This study proposes a TI stimulation protocol for spinal cord injury that optimizes electrode placement for specific regions and efficiently implements this optimized strategy in clinical application.
Method Article
This study proposes a TI stimulation protocol for spinal cord injury that optimizes electrode placement for specific regions and efficiently implements this optimized strategy in clinical application.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to permanent loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions, presenting a significant clinical challenge for rehabilitation. In addition to conventional rehabilitation approaches, epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCI) is often used to enhance recovery. However, the invasive nature of eSCI limits patient acceptance and widespread application. Compared to traditional spinal cord stimulation, temporal interference (TI) stimulation offers a noninvasive approach to stimulate deep spinal cord regions, making it a promising technique for SCI treatment. A critical factor in achieving effective TI stimulation for SCI rehabilitation is the accurate placement of two electrode pairs on the skin surface to generate a high electric field envelope within the targeted spinal cord area. We propose a unique protocol that utilizes electric field simulations and parameter optimization to determine the optimal electrode placement for specific SCI regions. Additionally, this protocol provides a systematic description of how to efficiently implement the optimized electrode placement strategy in clinical TI stimulation.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating central nervous system disorder that can result in the permanent loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions below the level of injury1,2. Consequently, the treatment and rehabilitation of SCI patients have become a focal point of both scientific research and clinical practice. Traditional treatment approaches, including pharmacological and physical therapies, have certain limitations in promoting functional recovery3,4,5,6. Among physical therapies, spinal cord electrical stimulation has emerged as an effective strategy for SCI rehabilitation, which can be categorized into invasive and noninvasive modalities7,8. Invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation, such as epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCI), delivers direct electrical stimulation via implanted electrodes but carries risks of infection and scar tissue formation9,10. In contrast, noninvasive techniques, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), are limited in their ability to effectively reach deep spinal structures, thereby compromising therapeutic efficacy11,12.
Temporal interference (TI) stimulation is an emerging neuromodulation technology that enables noninvasive stimulation of deep tissues through a specific mode of electrical current delivery13,14. This technique involves placing two pairs of electrodes on the skin surface to deliver electrical currents at slightly different kilohertz frequencies. Based on the principle of interference, this setup generates a unique low-frequency envelope (ranging from a few hertz to several tens of hertz) within deep tissues, thereby enabling targeted neuromodulation. This distinct working mechanism allows TI stimulation to overcome the depth limitations of conventional neuromodulation techniques, providing an effective intervention for deep neural structures without invasive procedures. Unlike TENS, TI achieves deeper penetration with high spatial specificity, and unlike eSCI, it avoids surgical risks, offering a safer, more accessible alternative for SCI neuromodulation. TI stimulation has been investigated for the treatment of various diseases, such as movement disorders and depression. In incomplete SCI, as some neural pathways remain intact, TI stimulation is highly likely to enhance the activity of remaining neural circuits, thereby promoting neuroplasticity and functional recovery15,16. Thus, TI stimulation holds significant promise as a neuromodulation strategy for SCI treatment17.
However, current TI stimulation hardware systems are primarily designed for transcranial applications, and there is a lack of TI systems specifically developed for spinal cord stimulation. Due to anatomical and electrophysiological differences between the head and the torso, existing TI stimulation devices designed for the head are not fully applicable to spinal stimulation, leading to challenges in output parameter optimization and electrode placement. When performing TI stimulation on the head, a fixed leadfield coordinate system (such as the 10-10 system) is often used to facilitate electrode positioning on the head. However, this system is not applicable to the torso. Furthermore, because TI stimulation generates low-frequency envelopes deep within biological tissues, it is difficult to predict the resulting electric field distribution based solely on manual electrode placement. Instead, computational simulations are typically required to visualize and optimize the internal electric field distribution. At present, however, there is no established workflow for electric field simulation and parameter optimization for spinal TI stimulation, which poses significant challenges for its clinical application. Parameters such as electrode placement, stimulation frequencies, and current amplitude directly influence the electric field distribution and the amplitude of the low-frequency envelope, modulating neural activity and promoting neuroplasticity13,17.
