$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Mechanical ventilation (MV) remains a cornerstone of critical care, providing essential respiratory support for acute respiratory failure and serving as a vital adjunct during anesthesia for surgical procedures1. However, MV is associated with a range of complications, such as ventilator-induced lung injury2, ventilation-induced diaphragm and expiratory muscles dysfunction3,4,5,6, and ventilator-associated brain injury7,8. These complications contribute to extubation failure, prolonged stay in intensive care units (ICU) and hospitals, and increased mortality9. As ICU survival rates improve, attention has increasingly shifted toward the long-term consequences of MV, with post-ICU syndrome (PICS) emerging as a critical concern10. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PICS remain unclear, partly due to the lack of reliable animal models to capture the nuances of post-extubation recovery and long-term sequelae of MV11.
Rat models have been pivotal in advancing the understanding of MV-induced injuries, offering scalability, reproducibility, and mechanistic insights. However, most existing models focus on the acute effects of MV, with tracheostomy being the predominant method for MV in experimental settings12,13,14. While tracheostomy facilitates MV and weaning after it, it bypasses the upper airway, a critical anatomical and functional barrier. This increases the susceptibility to pulmonary complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia15,16. Additionally, the absence of nasal airflow in tracheostomy models disrupts brain network synchronization. This complicates investigations into cognitive and neurological outcomes17,18. In contrast, endotracheal intubation /extubation models retain the integrity of the upper airway. They avoid the inherent disadvantages of tracheostomy and more closely resemble the clinical trajectory of weaning from MV.
However, existing extubation models often lack standardization, leading to considerable variability in the transition from MV to spontaneous breathing19,20. This lack of structure introduces risks of extubation-related complications, including airway obstruction, respiratory distress, and aspiration, which may result in animal mortality. Such failures not only compromise the ability to investigate long-term outcomes but also render the initial MV model ineffective, wasting valuable time, resources, and financial investment. These issues underscore the critical need for a structured extubation approach to ensure successful post-extubation survival and robust long-term studies.
To address these challenges, a structured extubation approach was developed for Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat models that closely aligns with clinical practices for weaning from MV. This approach encompasses four key stages: approaching weaning, preparing for extubation, executing extubation, and post-extubation care. Key procedural recommendations include maintaining light-to-moderate sedation during weaning, specifically, reducing propofol infusion to 50% of the dose used during full MV -- to allow spontaneous breathing while preventing agitation. Extubation readiness should be assessed based on a stable respiratory rate of 60-70 breaths per minute and adequate spontaneous tidal volumes, which can be approximated using a simple, calibrated homemade scale. Full recovery of consciousness is not required prior to extubation. Propofol infusion should be discontinued at the time of extubation to further reduce the risk of intubation-induced agitation. By standardizing the extubation process, this approach minimized variability, avoided extubation-related complications, and enhanced survival rates. This model has been optimized for MV durations of up to 6 h; extending MV beyond this period may necessitate modified sedation protocols, incremental weaning strategies, and careful physiological monitoring to ensure survival and reliable outcomes. Although validated in SD rats, the protocol can be adapted for other strains by adjusting ventilation settings to account for strain-specific respiratory mechanics and varying susceptibilities to lung injury. With appropriate modifications, the structured approach may also support longer-term ventilation studies, enhancing both reproducibility and translational relevance across experimental models.