This protocol describes a gel shift biochemical assay for measuring FEN1 (Flap Endonuclease 1) activity and inhibitor development.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
This protocol describes a gel shift biochemical assay for measuring FEN1 (Flap Endonuclease 1) activity and inhibitor development.
FEN1 (Flap Endonuclease 1) is a key DNA nuclease involved in DNA replication and damage repair, playing a crucial role in maintaining genomic stability. Elevated levels of FEN1 activity are closely associated with the development of various cancers, making FEN1 a recognized biomarker and drug target for lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Conventional radioisotope tagging methods for detecting FEN1 nuclease activity present challenges in terms of convenience and safety. In this study, a DNA fragment substrate with a flap structure was synthesized in vitro. This substrate is labeled with a fluorophore at the 5' end of the flap, allowing the FEN1 nuclease to specifically recognize and cleave the designated site. FEN1 activity was then determined by detecting the fluorophore signal after gel electrophoresis. This method enables rapid and effective assessment of FEN1 nuclease activity and the screening of its inhibitors. It provides a sensitive and specific approach for analyzing FEN1 activity and evaluating the efficacy of small-molecule inhibitors. Furthermore, it contributes significantly to research on DNA damage repair and cancer development, offering a novel strategy for clinical research on disease mechanisms and the detection of genotoxic substances.
DNA replication is not always flawless and can be disrupted by both internal and external factors. Consequently, the mechanisms of DNA replication and damage repair are vital for cell survival and genome stability. In this process, the human branching structure-specific endonuclease FEN1 (Flap Endonuclease 1), a core DNA nuclease, plays a crucial role1,2,3.
FEN1 is primarily involved in DNA replication and is indispensable for the maturation of Okazaki fragments on the lagging strand4,5. This ensures the efficient progression of DNA replication and the accurate repair of damaged DNA. However, abnormal increases in FEN1 levels have been closely linked to the development of various cancers6,7, such as lung and breast cancer7. Thus, FEN1 is not only essential for DNA replication and repair but has also garnered significant attention as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis and a potential therapeutic target8,9. The detection of FEN1 activity is essential for the early diagnosis of cancers and for advancing research on targeted therapies.
Given the importance of FEN1, and the need to study its activity for early cancer diagnosis and targeted therapy development, the primary goal of the method developed in this experiment was to accurately and efficiently measure FEN1 nuclease activity. This method aims to provide a reliable platform for screening small-molecule inhibitors targeting FEN1. By achieving these goals, the study seeks to contribute to a better understanding of FEN1's role in cancer and to facilitate the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies.
Numerous techniques exist for detecting FEN1 nuclease activity, each with distinct characteristics, principles, advantages, limitations, and applicable scenarios. For instance, gel electrophoresis and HPLC-based substrate separation methods provide intuitive results but involve cumbersome procedures and low throughput10,11. Fluorescence polarization (FP) assays face challenges in evaluating FEN1 activity due to interference from compound autofluorescence or light scattering, which affects FP signals. Although counter-screening strategies can partially exclude false positives, approximately 15% of primary active compounds are still misidentified due to technical interference12. The combined use of fluorescence donor/quencher pairs (e.g., TAMRA/BHQ-2) and AlphaScreen chemiluminescence presents drawbacks, such as the high synthesis cost of complex triple-flap fluorescent substrates, particularly limiting their utility in large-scale screening. Furthermore, the dual-flap structure of substrates may impede optimal binding with FEN1, reducing enzymatic cleavage efficiency and compromising detection sensitivity. Additionally, this approach heavily relies on specialized instruments (e.g., ViewLux, EnVision), restricting its adoption in resource-limited laboratories13,14,15. Fluorescent detection methods based on dual-flap dumbbell-shaped DNA nanoprobes functionalized with silver nanoclusters (DNA-AgNCs) suffer from batch-to-batch variability due to their dependence on precise annealing and in situ nucleation steps, hindering reproducibility and scalability. High costs and lengthy procedures further limit their practical application16.
