Delivering therapeutics to the retina and optic nerve is incredibly difficult due to the complex anatomy of the eye1,2, specifically the presence of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB)3,4,5. The BRB serves to protect the retina from systemic circulation invasion, but is a challenging opponent to therapeutic administration as systemic therapeutic circulation is often blocked by the BRB6,7. Small lipophilic molecules can readily diffuse through the BRB, but larger and hydrophilic molecules have a harder time gaining access to the retina6. Intravitreal (IVI) and retrobulbar (RBI) injections enable the delivery of drugs to the ocular tissues, overcoming the limitations imposed by the BRB. The IVI serves as a promising compromise by administering therapeutics into the internal environment of the eye8,9. This method requires the drug to cross through the vitreous, thus bypassing the BRB, and diffusing through the retina and choroid in order to reach the optic nerve7. The RBI is delivered behind the eye into the retrobulbar space10. Therapeutics can be delivered by diffusion through the tissues and glands in the retrobulbar space, affecting the optic nerve and surrounding structures without directly entering the retina, which maintains the integrity of the BRB. By delivering drugs directly or indirectly into the eye, both intravitreal and retrobulbar injections can achieve higher local concentrations of the therapeutic drug, which enhances its effectiveness compared to topical or systemic administration (oral or intravenous)2. This is particularly important for treatments that require rapid action or high potency, as seen in many ocular diseases. Targeted delivery also limits the exposure of the rest of the body to the drug, which reduces the risk of off-target effects and helps to minimize potential adverse effects that can occur when medications are administered topically, orally, or intravenously11.
Other periocular injections, such as subconjunctival, posterior subtenon, and subretinal, have their own benefits and limitations2,5. Posterior subtenon injections have been observed to deliver high drug concentrations to ocular tissues; however, the subtenon injection is closer to the scleral than the orbital vasculature5,12. In contrast, the RBI places the therapeutic closer to the optic nerve than the posterior subtenon or subconjunctival13. This may mean that optic nerve pathologies favor RBI-delivered therapeutics over other periocular injection types. Posterior subtenon injections have associated risks, including strabismus, hyphema, and elevated intraocular pressure5. Elevated intraocular pressure is also a reported risk factor in IVI, subconjunctival, and subretinal injections2. These injection types often require repetitive dosing in order to achieve the desired therapeutic effect2. Other risk factors associated with subretinal injections, subconjunctival injections, and IVI include cataract formation, retinal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, and inflammation2. These IVI, subretinal injections, and subconjunctival injections are more invasive than the RBI injections, as these injections are intraocular2. The RBI may be considered less invasive as it places the therapeutic in the retrobulbar space, without directly entering the needle into the globe of the eye. Other less invasive therapeutic delivery strategies, such as topical administration, fall short of sufficient drug delivery, with less than 5% of the drug being retained on the ocular surface2,5.
IVI is a prominent technique in preclinical models that is used for its ability to deliver therapeutic agents directly into the posterior segment of the eye. IVI delivers the drug directly to the vitreous humor, making it a preferred delivery technique for localized treatment14. The IVI technique allows the therapeutic to bypass the blood-retinal barrier, which is a common hindrance to drug penetration into the retina14. IVI introduces the opportunity for inflammation and damage to ocular structures, so meticulous adherence to the procedure must be employed14. To minimize retinal detachment and cataract formation, Chiu et al. describe an IVI approach that emphasizes a 45-degree bevel insertion and injection at the level of the par plana, avoiding the lens, retina, ocular muscle, and vessels15. In this technique, a 30 G needle is inserted into the nasal sclera for therapeutic delivery15. IVI is still associated with risks due to its invasive nature. Potential risks include retinal detachment, cataract formation, endophthalmitis, or hemorrhage16. The invasive nature of IVI techniques also increases intraocular pressure, as shown in an experiment on porcine eyes performed by Ikjong Park et al.16. The study shows changes in intraocular pressure during different stages of needle insertion and fluid injection. They report substantial variation in intraocular pressure during the procedure16.
