$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In general, the purpose of cortical recordings is to extract information from neuronal signaling in the brain. This information can be used in various ways-controlling an external device, communication, disease diagnosis, or rehabilitation1,2,3,4. Each application places unique requirements on the information content and spatial resolution required and the amount of invasiveness that is considered acceptable. Therefore, recording solutions with a range of invasiveness and spatial resolution have been developed since the discovery of the electroencephalogram in 19295.
Generally, these can be divided into electroencephalography (EEG), electrocorticography (ECoG), and intracortical recordings. EEG is a non-invasive recording method that captures neural oscillations and event-related potentials (ERPs) from the entire brain. However, its capability to define the sources of this activity is limited due to its low spatial resolution. ECoG is a more invasive method where electrodes are placed epi- or subdurally, typically covering a smaller portion of the cortex. It has a higher spatial resolution and can record ERP and surface local field potentials (LFP). Therefore, it can localize the source of brain activity more precisely, which makes it helpful, for example, in identifying the origin of focal epilepsy. The intracortical recording is the most invasive recording method and can record spiking activity from individual neurons located superficial or deep inside the brain and LFP from the volume of neurons around the electrodes. These signals have a very high spatial resolution and information content but are produced by a restricted subset of neurons (1-10 neurons per channel)6.
To extract information from the brain for prolonged periods (months-years), the interface must be stable and reliable for the acquired signals to continue to represent the same information during the entire period. EEG recordings require frequent electrode changes, rendering their reliability variable from very low to very high7,8,9,10. ECoG and intracortical methods are, therefore, often selected for prolonged recordings. However, these methods both require that the condition of the recording electrode, as well as the tissue, must remain stable over time. While the electrode usually stays at the same location, the electrode-tissue interface may change due to tissue reactions or electrode failure modes11,12,13,14. Tissue reactions include neuronal death, hemorrhage, biofouling, foreign-body reaction, gliosis, encapsulation, infection, meningitis, and meningeal extrusion15. These reactions compromise the recording capabilities of the electrodes12,13. Common electrode failure modes are delamination or leakage at the insulated parts, electrode surface coating delamination or cracking, wire damage, and electrode dislocation11,12.
To overcome electrode failure modes, we considered the viability of a temporary electrode placement solution that also addresses many of the challenges related to tissue responses, namely neuronal death, foreign-body reaction, gliosis, encapsulation, and meningeal extrusion. Furthermore, consistent electrode placement was a requirement to achieve reliable and reproducible neuronal recordings. Since the electrode was placed epidurally at a few millimeters distance to the nervous tissue, the movement of the electrode should not exceed 1 mm. The cranial window was designed with dimensions to prevent excessive movement between electrode placements. With the development of the cranial window technique, we aim to improve the long-term signal reliability and quality and remove the risk of electrode failure.