The objective of this study is to develop a convenient and effective workflow for TI electric field simulation and parameter optimization, along with a TI hardware system tailored for spinal cord injury treatment. Through electric field simulation and parameter optimization, we aim to determine electrode placement configurations that maximize the envelope field amplitude of TI at specific SCI target regions, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, to facilitate the practical implementation of optimized electrode configurations, we have designed a new electrode coordinate positioning method for spinal cord TI stimulation based on the original TI hardware system for the head. This system is intended to simplify electrode positioning and improve operational feasibility in clinical settings.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
This study involves human subjects and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Zhejiang University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion, ensuring they were fully informed of the study's purpose, procedures, potential risks, and their right to withdraw at any time without penalty. The reagents and the equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.
Contraindications and special considerations
SCI patients are assessed for eligibility using a medical history questionnaire and physical examination to identify conditions affecting participation:
Inclusion criteria: (1) Age between 18 and 80 years (male or female); (2) Incomplete SCI graded as ASIA B, C, or D, with onset of 1-6 months; (3) No changes in ASIA assessment within the past week; (4) Stable medication regimen throughout the study period; (5) Willingness to comply with all study requirements, including participation in all required training sessions and rehabilitation assessments.
Exclusion criteria17: (1) Motor function limitations due to neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury); (2) Presence of any unstable or severe medical conditions (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, heart failure); (3) History of epilepsy; (4) Contraindications to electrical stimulation (e.g., implanted electronic devices, pacemakers, metallic implants).
1. Materials
2. Electric field simulation and parameter optimization
NOTE: The overall workflow of the electric field simulation consists of three main steps: constructing the geometric model (including the human model and electrodes), defining simulation conditions (material properties, boundary conditions, and mesh generation), and finally performing computations to visualize the electric field distribution in the target region of spinal cord (Figure 2). Parameter optimization involves simulating electric fields for various candidate electrode pair configurations, calculating the average electric field intensity in the target region, and identifying the configuration that maximizes this intensity. The specific steps are as follows:
3. Electrode positioning and device setup
4. Stimulation
5. Postprocedural steps
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
When conducting TI simulations without errors, the average electric field intensity in the target spinal cord region stimulated by the current group of electrode pairs can be obtained. Taking Group 10 stimulating the C5 target area as an example (Figure 9), the "Volume Weighted Average" displayed in the interface is 0.50 V/m. Additionally, by clicking "Max Modulation - Mask Filter - Viewers - Surface Viewer", a 3D view of the electric field distribution on ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Critical steps
Setting up simulation conditions
When electrodes are placed on the surface of the human model's skin, the cylindrical electrodes are partially embedded into the skin to ensure there is no air gap between the electrodes and the skin. Otherwise, the current cannot pass through the air and into the human body. The distance from the electrode to the origin (d1, d2) is measured along the skin surface, as the skin is n...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.
Research supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52407261), the "Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang (2025C01137), Key Research and Development Plan of Zhejiang Province (2024C03040), Research Special Fund Project of Zhejiang Association of Rehabilitation Medicine (ZKKY2024008), and Sim4Life by ZMT, www.zmt.swiss.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3T MRI or CT system | Siemens Healthineers | MAGNETOM Skyra (MRI) / SOMATOM X.cite (CT) | |
| Adhesive Tape | 3M | Durapore 1538-1 | |
| Alcohol Wipes | PDI Healthcare | S41125 | |
| Battery | Neurodome | Accessory of NervioX-1000 | |
| Computer | Dell Technologies | Precision 3660 | 16 GB RAM, multi-core processor |
| Electrically conductive gel | Soterix | HD-1AGE-12 | |
| Electrodes adapter | Neurodome | Accessory of NervioX-1000 | |
| Electromagnetic simulation software | ZMT Zurich MedTech AG | Sim4Life v8.0 | |
| Human simulation models | IT’IS Foundation | Virtual Population 3.0 | Duke (Static) 3.0, Ella (Static) 3.0 |
| Isopropyl Alcohol | Medline Industries | MDS098003Z | |
| Measuring tape | Stanley Tools | 33-725 | |
| Paper Towel | Kimberly-Clark | Kimwipes 34155 | |
| Syringe or Applicator | BD | 305857 | |
| TI stimulator | Neurodome | NervioX-1000 | Temporal Interference Stimulation Device |
| Two pairs of Ag/AgCl electrodes and cables | Shanhai Medical Ltd | SHTIS | |
| Washable Marker | Crayola | 58-7726 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission