Method Article

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

DOI:

10.3791/67183

⸱

January 17th, 2025

 ,  ,  , 
1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, 2School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, 3School of Health and Clinical Psychology, East China Normal University, 4School of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Erratum Notice

Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. View Erratum Notice

Summary

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The protocol aims to provide a detailed description of the methodology for conducting an fNIRS hyperscanning study in psychological counseling. This includes the preparations for the experiment, the procedure for collecting data, and the subsequent data analysis process.

Abstract

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning is an innovative technique that enables real-time monitoring of brain activity among multiple individuals engaged in social interactions. Researchers in this field quantify concurrent brain activities through the index of inter-brain synchrony (IBS). In psychological counseling research, the use of fNIRS to measure IBS has garnered attention for its potential to illuminate the dynamics of counselor-client interactions. Nevertheless, the field currently lacks a standardized protocol for precisely measuring IBS between counselors and clients, which would facilitate the revelation of real-time interaction patterns during counseling sessions. To address this need, this paper proposes a detailed standardized protocol, outlining the procedural steps for conducting fNIRS hyperscanning in psychological counseling settings, focusing on the acquisition of brain signals, calculation of IBS between counselors and clients, and analysis of lead-lag patterns of IBS throughout counseling sessions. Implementing this standardized fNIRS hyperscanning pipeline not only enhances the reproducibility and reliability of IBS measurements in psychological counseling research but also facilitates deeper insights into the neural mechanisms underlying working alliance. By integrating fNIRS hyperscanning into naturalistic counseling environments, researchers can advance understanding of how IBS correlates with counseling outcomes, potentially informing personalized approaches to mental health treatment.

Introduction

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In recent years, using hyperscanning techniques to explore shared brain activities during dyadic or group interactions has become a popular research direction. Researchers often employ electroencephalogram (EEG)1, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)2, or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)3 to monitor the neural and brain activities of multiple subjects simultaneously. The neuroscience metric of inter-brain synchrony (IBS)4 is thus introduced to quantify the degree of brain activity coupling between people with meticulous analysis of the phase and amplitude alignment of neural or hemodynamic signals across time5. IBS refers to the phenomenon where the brain activities of two or more individuals become aligned or synchronized during social interactions. This synchronization can occur in various forms, such as in the phase, frequency, or amplitude of brain oscillations6,7,8.

In the realm of naturalistic social interactions involving multiple participants, a vast array of research has illuminated the phenomenon of IBS, particularly in contexts as diverse as parent-child dynamics9, educator-student exchanges10, romantic partnerships11, and audience-performer engagements12. Notably, IBS exhibits heightened levels within intimate relationships such as parent-child and romantic partnerships, compared to interactions with strangers13,14, underscoring its sensitivity to the depth of emotional connection. Concurrently, this heightened IBS frequently coincides with enhanced collaboration efficiency and behavioral improvements, suggesting a functional role in facilitating positive social outcomes15.

In the context of counseling, the working alliance -- a pivotal construct closely tied to counseling efficacy16 -- embodies a distinct interpersonal dynamic that gradually evolves between the counselor and client during the therapeutic process. At its essence, this alliance rests upon the fostering of profound emotional ties and the establishment of efficient collaborative frameworks17. Therefore, exploring IBS within counseling interactions provides a new perspective that enhances the understanding of the complexities and quality of these therapeutic relationships.

Counselor empathy, as perceived by the client, contributes to the development of a working alliance18. This indicates that the establishment of the working alliance may arise from the mutual understanding and corresponding neural activities between the counselor and the client. Empathy can be dissociated into two components: affective empathy and cognitive empathy. The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is implicated in affective empathy and is also associated with the neural processes underlying face-to-face communication19. The right temporal-parietal junction (rTPJ), an important part of the Theory of Mind network, is closely linked to cognitive empathy, particularly in understanding the mental states of others20. Consequently, early brain synchronization studies in counseling prioritized these two regions as regions of interest (ROIs) and identified IBS primarily in the rTPJ21. Subsequent research has thus focused predominantly on the rTPJ22. Studies have found that neural synchronization in the rTPJ between clients and therapists during counseling is significantly higher than in conversational contexts. There is a positive correlation between increased synchronous neural activity in the rTPJ and the strength of the therapeutic alliance21. The unique activity patterns in counseling may result from the in-depth exploration of emotional expressions and personal experiences. This suggests that IBS warrants further investigation within counseling. Additionally, the correlation between enhanced rTPJ activity and the strength of the working alliance indicates that IBS could serve as a neurobiological basis for assessing counseling relationships, offering a novel evaluation metric.

While these findings underscore the promising role of IBS in counselor-client dynamics, they also emphasize the need for further clarification regarding the direct causal link between brain synchronization, counseling effectiveness, and the working alliance. To advance this burgeoning field, developing standardized hyperscanning protocols and rigorous data analysis methodologies is paramount. By refining the methodological toolkit, it is possible to more precisely map the neural underpinnings of effective counseling, ultimately enhancing the quality of therapeutic interventions and their outcomes.

