$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Figure 2 represents the reaction scheme of the Menschutkin reaction involved in bringing about the synthesis process. 1-Hexadecylquinolin-1-ium bromide, thus synthesized, was characterized using NMR and IR spectroscopy. The oily product so acquired is expected to exhibit 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) at δ 9.34 (d, 1H), 8.21 (d, 1H), 7.80 (t, 1H), 7.30-7.35 (m, 3H), 7.20 (d, 1H), 5.00 (t, 2H), 2.00 (p,2H), 1.30-1.35 (m, 26H), 1 (t, 3H), as demonstrated in Figure 3. The compound should show 13C NMR (Figure 4; 100 MHz, CDCl3) at δ 143, 141, 131, 130.27, 130, 127.5, 126.3, 126, 60, 31, 29, 29, 28.5, 27, 23 and 14. Each peak is tagged with the corresponding proton number mentioned in the structure of the compound, responsible for bringing about that signal.
CDCl3 is transparent to the NMR region (i.e., the radio-frequency region) of the electromagnetic spectra due to the absence of H-atoms that impart prominent signals in this region and is thus used as a solvent for sample preparation in its deuterated form. It does not interfere with the applied magnetic field and is completely inert in nature. However, it is not possible to eliminate the peak corresponding to this solvent (appearing at around 7.26 ppm for 1H NMR spectra) since the deuterization of the NMR solvents cannot reach up to exactly 100%. However, the peak appearing is usually not significant and can be completely removed by running a blank spectrum of CDCl3 and integrating the required peaks accordingly. These settings can be either made directly within the instrument or by the utilization of certain software (like NMRium, etc.). In case the sample is not perfectly dried, the peak characteristic of water may appear prominently in the spectra. Additionally, CDCl3 and other deuteriated solvents may also contain some amount of water and thereby impart the peaks attributed to the presence of water. This issue here was resolved by drying the sample properly and keeping the NMR solvent at room temperature, covered using a transparent film. In some cases, certain inert drying agents, such as potassium carbonate or sodium sulfate, are also used to get rid of the water content present in the bottle of CDCl3.
The FTIR spectra of the IL (Figure 5) is expected to demonstrate vibration bands at 3051 cm-1, 2917 cm-1, and 2853 cm-1, with maximum intensity, corresponding to the C-H stretching vibrations existing in the aromatic ring as well as for alkyl carbons. A broad shoulder at 3440 cm-1 corresponds to the N-H stretching vibrations. Another shoulder band observed at 1357 cm-1 is characteristic of stretching vibrations arising due to the C-N bond. Notable bands at 820 cm-1,770 cm-1, and 710 cm-1 are associated with the out-of-plane C-H bending vibrations. The peak at 1155 cm-1is specific to the in-plane C-H bending vibrations. The C-C stretching vibrations prevailing in the aromatic ring are validated by the peaks visible at 1468 cm-1, 1520 cm-1, and 1585 cm-1. The results thus obtained are comparable with the previously reported data by Sharma et al.13 and hence confirm the formation of the desired compound.
The results obtained through the ADMET analysis are tabulated in Table 1. The biomedical potential of [C16quin]Br was investigated using a well diffusion assay against the C. albicans strain (Figure 6). This technique evaluates the antimicrobial potency of IL by measuring the zone of inhibition of growth around the site of application of the compound. It was observed that [C16quin]Br showed a statistically pronounced antimicrobial effect (p < 0.05) against C. albicans, making this class of ILs highly potent and effective in the field of biomedicine.
Percentage yield of the reaction
The theoretical yield of the reaction can be calculated as follows, as per the adopted reaction scheme (Figure 2).
From the scheme, 1 M quinoline leads to the formation of 1 M of 1-Hexadecylquinolin-1-ium bromide, i.e., 129.16 g/mol quinoline = 434 g/mol [C16quin]Br. Hence,
12.916 g (0.1 moles) of quinoline
×12.916= 43.4 g
Thus, the theoretical yield of the reaction is 43.4 g.
However,
% yield=
×100
In the present study, the actual yield of the reaction was found to be 37.84 g after the complete drying of the product obtained.
Hence,
% yield=
×100=87.188% (87%)
Additionally, the longer reaction time, as seen in the present scenario, is pertinent for allowing the reaction system to attain complete thermodynamic equilibrium, where the system's entropy is maximized while minimizing the Gibbs free energy. This eventually maximizes the reaction's yield. However, the reaction conditions are quite mild and thus require an extended reaction time to ensure that the entire reactant has successfully converted into the product. The reaction time, here, is optimized after repeated pragmatism.

Figure 1: Reaction set-up. The figure displays the general schematics of the reaction setup. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Synthesis mechanism. Schematic representation of the reaction scheme involved in the synthesis process. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Expected 1H NMR. Representation of the 1H NMR spectra of [C16quin]Br. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Expected 13CNMR. Representation of the 13C NMR spectra of [C16quin]Br. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Expected IR spectra. Representation of the IR spectra of [C16quin]Br. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Anti-fungal study. Disc diffusion assay was performed by the addition of 50 µL of 0.1 mM of the IL, representing the anti-fungal potential of [C16quin]Br. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Property | Value | Comment |
| Lipinski rule | Accepted | MW ≤ 500; log P ≤ 5; H-acceptor ≤ 10; H-donor ≤ 5. If two properties are out of range, a poor absorption or permeability is possible, one is acceptable. |
| Gastrointestinal absorption | High | Enhanced efficacy of oral administration |
| Water solubility | Moderate | Enhances the drug carrying capacity of the compund |
| Bioavailability score | 0.55 (55%) | Influences the therapeutic potential of the compound |
Table 1: ADMET analysis. Table representing the important properties to be considered to validate the biological potential of the synthesized IL.