$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
FRET at the single-molecule level is unique because it allows the observation and analysis of individual molecules, revealing sample heterogeneity and capturing transient states that can be obscured in ensemble measurements1,2. Observing individual RNA molecules using smFRET provides high-resolution insights into their folding pathways and dynamics. This protocol describes the chemical dual-end labeling of RNA and its surface immobilization via phospholipid vesicle encapsulation, which together enable following dynamic conformational changes via smFRET-TIRF microscopy.
Studying RNA dynamics is a constantly growing field with the need for new site-specific fluorescent labeling strategies. We label the RNA ends by targeting the 5'-phosphate with carbodiimides and the 3'-ribose sugar with periodate. These approaches have been described earlier (5'-end18,19 and 3'-end19,20,21,22) but have not previously been applied to an RNA of similar size to the wild-type Sc.ai5γ group II intron ribozyme, which required optimization. Carbodiimide (e.g., EDC) activation of the 5'-phosphate is reversible. Therefore, imidazole was used to irreversibly react with the O-acylisourea intermediate to form a highly reactive phosphorimidazolide19,20. However, it is now known that at higher pH, carbodiimides can modify nucleobases, specifically guanines and uracils, which has recently led to their use as structural probing agents23,24.
To avoid cross-reactivity, purifying the activated RNA from the EDC prior to raising the pH to 7.5 for the dye coupling step is crucial. However, when we introduced a purification step between the activation and the dye attachment25, we obtained very low yields. Analogously, in protein labeling, surface-accessible lysine residues can be activated with carbodiimides. However, instead of imidazole, which prevents the activation reversal, NHS is routinely used. We adopted this strategy too, thus replacing the phosphorimidazolide intermediate with an NHS-phosphate intermediate. This way we achieved pH control as well as an increased labeling density at lower temperatures and shorter incubation times, i.e., 25 °C for 4 h compared to 37 °C for 16 h. Developed for RNA, this 5'-labeling strategy can be applied to any other single-stranded nucleic acid with a 5'-phosphate.
The 5'-phosphate activation and 3'-ribose oxidation were mutually exclusive, because the chemistries are not orthogonal. To overcome this challenge and avoid cross-labeling, we started with the 5'-end, followed by a blocking step to inhibit the activated but not labeled sites before proceeding with the 3'-end labeling. While oxidizing the 3'-diol, excess sodium meta-periodate (NaIO4) could quench the already attached fluorophore at the 5'-end. Therefore, we reduced the concentration of NaIO4 used for single labeling from 20 mM to 10 mM.
We recommend working with multiple aliquots in parallel instead of scaling up the reactions. This protocol requires multiple ethanol (EtOH) precipitation steps. When working with several aliquots in parallel, prepare a precipitation mixture (30 mL of 100% absolute EtOH and 1 mL of 3 M NaOAc, pH 5.2). NaCl is not used due to its low solubility in EtOH. Precipitate the RNA with 3.1 vol. of this mixture by overnight incubation at -20 °C, followed by centrifugation. Wash the RNA pellet twice with 500 µL ice-cold 70% EtOH, spin down at 4 °C after each time, and dry under vacuum. EtOH precipitation takes advantage of the RNA's insolubility and the free dyes' solubility in 70% ethanol. Centrifugal filtration effectively removes free dyes due to their significant size difference from RNA and facilitates buffer exchange, eliminating salts. In addition to EtOH precipitation and centrifugal filtration methods, free dyes can also be removed using gel extraction and/or chromatography techniques (e.g., HPLC); however, the scale should be adapted accordingly. Do not vortex long RNAs to resuspend, as this may cause mechanical shearing26. The optimal time to pause the protocol is when the RNA is pelleted. We use DNA low-binding tubes to improve nucleic acid recovery. Although the final reaction volume is 100 µL, 1.5 mL (and not lower volume) tubes are preferred for better purification by EtOH precipitation.
Once the unreacted free dyes were removed by precipitation and centrifugal filtration, we confirmed the labeling by fluorescent gel electrophoresis (Figure 4A), UV-Vis spectroscopy, analytical HPLC3. However, it is important to note that these methods cannot distinguish between an RNA molecule carrying both fluorophores and a mixture of RNAs, each labeled with a single color. Similarly, they cannot be used to determine if an RNA molecule carries multiple fluorophores of the same color. Mass spectrometry cannot be used due to size limitations. Ensemble3 and single-molecule FRET spectroscopies corroborate dual-fluorescent labeling, as shown in Figures 4B and 5B. The stoichiometry of 0.5 (sCy3 to Cy5 ratio of 1:1) in smFRET experiments confirms the equal conjugation of the two fluorophores. One concern was the double labeling at the 3'-end by labeling both aldehydes instead of the proposed cyclization. The lack of species with a stoichiometry of 0.25 (sCy3 to Cy5 ratio of 1:2) in smFRET experiments suggests that the dye attachment sterically hinders and prevents the attachment of a second dye.
With this dual-fluorescent labeling, FRET signal changes can be attributed to structural rearrangements throughout RNA folding and catalysis. To maintain fluorescently labeled RNA within the evanescent field for single-molecule TIRF imaging, encapsulation is preferred over direct surface tethering. This approach involves trapping individual RNA molecules within lipid bilayers of vesicles, creating a controlled environment conducive to observing their dynamic behavior. The described protocol enriches mono-encapsulation, as photobleaching in a single step demonstrates11. To understand RNA folding and function, bridging the in vitro and in vivo gap is essential27. Molecular crowding agents can mimic the conditions inside cells to enhance RNA catalysis by group II introns7,28. Alternatively, encapsulation creates constrained microenvironments that promote RNA folding29, bringing our understanding of RNA structure and dynamics closer to a realistic cellular context.