RBIs have been successfully utilized in previous studies as a means of therapeutic delivery to rodents. One such study compared the effects of various prostaglandin analogs given via RBI17. Albino rats were given an RBI with a 26 G needle of 0.1 mL injectate inserted through the lateral area of the inferior fornix at a 45-degree angle17. The protocol used in this study was adapted from a previously described method in which the rats were anesthetized via intraperitoneal (IP) injection of chloralhydrate18. Another study conducted on rats compared topical drops to retrobulbar injections19. The rats were anesthetized via an IP injection of ketamine/xylazine, and the RBI was given via a 30 G needle19. In contrast to the previously discussed sedation methods, one study observing the effects of RBI on orbital fat used inhalational isoflurane to sedate the rats prior to RBI20. While these studies provide insight into what anesthetics and needle specifications could be successful, the positioning and handling of the animals during the procedure are not discussed.
Various studies in mice also conduct RBIs for therapeutic delivery methods. One study compared RBI to lateral tail vein injection for successfully inducing nephrotic syndrome21. A second study also compared the same two injection techniques in the administration of contrast media for cardiac imaging22. The mice were anesthetized with inhalational isoflurane and injected in the medial side of the eye22. Both studies adapted their RBI method from a previously written protocol. It is important to note that this protocol named their injection as retro-orbital yet described the injection location as the retrobulbar space behind the eye. The authors of this protocol utilized inhalational isoflurane as a preferred sedation method, noting the quick activation and recovery time of the mice23. For an RBI, the eye was partially protruded from the socket by applying pressure to the skin around the eye23. Then, the needle was introduced at the medial canthus bevel side down at an angle of 30 degrees and was inserted until it reached the base of the eye23. Care must be taken when applying pressure to the animal, as accidental blood flow blockage or tracheal collapse may occur23. The injector is also blind to the needle tip upon insertion, and therefore, damaging the eye is an associated risk.23 Damaging the eye upon therapeutic administration is a critical risk in this experiment, as causing additional injury directly undermines the results of the study. It also must be noted that the positioning and handling technique previously described was conducted on mice and did not include comments on applicability to rats.
There are many manners in which optic nerve and retina removal have been attempted. One such method explored the removal of optic nerves and eyes en bloc, preserving an intact optic chiasm24. This method is the most comparable to the current study as the individual eyes and optic nerves are also preserved for en bloc removal; however, the optic chiasm is separated. Exercising caution in this procedure would be of the utmost importance due to the complexity of the procedure. In the current method, we begin the dissection via the caudal skull and work rostrally in order to provide access in a way that limits damage to the optic nerves and allows the entire nerve to remain intact. Furthermore, keeping the nerve intact and attached to the eye is crucial to the embedding process, as damage to each part of the nerve can correspond to a different pathological observation24. The orientation of the optic nerve is important to consider as how it is embedded allows for different cross sections, which may be important for histological analysis.
A custom-made device known as the small animal laboratory ophthalmic operating table (SALOOT, an ophthalmic surgery platform) is comprised of a series of 3D printed materials to provide anesthesia and hold the animal in a stable position for ocular therapeutic injections. The SALOOT design allows for stability of the head and ocular structures for ophthalmic procedures, which improves the speed and reproducibility of operations while allowing for gas anesthesia delivery and scavenging of exhalation particulates. The SALOOT is a three-dimensional printed block featuring a concave reduction to hold the rat body with a narrower region at the front to hold the head of the animal into a nose cone with an isoflurane inlet. Beneath the nose cone is a small reservoir and exhaust outlet. The following methods were developed for therapeutic ocular delivery and precise ocular tissue retrieval; they were designed for studying tissues after ocular trauma, so it is crucial to delineate the effects of the trauma, injection, treatment, and dissection to avoid confounded interpretation of findings.
This article presents two ocular therapeutic injection methods, the intravitreal and retrobulbar injections, for use in adult rats. In addition, a tissue retrieval method is presented for the en bloc removal of the intact optic nerve and retina from an adult rat. These techniques enable the investigation of ocular and peri-ocular effects of induced pathology and treatment.