This article provides a protocol on how to conduct an fNIRS-based hyperscanning study and how to observe and analyze the IBS between the counselor-client dyads. fNIRS is a non-invasive imaging technique used to measure brain activity. It works by detecting changes in blood oxygenation and blood volume within the brain, which are indirect markers of neural activity. This is achieved by emitting near-infrared light into the brain and measuring the amount of light absorbed or scattered by the blood cells23. Thus, the hemodynamic/oxygenation activity is measured. Comparatively, fNIRS offers higher temporal resolution than fMRI, and it is less vulnerable to motion artifacts than EEG, rendering it well suited for studying social interactions in natural settings such as psychological counseling8.

This article also presents the specific steps of computing IBS via the method of wavelet transform coherence (WTC)24. WTC is an analytical technique that measures the relationship between two signals across different frequencies over time. It is beneficial for identifying areas of synchrony between brain regions or between participants in a study. It calculates the coherence between two time series by analyzing their cross-spectrum using wavelet transforms. To contextualize the importance of WTC, it is essential to first understand the foundational concepts of Wavelet Transform (WT)25, Coherence26, and how they converge in the framework of WTC27.

Wavelet Transform, a mathematical tool, excels at decomposing complex signals into their constituent time-frequency components, enabling the analysis of both localized changes in frequency over time and the overall frequency content of a signal27. This characteristic is particularly advantageous when studying neural activity, which is inherently non-stationary and exhibits dynamic changes across different frequencies. Coherence, on the other hand, quantifies the degree to which two signals share similar frequency components and phase relationships, serving as a metric of synchronization between them26. By combining these two concepts, WTC provides a powerful means to assess IBS, capturing both the temporal evolution and frequency specificity of neural coupling between individuals and providing insights into how different parts of the brain or brains interact dynamically throughout a task or stimulus24.

While the traditional WTC framework merely tests the correlation between the brain signals of different individuals, a method considering the directionality of the interaction between the counselor and client is presented here. There are different lead-lag patterns,where one signal consistently precedes variations in the other by a specific time interval, indicating a temporal relationship in IBS according to previous studies28,29. The IBS may not occur simultaneously between the counselor and the client during counseling. Thus, a comprehensive method is needed to explore the directionality of IBS. The method clarifies the role that counselors play throughout various phases of counseling (leading the IBS, in-phase IBS with the client, or led by the client).

This study proposes a detailed and implementable protocol based on the research question of whether IBS scores between counselors and clients can serve as potential biomarkers for assessing alliance quality or outcomes among clients with different adult attachment styles. The protocol outlines the utilization of fNIRS hyperscanning technology to investigate IBS between psychological counselors and clients within a counseling context. It provides comprehensive descriptions of the experimental procedures, precautions for each step, and subsequent data processing methods. It is anticipated that this protocol will offer valuable insights and guidance to future scholars interested in exploring IBS within the realm of psychological counseling.The specific protocol for data collection and processing is presented as follows.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All participants signed a written informed consent form before participating and were remunerated with approximately 60 yuan (Chinese currency) after the experiment. The study procedure outlined above was approved by the University Committee on Human Research Protection of East China Normal University (HR 425-2020).

1. Preparation for the experiment

  1. Measures included in the study
    1. Adult attachment style
      1. Prepare the revised Chinese version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R30,31) on a Chinese online survey platform called Wenjuanxing (similar to SurveyMonkey or Qualtrics in other parts of the world; see Table of Materials) to prescreen participants.
        NOTE: The Chinese version of the ECR-R consists of 18 items measuring two dimensions of attachment style (attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety). Use a 7-point self-report Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). This scale is for Chinese-speaking participants. Researchers can choose the ECR32 or a suitable revised version based on participants' language and cultural background.
      2. Prepare a Chinese revised version of the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ)30 to ensure that participants fit a typical attachment style.
        NOTE: The RQ comprises four short paragraphs describing four different attachment styles. Require participants to choose the paragraph that fits them best using a 7-point self-report Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). It is necessary to find a second scale measuring the same dimensions to clarify the attachment style of participants because typical participants are needed. This questionnaire is for Chinese-speaking participants. Researchers can choose the RQ33 or a suitable revised version based on participants' language and cultural background.
    2. Working alliance
      1. Prepare the Chinese version of the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form Revised (client version)34,35 (WAI-SR) to measure client-reported working alliances after the experiment.
        NOTE: The Chinese version of WAI-SR consists of a total of 12 items measuring three aspects of the therapeutic working alliances, including (a) agreement on the tasks of therapy, (b) agreement on the goals of therapy, and (c) development of an affective bond. The scale was based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never" to 5 = "always", with higher scores representing better-working alliance. This questionnaire is for Chinese-speaking participants. Researchers can choose the WAI-SR36 or a suitable revised version based on participants' language and cultural background.
    3. Clinical outcome
      1. Prepare the Chinese revised version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM)37,38for recruiting participants.
        NOTE: The Chinese revised version of CORE-OM includes four dimensions: subjective well-being, problems/symptoms, life/social functioning, and risk to self and others, comprising a total of 34 items. Ensure that these domains reflect different areas of distress and dysfunction, with "item clusters" addressing symptom domains such as anxiety, depression, physical problems, and trauma. This questionnaire is for Chinese-speaking participants. Researchers can choose the CORE-OM37 or a suitably revised version based on the participants' language and cultural background.
      2. Use the revised Chinese version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-10 (CORE-10)38 to assess symptom severity before and after the experiment in order to alleviate participants' cognitive load.
        NOTE: The CORE-10 is a shortened version of the CORE-OM, which consists of 10 items on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a higher level of psychological distress. Assess clients with pre and post-tests before and after the counseling process, and note that the difference in pre and post-test scores indicates the clinical effectiveness of the first counseling session. Calculate the amount of change in the CORE-10 (pre-test score minus post-test score) to demonstrate improvement in the client's symptoms. This questionnaire is for Chinese-speaking participants. Researchers can choose the CORE-1038 or a suitable revised version based on participants' language and cultural background.
  2. Participants
    1. Clients
      1. According to previous findings, recruit clients and counselors of the same sex(female) to avoid gender effect39,40 in synchronous brain activity.
      2. Recruit female college students experiencing psychological distress on campus through the Wenjuanxing platform (see Table of Materials) and ask participants to report their chief complaint for counseling. Ensure that they have a desire to seek help on their own.
      3. Ensure the student clients are right-handed and have normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing. Ensure that the student clients have no known previous or current psychiatric or physical diagnoses. Make sure that they do not have other psychological counseling in progress.
      4. Use the established cut-off score to ensure the CORE-OM score for female samples remains below 1.17, confirming that they have not met clinical diagnostic criteria for psychological distress in the past week and maintaining control over the clients' mental health levels. Classify clients into secure or dismissing attachment categories based on their self-evaluation of the Chinese version of the RQ.
      5. According to the scores of ECR-R, select the top 27% of all participants with high levels of avoidance in the dismissing attachment category to form the dismissing group; select the top 27% of all participants with low levels of anxiety in the secure attachment category to participate in the secure group.
      6. After successfully recruiting the participants, confirm with the counselors whether the sessions focus on the issues reported by the participants and assess the severity of the reported problems.
        NOTE: The prescreening process involved 252 college student clients, ultimately resulting in the selection of 37 participants facing moderate academic stress, school adjustment issues, or interpersonal relationship difficulties for the formal experiment. The mean age of the client participants was 20.46 years (SD = 2.17), and all participants were female college students. No significant differences were observed between dismissing clients (n = 16) and secure clients (n = 21) regarding age (t(35) = 0.51, p = .62) or in the problems/symptoms domain of the CORE-OM(t(35) = −1.76, p = .09).
    2. Counselors
      1. Recruit several counselors from the college mental health center.
      2. Ensure that the counselors are right-handed with normal or corrected vision and hearing, registered with the Chinese Psychological Association, and possess 2–10 years of counseling experience.
      3. Ensure that the counselors have received college counseling training programs and use the same Counseling Integration Orientation Therapy method41 for semi-structured counseling, focusing on the visitor's emotional state, current distress, and counseling goals.
        NOTE: A total of 7 female counselors from the Chinese Psychological Association (CPS) participated in this study, with a mean age of 34.42 years (SD = 5.09). Among the counselors, 6 were self-identified as securely attached, and 1 was self-identified as dismissingly attached. However, the dismissing counselor's ratings on the alliance, BS, and IBS did not significantly differ from those of the other 6 counselors (all p > .05).
    3. Random matching of counselors and clients
      1. Randomly match the counselors and student clients in dyads. Due to the small number of counselors, each counselor is paired with several clients at different times. Ensure that a counselor sees only one visitor at a time.
  3. Homemade fNIRS caps
    NOTE: Homemade fNIRS caps are unnecessary if there are suitable standard caps with the fNIRS system.
    1. Prepare two medium-sized swimming caps made of nylon fabric to place the optode holder grid and cover the brain region of interest (see Table of Materials). Mend the swimming caps using the following steps to meet the needs of the experiment.
      NOTE: Given the different head sizes of participants, binder clips of different sizes should be prepared to keep the optodes close to the participant's head during the experimental process.
    2. To anchor the reference optodes on the swimming cap according to the standard international 10-20 system42, use a standard 10-20 EEG cap (see Table of Materials ). Place the EEG cap on a head mold and then one of the swimming caps on the EEG cap.
      NOTE: Since the swimming cap and the EEG cap may not be exactly the same size, make sure neither of the caps is put on crooked.
    3. Mark reference optodes (Cz, T3, T4) with a red marker on the swimming cap through the EEG cap electrodes. Then, mark reference optodes of Regions of Interest (ROI).
      NOTE: In the study, the right temporal-parietal junction (rTPJ) is selected as the ROI, with a 4 x 4 optode probe patch placed over the right temporoparietal region. The reference optode of ROI is placed at P6.
    4. Reference the patch at P6 on the swimming cap. Place P6 at the second optode from the back of the column near T4 on the Patch. Mark the positions of other optodes and then cut small holes with a diameter of about 15 mm at the marked positions to ensure the grid holder fits in.
      NOTE: The 4 x 4 patch includes eight emitters and eight detectors, comprising 24 measurement channels (CH1-CH24). The fNIRS system is an optical topography system designed to collect fNIRS data by simultaneously measuring changes in the concentrations of oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) (see Table of Materials), provides a standard separation of 30 mm. Additionally, the corresponding anatomical structure of each channel (see Figure 1) would be determined in a standard Montreal Neurological Institute coordinate space using the MATLAB (see Table of Materials) toolbox of SPM8 later.
    5. Embed the probes into the holes to appropriately mount the patches to the modified swimming caps. Mend the other swimming cap according to the above steps. Finally, set the layout of a 4 x 4 probe set for each participant through the fNIRS measurement system, corresponding to the probe arrangements of the two caps.

