Over the past 50 years, numerous cell biology investigations have demonstrated that two-dimensional (2D) cultures fail to accurately replicate the in vivo conditions observed in animal models1. Structurally, 2D cell cultures do not allow cells to organize three-dimensionally and replicate the situation observed in in vivo systems. Furthermore, cellular signaling pathways are altered in 2D cultures compared to three-dimensional (3D) cultures, which could likely explain why certain types of drug screening using 2D cultures are so discrepant2. A significant advancement in cell culture techniques emerged with the introduction of 3D culture systems. 3D systems vary considerably in complexity depending on cellular composition and cytoarchitecture. Generally, two types of structures are generated, namely: spheroids and organoids. Spheroids are described as simple clusters of cells obtained from normal or tumor tissues, embryoid bodies, and cell lines. The formation of 3D structures is influenced by various factors, including cell-cell interactions and signaling pathways mediated by components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which provide structural support and biochemical cues. These elements regulate interactions that contribute to tissue organization and function3. The spheroid culture system was first described in the early 1970s, using V79 Chinese hamster lung cell lines as a model of nodular carcinomas, growing under non-adherent conditions and forming perfect spheres4. Organoids are described as clusters of organ-specific cell types derived from stem or progenitor cells, which self-organize through processes, such as cell sorting and lineage specification, in a spatially confined manner, mirroring the in vivo development5.
Several available methods and materials are available to culture cells under 3D conditions. The main methods currently employed for generating 3D cultures are: 1) hanging drops; 2) rotating cell culture and low-attachment plastics; 3) pyramid plates containing conical wells; 4) macroporous scaffolds; 5) magnetic beads; and 6) scaffold-free hydrogels.
Hanging drops is the method used to obtain scaffold-free 3D cultures. This method presents certain limitations, including the need for extensive handling, low production efficiency, spherical geometry, and exposure to high shear forces. Moreover, specific procedures, such as medium replacement or compound addition, can be challenging and may result in material loss. Furthermore, literature reports indicate that some cell lines fail to produce tightly packed spheroids when employing this approach6.
Rotating cell culture and low-attachment plastics are used to prevent cells from attaching to the substrate, causing them to aggregate and form spheroids. This process requires specific flasks and/or agitation/rotation. Although this is one of the most straightforward approaches for large-scale spheroids or organoids production, it is not without drawbacks, such as the need for specific equipment, low culture longevity, size variation in spheroids, mechanical damage to cells, and low efficiency6.
Pyramid plates containing conical wells are commercially available plates impacting costs, in addition to the fact that some manipulations may hinder the formation of spheroids/organoids7.
Macroporous scaffolds are also employed for 3D culturing; however, a major obstacle lies in achieving effective cell seeding and uniform distribution. This issue arises because the pore sizes may either be too small for cell penetration or too large to securely retain the cells. To address this issue, several strategies have been explored8, which directly impact the complexity and cost of this technique.
The magnetic beads methodology generates a small number of spheroids/organoids, has a high cost, and may leave nanoparticle residues inside the cells9.
Among the systems for cultivating spheroids, non-adhesive agarose hydrogels are available, representing a scaffold-free hydrogel. This approach offers notable benefits, such as precise control over the size of the 3D structures and the capacity to generate a substantial number of these structures per plate. In this method, cells are introduced into a hydrogel with preformed wells, in which they sink and self-assemble into 3D spheroids10.
In this study, we present a device and methodology for generating agarose microwells using a micropattern mold in a simple, efficient, reproducible, and low-cost manner.
The use of this stamp as a mold to generate microwells in agarose, aided by gravity, aims to enhance cell interaction within the microwell and cellular organization, generating 3D structures (spheroids/organoids) in vitro in a simple, efficient, reproducible, and low-cost manner, thus saving research time and laboratory resources.