A simplified and cost-effective protocol is described for the indirect co-culture of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells. This method utilizes a homemade scaffold for cell slides, which comprises an upper support ring tailored for attachment to standard 12-well cell culture plates, complemented by a basal cell slide holder featuring four L-shaped rod-like structures. This setup facilitates the separation of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells while allowing for their interaction through the exchange of signaling molecules in the culture medium. One of the key advantages of this approach is the substantial reduction in both time and expenditure compared to commercially available co-culture systems11. The homemade scaffold is constructed from readily available materials, significantly lowering the cost of the setup. Additionally, its design is straightforward, enabling researchers to assemble and disassemble the scaffold with ease, thus saving time and effort in the laboratory. Moreover, the homemade scaffold can be cleaned and sterilized for multiple uses, making it a sustainable and economical option for ongoing research. This feature is particularly beneficial for long-term studies, where consistent and reliable results are crucial.
Endometrial stromal cells and epithelial cells play pivotal roles in facilitating successful embryo implantation. Under physiological conditions, endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells in the endometrium do not typically have direct contact.Research on human endometrial stromal cell decidualization has proved that epithelial cells influence the decidual process by paracrine. The close proximity of epithelial and stromal cells allows for effective communication through paracrine signaling12. This interaction is vital for coordinating the cyclical changes in the endometrium, including the preparation for implantation and subsequent tissue shedding if implantation does not occur11. Both epithelial and stromal cells express receptors for estrogen and progesterone, which regulate their proliferation, differentiation, and secretory activities. The epithelial-stromal crosstalk ensures that these responses are well-coordinated13. Thus, the complex crosstalk between these cells remains a critical area of investigation, as it is essential to understand the intricate processes that underlie endometrial receptivity and the implantation of the embryo14. Despite significant advances in reproductive biology, the detailed mechanisms of communication between these cell types during implantation are still not fully elucidated15.
The scaffold provides a convenient way to achieve the co-culture of two kinds of adherent cells. However, in the process of long-term co-culture, the coverslip cells continue to grow and renew over time, and the dead cells will fall and come into contact with the lower-layer cells, which may impact the lower-layer cells. In addition, the cells seed on the coverslip are placed face down on the scaffold. Whether gravity has any effect on the state of the cells is unknown. In this research, two cell lines, hESC and Ishikawa, were used for demonstration. The scaffold can be widely used in the co-culture of two different kinds of adherent cell lines. In addition, the scaffold can also be used as a platform for other compounds or medicine release media and as a mounting platform for various devices such as luminescence, heating, and electrode devices.
Here, we present a reliable and robust in vitro cell culture system utilizing the specific scaffold, which is a useful and convenient tool to study the molecular mechanism of embryo-maternal uterine cell interactions further. In addition, we have characterized the feasibility of the established scaffold as a model for blastocyst/trophoblast studies. This protocol allows the construction of suitable scaffolds by 3D printing and their function as the 3D structure for the migration or invasion platforms in small volumes (12-well plates), where different factors can be evaluated using imaging quantification systems.
The use of cell lines allows the standardization of the model to compare different conditions, something that is not applicable using fresh primary villi tissues. However, any of the cell line components can be replaced by primary culture for validation. By incorporating the cells and tissues derived from patients of interest, the proposed model may facilitate the demonstration and modeling of different diseases that have been known to contribute to infertility and pregnancy failure.
Critical steps
Firstly, the density of Ishikawa cells for co-culture should be limited, approximately 60%-70% confluency. Secondly, the coverslip cover with cells should be kept down. Thirdly, the concentration of ECM should be less than 3 mg/mL to avoid forming a gel. Fourthly, the liquid level of the medium in the co-culture system should cover the coverslip.
Limitations
The model mentioned above comprises the endometrial epithelial cells and the stromal cells; one limitation of the study was the use of adenocarcinoma Ishikawa cells as epithelial cell surrogates instead of primary cells. Integrating primary epithelial and stromal cells from the same patient would replicate the physiological conditions of the human endometrium. For some experimental applications, a possible limitation concerns the lack of other cell types, such as endothelial cells and immune cells, and there is no characterization of the glandular structure in this model to assess the interactive impact of the endometrial glands on other endometrial cell types. However, under physiological conditions, the epithelial cells reveal polarity, and this character hardly simulates in vitro conditions without a uterine luminal environment. The endometrial stromal cells are under the decidual process in the menstrual cycle16,17. However, the molecular mechanism of decidualization remains unclear. Several factors, including immunocytes and endothelial cells, could play a role in decidualization. This model provides a limited way of examining the indirect crosstalk between stromal and epithelial cells during the decidual process. Furthermore, the levels and roles of the biological markers during decidualization are still unclear, which warrants further exploration