2. Before the participants arrive

  1. Start the fNIRS system at least 30 min in advance to ensure a stable normal temperature range of 5 °C to 35 °C during the experiment.
    NOTE: It is unnecessary to turn the laser on.
  2. In the fNIRS system, activate the event-related measurement mode and ensure that the recording of different states can be triggered by pressing specific keys. Check other parameters, such as subject ID, to ensure proper fNIRS measurement. Connect the fNIRS caps to the fNIRS system by inserting the corresponding optode probes into the optode probe patches on the caps.
    1. Specifically, set the experiment procedure here as an event-related design that includes two parts: the resting state session and the counseling session. In the NIRSPort system (NIRx), set the F1 key as the marker for the resting state session and the F2 key as the marker for the counseling session.
      NOTE: For users of other fNIRS systems, the procedure for marking the sessions may differ, and it is important to consult the specific system's manual or settings to ensure correct session marking.
  3. Prepare informed consent forms and the questionnaires mentioned in step 1.1 for participants. Prepare a stopwatch to remind the participants that the resting state is over. Prepare a clock to remind the counselor of the counseling time limit. Prepare some lighted probes to move participants' hair aside in case hair blocks the signal.
  4. Set the laboratory as a standard counseling room in a real-life scenario, with the counselor and the client sitting at 90° to each other in both groups, with a distance of 40 cm between the two chairs. The counselor would be seated on the right and the client on the left.

3. Data collection process

  1. Provide instructions to the participants
    1. When both participants arrive, ensure they do not know each other again. Remind the participants to keep their mobile phones on silent.
    2. Ask the client participants to read and sign the informed consent forms, complete some demographic information, and fill out the CORE-10 to assess their psychological well-being upon arrival at the laboratory. This process typically takes about 5 min.
    3. Seat the participants. Turn on the laser. Then, put the fNIRS caps on the participants.
      NOTE: Locate the center of the cap at CZ on the participant's head, with the 4 x 4 patch covering the rTPJ.
    4. Remind the participants that they can adjust their postures if they feel uncomfortable when adjusting optodes. Organize optical fiber bundles and place them on the arm of the chair without touching the participants in case they feel heavy or tired.
      1. Remind the participants not to adjust the position of the cap or make strenuous head movements during the experiment to prevent damage to the optical fibers or changing the position of the optodes.
    5. Calibrate signals. Click AUTO GAIN in the fNIRS system to check the quality of the signals. For poor signals, first ensure probe tips are fully seated. Then, use binder clips to close gaps from hats and a lighted probe to clear hair obstructions in case hair blocks the signals. Repeat until all channels show green, indicating acceptable signal quality.
      NOTE: In the NIRSPort system (NIRx), a poor signal at a channel is indicated in yellow, while a sufficient signal is indicated in green. Users of other fNIRS systems should refer to their specific system instructions for appropriate adjustments.
  2. Run the experiment
    1. Obtain the participant's consent, then turn on the camera to record the counseling process.
    2. Verify signal quality and initiate fNIRS recording. Instruct participants to rest with eyes closed for 5 min, marking the start with a predefined key (e.g., F1) and using a stopwatch to time the resting period.
    3. Remind the participants to stop resting 5 min later. Press F1 again to mark that the resting state is over. Recheck the quality of signals.
    4. Remind the participants that it is a 40-min counseling and where the clock is. Tell the participants that they can start counseling. Press F2 as set up previously to mark the start of the counseling.
    5. Leave the participants in the laboratory until 40 min later.
  3. After the experiment
    1. Knock on the laboratory door to ensure that the participants have finished their conversation. Press F2 to mark the end of the experiment. End the camera recording. Help the participants take off the caps.
      NOTE: Review the video afterward to confirm that the counseling proceeded as expected.
    2. Invite the client to fill out the WAI-SR and the CORE-10. This process typically takes about 5 min. Thank the participants and provide them with some monetary compensation.
    3. Save the data. Use a disc and click Text File Out to export the raw fNIRS data. Turn off the fNIRS system. Unplug the optode probes.
      NOTE: This step is specific to the NIRSPort system (NIRx). For other systems, please make the necessary adjustments according to the system's instructions.
    4. Wipe the probes and the probe holders with ethanol. Regularly wash the caps (with the probe holder unplugged) with mild detergent and air dry them.

