A significant number of elderly women worldwide experience Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), which involves the descent of at least one pelvic organ. As society ages, the demand for POP surgery is expected to rise dramatically13. Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (LS) is the primary surgical technique for addressing apical prolapse. However, the high incidence of postoperative defecation problems associated with LS cannot be overlooked14. Laparoscopic Pectopexy (LP) an alternative method for apical repair, utilizes bilateral iliopectineal ligament suspension, which minimizes defecation disorders due to the preservation of the posterior pelvic space15.
However, LS and LP both involve the usage of synthetic mesh, which is costly and can lead to mesh erosion, limiting its widespread application16. In response, we have developed a new approach called Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy with Uterine Preservation (LNMCPUP), which showed excellent efficacy, comparable to that of LP17. A high proportion of women undergoing POP surgery express a desire to preserve their uterus to retain self-confidence, self-esteem, and femininity. Traditional POP surgeries typically involved hysterectomy, but the rationale for this approach has been questioned18. Surgeries that preserve the uterus may offer long-term benefits and reduce the risk of potential complications8. The uterus is crucial for pelvic floor stability, as the cervix plays a significant role in pelvic suspensory system by providing attachment for uterosacral and cardinal ligaments. Uterine preservation surgeries are increasingly performed to meet the physical and psychological needs of POP patients19.
The key features of LNMCPUP include the following:
Cervico-isthmic cerclage
We selected a circular suture medial to uterine arteries around the cervical isthmus based on its firm anchoring to the cervix without compromising uterine blood flow and preventing laceration of the cervical tissue, a critical step in preserving uterine health during LNMCPUP. Tying the cerclage knot too tight may cause poor menstrual blood flow or amenorrhea. One patient in our study complained of obstructed menstrual blood flow in her first period after surgery; 3 months later, this condition resolved on its own. We adopted an efficient method to avoid this problem. In this method, we utilized uterine manipulator in the form of No. 6 Hegar dilator in premenopausal patients during the procedure, to prevent possible blockage of the endocervical canal, which was then removed after securing the knot.
Confirmation of the iliopectineal ligament
Careful identification and confirmation of the iliopectineal ligament, located between the lateral umbilical ligament and round ligament, are essential to avoid damage to nearby structures such as the corona mortis and obturator nerve20, ensuring the safety and efficacy of LNMCPUP.
Embedding a permanent suture in the round ligament
Bowels and bladder adjacent to the round ligament may be damaged by the naked permanent suture with high tension, as a high tensile strength is reinforced by suspension between the cervical isthmus and the iliopectineal ligament. To prevent pelvic organ laceration from stitches with tension, we adopted the most efficient technique of embedding the permanent suture in the round ligament.
Suspension without tension
The cervix was elevated to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage 0 to ensure suspension without tension, avoiding overcorrection.
In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrates the promising potential of LNMCPUP as a novel method for correcting POP. This procedure combines cervical cerclage and laparoscopic pectopexy, resulting in a firm uterine suspension while also preserving the uterus to meet patients' physical and psychological needs. The outcomes of LNMCPUP mirrors outstanding efficacy and safety, with satisfactory objective and subjective success rates comparable to those of laparoscopic pectopexy. Moreover, without using synthetic mesh, this procedure obviates the risk of mesh erosion and reduces medical costs. Thus, LNMCPUP can be performed even in rural and underdeveloped areas where synthetic mesh may not be readily available. However, this study's limitation lies in its small sample size. Multicenter investigations are necessary to validate the efficacy and safety of LNMCPUP in clinical settings.