vitro experiments with pine microshoots. Pinus pinaster in vitro shoot cultures (A) before and (B) after pinewood nematode infection. Chlorosis as a result of nematode infection can be seen in microshoot needles (arrows). Scale bar = 1.5 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Setup for the different volatiles isolation systems. Isolation of (A) essential oils by hydrodistillation (Clevenger apparatus), (B) volatiles by distillation-extraction (Likens-Nickerson apparatus), and headspace volatiles by solid phase microextraction (SPME) with (C) fibers or (D) packed tubes. Scale bar = 10 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Representative chromatograms of Pinus pinaster shoot volatiles. (A) essential oil, (B) volatiles collected by solid-phase microextraction fiber, and (C) emitted volatiles using packed tubes. Identified using a laboratory-built reference library. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The protocol presented here outlines an enhanced methodology to analyze volatile compounds in maritime pine infected by the PWN, where environmental and genetic variability is reduced and does not influence the outcomes. Using pure lines of in vitro maritime pine genotypes, extracted and emitted volatiles can be analyzed as a host response to one of the most damaging biotic threats to pine forests.
Maintenance of reference cultures or the growth of large amounts of PWNs is easily performed in the lab by growing in vitro B. cinerea (non-sporulating strain) and using it as a food source for the nematode. This procedure is commonly very accessible, given the right conditions; however, when pipetting the PWN suspension, be sure to break the fungal colony surface. Otherwise, the PWNs will be retained in the water droplets. When successful, the fungal mycelium will be consumed, and PWNs will greatly multiply. Nematode sterilization is a critical step, but once sterile PWNs are obtained, the culture can be either maintained in B. cinerea, being then a monoxenic culture only contaminated with this fungus, or on the in vitro pine shoots6,29.
The use of greenhouse-grown 2-year-old P. pinaster seedlings has the advantage of simulating a closer condition to natural PWD infections; however, variability is harder to control3,5. In vitro co-cultures of P. pinaster shoots with the PWN are a refined working system that is more adequate for studies that require a finer control of environmental and biological variation6,9. However, their use is limited to studies on the tissue level, e.g., ultrastructural morphology or on biochemical regulation mechanisms under biotic or abiotic stress. In other fields, these systems offer a great potential for following minute changes in host metabolome, proteome, or transcriptome induced by the PWN in the first stages of infection.
In the establishment of in vitro pine shoots, the surface sterilization of pine seeds resorts to a strong biocide; however, optimizations can be performed with a variation on exposure time or biocidal agent. Pine seed coats are generally strong and can withstand pure ethanol for a longer period than weaker seeds. However, liquid diffuses inside the shell, so care must be taken that ethanol does not reach the embryo. In vitro, pine shoots can also be used for the maintenance or micropropagation of specific pine genotypes. Although harder to establish in an uncontaminated environment, non-seminal material can also be used to establish the in vitro shoot cultures. However, multiplication and growth may be slower.
Hydrodistillation and distillation-extraction procedures are volatile extraction techniques. The first will yield a pure extract of pine volatiles, called an essential oil; the second has the advantage of simultaneously using a solvent, so lighter molecules that are prone to escape due to high temperatures of boiling water can potentially be retained. These are extracts and do not always represent the volatile mixtures that plants emit into the environment. These headspace volatiles are more accurately sampled through solid-phase microextraction procedures, e.g., using coated fibers or packed tubes. Despite using boiling water as an extractive agent, which can induce the formation of artifacts, the hydrodistillation procedure has several advantages, e.g., a) the non-use of organic solvents, thus providing a pure extract, b) allowing yield determination, c) affording a chlorophyll-free extract, and d) providing, in addition to the essential oil, two other extracts, an hydrolate and decoction water, each of which with its own composition and characteristic bioactivity. The Likens-Nickerson apparatus is a special distillation-extraction unit that allows the simultaneous condensation of the hydrodistillate coming from the flask with plant material and of the organic solvent coming from the second flask. As the organic solvent is immiscible with, and lighter than, water, it is visible as the supernatant floating over the distilled water in the U-shaped central separatory trap above the apparatus stopcock. The fact that the distillate return-arms in the separatory trap are at different levels allows the distilled water to return to the flask with plant material and the extracting organic solvent to return to the second flask. n-Pentane changes from being transparent to translucent, indicating the distillate's presence. Solid phase microextraction is one of the several ways to collect headspace volatiles and can be adjusted to different types of applications and volumes of plant material in nature, in vials, in glass desiccators, and in PTFE bags, among others17. All these extraction procedures provide complementary information on the volatile profile. However, individual in vitro pine shoots are small and have a lower weight, and consequently lower amounts of volatiles when compared to pine seedlings. For in vitro pine shoots, distillation-extraction is more suitable to obtain extracted volatiles, while resin packed tubes are more suitable to trap emitted volatiles.
We have nothing to disclose.
This research was partly funded by the EU under the PurPest project through grant agreement 101060634, and by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), through projects NemACT, DOI 10.54499/2022.00359.CEECIND/CP1737/CT0002; NemaWAARS, DOI 10.54499/PTDC/ASP-PLA/1108/2021; CESAM UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020+ LA/P/0094/2020; CE3C, DOI 10.54499/UIDB/00329/2020; GREEN-IT, DOI 10.54499/UIDB/04551/2020 and 10.54499/UIDP/04551/2020.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 mesh test sieve | Retsch | 60.131.000038 | |
| 6-Benzylaminopurine (6-BAP) | Duchefa Biochemie | B0904 | |
| Charcoal activated | Duchefa Biochemie | C1302 | |
| Clevenger apparatus | WINZER Laborglastechnik | 25-000-02 | |
| Hydrogen peroxide solution | Sigma-Aldrich | H1009-500ML | |
| Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) | Duchefa Biochemie | I0902 | |
| Likens-Nickerson apparatus | VitriLab LDA. | c/IN29/32 | |
| Microbox round containers | Sac O2 | O118/80+OD118 | |
| n-Pentane | Sigma-Aldrich | 1.00882 | |
| PARAFILM M sealing film | BRAND | HS234526B-1EA | |
| Phyto agar | Duchefa Biochemie | P1003 | |
| Potato Dextrose Agar | BD DIFCO | 213400 | |
| Scalpel blade no. 24 | Romed Holland | BLADE24 | |
| Schenk & Hildebrandt Basal salt medium | Duchefa Biochemie | S0225 | |
| Schenk & Hildebrandt vitamin mixture | Duchefa Biochemie | S0411 | |
| SPME fiber assembly Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) | Supelco | 57300-U | |
| SPME Fiber Holder | Supelco | 57330-U | |
| Sucrose | Duchefa Biochemie | S0809 | |
| Tenax TA- stainless steel tubes- conditioned + capped | Markes International | C1-AAXX-5003 |