4. Data analysis

  1. Data preprocessing
    NOTE: The software MATLAB (see Table of Materials ) was used to perform all data analysis with the following toolboxes: Homer 243 and Hitachi2nirs44. Homer 2 is used when the temporal information is of interest, i.e., when the activation is present in both conditions, to compare the difference between the response functions of the two conditions in terms of mean amplitude and latency. Hitachi2nirs is a MATLAB script to convert the raw .csv Hitachi ETG4000 output file into a .nirs file for use with Homer244.
    1. Copy the dataset from the disc and convert raw .csv files to. nirs format using csv2nirs in Hitachi2nirs. Then, launch the Homer2 toolbox in MATLAB by typing Homer2_UI and convert light intensity data to optical density (OD) measurements with the hmrIntensity2OD function. Average the OD points of each channel for each participant. Reject the channels within which the OD signals are too strong or too weak (exceeding five standard deviations (SD).
    2. Use the hmrMotionArtifact function to detect motion artifacts using a wavelet transform with Daubechies 5 (db5) wavelet and a tuning parameter of 0.145,46 for optimal sensitivity. After detecting the artifacts, use the hmrMotionCorrectSpline to correct them through spline interpolation, smoothing the signal and reducing motion-related noise for improved data quality.
    3. Band-pass filter the OD signal using the hmrBandpassFilt function with a selected frequency range of 0.01–0.1 Hz to remove low-frequency drift and high-frequency noise.
    4. Use the hmrR_OD2conc function of Homer2 to convert the OD data into oxygenated hemoglobin (Oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin ( DeOxy-Hb ) values according to the modified Beer-Lambert law47.
      NOTE: The Oxy-HB concentration changes are focused on conducting all the data analysis because the indicator can reflect changes in blood flow during brain activity48,49, has a high signal-to-noise ratio, and has been more widely used in social interaction studies based on fNIRS hyperscanning50,51.
    5. Use the hmrMotionCorrectGlobal function to remove global physiological noise, such as blood pressure, with a wavelet transform-based (WT-based) method.
      NOTE: The WT-based method is more sensitive to the temporal property of the data. If the focus is on the overall interaction pattern among participants rather than detailed changes at each time point, the principal components analysis (PCA)3 is a better choice. The PCA method, proposed by Zhang et al., primarily involves several steps, including decomposing the signal, conducting spatial smoothing, and reconstructing the signal in order to remove non-neural global components. The enPCAFilter function can be used to remove global physiological noise from fNIRS data using PCA. The WT-based method proposed by Duan and colleagues27 is adopted here.
      1. Use wavelet transform coherence ( WTC )24,52 to detect the time-frequency points contaminated by the global physiological noise. The method allows the detection of the coherence of two signals on different time scales and is suitable for analyzing complex dynamic relationships in time series data.
        NOTE: Specifically, the time-frequency distributed WTC map (also known as scalogram53) between the current channel signal and unfiltered signals from every other channel is first calculated. Then, convert these WTC maps into binary form based on the significance of the WTC value at each time-frequency pixel. Subsequently, these WTC maps are averaged, creating a globally co-varying time-frequency map. The value at each pixel of this composite map indicates the degree to which the current channel is globally synchronized with other channels at that specific time-frequency point. Ultimately, a denoising mask for the current channel is produced by setting a threshold k on this globally co-varying time-frequency map.
      2. Use WT to decompose the signal of the current denoising channel into time-frequency space.
      3. Apply the mask derived to the wavelet coefficients to suppress the wavelet energy at the time-frequency points contaminated by noise.
      4. Reconstruct the signal by using the inverse WT.
      5. Repeat the above steps per channel to complete the global physiological noise removal.
  2. Calculating the client-counselor inter-brain synchrony
    1. To compute the correlation between the signals in the time-frequency domain measured in each channel of the two participants, use the function of Wavelet Transform Coherence.
    2. Use the default setting of the mother wavelet (i.e., Generalized Morse Wavelet with its parameters beta and gamma), a fundamental waveform from which a family of wavelets can be derived by dilation (scaling) and translation54. Perform continuous wavelet transforms to convert the time series data into time-frequency space.
    3. Set MonteCarloCount as a representation of the number of surrogate datasets used for significance testing and use Auto AR1 to compute the autocorrelation coefficients of the time series.
    4. Use the Wavelet Coherence function to calculate the correlation between two signals in time-frequency space. Repeat the steps until the 24 WTC matrices are generated from the 24 recording channels.
    5. Determine the frequency of interest (FOI), which is sensitive to psychological counseling.
      1. Select and average the coherence values for the frequency range between 0.01 Hz and 0.1 Hz (which correspond to periods of 100 s and 10 s, respectively) based on the frequency range utilized in a previous fNIRS hyperscanning study focused on psychological counseling tasks55.