In this article, a fluorescence labeling-based assay is developed to address current technical limitations and meet the growing demand for safer, user-accessible methods for studying FEN1 activity. This technique takes advantage of the specificity and high sensitivity of fluorescence detection, as well as the ability to engineer DNA substrates with defined structures that can be recognized and cleaved by FEN1 (Figure 1). This method streamlines experimental procedures while maintaining high accuracy in assessing FEN1 nuclease activity. Compared with traditional gel electrophoresis and HPLC-based techniques, it offers simplified operation and faster turnaround. Unlike fluorescence polarization assays, this approach enables rapid qualitative screening of compounds, establishing an efficient strategy for preliminary enzymatic evaluation.
This method is suitable for studying FEN1 nuclease activity in laboratory settings where access to radioactive materials is limited. It is also well-suited for screening a large number of small-molecule inhibitors in a relatively short time, especially when high sensitivity and specificity are required. However, it is not ideal for studies requiring absolute quantification with very high precision or for laboratories lacking basic fluorescence detection equipment and expertise in fluorescence signal analysis. For studies focusing on in vivo applications-where FEN1 behavior may be influenced by complex biological factors not replicated in current in vitro assay designs-further refinement or alternative methods may be necessary.
This fluorescence assay is highly sensitive and specific, providing a safe, convenient, and effective tool for studying FEN1 activity and developing its inhibitors.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The reagents and the equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. FEN1 protein expression purification
2. FEN1 TAMRA-labeled DNA substrate preparation
3. FEN1 nuclease activity assay
4. Screening of small molecule inhibitors of FEN1 nuclease
5. Evaluation of inhibitory potency of FEN1--IN-4 small molecule inhibitor
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
As shown in Figure 2A, the staining reagent binds to protein, causing the protein to appear as a blue band on the gel. The first lane contains the labeled protein used as a molecular weight reference, in which the BSA standard protein band corresponds to a molecular weight of 70 kDa, and the FEN1 nucleic acid protein band corresponds to a molecular weight of 45 kDa. The experimental results showed that the FEN1 nuclease appeared as a clear band at approximately 45 kDa, indicating successful ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The FEN1 nuclease activity assay and small molecule inhibitor screening are central to research on DNA damage repair and cancer development. Compared to traditional radiolabeling techniques, the present method offers a cost-effective, efficient, easy-to-operate, and safer alternative. Additionally, unlike fluorescence burst-based FEN1 assays, this approach provides a more intuitive visualization of substrate cleavage, thereby allowing a more accurate assessment of enzyme activity and offering a more reliable platform for...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This work was supported by the Jiangsu Higher Education Institution Innovative Research Team for Science and Technology (2021), Program of Jiangsu Vocational College Engineering Technology Research Center (2023), Key Technology Programme of Suzhou People's Livelihood Technology Projects (SYWD2024099), Project of State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University (GZK12023013), Programs of the Suzhou Vocational Health College (SZWZYTD202201, SZWZYTD202205), and Qing-Lan Project of Jiangsu Province in China (2021, 2022).
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 M Tris-HCL | Beyotime | ST774 | |
| 30% Acr-Bis (29:1) | Beyotime | ST003-500ml | |
| 5M Nacl | Beyotime | ST347 | |
| BeyoBlue Plus | Beyotime | P0003S | |
| BL21(DE3)-FEN1 | Vazyme | C504-F1 | |
| BSA | Beyotime | P0007 | |
| Decoloring shaker | Kylin-Bell | TS-100 | |
| DL-Dithiothreitol | Beyotime | ST041 | |
| Dry Bath Incubator | RUICHENG | DH200 | |
| Electrophoresis apparatus | Bei jing Liuyi Biotechnology | DDY-6D | |
| FEN1-IN-4 | TargetMOL | T8545 | |
| IPTG | Takaba | 9030 | |
| Kanamycin Slufate | Biosharp | BS152 | |
| Laboratory Centrifuge | Thermo | SL 16R | |
| LB Broth | Solarbio | L8291 | |
| Ni-NTA His Bind Resin | 7se biotech | PANF001-001C | |
| Odyssey FC | ODYSSEY | LI-COR | |
| SDS-PAGE | Beyotime | P0015L | |
| Trition-x-100 | Shyuanye | S15022 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission