The efficiency of genetically modified (GM) animal generation has significantly increased due to the development of endonuclease-based methods, particularly CRISPR/Cas9. Many laboratories worldwide produce various GM mouse and rat lines that should be cryopreserved to prevent genetic drift and maintain the integrity of the original phenotype1. Additionally, archiving eliminates the need for constant breeding, which often results in excessive animal numbers. Some laboratories send GM mouse lines as cryopreserved embryos or sperm to international repositories, facilitating the exchange of these models while avoiding the transport of live animals. This ensures accessibility to lines without the repetitive generation of identical GM animal models2. For these reasons, embryo and sperm cryopreservation are paramount in any GM animal facility. Generally, embryo cryopreservation is preferred for storing GM lines because embryos contain the complete diploid genome with modifications and can be easily recovered via embryo transfer.
Vitrification is a non-equilibrium process characterized by an imbalance between water entering the cell and water forming extracellular crystals around it. This method prevents the formation of intracellular ice crystals, distinguishing it from the slow freezing method (SLF)3 (see Figure 1). The high concentration of cryoprotectants and direct contact with liquid nitrogen (LN2) enable ultra-rapid cooling (~40 °C/s), achieving a vitreous state of the samples within seconds. Moreover, vitrification is faster, easier, and less expensive than slow freezing4. It requires minimal LN2 and typically employs simple equipment that can be commercially purchased or homemade5 (see Figure 1).
Additionally, the warming process is generally fast and replicable. It should be performed quickly to avoid cryoprotectant toxicity and to maintain the vitreous state3. When freezing embryos, many laboratories consider the convenience of the carrier device, its reliability, robustness, holding capacity, and costs.
We prefer the minimum volume spatula vitrification method for routine cryopreservation of sheep and mouse embryos, using the Spatula Montevideo (MVD) device6. Initially, we employed the slow freezing method7 but quickly transitioned to vitrification. To create a simpler and more space-efficient device for the LN2 dewar, we modified the homemade spatula from Tsang and Chow (2009)8, which is plugged into a cryotube, to develop the Spatula MVD which is sealed with a 0.5 mL straw (see Table of Materials). The spatula features a gel-loader tip (see Table of Materials), where a platform of approximately 1 mm² is formed by gently melting the tip with fine forceps, creating a petal-like plate for loading the embryos. This platform can accommodate up to 40 mouse embryos in a small vitrification drop. An identification plug rod (see Table of Materials) is inserted into the open end of the gel-loader tip.
The aim of this method is to vitrify embryos in a simple, fast, and inexpensive method that, in addition, saves space in the nitrogen dewar. This system has been successfully used for many years, providing excellent embryo survival rates (~97%) and reproductive outcomes, particularly in mouse embryos. Since Spatula MVD is prepared in the laboratory, it is a low-cost method compared to commercial devices9. Moreover, it saves space in the nitrogen dewar in comparison to the use of cryotubes8,10.

Figure 1: Comparison of the main two techniques used for embryo cryopreservation. This figure has been modified with permission from Crispo et al.1. Created in BioRender.com. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.