        NOTE: Further statistic confirmation needs to be performed rather than simply confining the selected frequency band.
      2. Standardize the WTC values by conducting a time-average of the WTC values in resting and counseling stages, respectively, for each channel combination, helping in standardizing the data and preparing it for comparison. This standardization is crucial for reducing variability and focusing on task-specific effects.
      3. Set rest-stage WTC values as baseline-level WTC and task-stage WTC values as task-level WTC.
        NOTE: Rest-stage WTC values are used as a baseline to represent the normal, non-task-related state. In contrast, task-stage WTC values reflect the state during psychological counseling. This differentiation allows for isolating the specific impact of counseling on brain activity.
      4. Use the mult_comp_perm_t1 function of Groppe's work. Conduct paired-sample t-tests to compare baseline-level WTC and task-level WTC at each frequency point.
        NOTE: This step helps to statistically determine which frequency points exhibit significant differences between the baseline and task states. The comparison helps identify the specific frequency ranges where counseling has a measurable effect.
      5. Determine frequency bins where the task effect is significant (counseling > resting, p < 0.000556).
        NOTE: This step involves identifying the frequency bins that show significant increases in coherence during counseling compared to resting. The threshold p < 0.0005 is used to control for multiple comparisons and ensure the robustness of the findings.
      6. Determine the FOI as the frequency points with p values below 0.0005 and their nearest frequency points (p < 0.01).
        NOTE: This criterion ensures that the selected frequency bands are not only significant but also relevant to the observed counseling effects.
      7. Calculate the mean WTC values within the specified FOI for each channel across each pair in the study.
      8. Perform Fisher-Z statistical transformations on the inter-brain synchrony values obtained for each period in the two groups of subjects to get a normal distribution of the WTC values, which can be an index for analyzing IBS.
  3. Further statistics
    1. Determine the task-related channels.
      1. Gain task-related WTC values by subtracting baseline-level WTC from task-level WTC.
      2. Conduct one-sample t-tests for each channel, utilizing the mean task-related WTC values across the specified frequencies of interest.
      3. Use the mafdr function to apply the method of False Discovery Rate ( p < 0.05 )57 correction to multiple comparisons.
      4. Determine the task-related channels as channels with adjusted p values below 0.05.
    2. Compare IBS between different task conditions. Conduct a one-sample t-test between the WTC values of different conditioned groups (i.e., the secure and dismissing groups) at each task-related channel.
    3. Further, identify the differences in IBS between the two groups throughout the psychological counseling process. Divide the counseling into two stages: early stage (0–15 min) and late stage (15–35 min).
    4. Perform one-sample t-tests separately on the task-related WTC values for corresponding stages and the increments of task-related WTC (calculated as late-stage values minus early-stage values) across different task conditions.
    5. Check for the time lag effect in IBS. Shift the counselor's brain activity forward or backward to clients' by 2–12 s (step = 2 s) and re-calculate task-related WTC values according to the above steps. Check if there are differences between counselor-led IBS, client-led IBS, and in-phase IBS.
    6. Evaluate the relationship between the IBS and behavioral data using multiple regression analysis.
      NOTE: WTC computaion code is provided as Supplementary File 1.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The results showed that there was a marginally significant effect that the secure group had higher task-related WTC increments than the dismissing group (t = 2.50, adjusted p = 0.07) at channel 19 in the angular gyrus (ANG; see Figure 2). The WTC values at CH19 were selected for further analysis of IBS. As to the time lag effect in IBS, significantly higher late-stage counselor-led IBS was observed in the dismissing group (M = 0.04, SD = 0.07) compared to ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In the present protocol, the specific steps of how to conduct an fNIRS hyperscanning experiment in the natural setting of psychological counseling and how to calculate the IBS between counselor and client, as well as how to determine the lead-lag patterns of IBS across the counseling are described. The detailed operation can help researchers repeat an fNIRS hyperscanning experiment and further research in open science. Some critical issues about the experiment design, experiment conducting, and data analysis are discusse...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900767), the Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (20dz2260300), and The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Chinese online survey platformRanster Technology Company,Changsha,ChinaThe Free version of Wenjuanxing
EEG capCompumedics Neuroscan, Charlotte,USA64-channel Quik-Cap
fNIRS systemHitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo,JapanETG-7100 Optical Topography SystemThe NIRSport emitted and collected
 near-infrared light at two wavelengths
 (760 and 850 nm) at a sampling rate of 10.1725Hz. 
MATLAB 2018aThe MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MAMATLAB 2018a
Swimming capDecathlon Group, Villeneuve-d'Ascq,France1681552medium size

References

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Liu, D., et al. Interactive brain activity: review and progress on EEG-based hyperscanning in social interactions. Front Psychol. 9, 1862(2018).
  2. Xie, H., et al. Finding the neural correlates of collaboration using a three-person fMRI hyperscanning paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117 (37), 23066-23072 (2020).
  3. Zhang, X., Noah, J. A., Hirsch, J. Separation of the global and local components in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals using principal component spatial filtering. Neurophotonics. 3 (1), 015004(2016).
  4. Zhao, Q., Zhao, W., Lu, C., Du, H., Chi, P. Interpersonal neural synchronization during social interactions in close relationships: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fNIRS hyperscanning studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 158, 105565(2024).
  5. Zhao, N., Zhu, Y., Hu, Y. Inter-brain synchrony in open-ended collaborative learning: an fNIRS-hyperscanning study. J Vis Exp. (173), e62777(2021).
  6. Kinreich, S., Djalovski, A., Kraus, L., Louzoun, Y., Feldman, R. Brain-to-brain synchrony during naturalistic social interactions. Sci Rep. 7 (1), 17060(2017).
  7. Montague, P. R., et al. Hyperscanning: simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. Neuroimage. 16 (4), 1159-1164 (2002).
  8. Nam, C. S., Choo, S., Huang, J., Park, J. Brain-to-brain neural synchrony during social interactions: a systematic review on hyperscanning studies. Appl Sci. 10 (19), 6669(2020).
  9. Liu, S., et al. Parenting links to parent-child interbrain synchrony: a real-time fNIRS hyperscanning study. Cereb Cortex. 34 (2), bhad533(2024).
  10. Zhu, Y., et al. Instructor–learner neural synchronization during elaborated feedback predicts learning transfer. J Educ Psychol. 114 (6), 1427-1441 (2022).
  11. Pan, Y., Cheng, X., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Hu, Y. Cooperation in lovers: an fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Hum Brain Mapp. 38 (2), 831-841 (2017).
  12. Hou, Y., Song, B., Hu, Y., Pan, Y., Hu, Y. The averaged inter-brain coherence between the audience and a violinist predicts the popularity of violin performance. Neuroimage. 211, 116655(2020).
  13. Reindl, V., et al. Multimodal hyperscanning reveals that synchrony of body and mind are distinct in mother-child dyads. Neuroimage. 251, 118982(2022).
  14. Djalovski, A., Dumas, G., Kinreich, S., Feldman, R. Human attachments shape interbrain synchrony toward efficient performance of social goals. Neuroimage. 226, 117600(2021).
  15. Lu, H., et al. Increased interbrain synchronization and neural efficiency of the frontal cortex to enhance human coordinative behavior: a combined hyper-tES and fNIRS study. Neuroimage. 282, 120385(2023).
  16. Werz, J., Voderholzer, U., Tuschen-Caffier, B. Alliance matters: but how much? A systematic review on therapeutic alliance and outcome in patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Eat Weight Disord. 27 (4), 1279-1295 (2022).
  17. Sun, Q. W., Jiang, G. R., Feng, Y. Working alliance: concepts, measurement, and empirical research. Chin J Clin Psychol. 03, 383-386 (2009).
  18. Horvath, A. O., Bedi, R. P. Psychotherapy Relationships that Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. , Oxford University Press. New York. (2002).
  19. Lamm, C., Decety, J., Singer, T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 54 (3), 2492-2502 (2011).
  20. Frith, C. D., Frith, U. The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron. 50 (4), 531-534 (2006).
  21. Zhang, Y., Meng, T., Hou, Y., Pan, Y., Hu, Y. Interpersonal brain synchronization associated with working alliance during psychological counseling. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 282, 103-109 (2018).
  22. Dai, X., Li, X., Xia, N., Xi, J., Zhang, Y. Client-counselor behavioral and inter-brain synchronization among dismissing and secure clients and its association with alliance quality and outcome. Psychother Res. 34 (8), 1103-1116 (2024).
  23. Pinti, P., et al. The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1464 (1), 5-29 (2018).
  24. Nozawa, T., et al. Interpersonal frontopolar neural synchronization in group communication: an exploration toward fNIRS hyperscanning of natural interactions. Neuroimage. 133, 484-497 (2016).
  25. Mallat, S. G. A theory for multi-resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 11 (7), 674-693 (1989).
  26. Baccalá, L. A., Sameshima, K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern. 84 (6), 463-474 (2001).
  27. Duan, L., et al. Wavelet-based method for removing global physiological noise in functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 9 (8), 3805-3820 (2018).
  28. Long, Y., et al. Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cereb Cortex. 31 (3), 1647-1659 (2021).
  29. Dai, B., et al. Neural mechanisms for selectively tuning in to the target speaker in a naturalistic noisy situation. Nat Commun. 9 (1), 2405(2018).
  30. Lu, K., Teng, J., Hao, N. Measurement of adult attachment: Chinese version of the experiences in close relationships scale (ECR). Acta Psychol Sin. 03, 399-406 (2006).
  31. Atique, B., Erb, M., Gharabaghi, A., Grodd, W., Anders, S. Task-specific activity and connectivity within the mentalizing network during emotion and intention mentalizing. Neuroimage. 55 (4), 1899-1911 (2011).
  32. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., Shaver, P. R. Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment: An Integrative Overview. , The Guilford Press. New York. (1998).
  33. Bartholomew, K., Horowitz, L. M. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 61 (2), 226-244 (1991).
  34. Munder, T., et al. Working alliance inventory–short revised (WAI–SR): psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clin Psychol Psychother. 17 (3), 231-239 (2010).
  35. Hsu, S., Zhou, R. D. H., Yu, C. K. C. A Hong Kong validation of working alliance inventory–short form–client. Asia Pac J Couns Psychother. 7 (1-2), 69-81 (2016).
  36. Hatcher, R. L., Gillaspy, J. A. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychother Res. 16 (1), 12-25 (2006).
  37. Evans, C. CORE: clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. J Ment Health. 9 (3), 247-255 (2000).
  38. Barkham, M., et al. The CORE-10: a short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Couns Psychother Res. 13 (1), 3-13 (2013).
  39. Lu, K., Teng, J., Hao, N. Gender of partner affects the interaction pattern during group creative idea generation. Exp Brain Res. 238 (5), 1157-1168 (2020).
  40. Cheng, X., Li, X., Hu, Y. Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: a fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Hum Brain Mapp. 36 (6), 2039-2048 (2015).
  41. Stricker, G. Supervision of integrative psychotherapy: discussion. J Integr Eclectic Psychother. 7, 176(1988).
  42. Purdy, R. W., Homan, R. W., John, E. R., Poole, D. Cerebral location of international 10–20 system electrode placement localisation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 66 (4), 376-382 (1988).
  43. Huppert, T. J., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., Boas, D. A. HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain. Appl Opt. 48 (10), D280-D298 (2009).
  44. Hitachi2nirs. , NITRC. Available from: https://www.nitrc.org/projects/hitachi2nirs (2021).
  45. Cooper, R., et al. A systematic comparison of motion artifact correction techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front Neurosci. 6, 147(2012).
  46. Molavi, B., Dumont, G. A. Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiol Meas. 33 (2), 259-270 (2012).
  47. Obrig, H., Villringer, A. Beyond the visible–imaging the human brain with light. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 23 (1), 1-18 (2003).
  48. Yang, J., et al. Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict. Nat Neurosci. 23 (6), 754-760 (2020).
  49. Hoshi, Y. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: current status and future prospects. J Biomed Opt. 12 (6), 062106(2007).
  50. Pan, Y., et al. Interpersonal brain synchronization with instructor compensates for learner's sleep deprivation in interactive learning. Biochem Pharmacol. 191, 114111(2020).
  51. Pan, Y., Novembre, G., Song, B., Li, X., Hu, Y. Interpersonal synchronization of inferior frontal cortices tracks social interactive learning of a song. Neuroimage. 183, 280-290 (2018).
  52. Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., Jevrejeva, S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 11 (5/6), 561-566 (2004).
  53. Zhang, X., et al. Activation detection in functional near-infrared spectroscopy by wavelet coherence. J Biomed Opt. 20 (1), 016004(2015).
  54. Mallat, S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way. , Academic Press. (1999).
  55. Zhang, Y., Meng, T., Yang, Y., Hu, Y. Experience-dependent counselor-client brain synchronization during psychological counseling. eNeuro. 7 (5), (2020).
  56. Zheng, L., et al. Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state. Hum Brain Mapp. 39 (7), 3046-3057 (2018).
  57. Benjamini, Y., Yekutieli, D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 29 (4), 1165-1188 (2001).
  58. Lai, C. H., Wu, Y. T., Hou, Y. M. Functional network based statistics in depression: theory of mind subnetwork and importance of parietal region. J Affect Disord. 217, 132-137 (2017).
  59. Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, X., Yu, R. Interpersonal brain synchronization under bluffing in strategic games. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 15 (12), 1315-1324 (2020).
  60. Tyrrell, C. L., Dozier, M., Teague, G. B., Fallot, R. D. Effective treatment relationships for persons with serious psychiatric disorders: the importance of attachment states of mind. J Consult Clin Psychol. 67 (5), 725-733 (1999).
  61. Dubis, J. W., Siegel, S. E., Petersen, S. E. The mixed block/event-related design. Neuroimage. 62 (2), 1177-1184 (2012).
  62. Balters, S., et al. Capturing human interaction in the virtual age: a perspective on the future of fNIRS hyperscanning. Front Hum Neurosci. 14, 588494(2020).
  63. Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., Reiss, A. L. NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. Neuroimage. 59 (3), 2430-2437 (2012).
  64. Holper, L., Scholkmann, F., Wolf, M. Between-brain connectivity during imitation measured by fNIRS. Neuroimage. 63 (1), 212-222 (2012).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Erratum

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Formal Correction: Erratum: Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Posted by JoVE Editors on 2/16/2026. Citeable Link.

This corrects the article 10.3791/67183

Tags

fNIRS HyperscanningInter Brain SynchronyWorking AllianceBrain Activity MonitoringAttachment StylesCounseling OutcomesStandardized ProtocolEvent Related Measurement

Related Articles